April 15, 2026

496. Podcast Piracy, Apple Video, and the Future of Growth

496. Podcast Piracy, Apple Video, and the Future of Growth
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon

Today, we unpack one of the biggest emerging threats in podcasting right now: AI-powered podcast piracy. Copycat shows are using stolen names, branding, and even content to pull attention away from original creators. What seems like a niche issue points to a bigger shift, your podcast is no longer just content, it is something you may need to actively protect. This episode breaks down how it is happening, why it matters, and what creators should be thinking about moving forward.

The PMC cast and crew also zoom out to where podcasting is heading next. From Apple’s push into video and the real costs and tradeoffs that come with it, to new data showing how creators are making money through direct audience support instead of ads, there is a lot changing beneath the surface. You will also hear updates from Spotify, evolving platform strategies, and what it actually means to grow a podcast today. With everything changing this fast, what you focus on now will shape how your podcast grows next.

Episode Highlights:

[01:20] Hosts and how to join

[01:59] EPC Live and giveaways

[03:57] Podcast stats snapshot

[05:18] Top charts roundup

[07:22] Events this week

[09:42] Empowered Podcasting updates

[10:54] Creator business spotlight

[12:00] Podcasting as a business

[15:30] Apple video podcasting HLS

[24:18] Captivate pricing and bandwidth

[26:23] Skipping Apple Video

[27:25] Captivate Video Hosting Logic

[29:07] Apple Video Feels Unfinished

[30:37] Stats and Download Counting

[34:20] Spotify Audio Only Toggle

[35:32] Overcast Premium Price Hike

[37:07] Sam Altman Podcast PR

[41:51] Shonda AI Podcast Platform

[44:16] Podcast Piracy Copycats

[48:31] AI Ethics and Black Mirror

[50:44] Patreon Direct Fan Revenue

[54:53] Wrap Up and Tomorrow Preview

Links & Resources:

Featured Podcast Evaluation (Apr. 16th) SALVAGE:

https://pod.link/1890302704/episode/QnV6enNwcm91dC0xODk1NDgxNw

The Business of Podcasting (from today's Business Bite):

https://www.loeb.com/en/insights/publications/2026/04/how-successful-creators-approach-the-business-of-podcasting

Captivate Explains Apple Podcasts Video:

https://www.youtube.com/live/skzo4OcpTfk?si=lfY8uHYnLYgiUOnE

The Podcasting Morning Chat:

⁠⁠www.podcastingmorningchat.com⁠⁠

Ways to Watch or Listen:⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.podcastingmorningchat.com/joinus/

Meet the PMC Cast and Crew:

⁠⁠https://podcastingmorningchat.com/people⁠⁠

Join The Empowered Podcasting Facebook Group:

⁠⁠www.facebook.com/groups/empoweredpodcasting⁠⁠⁠

Book A Free Call With Marc:

https://calendly.com/ironickmedia/freestrategycall

Application To Submit Your Show For Evaluation:

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcastingmorningchat.com/eval⁠⁠

Join us every other Monday at 7 AM ET for the Obsession Worthy Podcasts:⁠⁠⁠

http://podcastingmorningchat.com/owp/⁠⁠

Join us LIVE every weekday morning at 7 am ET (US) on ⁠Clubhouse⁠: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcastingmorningchat.com/clubhouse⁠⁠

EPC3 Speaker Application:⁠⁠ ⁠https://empoweredpodcasting.com/speakers

Powered by⁠⁠⁠ ⁠iRonickMedia.com⁠⁠⁠⁠ and⁠ ⁠ContentCreatorsAccountant.com⁠⁠

Send in your mailbag questions:⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://www.podcastingmorningchat.contact/⁠⁠⁠⁠ or ⁠marc@ironickmedia.com

Want to be a guest on The Podcasting Morning Chat? Send me a message on PodMatch, here:

https://podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/1729879899384520035bad21b


1
00:00:05,400 --> 00:00:10,120
Good morning podcasters.
Today is Wednesday, April 15th,

2
00:00:10,760 --> 00:00:15,520
2026, and today it's our podcast
news and comment edition

3
00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:20,080
covering rising podcast piracy
threats, why treating your show

4
00:00:20,080 --> 00:00:22,960
like a real business matters
more than ever, and surprising

5
00:00:22,960 --> 00:00:25,280
new creator earnings shaking up
the industry.

6
00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:28,560
So if you're listening live on
Clubhouse, hit the share button,

7
00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:32,320
bottom right, no top right hand
side of the screen and share it.

8
00:00:32,320 --> 00:00:34,880
However, Clubhouse lets you.
And if you're catching us via

9
00:00:34,880 --> 00:00:37,800
podcast, YouTube, etcetera,
please share this with a fellow

10
00:00:37,800 --> 00:00:41,680
podcaster.
And now give us about 30 seconds

11
00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:44,520
and we'll get things rolling.
Thanks for being here.

12
00:00:51,920 --> 00:00:55,800
The Podcasting Morning Chat is
powered by Ironic Media, helping

13
00:00:55,800 --> 00:01:00,640
podcasters launch, Polish and
grow great shows, and by Content

14
00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:03,600
Creators Accountant, helping
creators build real business

15
00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:22,400
behind their content.
Good morning again podcasting

16
00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:24,360
morning chat.
Thank you so much for being

17
00:01:24,360 --> 00:01:26,640
here.
I am your host Mark Ronik and

18
00:01:26,640 --> 00:01:31,160
currently on stage with me.
My Co hosts we have DRFA, Ralph

19
00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:35,120
Estep, Sid Meadows, Jonathan
Howard, Nick Naulback and BC

20
00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:37,880
Babbles.
And from the audience Tide AKA

21
00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:40,160
Nikki has joined us on stage as
well.

22
00:01:40,160 --> 00:01:43,680
Thank you for being up here
Nikki, and hello to Bez, our

23
00:01:43,680 --> 00:01:47,320
first audience member in the
Clubhouse chat.

24
00:01:47,800 --> 00:01:50,720
And if you are watching us on
video and want to know more

25
00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:54,880
about how to join us on stage
here on Clubhouse, just go to

26
00:01:54,880 --> 00:01:59,080
podcastingmorningchat.com/join
us.

27
00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:03,080
Also quick note while you're
typing in podcasting morning

28
00:02:03,080 --> 00:02:08,560
chat.com do a slash EPC live
empowered podcasting conference

29
00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:13,040
live EPC live.
We are going Live Today myself,

30
00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:17,520
my business partners Co host
Jason Sir Cone, Rich Perry and

31
00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:22,360
also Hall of Famer Dave Jackson
joining us live.

32
00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:26,240
He is one of our partners for
Empowered Podcasting,

33
00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:31,040
specifically Pod Page and Dave
is a big part of Pod Page.

34
00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:33,640
So we're going to talk to Dave a
little bit about Pod Page, a

35
00:02:33,640 --> 00:02:37,000
little bit about podcasting
should be a good time.

36
00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:41,400
So come join us there 1:00 PM
Eastern today, April 15th tax

37
00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:44,480
Day, which happens to be well,
we'll get to it in a minute.

38
00:02:44,680 --> 00:02:50,840
I'll pause right there and I
will remind you that you if

39
00:02:50,840 --> 00:02:54,440
you're interested in some free
podcast gear, you may want to

40
00:02:54,440 --> 00:02:58,480
pay attention here because we
are in the final days of the

41
00:02:58,480 --> 00:03:03,200
chance to win Ralph E Steps Rd.
Caster Duo plus a free

42
00:03:03,200 --> 00:03:07,120
monetization strategy session
with him designed to help you

43
00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:11,280
make smarter moves with your
show, particularly financial and

44
00:03:11,280 --> 00:03:15,640
monetization moves.
The duo is a great piece of gear

45
00:03:15,640 --> 00:03:17,240
because it helps you sound
Polish.

46
00:03:17,480 --> 00:03:21,120
It works really well with
multiple audio sources and gives

47
00:03:21,120 --> 00:03:24,680
you hands on control over your
live production all in one

48
00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:27,760
compact unit.
And when I say compact, I mean

49
00:03:27,760 --> 00:03:29,840
it.
It's smaller size makes it

50
00:03:29,840 --> 00:03:35,160
especially convenient if you're
traveling on the go, recording

51
00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:38,640
on the go.
So check that out over at

52
00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:44,920
Podcasting Morning chat.com/duo
and you can find multiple ways

53
00:03:44,920 --> 00:03:47,320
to enter multiple chances to
win.

54
00:03:47,320 --> 00:03:53,160
So go there, increase your odds
to win a chance at Ralph's

55
00:03:53,600 --> 00:04:00,200
Roadcaster duo.
OK, let's dive in to the news.

56
00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:07,600
And as I like to do when we
start our news segments every

57
00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:10,960
Wednesday, 1st, a little bit of
data for you.

58
00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:14,760
And I'm reading straight from
podcastbusinessjournal.com.

59
00:04:14,760 --> 00:04:17,720
This is where I get this
specific data.

60
00:04:18,279 --> 00:04:21,560
They say that a helpful number
to understand the amount of

61
00:04:21,560 --> 00:04:26,200
podcasts being created is the
total number of quote active

62
00:04:26,400 --> 00:04:28,200
podcasts.
End Quote.

63
00:04:28,600 --> 00:04:31,240
These are podcasts that are
still being updated and

64
00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:34,160
therefore actively marketing
themselves.

65
00:04:34,160 --> 00:04:38,680
If you are making shows, podcast
episodes, you might consider

66
00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:40,600
this number to be your
competition.

67
00:04:40,920 --> 00:04:43,520
Even though that's not my
favorite word to use in this

68
00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:46,080
space.
But rather than the big number

69
00:04:46,080 --> 00:04:52,640
of almost 5 million podcasts
that podcast index reports.

70
00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:56,480
So with that being said, the
total podcast updated in this

71
00:04:56,480 --> 00:05:04,320
past week, 182,544 thousand,
which happens to be down 2.2%

72
00:05:04,320 --> 00:05:06,760
from the previous week.
And if we want to look at the

73
00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:11,280
last 30 days of podcasts that
have been updated, we're looking

74
00:05:11,280 --> 00:05:16,720
at 365,000 and change, which is
up a half a percent from the

75
00:05:16,720 --> 00:05:21,200
previous month.
All right, let's go to UDR for

76
00:05:21,240 --> 00:05:26,360
our top five lists, both from
Apple and not Spotify this week.

77
00:05:26,360 --> 00:05:29,440
Go for it.
Right, so the first one I want

78
00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:35,640
to give you is going to be Apple
and #5 is the Joe Rogan

79
00:05:35,640 --> 00:05:37,480
Experience.
Love that.

80
00:05:38,120 --> 00:05:47,440
Number 4 is Pod Save America #3
Tiffany Day, 5 #2 is Crime

81
00:05:47,520 --> 00:05:52,120
Junkie, and the number one
podcast on Apple is The Daily.

82
00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:57,360
I think the timpani cut you off
there at #3 I think that was

83
00:05:57,360 --> 00:05:58,120
Dateline.
Oh.

84
00:05:58,680 --> 00:05:59,760
It was dateline.
Right.

85
00:05:59,760 --> 00:06:00,440
Got it.
OK.

86
00:06:01,080 --> 00:06:05,720
Crime Junkie and number one was
daily, so then the next one is

87
00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:09,400
good.
Pods top five, always fun.

88
00:06:10,040 --> 00:06:20,120
So #5 is morbid #4 is up first
from NPR #3 Coffees up dip.

