April 16, 2026

497. What This Podcast Review Reveals About Storytelling

497. What This Podcast Review Reveals About Storytelling

Small performance and production choices can subtly shape how a story is experienced, and that becomes especially clear in narrative podcasting. Today, we’re taking a close look at Salvage, a storytelling podcast built around real historical events, including the true story that inspired Moby-Dick. We want to be clear that this isn’t about tearing a podcast down. We are listening closely to how structure, pacing, delivery, and sound design decisions influence immersion, tension, and the overall listener experience, and we’re sharing those observations to help you strengthen your own storytelling. As we walk through the episode, we highlight what’s working, from the strong opening hook and vivid descriptive language to the intentional use of silence and tone that draws listeners in, while also exploring where small adjustments could elevate the experience further, including pacing, sound design impact, and smoother transitions. Submitting a podcast for evaluation takes intention. It shows a commitment to growth and to serving your audience better, and this conversation reflects that mindset by offering practical insights you can apply as you refine how your stories sound, feel, and connect with the people listening.

Episode Highlights:

[02:04] Gear Giveaway Plug

[03:39] Introducing Salvage

[06:13] Host Credibility Backstory

[08:33] Intro Clip Breakdown

[14:28] Sound Design Debate

[26:09] Immersive Descriptions

[29:36] Guest Tease True Fans

[31:02] Aphantasia and Audience

[33:55] Expert Storytelling Praise

[35:24] Host Background Sleuthing

[36:37] Whale Strike Clip Review

[38:08] Sound Design and Pacing

[40:25] Scripted Voice and Style

[44:50] AI Voices Debate

[48:08] Breaking Fourth Wall

[53:06] Ending and CTA Critique

[59:33] Website and Discovery Fixes

[01:05:04] Ratings and Wrap Up

Links & Resources:

SALVAGE - Today's Podcast Evaluation:

https://pod.link/1890302704/episode/QnV6enNwcm91dC0xODk1NDgxNw

The Podcasting Morning Chat:

⁠⁠www.podcastingmorningchat.com⁠⁠

Ways to Watch or Listen:⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.podcastingmorningchat.com/joinus/

Meet the PMC Cast and Crew:

⁠⁠https://podcastingmorningchat.com/people⁠⁠

Join The Empowered Podcasting Facebook Group:

⁠⁠www.facebook.com/groups/empoweredpodcasting⁠⁠⁠

Book A Free Call With Marc:

https://calendly.com/ironickmedia/freestrategycall

Application To Submit Your Show For Evaluation:

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcastingmorningchat.com/eval⁠⁠

Win Ralph’s RØDECaster Duo + Strategy Session:

https://podcastingmorningchat.com/duo

Join us every other Monday at 7 AM ET for the Obsession Worthy Podcasts:⁠⁠⁠

http://podcastingmorningchat.com/owp/⁠⁠

Join us LIVE every weekday morning at 7 am ET (US) on ⁠Clubhouse⁠: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcastingmorningchat.com/clubhouse⁠⁠

EPC3 Speaker Application:⁠⁠ ⁠https://empoweredpodcasting.com/speakers

Powered by⁠⁠⁠ ⁠iRonickMedia.com⁠⁠⁠⁠ and⁠ ⁠ContentCreatorsAccountant.com⁠⁠

Send in your mailbag questions:⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://www.podcastingmorningchat.contact/⁠⁠⁠⁠ or ⁠marc@ironickmedia.com

Want to be a guest on The Podcasting Morning Chat? Send me a message on PodMatch, here:

https://podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/1729879899384520035bad21b


1
00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:07,400
Good morning podcasting Morning
Chat.

2
00:00:07,600 --> 00:00:14,040
Today is Thursday, April 16th,
2026, and today we're evaluating

3
00:00:14,120 --> 00:00:18,560
A listener's podcast salvage,
diving into narrative tension,

4
00:00:18,560 --> 00:00:23,080
immersion, storytelling craft to
uncover what hooks listeners and

5
00:00:23,080 --> 00:00:24,960
what could elevate the
experience.

6
00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:28,440
So if you're listening live on
Clubhouse, hit the share button,

7
00:00:28,440 --> 00:00:31,200
top right hand side of the
screen and share it.

8
00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:34,080
However, Clubhouse lets you.
And if you're catching this via

9
00:00:34,080 --> 00:00:36,840
podcast, YouTube, etcetera,
please share this with a fellow

10
00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:40,560
podcaster.
And now give us about 30

11
00:00:40,560 --> 00:00:42,920
seconds.
We'll get things rolling.

12
00:00:43,280 --> 00:00:53,320
Thanks for being here.
Podcasting Morning Chat is

13
00:00:53,320 --> 00:00:57,640
powered by Ironic Media, helping
podcasters launch, Polish and

14
00:00:57,640 --> 00:01:01,960
grow great shows, and by content
Creators Accountant, helping

15
00:01:01,960 --> 00:01:04,760
creators build real business
behind their content.

16
00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:22,960
Good morning again podcasting
morning chat.

17
00:01:22,960 --> 00:01:24,840
Thank you so much for being
here.

18
00:01:24,840 --> 00:01:29,360
I am your host Mark Ronic and
currently on stage with me my Co

19
00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:33,840
hosts Dr. Faye, Ralphie Steps,
Sid Meadows, Matt Bliss, Nick

20
00:01:33,840 --> 00:01:38,480
Naalbach and Dominic Howard and
also Tide AKA Nikki has joined

21
00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:41,320
us from the audience.
Good morning to all of you and a

22
00:01:41,320 --> 00:01:44,960
shout out to those of you who
have already joined us here in

23
00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:51,760
Clubhouse, Dave, Tim, Austin,
Leaping, Leaping Bear and Chris.

24
00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:54,040
Chris, good to see you back as
well.

25
00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:56,480
Let me clear my throat.
Thank you.

26
00:01:57,360 --> 00:01:59,360
Sorry about that.
We were just talking about

27
00:01:59,560 --> 00:02:04,360
hydration and I guess I need to
be better hydrated this morning.

28
00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:10,000
So before we dive into today's
discussion evaluation of

29
00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:14,160
salvage, which I think a lot of
us are excited to talk about, I

30
00:02:14,160 --> 00:02:17,400
want to remind you about Ralph's
duo.

31
00:02:17,800 --> 00:02:22,800
We're giving away his Rd. caster
duo, lightly used.

32
00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:27,560
He's had it for about 9 months.
He's upgraded, so it's time for

33
00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:31,160
him to get rid of that one.
He's also offering a free

34
00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:35,400
monetization strategy session
designed to help you make

35
00:02:35,400 --> 00:02:39,920
smarter moves with your show.
And as I always say, the Duo is

36
00:02:39,920 --> 00:02:43,920
a really great piece of gear,
good for beginners or advanced

37
00:02:43,920 --> 00:02:46,680
podcasters, has multiple audio
sources.

38
00:02:46,840 --> 00:02:51,160
It is small and compact, easy
for on the go recording.

39
00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:55,280
And before I go any further,
Ralph, will you share briefly

40
00:02:55,280 --> 00:02:58,720
about the strategy session?
Absolutely.

41
00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:01,680
I will work with you one-on-one
to try to help you build a

42
00:03:01,760 --> 00:03:05,080
content monetization strategy
for your particular show,

43
00:03:05,360 --> 00:03:08,520
whatever works best for you.
So we'll sit down, we'll do a

44
00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:10,800
Zoom call, and we'll walk
through what you want to do with

45
00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:12,840
your show, and I'll give you
some tidbits of how to make that

46
00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:14,840
happen.
Thank you, Ralph.

47
00:03:14,840 --> 00:03:18,440
And you can get your entries,
multiple entries, multiple ways

48
00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:21,560
to throw your hat in the ring by
going to

49
00:03:21,560 --> 00:03:28,360
podcastingmorningchat.com/duo.
Check that out.

50
00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:32,200
I mean, we have lots of entries
in there and would love to see

51
00:03:32,200 --> 00:03:36,120
you in there as well.
All right, let's see here.

52
00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:39,480
All right, Yeah, I think we this
is a good place to dive in.

53
00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:44,120
So as I said, we are digging
into the show Salvage.

54
00:03:44,680 --> 00:03:50,040
And this is a narrative podcast
and it's about really all

55
00:03:50,040 --> 00:03:54,200
things, all stories, adventures,
etcetera from the sea.

56
00:03:55,120 --> 00:03:56,840
That's I guess the best way to
put it.

57
00:03:57,120 --> 00:04:00,920
And when I heard that we were
going to be doing this episode,

58
00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:06,440
I was curious how if it would
really grab my attention because

59
00:04:06,760 --> 00:04:08,400
quite frankly, I mean, yeah,
sure.

60
00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:13,520
I think the Moby Dick story,
which is what this episode is

61
00:04:13,520 --> 00:04:15,360
about.
Well, it's about the real life

62
00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:19,040
story that inspired Moby Dick.
You know, I'm sure.

63
00:04:19,040 --> 00:04:22,440
I think I'm curious about the
Moby Dick story and the fact

64
00:04:22,440 --> 00:04:24,880
that there there's a true story
behind it.

65
00:04:25,240 --> 00:04:28,480
But still, I just didn't know if
this was going to grab my

66
00:04:28,480 --> 00:04:31,880
attention or not.
And boy, spoiler alert was I

67
00:04:31,880 --> 00:04:35,320
surprised.
And yeah, I thoroughly enjoyed

68
00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:38,280
listening to this episode and
there's a lot to get into.

69
00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:42,480
I'm going to play some clips
here in a second to get you, our

70
00:04:42,560 --> 00:04:45,120
listener, on the same page as
us.

71
00:04:45,120 --> 00:04:48,480
So we have several clips to play
and we're going to bring you

72
00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:52,200
into this experience with us.
And the whole idea here is,

73
00:04:52,200 --> 00:04:55,080
yeah, we want to help this
particular podcaster, but we

74
00:04:55,080 --> 00:05:00,240
believe that breaking down any
podcast can help our podcasting

75
00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:03,160
audience a great deal.
There's a lot to learn from

76
00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:07,480
podcast, whether they are really
well done, really poorly done,

77
00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:10,280
or somewhere in the middle.
I think we can find learning

78
00:05:10,280 --> 00:05:14,320
experiences for everyone.
So DRI saw you wanted to chime

79
00:05:14,320 --> 00:05:15,640
in first.
Go for it.

80
00:05:16,320 --> 00:05:19,200
Yeah.
Well, you know, I've been so

81
00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:24,600
wrapped up in my work and my
clients, which are all brand

82
00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:29,520
based podcasts, basically
entrepreneurial podcasts, that I

83
00:05:29,520 --> 00:05:34,880
very rarely reach out of my zone
and listen to something that is

84
00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:40,720
not entrepreneurial.
And this really had me.

85
00:05:40,720 --> 00:05:45,800
I mean, I loved it.
And I was telling people earlier

86
00:05:45,800 --> 00:05:49,280
that, you know, I'm the type of
person that follows all those

87
00:05:49,280 --> 00:05:53,680
TikTok, those short little
TikTok things with the bass

88
00:05:53,680 --> 00:05:58,120
singer singing yo-yo.
And the ship is swaying from

89
00:05:58,120 --> 00:06:00,680
side to side with the waves
crashing.

90
00:06:00,680 --> 00:06:04,120
So that's the first thing I
thought of when I started

91
00:06:04,440 --> 00:06:09,320
listening to this, but it
really, it made me reach out of

92
00:06:09,320 --> 00:06:11,480
my comfort zone and I really
loved it.

93
00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:15,160
OK, there you go.
And let's talk briefly about the

94
00:06:15,160 --> 00:06:19,120
host.
I know that, Matt, you dug in a

95
00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:21,360
little bit and learned some
things about the host that I

96
00:06:21,360 --> 00:06:24,120
didn't know 'cause we were
having a sidebar conversation.

97
00:06:24,360 --> 00:06:27,080
Curious if you would share a
little bit about what you know

98
00:06:27,080 --> 00:06:30,120
about the host, because I think
it adds to the credibility of

99
00:06:30,120 --> 00:06:33,080
the storytelling.
So, Matt, what do you know about

100
00:06:33,080 --> 00:06:35,320
our host?
And please forgive me, I totally

101
00:06:35,320 --> 00:06:38,120
have forgotten his name.
Richard Wesson.

102
00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:40,400
That's in Wesson, yeah.
Depends.

103
00:06:40,400 --> 00:06:42,680
On where you're from and how you
say it, I guess because I

104
00:06:42,680 --> 00:06:45,240
actually, there's precious
little that I actually know

105
00:06:45,240 --> 00:06:47,280
about him.
I did the exploration because I

106
00:06:47,280 --> 00:06:50,480
think it's a, it's probably a
good bit of feedback for him

107
00:06:51,000 --> 00:06:54,440
that maybe inserting a bit of
himself in the show is OK.

108
00:06:54,600 --> 00:06:59,080
But Richard, as far as I could
tell, is a Northern Irish,

109
00:06:59,320 --> 00:07:02,480
probably Belfast based from the
accent as far as I can tell.

110
00:07:02,960 --> 00:07:06,760
But he works for His Majesty's
Coast Guard, from all I can see

111
00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:09,280
could be decorated in that
respect.

112
00:07:09,560 --> 00:07:13,640
The earliest bit of reporting I
could find about him was in 2020

113
00:07:13,920 --> 00:07:17,400
when he he received something
specific award for it.

114
00:07:17,400 --> 00:07:20,320
But I think the part of the
reason that I wanted to do this

115
00:07:20,320 --> 00:07:22,640
is that it speaks to his
experience for what he's talking

116
00:07:22,640 --> 00:07:25,480
about as subject matter.
And someone might listen to this

117
00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:30,000
as a great story.
But giving that story authority

118
00:07:30,280 --> 00:07:32,760
can really lend to the
credibility of the host.

119
00:07:32,760 --> 00:07:36,840
And I think it does hear someone
who's a decorated Coast Guard

120
00:07:37,360 --> 00:07:41,400
for one of the most turbulent
seas you can imagine.

121
00:07:41,840 --> 00:07:46,360
And the fact that he works in
Northern Ireland and Belfast was

122
00:07:46,360 --> 00:07:50,160
where the Titanic was made and
had famous shipyards that sent

123
00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:52,520
ships across the world.
I think it's a really good

124
00:07:52,920 --> 00:07:55,680
history to talk to for the
podcast.