89
00:06:20,480 --> 00:06:28,320
Dip number. 3 is Ted Talk daily,
number 2 is well, that's

90
00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:31,560
interesting, and the number one
is the daily.

91
00:06:31,760 --> 00:06:34,000
Number one is the daily again,
OK.

92
00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:36,800
And by the way, we are not
editing out those slips.

93
00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:41,480
I will take that.
I will take those lumps and be

94
00:06:41,480 --> 00:06:43,160
OK with it.
That's fine.

95
00:06:44,560 --> 00:06:47,720
We'll leave them there.
Thank you, Dr. Yeah, Morbid.

96
00:06:48,280 --> 00:06:52,400
Let's see that description is
It's a lighthearted nightmare in

97
00:06:52,400 --> 00:06:54,680
here, weirdos.
That's how the description

98
00:06:54,680 --> 00:06:57,360
starts.
Morbid is a true crime, creepy

99
00:06:57,360 --> 00:07:02,880
history and all things spooky
podcast hosted by an autopsy

100
00:07:02,880 --> 00:07:06,120
technician and a hair stylist.
Interesting.

101
00:07:06,120 --> 00:07:08,760
All right, well I could see
there would be intrigue with

102
00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:12,120
that kind of show.
So not surprised to see that at

103
00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:16,680
#5 have not listened to Morbid
yet, but I am interested now.

104
00:07:16,920 --> 00:07:19,320
OK cool.
Thank you Dr. for those top

105
00:07:19,320 --> 00:07:23,160
fives.
Appreciate that and let's keep

106
00:07:23,160 --> 00:07:27,120
it moving with some events.
I will make these short and

107
00:07:27,120 --> 00:07:29,600
sweet today.
These are all events happening

108
00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:35,000
this very week.
So Military creator Con, we've

109
00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:37,800
talked about that a few times.
That's happening in Arlington,

110
00:07:37,800 --> 00:07:41,680
TX April 16th.
I think it's for more than one

111
00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:44,120
day.
Sid, I know you're in the area

112
00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:47,960
and I know although you're not
necessarily a military creator,

113
00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:50,680
I know you know several people
that are going to be there.

114
00:07:50,680 --> 00:07:52,480
Are you going to actually go
check this out?

115
00:07:53,120 --> 00:07:55,840
Oh, thank you so much for this
reminder Mark.

116
00:07:56,120 --> 00:07:59,320
I am not going to the event
itself, however.

117
00:07:59,800 --> 00:08:02,000
Tomorrow, Thursday.
Tomorrow is Thursday, right?

118
00:08:02,800 --> 00:08:10,280
I'm having dinner with Shay,
Janae, Sean and Simona and I get

119
00:08:10,280 --> 00:08:12,160
to meet little baby Sunny
tomorrow.

120
00:08:12,160 --> 00:08:14,440
Oh, wow.
Simona's newborn.

121
00:08:14,440 --> 00:08:16,760
That's awesome.
Very cool, Sid.

122
00:08:16,880 --> 00:08:18,160
Thank you.
For yeah, we're having dinner at

123
00:08:18,280 --> 00:08:20,560
5:30 and then we're going to,
I'm going to go, I'm going to be

124
00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:23,560
there plus one to the opening
event and then I'm coming home.

125
00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:27,400
So cool, Very, very cool.
Glad you're going to see all of

126
00:08:27,400 --> 00:08:30,680
those community members.
Please take pictures and post

127
00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:34,039
them in our Facebook group or
send them to me and I will Very

128
00:08:34,039 --> 00:08:36,799
cool.
Thank you Sid for sharing that.

129
00:08:36,799 --> 00:08:39,400
Also, by the way, we haven't
talked about this in a couple

130
00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:43,520
weeks, but Podcasting Made
Simple live, that is Alex

131
00:08:43,520 --> 00:08:48,240
Sanfilippo's event.
He is of course the founder of

132
00:08:48,280 --> 00:08:52,840
Podmatch and Podcasting Made
Simple is his podcast, but every

133
00:08:52,840 --> 00:08:58,280
quarter he does a live event
virtually and that is usually

134
00:08:58,280 --> 00:09:01,640
hosted by multiple voices in the
podcast industry.

135
00:09:01,640 --> 00:09:05,960
So consider it similar to like a
convention but a one day event

136
00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:08,040
all online.
Check that out.

137
00:09:08,040 --> 00:09:11,760
You can find out more at
podmatch.com or just Google

138
00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:16,320
Podcasting Made Simple live.
By the way, BCI saw you flash of

139
00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:19,120
pepper earlier and I forgot to
go to you.

140
00:09:19,120 --> 00:09:21,400
Did you want to add anything or
ask anything?

141
00:09:22,080 --> 00:09:24,360
Yeah, I was going to say with
those a couple of mess ups

142
00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:26,760
earlier, Ralph, it's time for
you to make a new Jingle foam

143
00:09:26,760 --> 00:09:31,160
Mark called Buttons are Hard.
That is true.

144
00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:35,480
That is my infamous mistake that
I've made all through

145
00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:37,640
podcasting.
I have a problem hitting the

146
00:09:37,640 --> 00:09:42,120
right buttons and I accept that
it is what it is.

147
00:09:42,560 --> 00:09:45,000
All right.
And finally, as I mentioned

148
00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:48,800
earlier, Empowered Podcasting
Live does happen today, 1:00 PM

149
00:09:48,800 --> 00:09:51,360
Eastern.
We have some big announcements

150
00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:55,000
including, well, I'm just going
to tell you, well, I don't want

151
00:09:55,000 --> 00:09:57,360
to tell you yet.
It has to do with our speaker

152
00:09:57,360 --> 00:10:00,200
deadline today.
So if you haven't submitted yet,

153
00:10:00,360 --> 00:10:02,400
now is a good time to go and do
that.

154
00:10:02,400 --> 00:10:08,400
Empoweredpodcasting.com/speakers
and Apply to Speak If you've got

155
00:10:08,400 --> 00:10:12,640
some knowledge, experience that
you think is valuable and other

156
00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:16,120
podcasts may want to know it
would love for you to apply to

157
00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:19,480
speak.
You can do a presentation 30

158
00:10:19,480 --> 00:10:23,480
minutes or a workshop style,
which would be we give you an

159
00:10:23,480 --> 00:10:26,480
extra 15 minutes on that 45
minutes so it can be a little

160
00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:29,280
more interactive.
So go check that out.

161
00:10:29,280 --> 00:10:32,560
Go apply today.
I promise you, if you've got

162
00:10:32,560 --> 00:10:35,720
experience doing this, you
probably have some knowledge to

163
00:10:35,720 --> 00:10:38,080
share with some fellow
podcasters.

164
00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:43,400
So go check that out.
Now again, button pressing.

165
00:10:43,400 --> 00:10:46,440
I got to play this quick tip,
smart move.

166
00:10:46,440 --> 00:10:51,360
Yeah, content creators business
fight.

167
00:10:53,640 --> 00:10:58,440
Let's go to the content creators
business by which is brought to

168
00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:01,680
you by the guy who's hosting
this segment, Ralph Estep,

169
00:11:01,680 --> 00:11:05,000
junior of Content
creatorsaccountant.com.

170
00:11:05,480 --> 00:11:09,040
If you don't know by now, Ralph
is a licensed accountant, also

171
00:11:09,040 --> 00:11:12,560
happens to be my accountant.
I think Dr. could use his help

172
00:11:12,560 --> 00:11:15,160
as well.
That's a pre show discussion we

173
00:11:15,160 --> 00:11:18,520
had earlier.
With over 30 years of experience

174
00:11:18,520 --> 00:11:20,520
at
contentcreatorsaccountant.com.

175
00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:24,000
Ralph helps creators stop
guessing about taxes and money,

176
00:11:24,200 --> 00:11:26,920
turning financial chaos into
clarity.

177
00:11:27,680 --> 00:11:32,840
So I highly recommend Ralph.
He really helped us big time

178
00:11:32,840 --> 00:11:36,280
with our taxes this year.
We are very happy with the

179
00:11:36,280 --> 00:11:39,240
results of it.
So thank you, Ralph, for that.

180
00:11:39,240 --> 00:11:42,720
And I know today it must be like
a holiday for you or at least a

181
00:11:42,720 --> 00:11:46,840
celebration for you because
April 15th is the tax deadline.

182
00:11:46,840 --> 00:11:49,560
All right, Ralph, I know you
have two interesting stories

183
00:11:49,560 --> 00:11:51,000
today.
Take it away.

184
00:11:51,400 --> 00:11:53,160
I do and thank you.
Yeah, a little bit of a

185
00:11:53,160 --> 00:11:55,720
celebration today, but I woke up
not feeling great today.

186
00:11:55,720 --> 00:11:59,400
So I might have about 80% of my
normal energy, but we'll get

187
00:11:59,400 --> 00:12:02,120
through it.
So this first one, the title of

188
00:12:02,120 --> 00:12:04,360
this is your podcast is a
Business.

189
00:12:04,680 --> 00:12:07,480
Are you running it like 1?
And when I saw this, I thought

190
00:12:07,480 --> 00:12:10,640
this is perfect.
Now this was a recent article by

191
00:12:10,640 --> 00:12:14,520
a law firm named Loeb and Loeb.
This is by entertainment

192
00:12:14,520 --> 00:12:18,120
attorney and Kennedy McGuire.
And her basic contention is that

193
00:12:18,120 --> 00:12:22,440
podcasting has matured from some
side hustle into a real business

194
00:12:22,440 --> 00:12:23,800
model.
And I loved it when she said

195
00:12:23,800 --> 00:12:27,080
that because I agree 100%.
Now here's the thing she said in

196
00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:28,720
the article, which I 100% agree
with.

197
00:12:29,120 --> 00:12:32,520
Podcasting is no longer just
make a show and hope it pops.

198
00:12:32,920 --> 00:12:35,520
The article's core argument is
that podcasting is now an

199
00:12:35,520 --> 00:12:39,080
enterprise play, and early
business decisions can shape

200
00:12:39,080 --> 00:12:42,040
whether a show becomes a lasting
brand or a dead end.

201
00:12:42,040 --> 00:12:43,480
I thought that was really
important.

202
00:12:43,960 --> 00:12:46,640
And the next thing she said is
YouTube has changed the game

203
00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:48,640
because it's solved discovery
now.

204
00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:51,280
I think that's something a lot
of us could argue about, but it

205
00:12:51,280 --> 00:12:54,080
basically says that the audio
only podcasts were harder to

206
00:12:54,080 --> 00:12:57,440
stumble onto and YouTube's
autoplay and recommendation

207
00:12:57,440 --> 00:13:00,160
engine now helps grow
organically and make them

208
00:13:00,160 --> 00:13:03,120
attractive to brands.
Now she also pivots, and I'm

209
00:13:03,120 --> 00:13:06,440
going to talk about this in a
few minutes, to video and video

210
00:13:06,440 --> 00:13:10,120
creates a bigger upside, but she
also notes it raises the cost of

211
00:13:10,120 --> 00:13:12,640
entry and she is very right
about that.

212
00:13:12,640 --> 00:13:15,440
The move from audio to video
makes podcasting more powerful

213
00:13:15,440 --> 00:13:19,200
commercially, but it also makes
production more expensive and

214
00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:23,280
creates new barriers for smaller
creators, which IA 100% agree

215
00:13:23,280 --> 00:13:25,240
with.
The next thing she mentioned in

216
00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:27,480
the article, and this is this is
where a great article.

217
00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:30,320
We'll put a link to it in the
show notes, but the Conversation

218
00:13:30,320 --> 00:13:33,280
podcast, she took a little bit
and talked about that has become

219
00:13:33,280 --> 00:13:36,160
the dominant, partly because
it's cheaper to do that.

220
00:13:36,520 --> 00:13:39,120
And the article notes that host
and guest formats are more

221
00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:42,440
accessible than heavily produced
narrative shows because they

222
00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:45,280
require less research, writing
and post production.

223
00:13:45,680 --> 00:13:48,440
And actually what we're seeing
is a trend that those shows are

224
00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:51,040
actually performing well.
They're retaining their

225
00:13:51,040 --> 00:13:52,360
audience, and they're really
working.

226
00:13:52,640 --> 00:13:55,440
And here's the big take away.
The smartest creators decide the

227
00:13:55,520 --> 00:13:58,440
end game on day one.
One of the strongest points in

228
00:13:58,440 --> 00:14:01,160
this piece is that creators need
to know whether the show is a

229
00:14:01,160 --> 00:14:04,840
marketing tool, a passion
project or the foundation of a

230
00:14:04,840 --> 00:14:07,080
media company before signing
deals.

231
00:14:07,640 --> 00:14:09,000
And that really was the big
thing.

232
00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:11,840
She talks about blurring the
lines between television and

233
00:14:11,840 --> 00:14:14,200
podcasting.
And there's a bunch of

234
00:14:14,200 --> 00:14:16,200
opportunities with bigger
audiences.

235
00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:18,760
And the other thing she mentions
here, and if she's an attorney,

236
00:14:18,760 --> 00:14:20,160
understand where she's coming
from here.

237
00:14:20,400 --> 00:14:23,840
Bigger audiences mean bigger
legal targets and that's where

238
00:14:23,840 --> 00:14:25,160
we always have to be aware of
that.

239
00:14:25,360 --> 00:14:27,760
But the bottom line is this.
Winning podcasters will look

240
00:14:27,760 --> 00:14:31,080
more like mini media companies
and I think we're seeing that.

241
00:14:31,360 --> 00:14:33,960
So the take away here is that
podcasting is no longer just

242
00:14:33,960 --> 00:14:37,400
content, it's IP.
And I'm going to leave you with

243
00:14:37,400 --> 00:14:38,840
this.
The story says the future of

244
00:14:38,840 --> 00:14:42,280
podcasting belongs to creators
who think like owners, not just

245
00:14:42,280 --> 00:14:45,200
performers.
And I think that is well said.

246
00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:48,080
Yeah, well said.
On point with a lot of

247
00:14:48,080 --> 00:14:52,040
discussions we've had as of late
too that we, yeah, we got to

248
00:14:52,040 --> 00:14:54,840
really if, if we want to
monetize, if we want our

249
00:14:54,840 --> 00:14:58,360
podcasts to be successful,
depending on your definition of

250
00:14:58,360 --> 00:15:00,960
success, I think we do have to
treat it like a business.

251
00:15:00,960 --> 00:15:03,840
We really do.
And yeah, it's like you were

252
00:15:03,840 --> 00:15:07,160
saying in the article there like
a media company because there

253
00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:11,400
are way more components to a
podcast than just the podcast.

254
00:15:12,120 --> 00:15:14,600
Yeah, and there's a place for
hobby podcasting, but I think

255
00:15:14,600 --> 00:15:17,080
you just have to understand that
from the front end, if that's

256
00:15:17,080 --> 00:15:21,760
your goal, it's a completely
different set up. 100% agreed

257
00:15:21,760 --> 00:15:23,960
with that.
OK, so with that Ralph here.

258
00:15:24,000 --> 00:15:26,400
Well, I was going to clean the
slate and do a little whoosh for

259
00:15:26,400 --> 00:15:27,800
you, but I don't want to hit the
wrong button.

260
00:15:27,800 --> 00:15:30,320
So whoosh, what's our next
story?

261
00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:32,360
So.
The next thing is I attended the

262
00:15:32,360 --> 00:15:36,960
Captivate HLS webinar yesterday
and this is all about Apple

263
00:15:36,960 --> 00:15:40,320
rolling out the video and I just
wanted to go through.

264
00:15:40,320 --> 00:15:45,000
I grabbed a couple clips from
Elsie Escobar and Rob Walsh, and

265
00:15:45,000 --> 00:15:47,320
if you want to play the first
clip, Mark, we'll start there.

266
00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:50,520
I will.
And side note, I think I've

267
00:15:51,200 --> 00:15:52,640
convinced.
Well, it didn't really take a

268
00:15:52,640 --> 00:15:55,440
lot of convincing, but I think
Elsie is going to be a speaker

269
00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:59,320
at Empowered Podcasting this
August, so I'm really excited

270
00:15:59,320 --> 00:16:02,160
about that.
She is one awesome woman,

271
00:16:02,160 --> 00:16:04,960
especially when it comes to this
podcasting industry.

272
00:16:05,120 --> 00:16:06,440
Let's hear what they have to
say.

273
00:16:07,200 --> 00:16:11,000
So the question, this is from
the content creators accountant

274
00:16:11,040 --> 00:16:14,720
and they asked how is the
separate audio file going to

275
00:16:14,720 --> 00:16:18,200
work if the listener wants to
switch between audio and video.

276
00:16:18,680 --> 00:16:22,920
Now in my understanding from
this is that if you upload a

277
00:16:22,920 --> 00:16:29,000
video into the video using HLS,
that's what's going to go into

278
00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:34,160
Apple Podcasts and it's going to
use the audio from your video.

279
00:16:35,520 --> 00:16:41,880
The extra audio that you would
like to upload separately is

280
00:16:41,880 --> 00:16:47,920
going to go to all of the other
apps that support audio.

281
00:16:48,680 --> 00:16:51,800
Via RSS.
Via RSS for the podcast app.

282
00:16:51,800 --> 00:16:56,080
So it's not going to like if you
upload a separate edit of your

283
00:16:56,080 --> 00:16:59,360
audio.
If that is not going to go into

284
00:16:59,360 --> 00:17:04,200
Apple Podcasts, it's going to
pull the audio from the video

285
00:17:04,760 --> 00:17:07,880
and then the special audio is
going to go everywhere else.

286
00:17:08,440 --> 00:17:10,760
Interesting.
Any if and if anyone has

287
00:17:10,760 --> 00:17:14,400
questions, comments while we're
playing these clips and want to

288
00:17:14,400 --> 00:17:17,160
respond to them, by all means
raise your hand.

289
00:17:17,160 --> 00:17:20,720
Let me know and we'll come to
you because I am sure there will

290
00:17:20,720 --> 00:17:24,520
be at least some questions or
comments on some of this stuff.

291
00:17:24,520 --> 00:17:26,119
But Ralph, please continue.
Yeah.

292
00:17:26,119 --> 00:17:28,840
And this was interesting because
this kind of reaffirmed some

293
00:17:28,840 --> 00:17:31,600
things that we've been saying.
But the good news about that

294
00:17:31,600 --> 00:17:34,320
though, at this stage at least
you have the option.

295
00:17:34,320 --> 00:17:36,600
Now this is just Captivate.
I'm not sure what the other

296
00:17:36,600 --> 00:17:38,440
platforms are going to do, but I
think they're going to follow

297
00:17:38,440 --> 00:17:41,800
suit based on what I'm seeing
here that if you can upload a

298
00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:44,360
separate RSS feed.
But if you want to go on to the

299
00:17:44,360 --> 00:17:46,760
second clip, Mark, now we're
going to get into cost

300
00:17:46,760 --> 00:17:48,400
discussions.
And this is where it really got

301
00:17:48,400 --> 00:17:50,920
interesting for me.
OK, I'll play that in a moment.

302
00:17:50,920 --> 00:17:54,640
Two things.
One, the separate RSS feed.

303
00:17:54,640 --> 00:17:58,520
So that would mean then that
your show would exist twice on

304
00:17:58,520 --> 00:18:00,920
in the Apple directory.
Not the way I understand it.

305
00:18:01,080 --> 00:18:03,080
The way I understood it is
you're not going to have a

306
00:18:03,080 --> 00:18:05,480
separate show in the Apple
directory.

307
00:18:05,920 --> 00:18:09,760
That RSS feed is going to be
attached to your show and that's

308
00:18:09,760 --> 00:18:13,080
going to go out to the other
apps who aren't using the video

309
00:18:13,080 --> 00:18:15,040
feed.
They they talked about that a

310
00:18:15,040 --> 00:18:17,680
little bit and there definitely
was no place for this to be a

311
00:18:17,680 --> 00:18:20,600
second feed.
So I don't believe that's going

312
00:18:20,600 --> 00:18:23,040
to be the case, Mark.
OK, gotcha.

313
00:18:23,040 --> 00:18:25,080
All right.
And by the way, shout out to Tim

314
00:18:25,080 --> 00:18:27,560
in the audience who joined us.
Tim, I'd been thinking about you

315
00:18:27,560 --> 00:18:32,200
because I know you had some
medical stuff and I'm hoping

316
00:18:32,200 --> 00:18:33,960
you're feeling better.
We didn't see you for a couple

317
00:18:33,960 --> 00:18:35,800
days, so I was just thinking
about you.

318
00:18:35,800 --> 00:18:37,080
Hope you're doing well.
My friend.

319
00:18:37,360 --> 00:18:40,000
Nick had something before we go
to the next clip.

320
00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:41,280
Go ahead, Nick.
Good morning.

321
00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:42,840
Hey.
Good morning, everybody.

322
00:18:43,040 --> 00:18:47,720
One thing like that's really
interesting that one you're able

323
00:18:47,720 --> 00:18:50,480
to upload both and they both do
exist.

324
00:18:51,080 --> 00:18:55,200
And it wouldn't surprise me and
will be kind of cool if you were

325
00:18:55,200 --> 00:19:01,000
able to utilize that RSS feed
for like years paid listeners,

326
00:19:01,440 --> 00:19:04,080
like if you wanted to run some
kind of like, I think Apple has

327
00:19:04,080 --> 00:19:05,280
their own like paid tier, don't
they?

328
00:19:06,080 --> 00:19:08,520
They do.
Where, yeah, so you could

329
00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:11,680
essentially have your video
feed, which is going to be

330
00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:17,360
probably your your cut version
of the episode, but then in the

331
00:19:17,360 --> 00:19:21,560
future maybe you'd be able to
offer that full quote UN quote

332
00:19:21,560 --> 00:19:26,520
raw edit of the podcast, like
the full version to your paid

333
00:19:26,520 --> 00:19:28,520
subscribers.
Not saying that's what they're

334
00:19:28,520 --> 00:19:30,040
doing, but that that would be
pretty neat.

335
00:19:30,120 --> 00:19:34,360
And definitely within the realm
of their capabilities if that

336
00:19:34,360 --> 00:19:35,760
was something that they could
offer in the future.

337
00:19:36,520 --> 00:19:38,960
Yeah, very cool.
I have no idea if that is on the

338
00:19:38,960 --> 00:19:42,440
horizon or not, Ralph.
I will interject one thing, and

339
00:19:42,440 --> 00:19:43,840
I don't know the answer to that
question.

340
00:19:44,080 --> 00:19:46,840
The one thing I will interject
is Captivate has made the

341
00:19:46,840 --> 00:19:50,400
decision to post the video in
78720P.

342
00:19:50,760 --> 00:19:53,240
So some people kind of grumbled
about that.

343
00:19:53,520 --> 00:19:57,480
You can upload a 1080MP4 file,
but they're still going to cut

344
00:19:57,480 --> 00:19:59,440
it down to a 720.
They're actually going to cut it

345
00:19:59,440 --> 00:20:02,800
down to three different levels.
Depending upon how you want to

346
00:20:02,800 --> 00:20:04,440
view it, depending upon your
bandwidth.