125
00:07:55,680 --> 00:07:58,440
It's a when we start off with
podcasts, it's easy for us to

126
00:07:58,440 --> 00:08:01,000
kind of fall back into the
shadows and let the content do

127
00:08:01,000 --> 00:08:04,080
the work.
But I think Richard should feel

128
00:08:04,080 --> 00:08:06,920
a bit more confident about
perhaps inserting some of that

129
00:08:06,920 --> 00:08:10,040
history credibility.
Like, I thought he was a

130
00:08:10,840 --> 00:08:13,600
nautical historian.
I thought that would suit really

131
00:08:13,600 --> 00:08:16,720
well.
But I think his experience in

132
00:08:16,720 --> 00:08:21,320
ocean salvage and rescue would
really, you know, add some stuff

133
00:08:21,320 --> 00:08:23,920
to this show.
Yeah, and thank you for adding

134
00:08:23,920 --> 00:08:27,080
some stuff to this show because
it's like I said, I didn't do

135
00:08:27,080 --> 00:08:29,880
the homework, and I'm glad that
you did and got a little bit

136
00:08:29,880 --> 00:08:33,039
more of a background about this
host.

137
00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:35,280
Yeah.
And so, yeah, we're going to

138
00:08:35,280 --> 00:08:37,320
evaluate this one particular
episode.

139
00:08:37,320 --> 00:08:40,240
Again, it's called Salvage.
And like I said, it is a

140
00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:44,280
narrative storytelling podcast
that focuses on, to be more

141
00:08:44,280 --> 00:08:48,920
specific, historic ocean events,
survival stories, real people,

142
00:08:48,920 --> 00:08:52,320
fatal decisions.
So we're going to learn the way

143
00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:56,560
that podcasters should listen,
not just for whether the story

144
00:08:56,560 --> 00:09:00,840
is interesting, but for how the
show builds tension, how the

145
00:09:00,840 --> 00:09:05,840
host carries the story, how the
episode is structured and where

146
00:09:05,840 --> 00:09:08,400
the experience could become even
stronger.

147
00:09:08,760 --> 00:09:12,200
So I think what we will do,
Yeah, let's do this.

148
00:09:12,200 --> 00:09:15,120
I'm going to go ahead and play
the first clip for you.

149
00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:19,520
This is the intro.
And I think we're what I'd like

150
00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:22,520
you to do is listen to the
opening and just notice what

151
00:09:22,520 --> 00:09:25,520
happens in this first minute,
minute and a half.

152
00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:30,280
And how does it make you feel
what it what is, what does it

153
00:09:30,280 --> 00:09:33,240
promise?
How effectively does it bring

154
00:09:33,240 --> 00:09:37,240
you into the story?
So let's play this clip and then

155
00:09:37,240 --> 00:09:51,320
we'll talk about it.
A huge wheel rammed their ship

156
00:09:52,240 --> 00:09:58,320
not once, but twice.
It was 1820 in the Pacific Ocean

157
00:09:58,400 --> 00:10:02,880
in the middle of nowhere, and
the wheel ship was the Essex.

158
00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:09,040
And this is a story that's
almost unbelievable and becomes

159
00:10:09,040 --> 00:10:11,680
quite traumatic to say the
least.

160
00:10:12,040 --> 00:10:16,200
But it's all true.
The 20 men on board could not

161
00:10:16,200 --> 00:10:20,040
believe what had happened.
They'd heard of whales striking

162
00:10:20,040 --> 00:10:22,840
ships before.
It did happen occasionally.

163
00:10:23,440 --> 00:10:29,560
Usually the whale would ram once
and disappear back into the

164
00:10:29,560 --> 00:10:31,480
deep.
Not this one.

165
00:10:31,920 --> 00:10:37,680
This creature, longer than a
bus, struck them twice in what

166
00:10:37,680 --> 00:10:40,560
appeared to be a deliberate
attack.

167
00:10:41,160 --> 00:10:44,960
But why annoy?
The men were stranded in their

168
00:10:44,960 --> 00:10:50,280
open wooden boats with only a
few rations, with open ocean in

169
00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:54,160
every direction for thousands of
miles.

170
00:10:54,600 --> 00:10:57,320
The question is, would they
survive?

171
00:10:58,040 --> 00:11:04,400
Well, that would depend on some
very, very difficult decisions

172
00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:07,400
that you're going to hear about
today.

173
00:11:07,960 --> 00:11:11,760
I'm Richard Wasson and this is
Salvage.

174
00:11:15,000 --> 00:11:20,800
All right, So what do we think?
I'm going to go to Dominic 1st.

175
00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:25,000
And by the way, Dominic Lawson,
I know I said Howard and I think

176
00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:27,240
that's because Dominic, I don't
know if you knew this, but I

177
00:11:27,240 --> 00:11:30,880
knew somebody growing up named
Dominic Howard and I think it

178
00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:33,960
just totally slipped out for the
first time that way.

179
00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:38,120
So please forgive me for saying
Howard, I do know your last

180
00:11:38,120 --> 00:11:40,120
name.
You are a good friend of mine.

181
00:11:40,480 --> 00:11:46,080
So with that, Dominic, curious
as our narrative storyteller,

182
00:11:46,280 --> 00:11:50,520
podcaster extraordinaire, what
stood out to you right away

183
00:11:50,520 --> 00:11:53,280
hearing that intro?
Good morning.

184
00:11:54,040 --> 00:11:56,400
Good morning everybody.
Hope everybody is well.

185
00:11:56,560 --> 00:12:01,240
I think what stood out to me
initially was the tone was set

186
00:12:01,240 --> 00:12:04,320
with the sound of the ocean
waves, right?

187
00:12:04,360 --> 00:12:06,440
It said.
So I mean, obviously we know

188
00:12:06,480 --> 00:12:10,440
we're listening to in a maritime
podcast, but it really puts us

189
00:12:10,440 --> 00:12:13,000
in the mindset that we're on the
ocean.

190
00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:17,880
And then he says, you know, a
ram struck not once, but twice,

191
00:12:18,400 --> 00:12:20,000
right?
It's like, oh, crap.

192
00:12:20,040 --> 00:12:25,200
OK, so we're, we're diving right
into the, the, the tension, the

193
00:12:25,200 --> 00:12:28,880
problematic parts of this story,
right?

194
00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:32,280
And so I'm like, OK, wow, why,
why did the ram strike twice?

195
00:12:32,280 --> 00:12:35,520
Why does it, you know, why this
particular case, right?

196
00:12:35,520 --> 00:12:39,800
And then there's also the
foreshadowing of, you know,

197
00:12:40,040 --> 00:12:42,720
what's going to happen later on
and stuff like that.

198
00:12:42,720 --> 00:12:45,440
And then I think for me, two
things.

199
00:12:45,440 --> 00:12:49,560
One, the fact that he says this
is absolutely true, like this

200
00:12:49,560 --> 00:12:51,720
happened, right?
It's not mythical.

201
00:12:51,720 --> 00:12:54,840
It's not whatever.
Like this actually happened.

202
00:12:54,840 --> 00:12:57,720
And I think that's important
because I think a lot of times

203
00:12:57,720 --> 00:13:01,240
when we're listening as
consumers, we're curious, like,

204
00:13:01,800 --> 00:13:04,680
you know, this didn't happen.
You're making this up, right?

205
00:13:04,680 --> 00:13:07,320
And I think that adds to the
intrigue.

206
00:13:07,760 --> 00:13:13,400
And lastly, for me, and I'll
just be dumb American here, the

207
00:13:14,280 --> 00:13:18,120
Irish accent does it for me.
It's something about the Irish

208
00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:22,840
accent and being in this
maritime journey that we're

209
00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:24,960
about to go on.
It makes sense.

210
00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:29,200
I'm not saying that, you know,
an American accent wouldn't do

211
00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:32,160
it, but it's something.
It amplifies it for me.

212
00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:35,160
Like, OK, we're I don't know if
it gives it a level

213
00:13:35,160 --> 00:13:37,400
authenticity.
I don't know if it gives us a

214
00:13:37,400 --> 00:13:40,320
level of like, you know, just
add to the storyteller, but it

215
00:13:40,320 --> 00:13:43,040
does something for me.
And so that's what I noticed off

216
00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:44,760
the bat.
Love that.

217
00:13:44,760 --> 00:13:47,280
Yeah, and I'm with you.
Like, and I think others have

218
00:13:47,280 --> 00:13:50,880
shared this as well, that the
accent really added to it.

219
00:13:50,880 --> 00:13:53,720
And I know it's funny because
we've had other podcasts that

220
00:13:53,720 --> 00:13:58,000
we've evaluated that have had
had accents and some people,

221
00:13:58,000 --> 00:14:02,640
some of our American podcasters
here have had trouble sometimes

222
00:14:02,640 --> 00:14:05,360
following along.
And it seems like in this case,

223
00:14:05,360 --> 00:14:07,520
the accent does work really
well.

224
00:14:07,520 --> 00:14:10,000
And I'm with you, Dominic.
Like, I think, sure, the right

225
00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:13,560
kind of American voice would
still work really well here.

226
00:14:13,560 --> 00:14:17,520
Like, you know, a James Earl
Jones type voice would be pretty

227
00:14:17,520 --> 00:14:20,480
powerful listening to a story
like this, right?

228
00:14:20,840 --> 00:14:24,320
But yeah, there I agree.
There's something that really

229
00:14:24,320 --> 00:14:27,840
draws you into the story that
much more with the accent.

230
00:14:28,080 --> 00:14:30,440
Let's see.
Nick, did you want to chime in?

231
00:14:31,120 --> 00:14:32,000
Yeah.
Good morning.

232
00:14:32,600 --> 00:14:34,080
Good morning.
Yeah, good morning, everybody.

233
00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:39,840
I, the intro definitely pulled
me in like Dominic's point.

234
00:14:39,920 --> 00:14:45,240
The the tension that is brought
into the show almost immediately

235
00:14:45,240 --> 00:14:48,560
kind of sucks you into it.
And I think the sound effects

236
00:14:48,560 --> 00:14:53,320
and then the music, I thought
the music at the back end of

237
00:14:53,320 --> 00:14:59,000
that little intro there like fit
perfectly with the feeling that

238
00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:00,960
he's giving you while telling
the story.

239
00:15:01,200 --> 00:15:05,800
And honestly, I almost want more
music and more sound.

240
00:15:07,360 --> 00:15:09,440
I listened to it this morning
and I didn't really catch it as

241
00:15:09,440 --> 00:15:12,560
you replayed it again.
Now when he comes in and he's

242
00:15:12,560 --> 00:15:15,200
kind of telling the story, like
it does build tension.

243
00:15:15,200 --> 00:15:19,320
And I feel like some like music
building along with him as he's

244
00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:23,960
going leading into like that
final like musical intro, I

245
00:15:23,960 --> 00:15:27,280
think would just amplify the
tension that he's trying to

246
00:15:27,280 --> 00:15:30,320
create with it.
But I like I'm he.

247
00:15:30,480 --> 00:15:33,280
I was sucked in after that first
little intro.

248
00:15:33,840 --> 00:15:35,600
Yeah, I think we'll get into
that.

249
00:15:35,600 --> 00:15:39,080
At least I intend to get into
that today about some of the

250
00:15:39,680 --> 00:15:43,360
sound design choices and I'm
glad Dominic is here as well

251
00:15:43,360 --> 00:15:45,240
because I think he can add on to
it.

252
00:15:45,400 --> 00:15:49,520
It's great to have a multi award
winner on stage with us,

253
00:15:49,520 --> 00:15:53,400
especially that does the
narrative podcasting thing.

254
00:15:53,400 --> 00:15:55,800
I think this is going to add so
much more value.

255
00:15:55,800 --> 00:15:59,760
So I'm so happy Dominic Lawson
is here this morning.

256
00:16:00,520 --> 00:16:03,920
No, really quickly and I can
hold my thoughts, but I actually

257
00:16:04,280 --> 00:16:07,920
actually, you know, I slightly
disagree with Nick on this one.

258
00:16:07,920 --> 00:16:11,560
OK, but and the reason I said as
far as the more music, because I

259
00:16:11,560 --> 00:16:16,720
think sometimes no sound design
is the best sound design, right?

260
00:16:16,920 --> 00:16:22,440
And I think in this instance,
the very minimal music as to the

261
00:16:22,440 --> 00:16:25,600
eeriness, right?
It it actually adds to the

262
00:16:25,600 --> 00:16:28,760
intensity of like, oh, crap,
just tell me what happens.

263
00:16:28,760 --> 00:16:32,440
It's like, because you know how
sometimes you're, you know, the

264
00:16:32,440 --> 00:16:35,640
worst thing is not knowing that
you just want to get it over

265
00:16:35,640 --> 00:16:38,120
with.
But I think sometimes the less

266
00:16:38,120 --> 00:16:41,040
less is more.
Which I know sounds cliche, but

267
00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:43,280
I actually slightly disagree
with Nick on this one.

268
00:16:43,680 --> 00:16:47,120
Yeah, I mean, look, I wasn't
finding myself wanting more

269
00:16:47,200 --> 00:16:50,920
sound design in this moment.
I think later in the episode

270
00:16:50,920 --> 00:16:54,080
there are moments where I feel
like it could be helpful.

271
00:16:54,440 --> 00:16:56,640
But yeah, I'm with you, Dominic.
It's not that I necessarily

272
00:16:56,640 --> 00:16:59,720
disagree with Nick, It's just
that from my first time

273
00:16:59,720 --> 00:17:03,600
listening experience, I didn't
feel like the need for that.

274
00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:07,480
And by the way, I see that Matt
was nodding his head as Dominic

275
00:17:07,480 --> 00:17:09,520
was sharing, and so was Ralph
for that matter.

276
00:17:09,520 --> 00:17:11,920
Oh, and by the way, if you're
not going to

277
00:17:11,920 --> 00:17:16,680
podcastingmorningchat.com/join
us to check out our video, I

278
00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:19,680
highly encourage that you do
because Ralph has an amusing

279
00:17:19,680 --> 00:17:24,760
shirt on a very appropriate for
our money guy, our tax guy.

280
00:17:25,040 --> 00:17:28,400
So yeah, go check that out if
you haven't already.