347
00:20:04,680 --> 00:20:06,000
But they didn't specifically
speak.

348
00:20:06,000 --> 00:20:09,440
But my big take away for this
piece is understand if you're

349
00:20:09,440 --> 00:20:13,240
doing a deeper audio edit, once
you flip that switch to go to

350
00:20:13,240 --> 00:20:16,800
video on Apple, your people on
Apple aren't going to get that

351
00:20:16,800 --> 00:20:19,360
deeper RSS feed.
They're just not going to get

352
00:20:19,360 --> 00:20:22,400
that anymore.
Matt, I saw you put something in

353
00:20:22,400 --> 00:20:25,080
the chat.
Did you want to say it here on

354
00:20:25,080 --> 00:20:27,560
stage?
Caught me out again not eating

355
00:20:27,560 --> 00:20:28,760
an apple though.
Morning.

356
00:20:28,960 --> 00:20:32,240
I missed the captivate thing and
obviously just stumbled into the

357
00:20:32,240 --> 00:20:35,640
room trying to quietly pick a
seat at the back of the

358
00:20:35,640 --> 00:20:36,960
classroom.
So I noticed.

359
00:20:37,760 --> 00:20:42,840
But I said 720P480P and 240P as
the three available resolutions

360
00:20:42,840 --> 00:20:45,480
from Captivate.
Is that kind of what people are

361
00:20:45,480 --> 00:20:47,640
angling too?
Yeah, that's correct, Matt.

362
00:20:47,640 --> 00:20:50,160
And the reason they're doing
that, and they were very clear

363
00:20:50,160 --> 00:20:54,000
about that, is the cost, because
the cost of storing those 4K

364
00:20:54,000 --> 00:20:57,960
files was so high that they
couldn't make it valuable to the

365
00:20:58,080 --> 00:21:00,920
customers.
So, yeah, yeah, go ahead, Matt.

366
00:21:01,400 --> 00:21:04,280
Just very quickly, I did catch
the end and there was a lot of

367
00:21:04,280 --> 00:21:09,200
discussion in the chat from that
live stream about the cost and

368
00:21:09,200 --> 00:21:11,960
the structure of it.
The big question for me from

369
00:21:11,960 --> 00:21:14,320
that was going to be whether
they hosted the video themselves

370
00:21:14,320 --> 00:21:17,880
or did a transistor beta where
they were going to connect

371
00:21:18,240 --> 00:21:21,160
outsourced video streaming to
somewhere else.

372
00:21:21,680 --> 00:21:24,160
But I think what John has
actually put in the chat here is

373
00:21:24,160 --> 00:21:26,200
the juice worth the squeeze?
I think that's the biggest

374
00:21:26,200 --> 00:21:27,640
question people have been asking
themselves.

375
00:21:27,640 --> 00:21:32,960
And what Elsie and Rob were
making very clear is that, guys,

376
00:21:32,960 --> 00:21:35,040
this is one thing of a little
bit.

377
00:21:35,440 --> 00:21:38,560
This isn't someone discovering a
gold mine in the middle of

378
00:21:38,560 --> 00:21:41,080
nowhere.
And I was wondering if there's

379
00:21:41,160 --> 00:21:44,480
plenty of gold mines there.
If 6000 people roll up and this

380
00:21:44,480 --> 00:21:51,240
turns out to be terrible for
5980 of those people, then it's

381
00:21:51,240 --> 00:21:52,480
not going to be worth the
squeeze.

382
00:21:53,040 --> 00:21:56,880
So this is video podcasting.
It's not the gold rush, you

383
00:21:56,880 --> 00:21:59,920
know.
Yeah, and John has joined us in

384
00:21:59,920 --> 00:22:05,560
the chat and John is the editor
for Elsie and Rob's show.

385
00:22:05,560 --> 00:22:09,400
And this technically wasn't
their show yesterday, but still

386
00:22:09,400 --> 00:22:11,840
worth mentioning.
And John says, is the juice

387
00:22:11,840 --> 00:22:15,040
worth the squeeze?
All this extra work and cost for

388
00:22:15,040 --> 00:22:19,160
one app that who knows how many
people will watch the video.

389
00:22:19,160 --> 00:22:22,040
I'm there with you.
And I see Nick and Jonathan both

390
00:22:22,040 --> 00:22:26,720
are making fun of some of these
resolution sizes here, 240.

391
00:22:26,720 --> 00:22:29,240
Nick says people watching from
an old Nokia.

392
00:22:30,640 --> 00:22:34,080
Yeah, I'm not sure the need for
the smaller resolution size, but

393
00:22:34,080 --> 00:22:36,040
they're doing it.
I don't know, maybe they want

394
00:22:36,080 --> 00:22:37,440
to.
Maybe they feel like having

395
00:22:37,440 --> 00:22:41,200
options offsets the fact that
they don't have the higher

396
00:22:41,200 --> 00:22:45,560
resolution 1080P, which just
really actually, I mean, I get

397
00:22:45,560 --> 00:22:49,200
why because it's a cost savings
thing, but in this day and age,

398
00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:53,080
it feels weird not to offer the
higher definition resolution.

399
00:22:53,480 --> 00:22:55,560
Alex, did you want to add
something before we go to the

400
00:22:55,560 --> 00:22:57,840
next clip?
Yeah, it's, it's an interesting

401
00:22:57,840 --> 00:23:00,000
conversation.
I'm like Matt, I kind of snuck

402
00:23:00,040 --> 00:23:02,280
in, you know, it's, it'll be
interesting.

403
00:23:02,280 --> 00:23:04,360
Like you just said.
Why did they offer it?

404
00:23:04,360 --> 00:23:06,920
But at the same time, who knows
if they're going to roll out at

405
00:23:06,920 --> 00:23:10,680
the, you know, down the road.
I mean, I, I don't know if it's

406
00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:12,880
going to be, I don't know.
I had a train of clock and I

407
00:23:12,880 --> 00:23:14,000
just lost it.
So never mind.

408
00:23:14,280 --> 00:23:16,960
Welcome to my world.
Yes, Matt, go ahead.

409
00:23:17,480 --> 00:23:19,280
What I will say, and I can't
remember if I said it on this

410
00:23:19,280 --> 00:23:23,280
show before or somewhere else,
but people should be looking to

411
00:23:23,280 --> 00:23:28,840
Sam Sethi with his True Fans
platform as kind of the

412
00:23:28,840 --> 00:23:33,720
foundational model for how this
will probably work for podcast,

413
00:23:33,720 --> 00:23:36,880
how it hosts ongoing.
Yeah, I think actually Matt

414
00:23:37,040 --> 00:23:40,560
Ralph is working on getting Sam
to come join us one morning to

415
00:23:40,560 --> 00:23:42,320
talk about that.
Great.

416
00:23:42,600 --> 00:23:46,000
Yeah, that'll be wait for that,
because the way he's built that

417
00:23:46,000 --> 00:23:50,600
platform is exactly what
everyone will be doing with HLS

418
00:23:50,600 --> 00:23:52,080
anyway to some degree.
So.

419
00:23:52,080 --> 00:23:55,520
OK, Yeah, cool, cool.
And I don't know about you, but

420
00:23:55,680 --> 00:23:59,040
I often when I hear true fans, I
immediately think it's only

421
00:23:59,040 --> 00:24:00,440
fans.
And then I have to remind

422
00:24:00,440 --> 00:24:03,640
myself, no, podcasting is not on
that platform.

423
00:24:04,120 --> 00:24:05,520
It's true fans.
Yes.

424
00:24:05,680 --> 00:24:09,120
OK, so Ralph, I've been
sidebarring here.

425
00:24:09,120 --> 00:24:10,600
Do you want me to play clip two?
Yeah.

426
00:24:11,000 --> 00:24:13,000
Go ahead and play clip 2,
because this is where we cut to

427
00:24:13,000 --> 00:24:15,520
the chase about cost, which a
lot of people were wondering

428
00:24:15,520 --> 00:24:17,040
about.
All right, let's do it.

429
00:24:18,280 --> 00:24:21,000
Here is that question.
How will this affect pricing?

430
00:24:21,000 --> 00:24:25,000
And the answer is to enable
Apple Video podcasting HLS

431
00:24:25,000 --> 00:24:27,920
video.
It will be $12.00 per show.

432
00:24:28,600 --> 00:24:31,680
So that's per show, not per
account, $12.00 per show.

433
00:24:31,680 --> 00:24:33,680
If you have multiple shows in
your account, it'll be $12.00

434
00:24:33,680 --> 00:24:36,800
for each.
That will give that show 1000

435
00:24:36,800 --> 00:24:43,160
HLS downloads per month and then
a bandwidth fee based on usage.

436
00:24:43,760 --> 00:24:48,400
Users will only be charged on
the HLS bandwidth used if the

437
00:24:48,400 --> 00:24:51,120
contents delivered via HLS on
Apple.

438
00:24:51,120 --> 00:24:57,280
So again, it'll be $12.00 per
show with 1000 HLS downloads per

439
00:24:57,280 --> 00:25:01,440
month, then a bandwidth fee on
usage thereafter.

440
00:25:02,640 --> 00:25:04,920
And Mark, this is going to be
interesting because he was

441
00:25:04,920 --> 00:25:07,560
careful in the way he said that.
And I tried to ask the question,

442
00:25:07,920 --> 00:25:12,960
if you understand how HLS works,
it downloads packets and my

443
00:25:12,960 --> 00:25:16,800
question for him and once they
roll this out is that 1000

444
00:25:16,800 --> 00:25:20,400
packet downloads or is that 1000
complete show downloads?

445
00:25:20,760 --> 00:25:22,440
Because there's definitely a
difference.

446
00:25:22,680 --> 00:25:24,680
I was thinking about my own
Daily Show.

447
00:25:24,680 --> 00:25:26,680
I do about 10,000 downloads a
month.

448
00:25:26,960 --> 00:25:32,000
So at 1000, you know, $12.00
each, that's $120.00 potentially

449
00:25:32,000 --> 00:25:35,440
to host this assuming that it's
the whole show.

450
00:25:35,440 --> 00:25:38,720
I don't think it is actually.
I think that because if you

451
00:25:38,720 --> 00:25:41,400
think about it Mark, if you've
got a hour, oh, the other thing

452
00:25:41,400 --> 00:25:44,760
I should mention is the cap on
length of show is 90 minutes

453
00:25:44,760 --> 00:25:47,560
right now as well.
So if you've got a 90 minute

454
00:25:47,560 --> 00:25:50,800
show, you know that's going to
take a lot more bandwidth than a

455
00:25:50,800 --> 00:25:53,760
10 minute show.
So I'm wondering if they were

456
00:25:53,760 --> 00:25:55,800
careful and I'm not saying Rob
was saying anything

457
00:25:55,800 --> 00:25:58,560
inappropriate or trying to dodge
the question, but I think it's

458
00:25:58,560 --> 00:26:01,600
going to be interesting to see
how that plays out because that

459
00:26:01,600 --> 00:26:03,840
is a big deal.
I should also mention if you

460
00:26:03,840 --> 00:26:06,680
want to go to high resolution,
they can do it, but you're going

461
00:26:06,680 --> 00:26:09,000
to have to work out separate
pricing with them to do that.

462
00:26:09,000 --> 00:26:11,640
They did make that offer, but
you've got to like send him an

463
00:26:11,640 --> 00:26:14,120
e-mail and have him do it sort
of on the sidebar.

464
00:26:14,800 --> 00:26:19,720
Nick, what do you got for us?
That is a steep price to get a

465
00:26:19,720 --> 00:26:22,440
podcast onto a single platform,
in my opinion.

466
00:26:23,560 --> 00:26:27,080
Like most people are paying
around that to get their podcast

467
00:26:27,080 --> 00:26:31,360
on all platforms.
And I understand that video

468
00:26:31,360 --> 00:26:36,040
takes up a lot of space and
they're talking 720P just to

469
00:26:36,080 --> 00:26:39,480
like kind of save on cost and be
able to offer at that price for

470
00:26:39,480 --> 00:26:40,960
all the storage and everything
that's going on.

471
00:26:40,960 --> 00:26:44,920
But damn, like $12.00 to be on
the Apple podcast.

472
00:26:44,920 --> 00:26:46,520
Like I personally I'd pass on
it.

473
00:26:47,560 --> 00:26:49,200
I'm taking by chances on
YouTube.

474
00:26:49,840 --> 00:26:52,000
Yeah.
I mean, look, I don't distribute

475
00:26:52,000 --> 00:26:57,600
the video other than we let our
live broadcast stay, stay alive

476
00:26:57,600 --> 00:27:01,240
over on YouTube.
But even if I were to to be

477
00:27:01,240 --> 00:27:04,800
putting out more produced
content, I think I would just

478
00:27:04,800 --> 00:27:08,240
skip it right now with Apple,
maybe down the road, maybe if

479
00:27:08,240 --> 00:27:11,760
the prices change, maybe if it
does become a popular thing

480
00:27:11,760 --> 00:27:15,840
among consumers.
But as of now, for me, I ain't

481
00:27:15,840 --> 00:27:18,040
interested.
I'm just not interested in it.

482
00:27:18,240 --> 00:27:20,600
Let's see here, Matt, you had
something and Alex had

483
00:27:20,600 --> 00:27:22,520
something.
Alex, don't forget your thought.

484
00:27:22,680 --> 00:27:25,720
Go ahead, Matt.
Yes, remember Alex on the

485
00:27:25,720 --> 00:27:29,040
technical side, I think the
advantage for Captivate here for

486
00:27:29,040 --> 00:27:31,920
what Ralph was referring to
there is that there are fewer

487
00:27:31,920 --> 00:27:35,600
unknowns if they take control of
what the video is now.

488
00:27:35,800 --> 00:27:39,760
John has been putting a lot of
thoughts in the chat as well

489
00:27:39,760 --> 00:27:43,680
about the structure of video and
whether people can take can tell

490
00:27:43,680 --> 00:27:46,200
the difference.
But the thing to remember about

491
00:27:46,200 --> 00:27:48,640
video is that you're adding an
extra dimension to what is

492
00:27:48,640 --> 00:27:50,440
otherwise a predictable file
type.

493
00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:54,160
But the transmission of that
video is dependent on the type

494
00:27:54,160 --> 00:27:55,800
of video that it is.
And there's lots of different

495
00:27:55,800 --> 00:27:57,960
formats that it could be that
affects its size.

496
00:27:58,560 --> 00:28:01,880
So Captivate doing the
processing on their end for

497
00:28:01,880 --> 00:28:06,120
different resolutions, they will
have a predictable output that

498
00:28:06,120 --> 00:28:08,320
they control for with
transmitting the bandwidth.

499
00:28:08,320 --> 00:28:12,920
Which is why they can probably
have a $12.00 foundational price

500
00:28:12,920 --> 00:28:17,360
and then bandwidth beyond.
Whereas the contrary case with

501
00:28:17,360 --> 00:28:22,360
transistor where Justin was
asking people to go off platform

502
00:28:22,840 --> 00:28:24,920
to stream their content.
I think he said it was like a

503
00:28:24,920 --> 00:28:26,800
$5.
I can't remember if it was

504
00:28:26,800 --> 00:28:30,880
Cloudflare or something, $5
Cloudflare account to host your

505
00:28:31,120 --> 00:28:34,400
video over there.
I think Captivate is going about

506
00:28:34,400 --> 00:28:37,120
this the right way and they've
structured the payment model the

507
00:28:37,120 --> 00:28:39,720
right way to where I think,
Ralph, you need to be.

508
00:28:39,840 --> 00:28:44,040
You don't need to be as worried
about the type of video files,

509
00:28:44,040 --> 00:28:46,920
the size, the bandwidth, because
all of that is going to be

510
00:28:46,920 --> 00:28:48,880
predictable.
None more so in the fact that

511
00:28:48,880 --> 00:28:51,760
they don't offer 1080P as an
option unless you contact them,

512
00:28:51,960 --> 00:28:53,840
because that's when it does
balloon.

513
00:28:54,520 --> 00:28:56,280
Thank you, Matt.
Appreciate that.

514
00:28:56,280 --> 00:28:58,600
I'm going to keep it moving
because man, we have lots of

515
00:28:58,600 --> 00:29:00,680
stories to get to and I want to
go to Alex.

516
00:29:00,680 --> 00:29:02,840
I want to hear from him first.
So go for it, Alex.

517
00:29:02,840 --> 00:29:05,640
And then one more clip.
That long winded answer I did

518
00:29:05,640 --> 00:29:06,440
forget.
No, I'm kidding.

519
00:29:06,720 --> 00:29:09,560
I'm with Nick on this.
I'm really surprised at Apple.

520
00:29:09,560 --> 00:29:11,400
Maybe I'm a little novice on
this.

521
00:29:11,840 --> 00:29:15,360
I'm surprised that they released
this without the.

522
00:29:15,480 --> 00:29:18,960
It seems like it's a bug, not a
bug, that's the wrong way, but

523
00:29:18,960 --> 00:29:22,520
it seems like it's unfinished
and to offer something for 12

524
00:29:22,520 --> 00:29:25,560
bucks, I don't know, it's just
as a new like, I mean, look at

525
00:29:25,560 --> 00:29:29,640
Jen and she's in the audience.
They do a video 1st, I believe

526
00:29:29,760 --> 00:29:31,720
podcast.
I mean, that's a lot of money

527
00:29:31,720 --> 00:29:35,600
and it's a lot of time for, I
don't know, I just, yeah, it's

528
00:29:35,600 --> 00:29:38,120
very frustrating because you're
trying to make it right.

529
00:29:38,320 --> 00:29:42,320
And I mean, when we do our video
stuff, it's just it can't be

530
00:29:42,320 --> 00:29:43,400
free.
But come on.

531
00:29:43,720 --> 00:29:46,000
I mean, I'm in the camp.
I can't believe I'm saying this.

532
00:29:46,200 --> 00:29:49,360
I'm with ER in this case where
it's just like, you know,

533
00:29:49,360 --> 00:29:51,920
Apple's crazy.
Yep, thank you, Alex.

534
00:29:51,920 --> 00:29:55,040
And by the way, I just want to
say I don't blame Captivate like

535
00:29:55,040 --> 00:29:58,360
they have to do something like
this to make it work like I'm

536
00:29:58,360 --> 00:30:02,000
not I think we're just this
whole thing is taking us back.

537
00:30:02,000 --> 00:30:05,080
We're again, we're not coming at
Captivate because listen, I

538
00:30:05,080 --> 00:30:09,000
think we're going to see similar
models with all these different

539
00:30:09,000 --> 00:30:15,160
hosts that are now adding this
for Apple video and we'll see

540
00:30:15,160 --> 00:30:18,640
how podcasters respond.
We'll see how consumers respond,

541
00:30:18,640 --> 00:30:22,160
but as of now, I think people
are getting frustrated, as we

542
00:30:22,160 --> 00:30:24,720
can hear.
It might be a big players game.

543
00:30:24,720 --> 00:30:26,920
That's the problem.
They're trying to set it up for

544
00:30:26,920 --> 00:30:29,840
the big players that have the
sponsors and that's what it

545
00:30:29,840 --> 00:30:31,560
comes.
Down to Yep, Yep.

546
00:30:32,040 --> 00:30:34,280
OK, Do you want me to play this
next clip right?

547
00:30:34,280 --> 00:30:36,640
Let's go to the third clip.
I just want to finish off on

548
00:30:36,640 --> 00:30:38,960
this.
There's an issue about stats and

549
00:30:38,960 --> 00:30:40,360
you know, we always worry about
stats.

550
00:30:40,360 --> 00:30:42,040
And I wanted to play this last
clip Mark.

551
00:30:42,360 --> 00:30:46,480
Let's do it.
Well, people switching between

552
00:30:46,480 --> 00:30:49,080
audio and video count as two
different downloads.

553
00:30:49,080 --> 00:30:52,360
Video and audio analytics will
be combined.

554
00:30:52,800 --> 00:30:56,880
Audio always plays, while video
only plays if selected by the

555
00:30:56,880 --> 00:30:59,320
listener viewer.
Downloads will continue to be

556
00:30:59,320 --> 00:31:02,960
measured by IB certification,
which is a minimum of 60 seconds

557
00:31:02,960 --> 00:31:07,000
per playback or downloaded
enough data to be able to be

558
00:31:07,000 --> 00:31:11,960
listened to based on a unique IP
address user agent combo in a 24

559
00:31:11,960 --> 00:31:14,720
hour window.
Here's how this works a little

560
00:31:14,720 --> 00:31:17,600
bit.
If someone downloads has a file

561
00:31:17,600 --> 00:31:21,960
that's downloaded in HLS audio
and let's say your episode comes

562
00:31:21,960 --> 00:31:26,520
out on Saturday and that is
automatically going to download

563
00:31:26,520 --> 00:31:30,280
the audio from us and that will
show up in your downloads from

564
00:31:30,280 --> 00:31:33,960
that Saturday.
Then that person goes to listen

565
00:31:34,080 --> 00:31:39,080
to that episode on Monday.
If they are only listening and

566
00:31:39,080 --> 00:31:42,600
it's already downloaded, it
won't be an additional listen.

567
00:31:43,080 --> 00:31:47,680
However, if on Monday they start
playing video and some video

568
00:31:47,680 --> 00:31:50,960
byte ranges are delivered and
enough 60 seconds of byte ranges

569
00:31:50,960 --> 00:31:54,320
are delivered on that Monday, it
will show up as a second

570
00:31:54,400 --> 00:31:57,760
download.
Because in most, like most cases

571
00:31:57,760 --> 00:32:00,720
in in that scenario, the
person's going to be watching

572
00:32:00,720 --> 00:32:03,880
the video probably from a
different IP address than where

573
00:32:03,880 --> 00:32:06,080
it was originally downloaded and
in.

574
00:32:06,120 --> 00:32:08,160
And this is true for all podcast
hosts.

575
00:32:08,560 --> 00:32:12,120
We talked about this in the IEB
committee on this for everybody.

576
00:32:12,120 --> 00:32:14,440
It's really going to show up as
a second listen.

577
00:32:14,520 --> 00:32:17,720
So it will count as two in that
scenario.

578
00:32:18,480 --> 00:32:20,760
And I just think it's important
we understand that I think this

579
00:32:20,760 --> 00:32:24,720
is going to make the download
numbers go up because if people

580
00:32:24,720 --> 00:32:28,200
are switching back and forth.
So don't be surprised if you are

581
00:32:28,200 --> 00:32:30,960
one of those folks that moves
towards this that you start to

582
00:32:30,960 --> 00:32:34,240
see a rise in your downloads.
I don't think it's going to be a

583
00:32:34,240 --> 00:32:36,280
rise because of more people.
I think it's going to be a rise

584
00:32:36,280 --> 00:32:38,640
because of different playing
options.