281
00:17:28,680 --> 00:17:31,080
And DRI know you wanted to chime
in as well.

282
00:17:31,160 --> 00:17:32,400
Go for it.
Sorry, I'm in.

283
00:17:32,760 --> 00:17:34,440
The Kitchen.
But I just wanted to get this in

284
00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:39,000
when we were talking about the
accents and how it lended itself

285
00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:43,200
very well to the storytelling.
I also wanted to put in there

286
00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:45,280
that he's a hell of a
storyteller.

287
00:17:45,320 --> 00:17:49,360
He reads really well, you know?
So I just wanted to get that in.

288
00:17:49,560 --> 00:17:53,720
Yeah, and we'll play some more
clips demonstrating some of that

289
00:17:53,720 --> 00:17:57,040
storytelling here in a moment.
Matt, did you want to chime in?

290
00:17:57,680 --> 00:17:59,840
Yeah.
Just very quickly to point out

291
00:17:59,840 --> 00:18:03,920
that this one we're reviewing
today is the first episode that

292
00:18:03,920 --> 00:18:10,280
he put out, and I think a lot of
kudos needs to go his way for

293
00:18:10,280 --> 00:18:11,560
all the things he's gotten
right.

294
00:18:11,560 --> 00:18:14,880
Like we don't know how many
episodes he's practiced, how

295
00:18:14,880 --> 00:18:18,640
many hours he put into this
particular episode to get it

296
00:18:18,640 --> 00:18:22,200
just right.
But like, you can stumble into

297
00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:24,800
the magic that happens that
Dominic was talking about that

298
00:18:25,120 --> 00:18:29,080
we all agreed with here on the
video that the silence adds a

299
00:18:29,080 --> 00:18:31,920
bit more.
And I reflect that on in books

300
00:18:31,920 --> 00:18:35,440
these days too.
Like today with the shortest

301
00:18:35,440 --> 00:18:38,120
tension span thing, it's always
important to move the next

302
00:18:38,120 --> 00:18:39,800
thing.
Watch a movie trailer from like

303
00:18:39,800 --> 00:18:43,680
1996 and compare it to a movie
trailer today and you'll be

304
00:18:43,680 --> 00:18:45,720
incredibly surprised.
Same with books that were

305
00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:48,320
written back then.
There was way more room for the

306
00:18:48,320 --> 00:18:51,800
imagination to fill the gaps.
And I think you should stick

307
00:18:51,800 --> 00:18:53,720
with it to a degree.
But I agree with you too, Mark,

308
00:18:53,720 --> 00:18:55,920
that there's some sound design
choices you can make further on

309
00:18:55,920 --> 00:18:58,920
as the story gets told that can
add a little bit more.

310
00:18:59,320 --> 00:19:00,840
Yeah, yeah.
Thank you, Matt.

311
00:19:00,840 --> 00:19:03,600
We will play some more clips in
a moment.

312
00:19:03,920 --> 00:19:06,160
I know several people still want
to chime in.

313
00:19:06,160 --> 00:19:10,040
I'm going to skip my Co hosts
for a minute because one of our

314
00:19:10,040 --> 00:19:12,680
community members is on stage
wanting to chime in.

315
00:19:13,280 --> 00:19:15,080
Tide, did you have something for
us?

316
00:19:15,800 --> 00:19:17,880
It's going to make the smallest
of observations.

317
00:19:17,880 --> 00:19:22,320
So when he said whether they
were going to survive depended

318
00:19:22,320 --> 00:19:26,560
on some very, very difficult
decisions that you are going to

319
00:19:26,560 --> 00:19:28,960
hear today.
The only thing I would just

320
00:19:29,080 --> 00:19:32,520
eliminate is that phrase that
you are going to hear today and

321
00:19:32,520 --> 00:19:36,440
just end it with whether they
survive is going to depend on

322
00:19:36,440 --> 00:19:38,240
some very, very difficult
decisions.

323
00:19:39,400 --> 00:19:41,360
OK.
Yeah, that's an interesting

324
00:19:41,360 --> 00:19:44,240
observation.
I have to sit on that for a

325
00:19:44,240 --> 00:19:48,680
minute because yeah, does it.
I guess the point, and you can

326
00:19:48,680 --> 00:19:52,800
correct me if I'm wrong, is that
you feel like maybe he's pulling

327
00:19:52,800 --> 00:19:57,360
us out of the story by
addressing us and instead of.

328
00:19:58,040 --> 00:20:01,160
Yeah, in a way I did feel that
way just for like a split

329
00:20:01,160 --> 00:20:03,480
second.
And I said, oh, I wish he didn't

330
00:20:03,480 --> 00:20:06,520
do that because I felt like the
sentence would have had more

331
00:20:06,520 --> 00:20:09,360
impact.
And as a write a lot as a writer

332
00:20:09,360 --> 00:20:12,320
and all that kind of stuff, I'm
always looking at.

333
00:20:12,760 --> 00:20:15,640
The way I can phrase the
sentence for maximum impact, and

334
00:20:15,640 --> 00:20:19,280
most of the time that has to do
with eliminating words as

335
00:20:19,280 --> 00:20:21,720
opposed to adding them.
Yeah, interesting.

336
00:20:21,720 --> 00:20:25,360
I have some notes that we'll get
into later and I think several

337
00:20:25,360 --> 00:20:28,760
other people have talked about
that when they provided their

338
00:20:29,120 --> 00:20:32,960
breakdown of this episode,
talked about some moments where

339
00:20:33,520 --> 00:20:37,160
we might have been pulled out of
the story momentarily.

340
00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:40,120
So I want to we will get back
into that as well.

341
00:20:40,360 --> 00:20:43,160
Thank you for bringing that up.
Ralph, you wanted to add

342
00:20:43,160 --> 00:20:45,520
something?
Yeah, I just wanted to say when

343
00:20:45,520 --> 00:20:48,200
I first started listening to
this, I had to go back and check

344
00:20:48,200 --> 00:20:50,200
was this really this guy's first
episode?

345
00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:54,400
Because honestly, dude, I
thought this was a professional

346
00:20:54,400 --> 00:20:56,920
podcast from the moment it
started playing.

347
00:20:57,440 --> 00:21:00,120
When I went back and figured out
that this guy, this was his

348
00:21:00,120 --> 00:21:01,960
first podcast.
Well, at least with this

349
00:21:01,960 --> 00:21:04,720
particular show, I don't know
what he's done before, but I was

350
00:21:04,720 --> 00:21:09,040
like, I don't have a lot to
offer here in ways of helping

351
00:21:09,040 --> 00:21:11,760
this guy.
I got some ideas on having a

352
00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:14,080
website 'cause it doesn't like
he has one and we could talk

353
00:21:14,080 --> 00:21:17,080
about that later on.
But man, from the standpoint of

354
00:21:17,480 --> 00:21:20,840
just knocking it out of the park
at the front end, home run,

355
00:21:20,840 --> 00:21:23,080
dude, home run.
Yeah, Yeah.

356
00:21:23,080 --> 00:21:25,520
I am really impressed, like you
said.

357
00:21:25,520 --> 00:21:28,080
I mean, maybe he's had other
podcasts that we don't know

358
00:21:28,080 --> 00:21:31,920
about, but as as far as we know,
this is his first podcast and

359
00:21:31,920 --> 00:21:36,920
with what, maybe 2 episodes, I
am totally thoroughly impressed.

360
00:21:37,440 --> 00:21:39,280
Yeah.
OK, Nick, I think you had

361
00:21:39,280 --> 00:21:42,840
something you wanted to add.
I'm just going to comment what

362
00:21:42,840 --> 00:21:46,400
others are saying to push back
on my comments just kind of a

363
00:21:46,400 --> 00:21:49,680
little where my mind is going
with that because I do agree

364
00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:52,560
like what everyone is saying,
like silence is extremely

365
00:21:52,560 --> 00:21:55,920
powerful.
And I think in this instance,

366
00:21:55,920 --> 00:21:59,760
like the show gives me very much
like a almost like a documentary

367
00:21:59,760 --> 00:22:03,160
kind of feel to it.
And in many documentaries, there

368
00:22:03,160 --> 00:22:09,120
is some kind of sound or track
in the background that you can

369
00:22:09,120 --> 00:22:11,960
kind of hear playing.
And to me, when you have

370
00:22:11,960 --> 00:22:14,880
something like that intention is
building, that's when the

371
00:22:14,880 --> 00:22:17,680
silence becomes, like,
magnified.

372
00:22:17,760 --> 00:22:22,240
And when you go from the sound
of the waves crashing to silence

373
00:22:22,240 --> 00:22:25,640
with him speaking, I feel like
the tension hasn't built yet to

374
00:22:25,640 --> 00:22:29,600
that point where the silence can
speak even bigger volumes.

375
00:22:30,080 --> 00:22:32,800
So that's kind of where my mind
was going is like, yeah, because

376
00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:35,560
I had that same thought when
Dominic was talking about that.

377
00:22:35,560 --> 00:22:38,680
Like, should there be music in
here or should it just be

378
00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:41,320
silent?
And I think music building to

379
00:22:41,320 --> 00:22:44,240
the silence, like some of the
building up to the last couple

380
00:22:44,240 --> 00:22:47,120
things he says.
And cutting the sound out or the

381
00:22:47,120 --> 00:22:50,000
music out from there, I think
would have been like heart stop,

382
00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:52,200
like, oh, crap, here we go kind
of thing.

383
00:22:52,560 --> 00:22:55,320
But that that was just some
backing my case.

384
00:22:55,360 --> 00:22:59,200
Yeah.
And look, podcast listening,

385
00:22:59,200 --> 00:23:01,760
like almost everything, is
subjective, right?

386
00:23:01,760 --> 00:23:05,000
We have our different things
that some of us may gravitate

387
00:23:05,000 --> 00:23:08,440
to, others may not.
And I don't think it's an awful

388
00:23:08,440 --> 00:23:11,120
suggestion.
I just also agree, kind of agree

389
00:23:11,120 --> 00:23:12,840
with both of you.
Like I would kind of want to

390
00:23:12,840 --> 00:23:16,720
hear what it would sound like if
we did something more like what

391
00:23:16,720 --> 00:23:19,320
Nick is suggesting versus that
silence.

392
00:23:19,560 --> 00:23:22,800
I'm curious, does anybody feel
like I'll play it again real

393
00:23:22,800 --> 00:23:24,600
quick?
Does anyone feel like the ocean

394
00:23:24,600 --> 00:23:27,280
waves, and I know this is
nitpicking, but when you have a

395
00:23:27,280 --> 00:23:29,840
really good show, sometimes you
have to nitpick to find some

396
00:23:29,840 --> 00:23:33,080
constructive criticism.
Do you think the waves at the

397
00:23:33,080 --> 00:23:35,320
beginning were a little too
long?

398
00:23:44,480 --> 00:23:46,040
A huge.
Wheel.

399
00:23:46,040 --> 00:23:48,320
So what do you think?
Was that too long or do you

400
00:23:48,320 --> 00:23:51,160
think, and maybe Dominic, you
can speak to this as somebody

401
00:23:51,160 --> 00:23:54,920
who does a lot of sound design,
Do you think that that's a an

402
00:23:54,920 --> 00:23:57,640
appropriate amount of time to
play those ocean waves or should

403
00:23:57,640 --> 00:24:00,440
he have come in sooner?
And I know it's nitpicking a

404
00:24:00,440 --> 00:24:01,760
bit.
No, no, for sure.

405
00:24:01,920 --> 00:24:06,000
It's one of those things where
it's like from a podcast

406
00:24:06,080 --> 00:24:09,960
industry, you got to hook him in
very soon, get on with the

407
00:24:09,960 --> 00:24:12,880
story.
Yes, it's maybe a too long, but

408
00:24:12,880 --> 00:24:16,760
from an artistry trying to build
the story from the beginning,

409
00:24:17,160 --> 00:24:18,360
no.
Right.

410
00:24:18,360 --> 00:24:21,760
So I think the answer is it
depends, which I know is a.

411
00:24:22,200 --> 00:24:23,640
That's a common.
Phrase here.

412
00:24:23,640 --> 00:24:27,480
I know it's phoning it in,
right, but but it really does

413
00:24:27,480 --> 00:24:30,000
depend.
So I think it really lends to

414
00:24:30,480 --> 00:24:34,160
what the what his goal is for
the show.

415
00:24:34,200 --> 00:24:38,120
If it's like for, you know, the
industry part of it, then yeah,

416
00:24:38,120 --> 00:24:41,480
maybe come in a little sooner.
I don't think you lose the

417
00:24:41,480 --> 00:24:44,600
artistic whatever.
But if that's what he's trying

418
00:24:44,600 --> 00:24:47,320
to do, I think it's perfect.
OK, there you go.

419
00:24:47,320 --> 00:24:50,480
Yeah, me personally, I would
have cut that down a little bit,

420
00:24:50,800 --> 00:24:55,320
maybe a cup 2, two to three
seconds of it just to jump in a

421
00:24:55,320 --> 00:24:58,240
little bit sooner.
And I think if you did that, you

422
00:24:58,240 --> 00:25:00,360
wouldn't lose a whole lot.
No, I don't either.

423
00:25:00,360 --> 00:25:01,320
I agree with you.
Yeah.

424
00:25:01,560 --> 00:25:05,960
And by the way, I do want to
also shout out what I noticed he

425
00:25:05,960 --> 00:25:09,200
did on YouTube.
So, you know, he does not have a

426
00:25:09,200 --> 00:25:13,040
video version, but he puts his
podcast up on YouTube and it

427
00:25:13,040 --> 00:25:16,080
looks like he's doing it as a
separate upload.

428
00:25:16,080 --> 00:25:19,760
In other words, he's not
distributing it as an RSS feed

429
00:25:19,760 --> 00:25:22,240
to YouTube.
He's actually uploading it

430
00:25:22,520 --> 00:25:24,720
there.
And what he's doing is it's

431
00:25:24,720 --> 00:25:28,280
basically like his cover image,
but it's animated.

432
00:25:28,280 --> 00:25:31,400
The waves are actually moving
the whole time as you're

433
00:25:31,560 --> 00:25:35,640
listening to the video.
So I just thought that was a

434
00:25:35,640 --> 00:25:39,000
smart, nice little touch.
It's not obviously the most

435
00:25:39,000 --> 00:25:43,520
engaging, but it is nice that
it's better in my opinion, than

436
00:25:43,520 --> 00:25:48,400
a static image if you're going
to put up audio only on YouTube.

437
00:25:48,680 --> 00:25:52,200
Sid, I saw you had you threw up
a pepper a moment ago.

438
00:25:52,200 --> 00:25:53,840
Did you want to chime in on
something?

439
00:25:54,600 --> 00:25:55,880
Thank you, Mark.
Good morning, everybody.

440
00:25:55,880 --> 00:25:58,040
I'm actually going to wait
because I wanted to follow up to

441
00:25:58,040 --> 00:26:00,760
Tide's comment and then you
commented it.

442
00:26:00,760 --> 00:26:02,360
You're going to address that a
little bit later.

443
00:26:02,400 --> 00:26:02,960
Let's.
Yeah.

444
00:26:02,960 --> 00:26:05,080
Well, I think that was the
comment.

445
00:26:05,240 --> 00:26:06,880
Yeah.
I think that this addresses the

446
00:26:06,880 --> 00:26:08,720
comment.
I'll go to it right now.

447
00:26:09,080 --> 00:26:12,400
One of the things that I think
this episode does really well,

448
00:26:12,400 --> 00:26:14,880
actually, we'll go to it in a
second because I want to do this

449
00:26:14,880 --> 00:26:17,520
first.
What I think it does really well

450
00:26:18,200 --> 00:26:22,360
is it takes history and makes it
easy to picture.

451
00:26:22,840 --> 00:26:26,320
So I'm going to play this clip.
These next moments are small.

452
00:26:26,560 --> 00:26:29,440
There's not, I'm not going to
play a huge build up, but they

453
00:26:29,440 --> 00:26:32,960
matter because they show how a
storyteller can make old

454
00:26:32,960 --> 00:26:36,880
information feel immediate and
understandable.

455
00:26:37,160 --> 00:26:41,080
So like I said, this first clip
plays plays a couple of examples

456
00:26:41,080 --> 00:26:45,200
of what I'm talking about, but I
think it's doing a lot of the

457
00:26:45,200 --> 00:26:47,880
work.
Listen for how he compares.

458
00:26:48,280 --> 00:26:52,720
He makes this comparison to make
history click for us a little

459
00:26:52,720 --> 00:26:56,160
faster.
They had come from Nantucket, a

460
00:26:56,160 --> 00:27:00,080
tiny island off the coast of
Massachusetts in the United

461
00:27:00,080 --> 00:27:03,640
States.
Think of Nantucket as the Saudi

462
00:27:03,640 --> 00:27:09,520
Arabia of its day.
The Essex was 87 feet long, not

463
00:27:09,520 --> 00:27:12,120
very big at all by today's
standards.

464
00:27:12,600 --> 00:27:16,920
That's about roughly just
shorter than a basketball court.

465
00:27:17,800 --> 00:27:22,120
The 20 men lived and worked on
her for years at a time.

466
00:27:22,560 --> 00:27:26,160
The smells on a wheel ship are
something we can hardly imagine

467
00:27:26,160 --> 00:27:29,840
today.
Bodies unwashed, rotting food

468
00:27:29,840 --> 00:27:34,360
and wheel blubber with a smell
so thick you could taste it.

469
00:27:35,040 --> 00:27:37,280
I love how he says whale, by the
way.

470
00:27:37,480 --> 00:27:41,080
Wheel.
That's what it sounds like to

471
00:27:41,080 --> 00:27:44,000
this American anyway.
So what am I getting at here?

472
00:27:44,200 --> 00:27:50,120
The reference to Nantucket being
the Saudi Arabia of its day or

473
00:27:50,120 --> 00:27:53,560
the comparison of the size, I
think of the boat was what he

474
00:27:53,560 --> 00:27:57,800
was using the, you know, the
basketball court reference or

475
00:27:57,880 --> 00:28:03,560
those smells on the wheel ship,
on the whale ship, those smells.

476
00:28:03,800 --> 00:28:06,680
I think it's immersive.
It brings me in.

477
00:28:06,680 --> 00:28:11,200
It helps me visualize the story.
And by the way, even if you're

478
00:28:11,200 --> 00:28:15,160
not doing a narrative podcast, I
think thinking along these

479
00:28:15,160 --> 00:28:18,240
lines, when you are doing
especially an audio first

480
00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:22,640
podcast, this is the thing that
I was on my high horse about

481
00:28:22,640 --> 00:28:26,960
last week, is that when you're
doing a podcast, if it's audio

482
00:28:26,960 --> 00:28:30,600
first, but you do have a video
component, I don't believe you

483
00:28:30,600 --> 00:28:34,840
have to make two separate shows.
I think that if you can do a

484
00:28:34,840 --> 00:28:40,320
really good job describing the
visuals, it works well.

485
00:28:40,320 --> 00:28:43,840
In fact, it works really well in
my opinion, and I think that

486
00:28:43,840 --> 00:28:48,640
this is a great example of that.
So anybody have any thoughts?

487
00:28:48,640 --> 00:28:52,000
Anyone want to comment on this?
Did that make this feel easier

488
00:28:52,000 --> 00:28:55,600
to grab onto for you?
Or maybe to some people, maybe

489
00:28:55,600 --> 00:28:59,240
they feel like maybe that's kind
of pandering to them, that they

490
00:28:59,240 --> 00:29:02,720
know what Nantucket is.
Either they can visualize the

491
00:29:02,720 --> 00:29:06,480
size of of the boat or this
maybe the smells are annoying

492
00:29:06,480 --> 00:29:08,880
them, Who knows.
But I think for me, and I think

493
00:29:08,880 --> 00:29:10,800
a lot of people would appreciate
that.

494
00:29:10,800 --> 00:29:15,320
Dr. What are your thoughts?
I was, pardon the pun, I was so

495
00:29:15,320 --> 00:29:19,720
on board with him.
I loved the analogy that he made

496
00:29:19,720 --> 00:29:23,320
with the, you know, Saudi Arabia
thing, The fact that it was

497
00:29:23,320 --> 00:29:27,040
Nantucket and it was coming from
a person with, you know, this

498
00:29:27,040 --> 00:29:30,280
heavy Irish brogue.
It was just so.

499
00:29:30,280 --> 00:29:33,720
I loved it so much.
It really surprised me.

500
00:29:34,440 --> 00:29:38,520
Very cool.
Before we go any further, Ralph,

501
00:29:38,560 --> 00:29:43,200
I wanted to pause here because I
know you found us a special

502
00:29:43,200 --> 00:29:47,560
guest for Friday and I quickly
wanted to tease that in case

503
00:29:47,560 --> 00:29:49,480
somebody listening may be
interested.

504
00:29:49,880 --> 00:29:50,880
I did.
Thank you, Mark.

505
00:29:50,880 --> 00:29:52,440
Yeah.
Joining us on the show tomorrow

506
00:29:52,440 --> 00:29:55,960
is Sam Sethi.
He is the owner, the president

507
00:29:56,040 --> 00:30:00,640
of True Fans, I guess is what
it's called, and that is a

508
00:30:00,640 --> 00:30:03,360
podcasting platform where you
can.

509
00:30:03,360 --> 00:30:05,200
It's a podcasting app.
What?

510
00:30:05,360 --> 00:30:07,360
Only fans only.
Fans.

511
00:30:07,400 --> 00:30:08,760
No.
True fans.

512
00:30:08,800 --> 00:30:10,320
Let's be very careful about
that.

513
00:30:10,440 --> 00:30:12,440
True fans.
Only true fans.

514
00:30:12,920 --> 00:30:17,680
And he is also the Co host with
James Credlin on Fridays of the

515
00:30:17,680 --> 00:30:20,240
podcast Weekly Review.
But he's going to join us

516
00:30:20,240 --> 00:30:21,920
tomorrow.
I reached out to him and he said

517
00:30:21,920 --> 00:30:24,480
he would love to be on the show.
He's going to tell us about how

518
00:30:24,480 --> 00:30:27,360
his company's doing things a
little bit differently when it

519
00:30:27,360 --> 00:30:30,080
relates to hosting for
podcasters.

520
00:30:30,080 --> 00:30:33,440
He's actually embracing the HLS
technology, and we're going to

521
00:30:33,440 --> 00:30:35,600
get into it with him and why
he's doing that, how it's

522
00:30:35,600 --> 00:30:37,720
working, and exactly the point
of that.

523
00:30:37,720 --> 00:30:40,360
So make sure you join us on
tomorrow's show again, Sam

524
00:30:40,360 --> 00:30:43,640
Sethi.
Thank you, Ralph.

525
00:30:43,720 --> 00:30:45,440
OK, I saw.
Let's see.

526
00:30:45,440 --> 00:30:49,560
Matt, wanted to chime in and
again, just to refresh, we're

527
00:30:49,560 --> 00:30:54,200
talking about the
descriptiveness of this podcast

528
00:30:54,200 --> 00:30:59,480
and how well the host is sharing
and describing the different

529
00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:02,000
elements of the story.
Matt, what did you want to add?

530
00:31:02,720 --> 00:31:04,800
I think it's just really
important to point out here

531
00:31:04,800 --> 00:31:06,880
again, and I take this
opportunity just because it's a

532
00:31:06,880 --> 00:31:09,320
very unusual phenomenon that
doesn't get talked about in

533
00:31:09,320 --> 00:31:11,640
podcasting.
But there are some people that

534
00:31:11,640 --> 00:31:17,120
have a phenomenon called
aphantasia, which prevents them

535
00:31:17,160 --> 00:31:21,800
from visualizing something in
their mind from a description.

536
00:31:22,080 --> 00:31:26,680
For example, if I said imagine
in your mind a shiny red apple

537
00:31:26,680 --> 00:31:29,080
sitting on a table.
It looks delicious.

538
00:31:29,080 --> 00:31:33,440
There's a glistening morning dew
just running along the edges.

539
00:31:33,440 --> 00:31:36,840
The light reflects from the some
people are listening to that and

540
00:31:36,840 --> 00:31:38,800
going, give me the information,
Matt.

541
00:31:38,840 --> 00:31:40,880
I don't, you've told me there's
an apple.

542
00:31:40,880 --> 00:31:45,680
That's all I need.
That's the kind of FN Tasik kind

543
00:31:45,680 --> 00:31:49,760
of perception sometimes.
So I think before all of you run

544
00:31:49,760 --> 00:31:53,120
off when you thought that the
description was too much,

545
00:31:53,280 --> 00:31:56,720
wondering if you know, you might
be a hip hop Med and find out if

546
00:31:56,720 --> 00:32:00,160
you've got aphantasia or not.
I think that just needs to be

547
00:32:00,160 --> 00:32:02,640
recognized sometimes that for
some people, the theater of the

548
00:32:02,640 --> 00:32:07,240
mind from descriptive audio just
it doesn't match up to what

549
00:32:07,240 --> 00:32:10,640
they, you know, experience.
Whereas some of us can

550
00:32:10,640 --> 00:32:14,000
experience what, you know,
visualize a ship the size of a

551
00:32:14,000 --> 00:32:18,640
basketball court being compared
to a whale of a similar size or

552
00:32:18,640 --> 00:32:23,120
bigger that that creates the
scene for us, or the ocean waves

553
00:32:23,120 --> 00:32:26,800
lapping against a boat in the
middle of the ocean in complete

554
00:32:26,800 --> 00:32:29,720
isolation.
That works for some people. the

555
00:32:29,920 --> 00:32:32,640
IT just doesn't work for others
for many reasons.

556
00:32:32,880 --> 00:32:34,880
But aphantasia, I like to bring
it up sometimes.

557
00:32:35,000 --> 00:32:36,320
I thought this was a good
opportunity.

558
00:32:36,960 --> 00:32:39,960
Yeah, thank you.
And thank you for the for living

559
00:32:39,960 --> 00:32:42,440
up to your reputation with all
the big words.

560
00:32:43,640 --> 00:32:46,520
And I know Ralph is chomping at
the bit over here behind the

561
00:32:46,520 --> 00:32:50,800
scenes because Ralph has got a
Jingle ready for Matt and his

562
00:32:50,800 --> 00:32:53,920
big words that he likes to use.
But I don't have it queued up

563
00:32:53,920 --> 00:32:55,320
yet.
And I wanted to try to try to

564
00:32:55,320 --> 00:32:58,480
distribute these new jingles
effectively.

565
00:32:58,480 --> 00:33:00,800
I didn't want to just throw them
all out in one week.

566
00:33:00,800 --> 00:33:02,880
I want to really make them make
it.

567
00:33:02,880 --> 00:33:05,560
What's the word I'm looking for?
And I want them to simmer a

568
00:33:05,560 --> 00:33:07,600
little bit.
So that's why I didn't have that

569
00:33:07,600 --> 00:33:09,840
queued up.
By the way, Jessica was agreeing

570
00:33:09,840 --> 00:33:12,880
with some of us earlier here,
she says.

571
00:33:13,600 --> 00:33:16,400
I agree, and sometimes it
depends on what you're hungry to

572
00:33:16,400 --> 00:33:18,760
consume.
There was one other thing she

573
00:33:18,760 --> 00:33:19,360
said.
Ah, yes.

574
00:33:19,360 --> 00:33:22,560
His flow reminds me of the lull
of waves.

575
00:33:22,560 --> 00:33:26,760
His voice is the melody.
I love that Ralph, doing the

576
00:33:26,760 --> 00:33:28,600
little.
What is that a hula dance you're

577
00:33:28,600 --> 00:33:31,400
doing over there, Ralph?
Well, yeah, it's the waves, man.

578
00:33:31,400 --> 00:33:35,040
He she is absolutely right.
Because it's almost put you in a

579
00:33:35,040 --> 00:33:37,320
trance.
I was just listening to this and

580
00:33:37,320 --> 00:33:39,200
I'm just going.
I could take a nap now.

581
00:33:39,200 --> 00:33:41,480
Not that it was content, wasn't
good, don't misunderstand me.

582
00:33:41,760 --> 00:33:44,560
But it was one of those things
where I am just in this.

583
00:33:44,880 --> 00:33:48,360
And that's why again, I said I
need to take advice from this

584
00:33:48,360 --> 00:33:49,520
guy.
I shouldn't be giving him

585
00:33:49,520 --> 00:33:50,640
advice.
Yeah.