585
00:32:39,280 --> 00:32:42,840
Thank you, Ralph.
And by the way, want to shout

586
00:32:42,840 --> 00:32:45,800
out Ashley Feller in the
audience this morning.

587
00:32:45,800 --> 00:32:48,600
Great to see you here.
Ashley, we've missed you.

588
00:32:48,600 --> 00:32:53,440
Thanks for popping in and hope
to see more of you down the

589
00:32:53,440 --> 00:32:55,200
road.
I have a question for Ralph.

590
00:32:55,280 --> 00:32:57,800
OK.
Are they going to break it down

591
00:32:57,880 --> 00:33:01,680
behind the scenes or is it just
going to be downloads?

592
00:33:02,280 --> 00:33:04,160
I don't know the answer.
I don't know, Alex.

593
00:33:04,160 --> 00:33:07,320
They didn't say that.
It sounds like there's they're

594
00:33:07,320 --> 00:33:08,720
not going to.
I know that's one of the things

595
00:33:08,720 --> 00:33:11,080
I want to talk to Sam Sethi
about because he's actually

596
00:33:11,080 --> 00:33:14,560
doing it differently, where he's
actually measuring, you know,

597
00:33:14,560 --> 00:33:17,840
how much of A play that you have
in the depth of the episode.

598
00:33:17,840 --> 00:33:19,240
So that's one of the reason why
I talked to him.

599
00:33:19,560 --> 00:33:22,160
Apple or Captivate hasn't said
how they're going to do that.

600
00:33:22,160 --> 00:33:24,120
At this point, it sounds like
they're just going to use the

601
00:33:24,120 --> 00:33:27,040
existing model.
And if it's over 60 seconds then

602
00:33:27,040 --> 00:33:28,760
it's going to be considered a
download.

603
00:33:29,360 --> 00:33:31,120
Thank you, Ralph.
Appreciate that.

604
00:33:31,120 --> 00:33:32,400
And let's see here.
All right.

605
00:33:32,400 --> 00:33:35,760
It looks like everybody is good
to go.

606
00:33:35,760 --> 00:33:41,640
So very interesting stuff here
with this Apple HLS edition.

607
00:33:41,840 --> 00:33:46,400
And like I said, not interested
at the moment for me.

608
00:33:46,920 --> 00:33:50,480
So there you go all right,
here's what I want to do.

609
00:33:50,480 --> 00:33:53,880
This took up way more time and
that's fine I want to be clear,

610
00:33:53,880 --> 00:33:56,240
but it took up way more time
than I thought.

611
00:33:56,240 --> 00:34:00,680
So I want to do my best here to
get you guys as much of this

612
00:34:00,680 --> 00:34:05,000
info as possible.
So I will do a couple of news

613
00:34:05,000 --> 00:34:10,239
bites for you and then we'll get
into the headlines.

614
00:34:10,239 --> 00:34:14,600
So bear with me and thank you
Ralph for that content creators

615
00:34:14,600 --> 00:34:19,920
bite BC you are on deck.
FYI here's some news bites for

616
00:34:19,920 --> 00:34:22,800
you.
First, Spotify adds a Just let

617
00:34:22,800 --> 00:34:26,480
Me listen button.
They rolled out a feature that

618
00:34:26,480 --> 00:34:31,800
lets users turn off all video
content, including music videos

619
00:34:31,800 --> 00:34:36,600
and podcast clips, giving
listeners a cleaner audio first

620
00:34:36,600 --> 00:34:40,000
experience.
Again, the update comes after a

621
00:34:40,000 --> 00:34:43,400
steady push toward video across
the platform, which hasn't

622
00:34:43,400 --> 00:34:47,719
exactly thrilled everyone.
Now users can opt out and go

623
00:34:47,719 --> 00:34:51,600
back to using Spotify the way
many of them started as a place

624
00:34:51,600 --> 00:34:55,600
to simply listen without the
extra noise.

625
00:34:55,960 --> 00:34:58,840
So a couple of points from this
story.

626
00:34:59,160 --> 00:35:03,200
The this gives control back to
the users who prefer a

627
00:35:03,200 --> 00:35:05,320
distraction free listening
experience.

628
00:35:05,320 --> 00:35:08,960
It signals that Spotify knows
not everyone is sold on video

629
00:35:08,960 --> 00:35:11,640
podcasting first.
I know that's a little bit of an

630
00:35:11,640 --> 00:35:16,480
assumption, but it certainly
points to that it could impact

631
00:35:16,480 --> 00:35:20,200
how podcasters prioritize video
production over, or I should

632
00:35:20,200 --> 00:35:23,480
say, moving forward.
And it reinforces that audio

633
00:35:23,480 --> 00:35:29,480
still holds value even as
platforms chase video trends.

634
00:35:29,960 --> 00:35:36,520
Also, Overcast, the podcast
player platform, has doubled its

635
00:35:36,520 --> 00:35:38,960
premium price for new
subscribers.

636
00:35:39,320 --> 00:35:41,960
Overcast is getting more
expensive, at least for new

637
00:35:41,960 --> 00:35:45,040
premium subscribers.
And this was found in a Reddit

638
00:35:45,040 --> 00:35:48,080
post yesterday.
At least I found it yesterday.

639
00:35:48,080 --> 00:35:50,160
I'm not sure if that was the
exact post date.

640
00:35:50,680 --> 00:35:55,760
Developer Marco Arment said new
subscriptions are now 2999 a

641
00:35:55,760 --> 00:36:00,520
year with one week free trial,
while existing premium

642
00:36:00,520 --> 00:36:04,640
subscribers will stay at that
1499 price for now, though he

643
00:36:04,640 --> 00:36:09,600
says legacy prices will likely
go up gradually, possibly later

644
00:36:09,600 --> 00:36:12,400
this year.
He also noted the premium

645
00:36:12,400 --> 00:36:17,160
features themselves are staying
the same, and that anyone who

646
00:36:17,160 --> 00:36:21,040
cancels an older subscription
and comes back later will have

647
00:36:21,040 --> 00:36:25,640
to rejoin at the new price.
Armin's reasoning was pretty

648
00:36:25,640 --> 00:36:28,920
direct, he said.
Costs are up, ad revenue is

649
00:36:28,920 --> 00:36:33,320
down, but more importantly, he
believes Overcast has simply

650
00:36:33,320 --> 00:36:39,880
been underpriced for years and
that 2999 is a fairer reflection

651
00:36:39,880 --> 00:36:42,320
of the app's value in today's
market.

652
00:36:42,520 --> 00:36:45,560
He also floated one possible
future change that could matter

653
00:36:45,760 --> 00:36:49,360
to Sirius Podcast listeners.
Adding custom and private feeds

654
00:36:49,360 --> 00:36:54,520
by URL may eventually become a
premium only feature, though he

655
00:36:54,520 --> 00:36:58,080
said that's still under
consideration.

656
00:36:58,960 --> 00:37:02,640
Dr. Will you take the story
number six, our follow up story

657
00:37:02,640 --> 00:37:07,480
from last week of.
Course OK, so this is a follow

658
00:37:07,480 --> 00:37:10,920
up story from last week.
If you listened to our news

659
00:37:10,920 --> 00:37:17,280
episode last week, you knew you
know that Open AICEO Sam Altman

660
00:37:17,600 --> 00:37:19,960
is stepping into the podcasting
arena.

661
00:37:20,560 --> 00:37:28,800
He's teaming up with Open A is
newly acquired podcast TBPN TBPN

662
00:37:28,880 --> 00:37:34,360
OK to launch a new show focused
on artificial intelligence tech

663
00:37:34,360 --> 00:37:37,040
and the future of, well,
everything.

664
00:37:37,360 --> 00:37:40,800
The move puts Altman directly in
front of the listeners instead

665
00:37:40,800 --> 00:37:44,960
of behind press releases, giving
him a platform to shape the

666
00:37:44,960 --> 00:37:48,520
narrative around AI in his own
words.

667
00:37:48,720 --> 00:37:52,640
It also signals that even the
people building the machines now

668
00:37:52,640 --> 00:37:56,920
feel the need to explain
themselves repeatedly.

669
00:37:57,480 --> 00:38:01,360
So some of the highlights are
The podcast is part of a broader

670
00:38:01,560 --> 00:38:08,080
push by tech leaders to control
public perception around AITBPN.

671
00:38:08,560 --> 00:38:11,120
Damn, I hate that T.
Oh wait, I hit the wrong button.

672
00:38:11,120 --> 00:38:15,160
I have to hit it.
It is not math, says Glorning.

673
00:38:15,200 --> 00:38:18,000
Guess I forgot words are hard in
the morning.

674
00:38:18,440 --> 00:38:25,720
Did I say that out loud?
OK, TBPN continues expanding its

675
00:38:25,720 --> 00:38:28,720
network with high profile
industry voices.

676
00:38:29,120 --> 00:38:33,200
The show leans into long form
conversations, not quick sound

677
00:38:33,200 --> 00:38:37,280
bites, and this adds to the
growing pile of thought

678
00:38:37,280 --> 00:38:41,400
leadership content competing for
your attention.

679
00:38:41,920 --> 00:38:45,880
So here is a question.
Would you actually listen to

680
00:38:45,920 --> 00:38:51,320
ACEO explain their company, or
does that feel like just PR kind

681
00:38:51,320 --> 00:38:55,240
of, you know, in disguise?
I think that depends on how

682
00:38:55,240 --> 00:38:57,520
they're delivering the podcast.
I think it depends on the

683
00:38:57,520 --> 00:39:01,600
podcast itself because there are
podcasts out there, big name

684
00:39:01,600 --> 00:39:05,880
podcast, big company podcast
where the CE OS are a part of

685
00:39:05,880 --> 00:39:08,520
it.
And I think it just depends, you

686
00:39:08,520 --> 00:39:10,800
know, are they they're really
just pushing their products and

687
00:39:10,800 --> 00:39:15,240
services or are they doing an
actual podcast adding value to

688
00:39:15,240 --> 00:39:17,400
their brand?
And obviously for their

689
00:39:17,400 --> 00:39:19,760
audience, that's really what it
comes down to.

690
00:39:20,480 --> 00:39:23,760
Also, a lot has to do with
reputation.

691
00:39:23,760 --> 00:39:29,120
Now, Sam Altman has quite a
reputation for being difficult.

692
00:39:29,600 --> 00:39:33,200
That might bite him in the butt
when it comes to people wanting

693
00:39:33,200 --> 00:39:36,640
to actually listen to him, or it
might go completely the other

694
00:39:36,640 --> 00:39:40,320
way and people are hoping that
he's really going to fly off the

695
00:39:40,320 --> 00:39:42,280
handle.
Well, I think that the other

696
00:39:42,280 --> 00:39:45,840
option is that if they do it
right, maybe he does humanize

697
00:39:45,840 --> 00:39:49,080
himself more.
Maybe people, you know, after

698
00:39:49,200 --> 00:39:51,920
hearing him on a few episodes,
they're getting to know him in a

699
00:39:51,920 --> 00:39:54,960
different light and maybe he
becomes more trustworthy.

700
00:39:54,960 --> 00:39:59,400
I mean, that is what a podcast
can do for you if you're doing

701
00:39:59,400 --> 00:40:00,880
it well.
True.

702
00:40:01,000 --> 00:40:03,760
Yeah.
So I saw B TS Pepper come up.

703
00:40:03,840 --> 00:40:07,160
Yes, I saw lots of Peppers come
up, and if you're wondering why

704
00:40:07,160 --> 00:40:10,280
we're saying that, that is how
we get each other's attention on

705
00:40:10,280 --> 00:40:12,880
Clubhouse here.
We flashed this pepper emoji

706
00:40:13,280 --> 00:40:16,360
because we used to have a hand
wave and that has disappeared

707
00:40:16,360 --> 00:40:18,320
from Clubhouse.
I'm going to go to Sid first.

708
00:40:18,320 --> 00:40:19,720
Go ahead, Sid.
Good morning again.

709
00:40:20,440 --> 00:40:24,160
Yeah, good morning, everybody.
So I interviewed studios on my

710
00:40:24,160 --> 00:40:26,200
show and people want to hear
from them.

711
00:40:26,880 --> 00:40:29,360
And it's a SEC, a separate
series.

712
00:40:29,360 --> 00:40:32,920
I call CEO chat.
I did one on Monday and they're

713
00:40:32,920 --> 00:40:35,880
one of the most popular series
within my show cuz people really

714
00:40:35,880 --> 00:40:40,240
like to hear from the industry
leaders and share the insights

715
00:40:40,240 --> 00:40:42,160
of what's happening in their
business, their thoughts on

716
00:40:42,160 --> 00:40:43,440
what's happening in the
industry.

717
00:40:44,200 --> 00:40:47,520
So this could work really,
really well for Sam Altman.

718
00:40:47,720 --> 00:40:50,160
He is a controversial figure,
right?

719
00:40:50,680 --> 00:40:54,600
And it could be done, if it's
done right, it could actually

720
00:40:54,880 --> 00:40:57,920
really help his personal brand.
It can really help open AI grow.

721
00:40:57,920 --> 00:40:59,920
It could really provide
insights.

722
00:40:59,920 --> 00:41:03,800
So knowing that he's going to do
this and I am an active user of

723
00:41:04,120 --> 00:41:08,600
Open AII will likely go listen
to what he has to say and it,

724
00:41:08,600 --> 00:41:12,200
but if it's set up and all, it
is a freaking pitch about open

725
00:41:12,200 --> 00:41:15,360
AI and why you need to you, not
the behind the scenes and not

726
00:41:15,360 --> 00:41:18,040
the getting.
And then it will fail.

727
00:41:18,040 --> 00:41:22,600
And I believe that the more
leaders, executive level

728
00:41:22,600 --> 00:41:27,040
leaders, CEO, the C-Suite should
be public with podcast

729
00:41:27,040 --> 00:41:29,840
appearance, video appearance,
LinkedIn messaging.

730
00:41:30,320 --> 00:41:33,200
They should be the face of their
brand and they need to be more

731
00:41:33,200 --> 00:41:34,960
public.
And so I think that can have a

732
00:41:34,960 --> 00:41:39,640
lot of benefit when your
customer base sees the leader

733
00:41:39,880 --> 00:41:41,680
doing things and sharing
messages.

734
00:41:41,680 --> 00:41:44,960
So it can be very powerful.
Totally with you, Sid.

735
00:41:45,000 --> 00:41:47,960
Well said.
And I'm going to keep it going.

736
00:41:47,960 --> 00:41:50,040
I think that's a good place to
keep moving.

737
00:41:50,640 --> 00:41:55,200
Let's go to BC Babbles with some
with a tech update, some

738
00:41:55,200 --> 00:41:59,080
products and software.
This is where BC shares the

739
00:41:59,080 --> 00:42:02,520
newer products and software.
So yeah, go for it BC.

740
00:42:03,200 --> 00:42:06,120
Yes, but of course maintaining
the AI topic because we can't

741
00:42:06,120 --> 00:42:07,800
leave that too early in the
show.

742
00:42:08,160 --> 00:42:11,720
So Shonda, this is going to be
something more for DIY and indie

743
00:42:11,720 --> 00:42:15,160
podcasters.
Shonda and AI powered podcast

744
00:42:15,160 --> 00:42:19,120
creation platform has launched a
version three of its platform, a

745
00:42:19,120 --> 00:42:21,760
significant rebuild designed to
remove the technical and

746
00:42:21,760 --> 00:42:25,200
creative barriers that prevent
independent creators from making

747
00:42:25,200 --> 00:42:29,080
professional quality audio.
Now the platform brings together

748
00:42:29,080 --> 00:42:33,600
recording templates,
transcription based editing, AI

749
00:42:33,600 --> 00:42:37,120
audio enhancement and publishing
distribution and AI generated

750
00:42:37,120 --> 00:42:40,240
metadata into a single
workspace.

751
00:42:40,680 --> 00:42:43,480
The founding thesis for Shonda
is pretty simple.

752
00:42:44,200 --> 00:42:47,360
Audio is among the most human
ways to share an idea, but the

753
00:42:47,360 --> 00:42:49,960
tools built around it have
historically been designed for

754
00:42:49,960 --> 00:42:53,360
studios and engineers, not for
independent creators.

755
00:42:53,680 --> 00:42:57,160
So version 3 rolling out here
brings a number of interesting

756
00:42:57,160 --> 00:43:00,800
updates, including a rebuilt
browser based recording studio

757
00:43:00,800 --> 00:43:02,920
with automatic background noise
removal.

758
00:43:03,160 --> 00:43:05,240
It also supports over 12
languages.

759
00:43:05,760 --> 00:43:10,080
A multi track text based audio
editor with natively built in

760
00:43:10,360 --> 00:43:13,160
that's built into the browser.
It also has vinyl.

761
00:43:13,160 --> 00:43:16,480
A clean shareable episode page
for each published episode,

762
00:43:16,480 --> 00:43:20,120
which to me sounds very
captivate ish and a built in

763
00:43:20,120 --> 00:43:23,840
analytics and track episode.
A building analytics system to

764
00:43:23,840 --> 00:43:28,320
track each episode among
numerous other updates to this

765
00:43:28,320 --> 00:43:30,600
version.
So for anyone who's interested,

766
00:43:30,600 --> 00:43:34,520
shonda 3 of course is now live.
The platform offers a free tier

767
00:43:34,680 --> 00:43:39,480
pro plan of 19 bucks a month, a
business plan at 49 a month, and

768
00:43:39,480 --> 00:43:42,680
a 7 day free trial for those who
are interested in the paid

769
00:43:42,680 --> 00:43:45,960
plans.
Thank you BC So this is an

770
00:43:45,960 --> 00:43:49,720
interesting story in the sense
that this is where I think a

771
00:43:49,720 --> 00:43:52,760
product like this, it makes
sense for podcasters.

772
00:43:52,760 --> 00:43:57,080
It's using AI to help streamline
your process, simplify your

773
00:43:57,080 --> 00:44:00,880
process, etcetera.
And we know, I hope I can get to

774
00:44:00,880 --> 00:44:03,160
this next story.
Well, you know what, I'm going

775
00:44:03,160 --> 00:44:06,120
to get to it really quickly
'cause I think it's interesting

776
00:44:06,360 --> 00:44:11,040
clash between what you've just
shared, BC and how others are

777
00:44:11,040 --> 00:44:15,080
using AI.
So yeah, thank you BC This is a

778
00:44:15,080 --> 00:44:18,160
story the headline reads.
Podcast piracy has a new

779
00:44:18,160 --> 00:44:21,240
playbook and it's infuriating
creators.

780
00:44:21,480 --> 00:44:24,840
And this came from pod news.
It says it well, this is what

781
00:44:24,840 --> 00:44:26,200
they said.
I'm paraphrasing.

782
00:44:26,480 --> 00:44:31,640
A shady new studio is ripping
off the names, artwork and

783
00:44:31,640 --> 00:44:36,200
branding of dozens of successful
history podcasts, not to make

784
00:44:36,200 --> 00:44:41,280
great content, but to siphon off
unsuspecting listeners and the

785
00:44:41,280 --> 00:44:46,000
ad dollars that follow them.
The operation was first spotted

786
00:44:46,000 --> 00:44:50,640
by Dirk, the host of the History
of the Germans podcast, who

787
00:44:50,640 --> 00:44:55,520
noticed the copycat show using a
visual clone of his branding.

788
00:44:55,880 --> 00:44:59,600
The scheme targets history
podcast specifically, with at

789
00:44:59,600 --> 00:45:04,520
least 75 shows affected so far.
At least that I guess that know

790
00:45:04,520 --> 00:45:06,760
of this, right?
It's probably more.

791
00:45:07,240 --> 00:45:10,160
Dirk put the listener impact
plainly.

792
00:45:10,400 --> 00:45:15,240
Someone searching for his show
could land on the fake show

793
00:45:15,240 --> 00:45:18,840
instead and assume the real one
just isn't worth their time,

794
00:45:18,840 --> 00:45:22,320
making the first listen harder
than it already is.

795
00:45:22,520 --> 00:45:26,080
The tactic exploits a gap in
platform accountability.

796
00:45:26,560 --> 00:45:30,040
Since podcast directories don't
have the same content matching

797
00:45:30,040 --> 00:45:34,520
guard rails that music or video
platforms have developed.

798
00:45:35,160 --> 00:45:38,560
It underscores why trade marking
your podcast name matters.

799
00:45:38,560 --> 00:45:42,040
Something pod news and
podcasting morning chat has

800
00:45:42,040 --> 00:45:45,080
flagged before as an
underutilized protection for

801
00:45:45,080 --> 00:45:48,560
independent creators.
The broader concern is that as

802
00:45:48,560 --> 00:45:52,480
podcasting grows into a real
business, bad actors are

803
00:45:52,480 --> 00:45:56,240
increasingly treating listener
attention as something worth

804
00:45:56,240 --> 00:46:01,200
stealing, not just borrowing.
And bad actors could include not

805
00:46:01,200 --> 00:46:07,080
just humans, but AI as well.
So who do you think should be

806
00:46:07,080 --> 00:46:11,000
responsible for stopping this?
The creator, the podcast, the

807
00:46:11,000 --> 00:46:13,240
directories?
Someone else?

808
00:46:13,440 --> 00:46:16,760
How do we nip this in the bud?
Or can we?

809
00:46:16,920 --> 00:46:18,720
I don't know if that's a
rhetorical question.

810
00:46:18,720 --> 00:46:21,400
I don't know if any of us have
the answers to that yet.

811
00:46:21,880 --> 00:46:24,960
Matt, what do you think?
I've been keeping up with this

812
00:46:24,960 --> 00:46:28,160
story 'cause I saw it and there
are a few podcasts in there that

813
00:46:28,160 --> 00:46:31,560
I was looking at the show notes
of and I was like, that is so

814
00:46:31,560 --> 00:46:34,880
sneaky.
The what seems to be the tenor,

815
00:46:34,880 --> 00:46:38,720
based on what I've seen of
information released today, is

816
00:46:38,720 --> 00:46:43,800
that the big move is that the
Podcast Index has been keeping

817
00:46:43,800 --> 00:46:46,680
track of what it believes a lot.
This is in pod news today by the

818
00:46:46,680 --> 00:46:47,880
way.
If you want to check out the

819
00:46:47,960 --> 00:46:51,520
episode that just went out, the
Podcast Index is starting to

820
00:46:51,520 --> 00:46:55,600
mark and find a way to flag and
feedback information in an API

821
00:46:56,160 --> 00:47:00,200
about which podcasts it believes
are AI generated and could be

822
00:47:00,200 --> 00:47:05,240
doing very similar things.
thatrss.com very quickly and

823
00:47:05,240 --> 00:47:08,480
hastily removed all these
podcasts that were flagged so

824
00:47:08,480 --> 00:47:11,520
that they were unable to be
found anywhere afterwards.