586
00:33:51,240 --> 00:33:55,120
And by the way, we've got some
people here on YouTube.

587
00:33:55,120 --> 00:33:57,440
Thank you for watching on
YouTube as well.

588
00:33:57,440 --> 00:34:00,040
And Jr.
Junior, I always get them.

589
00:34:00,040 --> 00:34:02,920
I always intertwine Jr. or
Junior.

590
00:34:03,120 --> 00:34:07,880
But he was mentioning the
dramatic sound, dramatic with

591
00:34:07,880 --> 00:34:09,679
the sound effects to draw you
in.

592
00:34:09,920 --> 00:34:12,840
He says he puts you in a trance
with his description.

593
00:34:12,840 --> 00:34:16,040
Also agreeing.
And also thank you for giving us

594
00:34:16,560 --> 00:34:20,880
a little bit of kudos, Jr. for
the video presentation of this

595
00:34:20,880 --> 00:34:23,159
show.
Appreciate you watching and the

596
00:34:23,159 --> 00:34:26,480
fact that you're enjoying it.
Thank you for calling that out.

597
00:34:26,560 --> 00:34:28,679
OK.
And Mark, can I, yeah, go ahead

598
00:34:28,679 --> 00:34:31,000
just for a second.
Just really quickly, I, I think

599
00:34:31,000 --> 00:34:34,560
this was the part of the episode
that it kind of lends to what

600
00:34:34,560 --> 00:34:38,679
Matt was saying before, because
I think the description, the

601
00:34:38,679 --> 00:34:41,880
well blubber and stuff like
that, that was the first time in

602
00:34:41,880 --> 00:34:45,719
the episode I thought, I wonder
if he's done this before, Right?

603
00:34:45,719 --> 00:34:47,000
Right.
Without actually saying because

604
00:34:47,000 --> 00:34:49,000
I hadn't looked into the bio or
anything, something like that.

605
00:34:49,000 --> 00:34:54,800
And so I think people who are
experts are able to give you the

606
00:34:55,239 --> 00:34:58,800
perspective and the setting
without overwhelming you with

607
00:34:58,800 --> 00:35:00,440
it, right?
Like he started talking like

608
00:35:00,440 --> 00:35:03,280
nautical miles and I was like,
yeah, you're about to lose me,

609
00:35:03,280 --> 00:35:06,080
bro.
But if the way he described it

610
00:35:06,080 --> 00:35:08,520
and he did that example later on
them.

611
00:35:08,520 --> 00:35:11,560
So I don't want to give it away
in case you bring it up, but

612
00:35:11,560 --> 00:35:14,120
that description of the
basketball court, stuff like

613
00:35:14,120 --> 00:35:18,440
that, as a person who has never
gone out on a boat like that, it

614
00:35:18,440 --> 00:35:21,480
really gave me an idea like, oh,
OK, that makes sense.

615
00:35:21,560 --> 00:35:24,960
So no, I appreciated that part.
Yeah, thank you, Dominic.

616
00:35:24,960 --> 00:35:27,640
And Matt, you wanted to add on
to that breaking?

617
00:35:27,640 --> 00:35:29,320
News.
I've been doing a little bit of

618
00:35:29,320 --> 00:35:31,640
research in the background after
someone, I can't remember, it

619
00:35:31,640 --> 00:35:34,360
might have been you, Mark said.
Maybe he's done this before.

620
00:35:35,040 --> 00:35:37,720
Yeah.
So I did a bit of research a

621
00:35:37,720 --> 00:35:41,760
little bit and I've discovered
that he has been on several

622
00:35:41,760 --> 00:35:45,520
podcast appearances in the past
and I can attribute potentially

623
00:35:46,080 --> 00:35:49,280
two other maritime related
podcasts to his name.

624
00:35:49,880 --> 00:35:54,560
The first being a being Maritime
Careers International, which

625
00:35:54,560 --> 00:35:57,360
seems to have an Instagram
account but no correlating

626
00:35:57,360 --> 00:36:01,680
podcast may have been removed.
Similarly, 20 minutes see

627
00:36:01,680 --> 00:36:05,600
Stories, which is structured
very similarly, has two

628
00:36:05,600 --> 00:36:11,240
episodes, and the second episode
is about Tom Crean, which also

629
00:36:11,480 --> 00:36:14,800
is the second episode of Salvage
the Subject Matter.

630
00:36:15,040 --> 00:36:18,440
So it's entirely possible we're
dealing with a practiced expert

631
00:36:18,480 --> 00:36:20,520
who just hasn't left his work on
the table.

632
00:36:21,440 --> 00:36:25,800
In any case, still speaks to his
experience and his ability that

633
00:36:25,800 --> 00:36:27,160
he can create episodes like
this.

634
00:36:27,760 --> 00:36:29,800
Agreed.
Yeah, absolutely.

635
00:36:29,800 --> 00:36:34,040
OK, I want to keep things going.
Thank you again for your

636
00:36:34,040 --> 00:36:38,160
investigative work.
Appreciate that, Matt, I want to

637
00:36:38,280 --> 00:36:42,480
dig into, let's see which, where
are we here?

638
00:36:42,480 --> 00:36:46,560
Let's go to clip three.
Yes, clip 3.

639
00:36:47,160 --> 00:36:51,840
Let's hear the whale attack and
the sinking sequence.

640
00:36:52,360 --> 00:36:55,120
And as you listen, notice the
different things like the

641
00:36:55,120 --> 00:36:58,080
pacing, which I've seen some
comments about the pacing here

642
00:36:58,080 --> 00:37:00,200
in the chat.
So we'll talk about that, the

643
00:37:00,200 --> 00:37:04,800
narration, the emotional
intensity, and whether you feel

644
00:37:04,800 --> 00:37:08,040
like the production is doing
enough or whether there may be

645
00:37:08,040 --> 00:37:11,960
room for even more impact.
Let's listen.

646
00:37:12,680 --> 00:37:18,160
And then he saw it.
An enormous sperm wheel, almost

647
00:37:18,160 --> 00:37:22,720
exactly the same size of the
ship, so not far off the length

648
00:37:22,840 --> 00:37:27,320
of a basketball court.
An absolutely huge creature.

649
00:37:27,760 --> 00:37:30,000
It was heading slowly towards
them.

650
00:37:30,400 --> 00:37:33,720
She has watched it approach.
Something wasn't right.

651
00:37:33,720 --> 00:37:37,920
He ordered the helmsman of the
Essex to turn away, but it was

652
00:37:37,920 --> 00:37:41,760
too late.
The wheel struck the ship full

653
00:37:41,760 --> 00:37:44,440
on.
The impact threw men off their

654
00:37:44,440 --> 00:37:48,760
feet and the ship shuddered.
They'd heard of whales striking

655
00:37:48,760 --> 00:37:51,920
ships.
It did happen, but not like

656
00:37:51,920 --> 00:37:56,480
this.
Chius was convinced that what

657
00:37:56,480 --> 00:37:59,440
this wheel had done, it did it
on purpose.

658
00:38:00,240 --> 00:38:02,000
All right, so let's talk about
this.

659
00:38:02,160 --> 00:38:05,200
What did you notice in this
particular sequence?

660
00:38:05,200 --> 00:38:07,800
What thoughts do you have?
Sid, go for it.

661
00:38:08,480 --> 00:38:11,320
Yeah, I really enjoyed this
episode so much.

662
00:38:11,320 --> 00:38:14,200
So I started listening to the
second one because I love

663
00:38:14,200 --> 00:38:17,160
history, right?
So I just was enthralled with

664
00:38:17,160 --> 00:38:18,520
this.
And he did a really, really good

665
00:38:18,520 --> 00:38:21,360
job.
But to the enhanced sound

666
00:38:21,360 --> 00:38:26,680
design, like I think it would
have really made an impact if we

667
00:38:26,680 --> 00:38:31,320
had heard the sound of a whale
crashing into a wooden hull of a

668
00:38:31,320 --> 00:38:33,840
boat, right?
It would have just, it's kind of

669
00:38:33,840 --> 00:38:37,640
like just the impact of that, if
you will, that sometimes when

670
00:38:37,640 --> 00:38:39,880
you're when there's something
happening and and there's a

671
00:38:39,880 --> 00:38:42,360
pause, you hear a shotgun go off
or something like that, it would

672
00:38:42,360 --> 00:38:45,840
have been a bit more dramatic.
I do appreciate the references

673
00:38:45,840 --> 00:38:48,400
back to how big the whale was
again, the size of the

674
00:38:48,400 --> 00:38:50,920
basketball court.
But Ralph and I are agreeing, I

675
00:38:50,920 --> 00:38:55,240
think he was just a little bit
too slow and he could have

676
00:38:55,240 --> 00:38:58,920
increased his pace just a little
bit and not and it did.

677
00:38:58,920 --> 00:39:02,240
It wasn't like it I was going to
stop listening because he was

678
00:39:02,240 --> 00:39:04,840
talking slow, but I think it
could have benefited from a

679
00:39:04,840 --> 00:39:08,640
little bit more of a increase in
the speed of how he's talking.

680
00:39:09,200 --> 00:39:11,520
And then if he's worried about
the length of the show, adding

681
00:39:11,520 --> 00:39:14,840
in some of the pause,
intentional pauses and the

682
00:39:14,840 --> 00:39:18,680
sounds like we just talked about
would have had added a lot of

683
00:39:18,680 --> 00:39:21,400
drama to to this, much more
drama to this.

684
00:39:22,040 --> 00:39:24,280
OK, yeah, I'm with you there,
Sid.

685
00:39:24,280 --> 00:39:28,120
I found, like found that same
thing when I was listening.

686
00:39:28,120 --> 00:39:31,160
I wanted there to be some more
sound design, some more sound

687
00:39:31,160 --> 00:39:32,400
effects.
Yeah.

688
00:39:32,400 --> 00:39:35,640
And that's a great example.
Like when he says that that

689
00:39:35,640 --> 00:39:39,880
whale struck, I want to hear it.
I want to hear something that

690
00:39:39,880 --> 00:39:44,000
just emphasizes that point and
feel that in my body when it

691
00:39:44,000 --> 00:39:46,240
happens as opposed to just
visualizing it.

692
00:39:46,560 --> 00:39:49,560
So whatever that thought is, you
know, just a boom.

693
00:39:49,920 --> 00:39:53,720
I think that would really
capture attention a little bit

694
00:39:53,720 --> 00:39:57,200
of a more of a pattern disrupt
and more of an immersive

695
00:39:57,200 --> 00:40:00,440
experience at that point.
And by the way, the pacing

696
00:40:00,440 --> 00:40:03,840
thing, I saw it, maybe it was
Matt put it in the chat here.

697
00:40:04,040 --> 00:40:07,680
Did you try listening Sid at 1
1/2 times the speed?

698
00:40:08,200 --> 00:40:09,120
Do you think that would have
helped?

699
00:40:09,840 --> 00:40:12,800
I did not, but it didn't bother
me enough to even think about

700
00:40:12,800 --> 00:40:16,000
doing that right.
But as I was listening, I was

701
00:40:16,000 --> 00:40:18,320
just like, maybe you could
increase the pace of the story

702
00:40:18,320 --> 00:40:22,000
just a little bit, but I wasn't
bothered enough to go change how

703
00:40:22,040 --> 00:40:25,120
I consume podcasts.
OK, fair enough.

704
00:40:25,200 --> 00:40:26,720
Yeah.
And Ralph, you wanted to chime

705
00:40:26,720 --> 00:40:28,640
in?
Yeah, I just wanted to sort of

706
00:40:28,640 --> 00:40:31,480
go alongside of what Sid was
saying at this part.

707
00:40:31,480 --> 00:40:34,240
I'm glad you picked this clip
because this is a part where I

708
00:40:34,240 --> 00:40:36,800
thought he has a great voice
that he could have made more

709
00:40:36,800 --> 00:40:39,560
dramatic.
And at this very stage is when I

710
00:40:39,560 --> 00:40:43,400
start to think he's reading a
script, and I'm cool with that.

711
00:40:43,680 --> 00:40:46,520
But this is a part that I think
if he had done it better.

712
00:40:46,880 --> 00:40:49,040
And like I said, I thought this
dude did a great job.

713
00:40:49,040 --> 00:40:50,680
So don't miss, don't mishear
what I'm saying.

714
00:40:51,240 --> 00:40:53,440
But this is a part where he
could have built it up more and

715
00:40:53,440 --> 00:40:55,480
he could have gotten more
excited and he could have had a

716
00:40:55,480 --> 00:40:57,360
quicker pace.
And we could have pictured this

717
00:40:57,360 --> 00:40:59,960
whale coming towards the boat
and all of a sudden it struck.

718
00:41:00,120 --> 00:41:03,360
And I just think that would have
been more dramatic and it would

719
00:41:03,360 --> 00:41:05,800
have gone along with what he was
already doing.

720
00:41:06,160 --> 00:41:08,560
Because there were times when I
thought like, yeah, this guy's

721
00:41:08,560 --> 00:41:11,040
reading a script because I
noticed the tail offs at the end

722
00:41:11,040 --> 00:41:13,880
of his words sometimes.
Now, maybe that's an accent

723
00:41:13,880 --> 00:41:16,800
thing, but I picked it up a lot
that it felt like because when I

724
00:41:16,800 --> 00:41:19,520
first started podcasting, I was
doing the same thing before.

725
00:41:19,520 --> 00:41:22,200
I worked with a speaking coach
and she told me don't end up

726
00:41:22,200 --> 00:41:25,000
here, you know, and like you
normally talk and that's what I

727
00:41:25,000 --> 00:41:27,520
felt a little bit throughout his
presentation.

728
00:41:28,120 --> 00:41:32,400
I definitely think that part of
that is the accent, because the

729
00:41:32,400 --> 00:41:36,000
accent does usually carry a bit
of an uptick.

730
00:41:36,000 --> 00:41:37,800
We were talking about that
before the show.

731
00:41:37,800 --> 00:41:39,360
So I think that has something to
do with it.

732
00:41:39,600 --> 00:41:44,160
Also, you know, I maybe it was
just an assumption for me, one

733
00:41:44,160 --> 00:41:48,040
that I wasn't even conscious of.
I don't think I really paid

734
00:41:48,040 --> 00:41:51,360
attention to the fact that he
was reading because I think I

735
00:41:51,360 --> 00:41:53,960
maybe was just assuming he must
have been reading.

736
00:41:53,960 --> 00:41:56,720
Like, I don't think somebody
could tell that story off the

737
00:41:56,720 --> 00:42:00,320
top of their head.
And the last thing I wanted to

738
00:42:00,320 --> 00:42:04,440
say is it could have been a
styling choice like this host.

739
00:42:04,480 --> 00:42:08,040
You know, there are hosts that
intentionally keep the same

740
00:42:08,040 --> 00:42:11,080
tone, the same pacing the whole
way through.

741
00:42:11,080 --> 00:42:13,920
It's their brand.
It's just the way that they want

742
00:42:13,920 --> 00:42:16,240
to deliver it.
And then the audiences gravitate

743
00:42:16,240 --> 00:42:18,160
to that.
They just expect that.

744
00:42:18,680 --> 00:42:21,880
And I'm not saying your advice
is wrong Ralph because I do.

745
00:42:21,880 --> 00:42:26,880
I can feel a difference if he
was doing more of a build up,

746
00:42:26,880 --> 00:42:31,000
but I also appreciate his style
for what it is.

747
00:42:31,520 --> 00:42:33,480
I think that's very fair, Mark,
and I think you're right.

748
00:42:33,480 --> 00:42:37,120
He made a stylistic choice, and
I'm totally in agreement with

749
00:42:37,120 --> 00:42:38,320
you on that.
Yeah, OK.

750
00:42:38,400 --> 00:42:39,920
And Dominic, you wanted to chime
in, Go ahead.

751
00:42:40,080 --> 00:42:44,200
No, I think that may be the case
because I I also kind of delved

752
00:42:44,200 --> 00:42:49,440
into the other episode well, and
even the music to the other

753
00:42:49,440 --> 00:42:53,760
episode that he has as well.
And even the Music Choice, the

754
00:42:53,760 --> 00:42:58,280
music sound bad that he has for
this episode is also in the

755
00:42:58,280 --> 00:43:01,440
other episode as well.
So I wonder if there's a level

756
00:43:01,440 --> 00:43:06,280
of consistency he's trying to
keep with the show overall.

757
00:43:06,280 --> 00:43:11,440
And that would make sense to me,
not just not just the music bed,

758
00:43:11,560 --> 00:43:14,640
but also in the way he delivers
the lines.

759
00:43:15,520 --> 00:43:16,280
Got it.
OK.

760
00:43:16,360 --> 00:43:17,760
Matt, did you want to add
something?

761
00:43:18,520 --> 00:43:22,400
Yeah, I think like Ralph's on to
something there and I'm sure

762
00:43:22,400 --> 00:43:25,880
whatever Dominic said is also
plausible.

763
00:43:25,880 --> 00:43:28,720
Unfortunately, those of us on
Riverside also misspeak a little

764
00:43:28,720 --> 00:43:30,440
bit because of Mark's Internet I
presume.

765
00:43:30,960 --> 00:43:34,360
But I think that's where
building the voice for where

766
00:43:34,360 --> 00:43:36,840
things and the persona going
forward is important.

767
00:43:37,480 --> 00:43:39,640
Like he might be playing around
with a couple of things.

768
00:43:39,680 --> 00:43:43,600
And I think what he is leaning
into at the moment is, you know,

769
00:43:43,600 --> 00:43:48,040
come along with me as I tell you
a story and it's the story

770
00:43:48,040 --> 00:43:53,200
that's at the forefront.
So perhaps a dramatic speed up

771
00:43:53,200 --> 00:43:56,200
for the moment the whale hit the
ship and then and then this

772
00:43:56,200 --> 00:43:58,960
happened and then this happened
and then always calm.

773
00:43:59,040 --> 00:44:02,320
That might be just a bit too,
too much, but there might be

774
00:44:02,320 --> 00:44:06,040
something perfect for Richard's
voice and for the cadence that

775
00:44:06,040 --> 00:44:09,720
doesn't break the flow.
But still, you know, stresses

776
00:44:09,720 --> 00:44:13,040
out as you listen.
The fact that he has speed up

777
00:44:13,120 --> 00:44:15,360
and you don't even realize he's
speed up yet.

778
00:44:15,960 --> 00:44:19,000
There's like a there's a balance
there, but I think this is the

779
00:44:19,000 --> 00:44:21,760
operant moment for him to pick
who he is.

780
00:44:22,000 --> 00:44:25,000
Is it the story that's playing
the major part?

781
00:44:25,040 --> 00:44:28,280
Like Tide pointed out earlier,
the selection of language is

782
00:44:28,280 --> 00:44:30,800
important to establish that and
what you keep and what you

783
00:44:31,240 --> 00:44:34,560
remove.
And also how he as the

784
00:44:34,560 --> 00:44:38,560
storyteller establishes his
persona as part of the podcast.

785
00:44:38,560 --> 00:44:41,960
And whether we're there with him
or he's just telling us a story

786
00:44:41,960 --> 00:44:45,120
and we're there for the story.
There's stylistic choices to

787
00:44:45,120 --> 00:44:48,280
make there that I think talk to
all the things we're kind of

788
00:44:48,280 --> 00:44:50,800
mentioning at the moment.
Thank you, Matt.

789
00:44:50,800 --> 00:44:54,720
Sid, did you want to chime into?
Yeah, I have a question about

790
00:44:54,720 --> 00:44:57,120
this.
So there's several points of the

791
00:44:57,880 --> 00:45:00,640
episode where he's telling the
story from the viewpoint of the

792
00:45:00,640 --> 00:45:03,120
character.
He's talking as if I'm the

793
00:45:03,120 --> 00:45:05,560
character.
The captain says this and so and

794
00:45:05,560 --> 00:45:08,240
so says that, right?
And as I was listening to this,

795
00:45:08,240 --> 00:45:11,480
I thought a lot about Dominic
and his shows, and Dominic does

796
00:45:11,480 --> 00:45:14,760
a great job at bringing in the
voices of the character

797
00:45:14,760 --> 00:45:16,600
themselves.
Now he's got recordings and

798
00:45:16,600 --> 00:45:20,520
things that he can pull and you
can hear the characters voice.

799
00:45:21,280 --> 00:45:24,840
If he wanted to, could he do
something like that with this

800
00:45:24,840 --> 00:45:27,840
show where the captain's
actually talking, realizing the

801
00:45:27,840 --> 00:45:31,040
audio recording may not be
available, but he could indeed

802
00:45:31,040 --> 00:45:34,440
make that person's voice or
mimic that person's voice using

803
00:45:34,600 --> 00:45:36,720
AI, right?
And I think if he did something

804
00:45:36,720 --> 00:45:39,400
like that, it would add to the
show as well.

805
00:45:39,680 --> 00:45:43,320
I realized it's more work to do,
but I also think it's going to

806
00:45:43,320 --> 00:45:46,480
have more impact.
Ralph, what's the big smile for?

807
00:45:46,920 --> 00:45:50,560
No, I think Matt is going to
lose his stack on that one as we

808
00:45:50,560 --> 00:45:52,240
were talking about AI.
So I don't.

809
00:45:52,240 --> 00:45:54,880
I don't want to speak for Matt,
but I saw Matt make a very

810
00:45:54,880 --> 00:45:57,960
strong gesture when the word AI
was invoked.

811
00:45:58,200 --> 00:46:00,240
Ah.
Hang on, hang on, let's not talk

812
00:46:00,240 --> 00:46:02,560
about gestures here.
I rapidly shook my head.

813
00:46:02,880 --> 00:46:06,280
There was nothing untoward
flying around from digits here.

814
00:46:06,840 --> 00:46:11,040
I just rapidly shook my head
because I thought a like in a

815
00:46:11,040 --> 00:46:14,760
couple of years we might get
there and voice over in Fire AI

816
00:46:14,760 --> 00:46:18,880
is definitely improving.
But I think these are stories,

817
00:46:18,880 --> 00:46:21,840
right?
And often, sometimes they do,

818
00:46:21,880 --> 00:46:27,520
but not often Do you see a fully
cast audio book where all of the

819
00:46:27,520 --> 00:46:29,680
characters come in.
Harry Potter I think has all of

820
00:46:29,680 --> 00:46:32,120
the original actors in for the
books when they do the audio

821
00:46:32,120 --> 00:46:34,600
books.
So I think for him perhaps

822
00:46:34,600 --> 00:46:37,880
putting on the voices himself or
having a small team of

823
00:46:37,880 --> 00:46:40,920
volunteers or people that he
pays to enact those voices, a

824
00:46:40,920 --> 00:46:43,480
male and a female would be
enough probably to do that.

825
00:46:43,480 --> 00:46:46,480
I think would mate.
What you don't want to do is

826
00:46:46,480 --> 00:46:51,080
pull the listener out of his the
trance.

827
00:46:51,320 --> 00:46:54,680
As you guys said, I think AI
voices may do that.

828
00:46:54,800 --> 00:46:59,560
But that is a very That is an
opinion from me on that one, a

829
00:46:59,560 --> 00:47:02,080
vigorous.
Action apps, I actually agree

830
00:47:02,080 --> 00:47:05,960
with this in that regard because
in this goes in line with what I

831
00:47:05,960 --> 00:47:08,000
was saying as far as his accent
goes.

832
00:47:08,320 --> 00:47:11,560
Like I think the accent is part
of the trance and like, even if

833
00:47:11,560 --> 00:47:15,960
it's not AI and you got voice
actors and like, you would still

834
00:47:15,960 --> 00:47:22,080
have a hard time trying to find
somebody to not be anachronistic

835
00:47:22,560 --> 00:47:26,960
with the voices that would be
different from the host, right?

836
00:47:26,960 --> 00:47:31,920
Because even though there were
American sailors a part of this

837
00:47:31,920 --> 00:47:36,360
mission or whatever, even the
way we speak now, English today

838
00:47:36,360 --> 00:47:40,440
in 2026 is different than they
spoke English in 1820, right?

839
00:47:40,440 --> 00:47:42,920
So like even then you will find
it difficult.

840
00:47:43,120 --> 00:47:46,760
And I think I want to stay in
the trance for the full 35

841
00:47:46,760 --> 00:47:49,160
minutes to really enjoy the
story.

842
00:47:49,360 --> 00:47:52,800
So I definitely get what Sid is
saying, and I and AI choices

843
00:47:52,800 --> 00:47:55,800
have definitely improved, but I
don't know if they've improved

844
00:47:55,800 --> 00:47:58,880
to the point where I would
implement it in this particular

845
00:47:58,880 --> 00:48:00,560
episode, if that makes any
sense.

846
00:48:01,240 --> 00:48:05,400
That makes a lot of sense.
Yes, thank you, Dominic and Sid

847
00:48:05,560 --> 00:48:08,320
appreciate that and Matt for
that matter, thank you as well.

848
00:48:08,520 --> 00:48:11,960
I want to go to this next clip
because I also want to make sure

849
00:48:11,960 --> 00:48:14,400
we leave a little bit of time
for some feedback about the

850
00:48:14,400 --> 00:48:17,920
branding, the website, etcetera.
I have plenty of notes here.

851
00:48:18,080 --> 00:48:21,520
I know Dr. does I know that
Ralph wanted to chime in on that

852
00:48:21,520 --> 00:48:25,920
as well.
So this this next clip, this

853
00:48:25,920 --> 00:48:30,240
next moment here, let me make
sure I have the right one queued

854
00:48:30,240 --> 00:48:31,320
up.
I don't want to hit the wrong

855
00:48:31,320 --> 00:48:35,480
button this morning.
This one is I think, to what we

856
00:48:35,480 --> 00:48:39,240
were talking about with Sid
earlier and Tide earlier.

857
00:48:39,240 --> 00:48:43,040
This is where a moment where and
it happens a couple of times

858
00:48:43,680 --> 00:48:49,840
where the host is telling the
story, but then sort of pauses

859
00:48:49,840 --> 00:48:53,840
and talks to us, the listener.
And I'm curious how people feel

860
00:48:53,840 --> 00:48:55,080
about that.
So let's play it.

861
00:48:56,120 --> 00:49:01,120
Waking up, even if they did get
some sleep, to the same horizon,

862
00:49:01,440 --> 00:49:04,800
the same relentless ocean, not
knowing what the next day would

863
00:49:04,800 --> 00:49:10,560
bring or the week after that,
the water they had on board, the

864
00:49:10,560 --> 00:49:14,480
food, the hope, all of it
started running out.

865
00:49:15,440 --> 00:49:18,120
But they kept going.
The weeks that followed were

866
00:49:18,120 --> 00:49:21,720
slow and merciless.
And don't worry, things are

867
00:49:21,720 --> 00:49:25,480
going to happen soon.
The sun burned them raw every

868
00:49:25,480 --> 00:49:28,440
day.
They'd know shelter.

869
00:49:28,720 --> 00:49:30,720
They're scared.
So there it was, if you paid

870
00:49:30,720 --> 00:49:33,880
attention there he stops and
says don't worry, something's

871
00:49:33,880 --> 00:49:36,400
about to happen.
I'm paraphrasing but I think you

872
00:49:36,400 --> 00:49:40,000
get the gist here.
And he does stuff like that a

873
00:49:40,000 --> 00:49:43,720
few times, not often, but a few
times where I noticed.

874
00:49:44,240 --> 00:49:48,040
And I'm wondering if it was
necessary because let's be real,

875
00:49:48,040 --> 00:49:52,920
here are the the podcast episode
feels a lot like an audio book,

876
00:49:53,520 --> 00:49:55,920
which is a good thing.
That's not a knock on the

877
00:49:55,920 --> 00:49:58,760
presentation.
And if we think about audio

878
00:49:58,760 --> 00:50:03,440
books, the narrator is not
pulling, in most cases, pulling

879
00:50:03,600 --> 00:50:07,560
us out of the story to let us
know that you know, something's

880
00:50:07,560 --> 00:50:10,360
coming.
So I'm wondering, did that work

881
00:50:10,640 --> 00:50:13,920
for you guys or not?
Matt, you raised your hand, so

882
00:50:13,920 --> 00:50:16,640
let me go to you first.
Just a bit of commentary as

883
00:50:16,640 --> 00:50:18,600
well.
Someone posted on LinkedIn

884
00:50:18,640 --> 00:50:22,320
recently, Keelan Peterson, who
does mentally a magpie, she

885
00:50:22,320 --> 00:50:25,720
reviews podcasts a lot.
She actually asked what the

886
00:50:25,720 --> 00:50:28,400
difference between a podcast and
an audio book is for people.

887
00:50:29,000 --> 00:50:33,840
And the thing I commented is
that an audio book is reading a

888
00:50:33,840 --> 00:50:37,400
story as written, whereas a
podcast is intended to be a

889
00:50:37,400 --> 00:50:40,440
spoken word.
Now, here the differentiator for

890
00:50:40,440 --> 00:50:44,080
what you're referring to there
could be whether we are speaking

891
00:50:44,080 --> 00:50:47,040
a story or whether we are
speaking in front of an

892
00:50:47,040 --> 00:50:50,320
audience.
And to me, like, I didn't even

893
00:50:50,320 --> 00:50:52,320
pick that up when you played the
clip.

894
00:50:52,760 --> 00:50:55,360
I didn't even notice it, to be
fair.

895
00:50:55,600 --> 00:50:58,240
Yeah, But there might be a bias
there for podcasting.

896
00:50:58,240 --> 00:50:59,840
Be curious to hear what everyone
else thinks.

897
00:51:00,440 --> 00:51:02,560
Let's go to Sid.
I know he wanted to chime in on

898
00:51:02,560 --> 00:51:03,360
this.
Go ahead, Sid.

899
00:51:03,960 --> 00:51:06,240
Yeah, I heard him do this three
or four times.

900
00:51:06,640 --> 00:51:09,160
And the one that sticks out to
me the most of where he did it

901
00:51:09,160 --> 00:51:13,280
was when he talks about the
island that they discovered and

902
00:51:13,760 --> 00:51:15,880
they passed another island or
something.

903
00:51:15,880 --> 00:51:19,160
And he said, oh, there's a story
about that as well.

904
00:51:19,720 --> 00:51:22,720
And I forget exactly what he
said, but I think the phrasing

905
00:51:22,720 --> 00:51:26,640
that you and Ty both used is he
pulled me out of the story by

906
00:51:26,640 --> 00:51:30,840
the commentary of something that
wasn't part of the story.

907
00:51:30,840 --> 00:51:33,600
If you want to do another
episode about that island and

908
00:51:33,600 --> 00:51:35,720
what all happened on that other
island, then do another episode

909
00:51:35,720 --> 00:51:38,240
about that.
Don't pull me out of the story

910
00:51:38,240 --> 00:51:42,160
that I'm in to tell me there's
another story about the island.

911
00:51:42,960 --> 00:51:46,520
OK, OK, that's fair.
Dominic, as an award-winning

912
00:51:46,760 --> 00:51:50,320
narrative podcaster, I'm curious
your thoughts about this.

913
00:51:50,320 --> 00:51:54,000
Was this Is this a move that you
do on your podcasts and would

914
00:51:54,000 --> 00:51:56,680
you recommend it?
I did notice it.

915
00:51:56,840 --> 00:51:59,600
I have done it.
Think there's a way to do it a

916
00:51:59,600 --> 00:52:04,520
bit more subtly or even just
like, you know, because he did

917
00:52:05,040 --> 00:52:07,720
even say the phrase that's a
story for another day.

918
00:52:08,080 --> 00:52:11,280
I may do something in that
regard.

919
00:52:11,520 --> 00:52:16,200
I won't go on a whole like mini
history of the other because I

920
00:52:16,200 --> 00:52:18,720
think the word pit Karen came
up.

921
00:52:18,720 --> 00:52:21,160
I can't remember if it was the
island, separate island or

922
00:52:21,160 --> 00:52:24,520
something like that.
But yeah, I I saw it as like

923
00:52:24,520 --> 00:52:28,920
somebody breaking the 4th wall,
which I am always a fan of in

924
00:52:29,000 --> 00:52:34,000
both TV film and podcasting.
But that part probably went on a

925
00:52:34,000 --> 00:52:37,720
little longer than those because
Sid's right, he did do it like 3

926
00:52:37,720 --> 00:52:41,600
or 4 times and I was like, OK,
maybe didn't have to do that

927
00:52:41,600 --> 00:52:46,120
much to it.
I do short, short answer, I like

928
00:52:46,120 --> 00:52:48,400
the practice.
He probably did it a little bit

929
00:52:48,400 --> 00:52:49,440
too long, if that makes any
sense.

930
00:52:49,440 --> 00:52:52,600
OK, yeah, I like that.
And yeah, things like that's a

931
00:52:52,600 --> 00:52:55,560
story for another day.
That works really well for me

932
00:52:55,560 --> 00:52:59,320
personally, I think because, you
know, it's like, oh, OK, there's

933
00:52:59,560 --> 00:53:02,320
this is leading me into
something else that he may be

934
00:53:02,320 --> 00:53:05,920
telling me later down the road.
Yeah, yeah, OK, cool.

935
00:53:05,920 --> 00:53:09,320
I like that.
Dr. I'm going to ask you to hold

936
00:53:09,320 --> 00:53:13,200
their thought because I do want
to keep going here because

937
00:53:13,200 --> 00:53:15,160
there's one more clip I want to
play.

938
00:53:15,360 --> 00:53:17,840
It's the ending and I want it
because I think there's some

939
00:53:17,840 --> 00:53:21,040
things to talk about with how he
wraps up and then goes into his

940
00:53:21,040 --> 00:53:23,560
call to action.
And I do want to do the branding

941
00:53:23,560 --> 00:53:25,000
stuff.
So I'm going to ask the team if

942
00:53:25,000 --> 00:53:27,400
you have a few extra minutes.
Let's stick around.

943
00:53:27,400 --> 00:53:30,480
This will be a little bit longer
of an episode, but I think it's

944
00:53:30,480 --> 00:53:33,240
important that we get to these
last couple of points.

945
00:53:33,760 --> 00:53:37,120
This last clip, like I said, is
the conclusion.

946
00:53:37,520 --> 00:53:40,160
It's also the longest clip that
I'm going to play today.

947
00:53:40,160 --> 00:53:41,960
It's the last clip I'm going to
play today.

948
00:53:42,160 --> 00:53:44,800
But I think it's really
important that we stick with it.

949
00:53:44,800 --> 00:53:47,640
So let's play it and then we'll
talk about it on the other side.

950
00:53:51,960 --> 00:53:55,520
Well, there you have it.
What a story.

951
00:53:56,120 --> 00:53:59,320
And it's really hard to believe
that it's true.

952
00:54:00,320 --> 00:54:05,040
If there was ever a moment and a
place to to test a human being

953
00:54:06,000 --> 00:54:10,000
and to see what they're made of,
it would be a small wooden boat

954
00:54:10,720 --> 00:54:12,760
in the middle of the Pacific
Ocean.

955
00:54:13,360 --> 00:54:17,600
No food, no water, no hope of
rescue.

956
00:54:19,680 --> 00:54:26,080
Of course, we now know the
phrase Post Traumatic Stress

957
00:54:26,080 --> 00:54:31,520
Disorder, PTSD, possibly what
these men carried home with them

958
00:54:32,400 --> 00:54:36,160
very understandably.
But back then there was no such

959
00:54:36,160 --> 00:54:40,560
word or phrase.
There was no help, there was no

960
00:54:40,560 --> 00:54:43,080
understanding.
They just had to live with it

961
00:54:43,520 --> 00:54:48,000
every single day in silence.
And of course, the judgment that

962
00:54:48,000 --> 00:54:54,000
went with it, the judgment of
the decisions they made, and yet

963
00:54:54,000 --> 00:54:57,720
they survived.
So the question that I think

964
00:54:58,320 --> 00:55:05,600
raises in my mind by this story
is what would I do in that

965
00:55:05,600 --> 00:55:08,120
situation if I was one of those
men?

966
00:55:09,840 --> 00:55:12,640
So what do you think you would
have done if you were one of

967
00:55:12,640 --> 00:55:15,520
those men?
It's possibly really difficult

968
00:55:15,520 --> 00:55:18,120
to say.
Just before we finish, a couple

969
00:55:18,120 --> 00:55:21,360
of quick things.
One random fact is that this

970
00:55:21,360 --> 00:55:25,960
story was the inspiration for
the Moby Dick story by Herman

971
00:55:25,960 --> 00:55:29,680
Melville.
He had heard it from a survivor

972
00:55:29,960 --> 00:55:33,920
at sea.
So please get in touch via the

973
00:55:33,920 --> 00:55:36,440
details in the show notes
wherever you're listening.

974
00:55:36,440 --> 00:55:40,640
I'd love to hear some feedback.
I'd love to hear if how this

975
00:55:40,640 --> 00:55:43,160
podcast is landing if you're
enjoying it.

976
00:55:43,600 --> 00:55:47,360
And you'll also find details
there too in the show notes of

977
00:55:47,360 --> 00:55:49,360
further reading on the ESIC
story.

978
00:55:49,360 --> 00:55:53,840
If you want to read more, this
has been Salvage.

979
00:55:54,680 --> 00:55:57,160
And until next time, goodbye
all.

980
00:56:00,120 --> 00:56:03,640
Right.
So DRI, think you wanted to

981
00:56:04,040 --> 00:56:08,160
chime in first, How did that
full closing sequence land for

982
00:56:08,160 --> 00:56:11,280
you?
Well, I was trying to figure out

983
00:56:11,640 --> 00:56:15,960
the way to verbalize it, and I
think Sid did a good job with

984
00:56:15,960 --> 00:56:18,160
his.
He took me out of the story a

985
00:56:18,160 --> 00:56:21,960
little too soon.
It was like premature.

986
00:56:22,400 --> 00:56:26,480
It was just too soon.
It was jarring the way that we

987
00:56:26,480 --> 00:56:29,960
got to that CTA, you know,
contact me if you have any

988
00:56:29,960 --> 00:56:33,360
feedback, that sort of thing.
I think there there could have

989
00:56:33,360 --> 00:56:38,280
been like maybe a whoosh or some
kind of trigger sound to say,

990
00:56:38,280 --> 00:56:42,200
OK, now we're done.
And now here are some notes.

991
00:56:42,440 --> 00:56:44,480
This is based on a.
But, you know, something like

992
00:56:44,480 --> 00:56:47,240
that.
But yeah, and also, I want to

993
00:56:47,240 --> 00:56:51,440
get this in before we're done.
I think that this kind of

994
00:56:51,440 --> 00:56:55,960
podcast would lend itself very
well if it had a trailer.

995
00:56:56,400 --> 00:57:01,200
I think a trailer would really
would really be impactful,

996
00:57:01,520 --> 00:57:06,240
taking a few clips from both of
these episodes, maybe a third

997
00:57:06,240 --> 00:57:09,920
episode if he's got that in the
can, and building a trailer

998
00:57:09,920 --> 00:57:12,520
around this.
That's what I'm thinking.

999
00:57:12,520 --> 00:57:13,080
Yeah.
OK.

1000
00:57:13,080 --> 00:57:17,160
So yeah, if you go and look on
say Apple or Spotify, he has a

1001
00:57:17,160 --> 00:57:19,800
couple of episodes.
But yeah, I didn't see a trailer

1002
00:57:19,840 --> 00:57:21,160
either.
And I yeah, I think that would

1003
00:57:21,160 --> 00:57:26,000
be that would lend itself well.
And I'll say this, you know, I

1004
00:57:26,000 --> 00:57:30,920
always believe a trailer will do
will be an additional plus for a

1005
00:57:30,920 --> 00:57:33,920
podcast.
But I'll say, if his podcast

1006
00:57:33,920 --> 00:57:38,400
episodes always start with that
first minute intro, as this one

1007
00:57:38,400 --> 00:57:40,720
was that we played, I think it's
just fine.

1008
00:57:40,720 --> 00:57:43,520
Like if some if a listener's
coming in for the first time and

1009
00:57:43,520 --> 00:57:47,560
just sees the two episodes press
play on one of the two, they're

1010
00:57:47,560 --> 00:57:50,400
most likely going to get a very
good feel for what the episode

1011
00:57:50,400 --> 00:57:53,680
is about, in my opinion.
But yeah, I'm with you.

1012
00:57:53,680 --> 00:57:56,720
I think a trailer only supports
and helps what he's doing.

1013
00:57:57,600 --> 00:57:59,520
Let's see here.
Anyone else?

1014
00:57:59,520 --> 00:58:01,760
Any thoughts?
Did anyone else feel the same

1015
00:58:01,760 --> 00:58:06,080
way as far as that transition
from ending the story?

1016
00:58:06,280 --> 00:58:10,000
Like I liked the wrap up.
I like I always like how in a

1017
00:58:10,000 --> 00:58:13,000
movie too, for example, you'll
see it, watch a movie and then

1018
00:58:13,000 --> 00:58:17,000
at the end sometimes they'll
give you some some text on the

1019
00:58:17,000 --> 00:58:20,600
screen that says what happens to
the characters now, you know,

1020
00:58:20,600 --> 00:58:23,120
moving forward.
I like that kind of stuff.

1021
00:58:23,120 --> 00:58:27,680
I think that works well and I
like how he tied it back to

1022
00:58:27,680 --> 00:58:32,200
today with PTSD references and
then how he even asked us a

1023
00:58:32,200 --> 00:58:36,000
question to think about, you
know, almost like a take away

1024
00:58:36,000 --> 00:58:39,720
segment, if you will.
I agree that there might have

1025
00:58:40,120 --> 00:58:42,520
it.
It did feel a little bit jarring

1026
00:58:42,960 --> 00:58:46,920
when he then it's went to his
CTA asking us to connect with

1027
00:58:46,920 --> 00:58:49,480
him.
I agree also Dr. Maybe it's a

1028
00:58:49,480 --> 00:58:51,680
whoosh.
Maybe it's an ocean sound

1029
00:58:51,880 --> 00:58:56,440
transition or something to just
to kind of cleanse the palate,

1030
00:58:56,800 --> 00:58:59,280
but I think it should be quick.
Something something in line,

1031
00:58:59,280 --> 00:59:03,480
like an ocean sound or one of
those fog horns or something,

1032
00:59:03,520 --> 00:59:05,400
you know?
Yeah, I think it should be

1033
00:59:05,400 --> 00:59:08,240
something relatively quick
because look, when we wrap up a

1034
00:59:08,240 --> 00:59:12,040
story, the audience should feel
like the story's wrapping up.

1035
00:59:12,040 --> 00:59:15,840
And the problem with that is if
it's wrapped up to them, they

1036
00:59:15,840 --> 00:59:19,240
may just want to hit stop on the
episode and then they'll miss

1037
00:59:19,240 --> 00:59:21,800
the whole CTA.
So I think you have to be

1038
00:59:21,800 --> 00:59:23,920
careful with how you do that
transition.

1039
00:59:23,920 --> 00:59:28,800
But I do think maybe even a long
pause, a longer pause might be

1040
00:59:28,800 --> 00:59:31,320
all that's needed there.
A longer pause.

1041
00:59:31,360 --> 00:59:32,840
Yeah, I agree.
I agree.

1042
00:59:33,200 --> 00:59:37,720
And also we did some digging and
we found out that he he doesn't

1043
00:59:37,720 --> 00:59:42,680
have a website for his podcast
and I would encourage him to

1044
00:59:42,680 --> 00:59:47,120
check out pod page for this.
Yes, we will include a pod page

1045
00:59:47,120 --> 00:59:49,840
link in the show notes.
I think that's a great

1046
00:59:49,840 --> 00:59:50,800
suggestion.
Yeah.

1047
00:59:50,800 --> 00:59:53,600
He only seems to have maybe a
Buzz Sprout page.

1048
00:59:53,600 --> 00:59:56,560
But yeah, and let's talk about
that just for a quick.

1049
00:59:56,600 --> 00:59:59,640
Well, actually I'm going to pin
on that for a second and that

1050
00:59:59,640 --> 01:00:02,240
because I thought saw Dominic
wanted to chime in about the

1051
01:00:02,240 --> 01:00:06,480
whole transition from ending the
story and going into the CTA.

1052
01:00:06,520 --> 01:00:09,360
Go ahead, Dominic.
Just really quickly, I think

1053
01:00:09,400 --> 01:00:14,160
usually what I try to do is, you
know, as I as I'm ending the

1054
01:00:14,160 --> 01:00:17,880
story, I'm letting the music,
I'll bump up the music just a

1055
01:00:17,880 --> 01:00:21,000
little bit, you know, and then
let it fade out, right.

1056
01:00:21,000 --> 01:00:23,880
And so that's usually like a
nice palate cleanser.

1057
01:00:23,880 --> 01:00:27,600
It typically in the narrative,
especially given his pacing, you

1058
01:00:27,640 --> 01:00:31,960
you don't want something jarring
like a foghorn or something like

1059
01:00:31,960 --> 01:00:36,280
that, artistically speaking, of
course, only because like that

1060
01:00:36,440 --> 01:00:40,880
kind of go, it's kind of
contradictory to the format that

1061
01:00:40,880 --> 01:00:42,640
he's kind of created a little
bit.

1062
01:00:42,640 --> 01:00:46,240
So I do agree with the you know
the transition, but you may want

1063
01:00:46,240 --> 01:00:49,640
to something a little bit softer
than you know what's been

1064
01:00:49,640 --> 01:00:50,640
suggested.
OK.

1065
01:00:50,960 --> 01:00:53,040
Yeah, that makes sense.
Thank you, Dominic.

1066
01:00:53,440 --> 01:00:56,880
Matt, did you want to chime in?
Yeah, just a very quick bit of

1067
01:00:56,880 --> 01:01:00,400
advice that I heard from working
a bit with Mason Amadeus on

1068
01:01:00,400 --> 01:01:02,320
Digital Folklore, another
podcast.

1069
01:01:02,720 --> 01:01:05,560
When you're building a story
when there was scripting X, it's

1070
01:01:05,560 --> 01:01:08,640
an entirely audio, experienced
narrative experience that

1071
01:01:08,680 --> 01:01:11,640
intersperses interviews.
But as you write it, thinking

1072
01:01:11,640 --> 01:01:14,920
about where anyone is in the
scene, he said, was the best way

1073
01:01:14,920 --> 01:01:17,320
to script it, to make it as
engaging as possible.

1074
01:01:17,320 --> 01:01:21,200
I think the similar, similar
approach could be good here

1075
01:01:21,920 --> 01:01:25,080
because it places the story and
him as a character or a narrator

1076
01:01:25,080 --> 01:01:28,520
in the story as the primary
thing that guides what happens

1077
01:01:28,520 --> 01:01:30,480
next.
So we could say, you know how to

1078
01:01:30,480 --> 01:01:34,720
transition sound there, bit of
music, whoosh, waves, whatever.

1079
01:01:35,200 --> 01:01:38,960
That's the tactical version.
But I think for him figuring out

1080
01:01:38,960 --> 01:01:43,440
who he is in this story, where
the story sits, and then

1081
01:01:43,440 --> 01:01:47,120
thinking about the scene, like,
is he in an armchair?

1082
01:01:47,120 --> 01:01:50,720
Is he closing a book when he
finishes the story and how does

1083
01:01:50,720 --> 01:01:55,240
that come out in the audio?
When we have our Imaginarium, I

1084
01:01:55,240 --> 01:01:57,120
think that might be a really
good way to approach it.

1085
01:01:57,720 --> 01:01:58,800
Yeah.
Thank you, Matt.

1086
01:01:58,800 --> 01:02:01,080
Appreciate that.
I'm not going to expand on it

1087
01:02:01,080 --> 01:02:03,720
just for sake of time, but thank
you for that.

1088
01:02:03,720 --> 01:02:07,520
I think those are good points.
And let's just quickly go back

1089
01:02:07,520 --> 01:02:12,240
to the reference of no website
and that call to action at the

1090
01:02:12,240 --> 01:02:14,760
end.
I personally, as the listener

1091
01:02:14,760 --> 01:02:17,280
found it really hard to take
action.

1092
01:02:17,560 --> 01:02:20,040
He asked for feedback, right?
Well, we're giving him the

1093
01:02:20,040 --> 01:02:22,600
feedback here today.
So he's getting it, but in the

1094
01:02:22,600 --> 01:02:25,520
more traditional sense.
I had no idea how I could

1095
01:02:25,520 --> 01:02:28,320
contact him.
There was no real way.

1096
01:02:28,320 --> 01:02:31,240
I went into the Apple page to
see if there were links to a

1097
01:02:31,240 --> 01:02:34,120
website or to see if there was
an e-mail address.

1098
01:02:34,480 --> 01:02:36,960
I went to Spotify looking for
the same thing.

1099
01:02:37,200 --> 01:02:39,920
I went on Google searching for a
website.

1100
01:02:39,920 --> 01:02:42,960
I could not find anything.
As a matter of fact, I had a

1101
01:02:43,000 --> 01:02:46,400
hard time just even finding his
RSS feed somewhere.

1102
01:02:47,040 --> 01:02:50,920
So I think that this is, you
know, and I've seen that he's

1103
01:02:50,920 --> 01:02:54,520
also gone on other platforms
asking people for feedback, like

1104
01:02:54,520 --> 01:02:56,440
on Reddit and what and what have
you.

1105
01:02:57,000 --> 01:02:59,720
I think if he really wants this
feedback, he's got to make it

1106
01:02:59,720 --> 01:03:02,760
very easy for the audience to
connect with him.

1107
01:03:03,600 --> 01:03:06,840
Give them the specific way.
If you're going to do that at

1108
01:03:06,840 --> 01:03:10,640
the end of your show, tell them
exactly how. e-mail me, give the

1109
01:03:10,640 --> 01:03:15,720
e-mail address.
And to D Rs point, I think we

1110
01:03:15,720 --> 01:03:18,960
need to create for this podcast
a home base.

1111
01:03:19,560 --> 01:03:21,120
And I think that starts with a
podcast.

1112
01:03:21,120 --> 01:03:22,720
I'm sorry, starts with a
website.

1113
01:03:23,520 --> 01:03:26,000
There was I also couldn't find
any social media presence.

1114
01:03:26,000 --> 01:03:28,880
And I'm not encouraging him to
start with social media presence

1115
01:03:28,880 --> 01:03:31,600
as your home base.
But I think having some other

1116
01:03:31,600 --> 01:03:35,160
ways that your audience can find
you is going to increase your

1117
01:03:35,160 --> 01:03:37,560
odds of getting the feedback
that you're looking for.

1118
01:03:37,920 --> 01:03:40,280
And I'll go say this one last
thing.

1119
01:03:40,680 --> 01:03:43,440
Be specific about what kind of
feedback that you want.

1120
01:03:43,440 --> 01:03:46,640
Don't just ask for feedback
because it's going to be harder

1121
01:03:46,640 --> 01:03:49,040
for people to know what, what to
say.

1122
01:03:49,440 --> 01:03:52,360
Be very specific.
You know, did something I shared

1123
01:03:52,360 --> 01:03:55,440
with you today about this story
really stick with you?

1124
01:03:56,040 --> 01:03:59,040
Or was there something about
this podcast that I, that I

1125
01:03:59,040 --> 01:04:01,920
spoke about or I did that didn't
sit well with you?

1126
01:04:01,920 --> 01:04:04,920
But just ask for something
specific.

1127
01:04:05,520 --> 01:04:08,360
Specific, yeah.
I also wanted to mention that

1128
01:04:08,360 --> 01:04:13,440
through our research, it looks
like he's missing on some of the

1129
01:04:13,440 --> 01:04:18,600
platforms like True Fans Podcast
Index, Evox, iheart.

1130
01:04:18,920 --> 01:04:24,840
So it would help his discovery
if he was on those platforms.

1131
01:04:25,280 --> 01:04:26,600
Yeah, fair enough.
I didn't.

1132
01:04:26,600 --> 01:04:29,520
I can't verify whether that's
the case or not, but yeah, go

1133
01:04:29,520 --> 01:04:33,160
ahead, Dominic.
Just to be fair, I think the

1134
01:04:33,160 --> 01:04:37,160
fact that he it appears to be a
new podcast, it does take a few

1135
01:04:37,520 --> 01:04:40,040
months or weeks to kind of get
on some of those platforms.

1136
01:04:40,040 --> 01:04:44,600
Like I know for sure, like when
you upload your first show, it

1137
01:04:44,600 --> 01:04:47,320
takes a few weeks before you can
get on iheart, right?

1138
01:04:47,320 --> 01:04:49,280
Like I know that through Lipson,
right?

1139
01:04:49,280 --> 01:04:50,680
Like I think it takes like 6
weeks.

1140
01:04:50,680 --> 01:04:53,480
You have to like have beyond the
RSS feed.

1141
01:04:53,480 --> 01:04:55,760
So sometimes they may just be
it's a brand new show.

1142
01:04:56,080 --> 01:04:59,000
The website thing I agree with
or whatever as far as like you

1143
01:04:59,000 --> 01:05:01,480
could do that, but some of these
things they may just take time.

1144
01:05:02,040 --> 01:05:04,960
I agree wholeheartedly.
Thank you, Dominic, and thank

1145
01:05:04,960 --> 01:05:08,720
you to all of you for not just
breaking this episode down but

1146
01:05:08,720 --> 01:05:12,200
also staying a little later
today so that we could do this

1147
01:05:12,200 --> 01:05:14,760
justice.
This is overall, I think if I

1148
01:05:14,760 --> 01:05:18,720
had to guess, nobody gave their
actual five star rating, but I

1149
01:05:18,720 --> 01:05:21,560
would say this show probably
gets at least Yeah, several

1150
01:05:21,560 --> 01:05:23,920
people are holding up a five out
of five.

1151
01:05:24,280 --> 01:05:25,720
Matt says 6.
I was.

1152
01:05:25,720 --> 01:05:28,360
Going to I gave it in the chat.
Oh, what did you say, Dominic?

1153
01:05:28,920 --> 01:05:32,640
I said five star review a game
right after I listened to the

1154
01:05:32,640 --> 01:05:35,360
show and I said fantastic show
awards downloading.

1155
01:05:35,760 --> 01:05:38,280
Right on, Right on.
Yeah, I was going to say at

1156
01:05:38,280 --> 01:05:42,520
least a 4 1/2 out of five, but
it sounds more now like a 5 out

1157
01:05:42,520 --> 01:05:44,880
of five from the majority of our
team.

1158
01:05:45,040 --> 01:05:46,840
Sid, did you want a final word
on this?

1159
01:05:47,400 --> 01:05:49,560
Excuse me, we just had a
question because we didn't get

1160
01:05:49,760 --> 01:05:53,160
to the branding and stuff and
all of that.

1161
01:05:53,280 --> 01:05:55,560
Going to give him any feedback
about that because I do believe

1162
01:05:55,560 --> 01:05:57,960
there's some things here.
I do think there are some things

1163
01:05:57,960 --> 01:06:01,880
that he could do that could
increase his discovery and his

1164
01:06:01,880 --> 01:06:07,840
reach by cover art, you know,
maybe even a name change and

1165
01:06:07,840 --> 01:06:10,360
things and thinking about SEO
keywords and stuff like that.

1166
01:06:10,360 --> 01:06:12,680
Are you going to give him or do
you are going to give him any

1167
01:06:12,680 --> 01:06:15,880
specific feedback about that?
Yeah, we can do that behind the

1168
01:06:15,880 --> 01:06:18,000
scenes.
Yeah, I think we've run out of

1169
01:06:18,000 --> 01:06:21,600
time to do it today, but yes, we
can definitely do more of that

1170
01:06:21,600 --> 01:06:25,000
for him or maybe even talk about
it on another episode.

1171
01:06:25,280 --> 01:06:27,240
So, yeah, thank you for calling
that out, Sid.

1172
01:06:27,240 --> 01:06:30,240
And again, thank you to all of
you for participating today.

1173
01:06:30,400 --> 01:06:33,720
We're back tomorrow with our
special guest and we would love

1174
01:06:33,720 --> 01:06:36,560
for you to be there.
Also bring your wins tomorrow as

1175
01:06:36,560 --> 01:06:37,880
well.
We're going to celebrate our

1176
01:06:37,880 --> 01:06:40,360
wins after we have that
interview.

1177
01:06:40,520 --> 01:06:44,160
So until tomorrow, make it a
great day.

1178
01:06:44,160 --> 01:06:45,400
Everybody.
Take care.