825
00:47:12,040 --> 00:47:16,600
Was a really good thing.
But I think I don't know, is it

826
00:47:16,600 --> 00:47:21,680
like social policing that we
need as a result of this cause?

827
00:47:21,680 --> 00:47:26,520
The moral imperative not to do
this kind of BS to manipulate

828
00:47:26,520 --> 00:47:28,760
the industry to try and make a
quick buck.

829
00:47:29,360 --> 00:47:31,280
There's no technical way to stop
it.

830
00:47:31,280 --> 00:47:34,000
It's why there's a huge movement
against deception at the moment

831
00:47:34,000 --> 00:47:37,720
with AI generated content.
The ability to pretend to be

832
00:47:37,720 --> 00:47:42,160
someone else in a zoom call is
becoming less and less sci-fi

833
00:47:42,440 --> 00:47:47,960
and more real as time goes on.
So I think it has to be like an

834
00:47:47,960 --> 00:47:50,360
ethical approach.
I think we need maybe the

835
00:47:50,360 --> 00:47:56,200
podcast index needs a podcast,
podcast, podcast ethics board

836
00:47:56,200 --> 00:48:00,320
that.
Says glorning.

837
00:48:00,400 --> 00:48:02,960
Guess I forgot words are hard in
the morning.

838
00:48:03,600 --> 00:48:05,600
Did I say that out loud?
Out loud.

839
00:48:07,480 --> 00:48:09,400
I made that yesterday, guys,
yes.

840
00:48:09,400 --> 00:48:11,040
Now I'm getting hit with it,
yes, but yeah.

841
00:48:11,080 --> 00:48:12,840
Thank you for shortening that up
for us.

842
00:48:13,320 --> 00:48:15,480
I think we need a an ethics
standard.

843
00:48:15,520 --> 00:48:19,720
I think for too long podcasting
has been left to what can be

844
00:48:19,720 --> 00:48:21,760
done as opposed to what should
be done.

845
00:48:21,920 --> 00:48:26,880
I think socially driven ethics
would be a good way to approach

846
00:48:26,880 --> 00:48:29,320
this.
Yeah, that's wishful thinking.

847
00:48:30,200 --> 00:48:32,000
Thank you, Matt.
Ralph, did you want to chime in?

848
00:48:32,520 --> 00:48:34,000
Yeah, I just want to say one
thing.

849
00:48:34,040 --> 00:48:38,120
I'm not a fan of a policing
agency to do this because I

850
00:48:38,120 --> 00:48:41,520
think then it gets into this
subjective conversation about

851
00:48:41,640 --> 00:48:44,680
what is this, What is that?
So I'm just, I'm a sort of one

852
00:48:44,680 --> 00:48:46,920
of those guys.
It's not a big fan of that.

853
00:48:47,200 --> 00:48:48,640
So I just want to throw that in
there.

854
00:48:48,640 --> 00:48:49,840
I want to throw one other thing
in.

855
00:48:50,240 --> 00:48:52,720
My wife turned me on to this
show called Scarpetta.

856
00:48:53,080 --> 00:48:56,160
It is with Nicole Kidman and I
want to talk about just for a

857
00:48:56,160 --> 00:48:59,320
second, it's about AI.
Well, it's a very interesting

858
00:48:59,320 --> 00:49:02,440
thing.
Her wife passed away and now she

859
00:49:02,440 --> 00:49:06,040
has an AI that she talks to her
wife every single day.

860
00:49:06,040 --> 00:49:07,600
It was really an interesting
thing.

861
00:49:07,880 --> 00:49:10,480
But you know, it's a very
fascinating thing just how far

862
00:49:10,480 --> 00:49:14,400
that AI technology has come to
where this person, it's like

863
00:49:14,400 --> 00:49:17,600
somebody is still around, but
through the through the screen.

864
00:49:17,680 --> 00:49:20,480
So just this is where we are.
Like, this is where we are now,

865
00:49:20,720 --> 00:49:23,280
so it's going to be hard to put
the genie back in the bottle at

866
00:49:23,280 --> 00:49:25,600
this point.
There's, I don't know if that's

867
00:49:25,600 --> 00:49:28,440
the same show or not.
There was definitely a show on

868
00:49:28,440 --> 00:49:32,440
Netflix I saw a few years ago
where, yeah, when people passed

869
00:49:32,440 --> 00:49:36,320
away, they could get their
consciousness uploaded into

870
00:49:36,320 --> 00:49:38,720
this, you know, basically AI
thing.

871
00:49:38,720 --> 00:49:42,680
And yeah, it was a lot of the
ethics around that was the focal

872
00:49:42,680 --> 00:49:45,520
point of the show, but there.
Was This is a new one?

873
00:49:45,520 --> 00:49:47,920
This is a new one.
Oh, this is a new kind of show

874
00:49:47,920 --> 00:49:49,080
like that.
OK, Got.

875
00:49:49,080 --> 00:49:51,120
It it is.
Got it BC what did you want to

876
00:49:51,120 --> 00:49:53,480
add?
Wasn't there also a movie a few

877
00:49:53,480 --> 00:49:57,560
years ago called Her that was
about a a man who had like AAI

878
00:49:57,560 --> 00:49:59,080
interface that he fell in love
with?

879
00:49:59,240 --> 00:50:01,000
Essentially, yeah.
Absolutely.

880
00:50:01,560 --> 00:50:03,760
I forgot who starred in that
right now off the top of my

881
00:50:03,760 --> 00:50:06,680
head, but I yeah, I know exactly
the movie you're talking about

882
00:50:07,120 --> 00:50:09,080
and it feels more and more real
these days.

883
00:50:09,240 --> 00:50:10,560
Matt, did you want to add
something?

884
00:50:11,280 --> 00:50:13,360
I can't remember, but I will say
that probably what you're

885
00:50:13,360 --> 00:50:17,200
thinking of Mark is when Black
Mirror, previously ABBC series,

886
00:50:17,200 --> 00:50:18,720
made its way to Netflix Season
2.

887
00:50:18,720 --> 00:50:22,400
Episode 1 covers this as a
premise of the episode.

888
00:50:22,400 --> 00:50:26,720
Maybe that's what it was.
Someone died and they took their

889
00:50:26,720 --> 00:50:29,640
entire Twitter feed and turned
them into an AI generated

890
00:50:29,640 --> 00:50:33,920
companion they could talk to.
But Black Mirror I think is

891
00:50:33,920 --> 00:50:37,760
necessary watching for anybody
who's going to operate in the

892
00:50:37,760 --> 00:50:39,800
world today.
Is this for another episode?

893
00:50:39,800 --> 00:50:41,400
Watch.
It that's a good show.

894
00:50:41,400 --> 00:50:43,680
Yeah, I agree.
Go check that out.

895
00:50:43,720 --> 00:50:50,640
OK, Dr., can you do story #9 to
take us home today?

896
00:50:51,360 --> 00:50:54,960
Absolutely.
So podcasters are cashing in on

897
00:50:55,040 --> 00:50:59,640
fans, not ads, and the numbers
are staggering.

898
00:51:00,000 --> 00:51:04,080
So Patreon just dropped data.
Data, as some of you call it.

899
00:51:04,080 --> 00:51:08,480
Data that makes a strong case
for treating your podcast like a

900
00:51:08,480 --> 00:51:11,880
real business.
Listen up Ralph, Podcasters

901
00:51:11,880 --> 00:51:17,440
earned 629,000,000.
I always feel I have to say

902
00:51:17,440 --> 00:51:25,200
million like that 629,000,000 on
the platform in 2025 and the

903
00:51:25,200 --> 00:51:28,440
direct to fan model is only
picking up steam.

904
00:51:28,440 --> 00:51:31,640
So here's some of the little
highlighted findings.

905
00:51:31,840 --> 00:51:36,800
More than 47,000 podcasters
currently earn income on the

906
00:51:36,800 --> 00:51:43,720
platform, supported by 7.6
million paid memberships with

907
00:51:43,720 --> 00:51:48,920
top earners like Joe Boudin.
Is it Boudin or Boudin pulling

908
00:51:48,920 --> 00:51:53,520
in 1 million or 1 million or
more per month?

909
00:51:53,960 --> 00:51:59,320
Patreon frames the growth as a
deliberate shift away from reach

910
00:51:59,360 --> 00:52:03,920
based strategies, arguing that
reach doesn't mean what it used

911
00:52:03,920 --> 00:52:05,560
to.
And that's in quotes.

912
00:52:05,760 --> 00:52:07,600
Quote reach doesn't mean what it
used to.

913
00:52:08,000 --> 00:52:12,520
In an era of crowded feeds and
algorithm driven discovery that

914
00:52:12,520 --> 00:52:16,720
doesn't always translate to
loyalty, the Spotify integration

915
00:52:16,720 --> 00:52:19,640
has proven meaningful.
Nearly half of earning

916
00:52:19,640 --> 00:52:24,320
podcasters have enabled it, and
15% of Spotify listeners who

917
00:52:24,320 --> 00:52:30,600
visit a Creators Tron Patreon
page convert to paid members.

918
00:52:30,960 --> 00:52:34,680
Patreon's framing of the most
successful podcasters is

919
00:52:34,680 --> 00:52:38,920
telling.
They're building full ecosystems

920
00:52:38,920 --> 00:52:43,040
around their show, including
bonus content, ad free

921
00:52:43,040 --> 00:52:47,920
listening, exclusive series and
live experiences often centered

922
00:52:48,160 --> 00:52:53,760
on tight knit niche communities
rather than mass audiences.

923
00:52:54,080 --> 00:52:57,880
And the top earning podcast
genres in Patreon are pop

924
00:52:57,880 --> 00:53:03,520
culture and comedy, lifestyle
and hobbies and education and

925
00:53:03,520 --> 00:53:05,360
information.
How about that?

926
00:53:05,960 --> 00:53:11,720
Yeah, thank you, Dr. and Ralph,
I know you use Patreon.

927
00:53:12,080 --> 00:53:13,600
What are your thoughts on this
story?

928
00:53:14,240 --> 00:53:16,760
Oh, I think this is the future
of content creation.

929
00:53:17,120 --> 00:53:20,760
I think the race to the bottom
of CPM is going to end up more

930
00:53:20,760 --> 00:53:24,520
people moving in this direction.
I have a Patreon for each of my

931
00:53:24,520 --> 00:53:27,760
shows, actually, and we post a
ton of content there.

932
00:53:27,760 --> 00:53:31,480
It's not grown yet, but my
intention was to start putting a

933
00:53:31,480 --> 00:53:34,280
lot of content over there.
But I really think that's the

934
00:53:34,280 --> 00:53:35,960
truth of where we're moving
towards.

935
00:53:36,200 --> 00:53:39,240
I think that's the most sensible
model, building your own

936
00:53:39,240 --> 00:53:40,880
ecosystem.
It kind of goes along with the

937
00:53:40,880 --> 00:53:43,920
business bite I talked about
today, and that is building your

938
00:53:43,920 --> 00:53:47,640
own media company, and you're
basically using Patreon to do

939
00:53:47,640 --> 00:53:48,880
that.
I think it's brilliant.

940
00:53:49,360 --> 00:53:52,800
And the truth of the matter is
you can make decent money doing

941
00:53:52,800 --> 00:53:56,320
that with a very small audience.
You know, you think about it, if

942
00:53:56,320 --> 00:53:59,520
you get $510 a month from 100
people, that's real money.

943
00:53:59,920 --> 00:54:02,280
And so I think you're going to
see a lot more people taking

944
00:54:02,280 --> 00:54:05,040
that approach and putting it
behind the quote paywall.

945
00:54:05,440 --> 00:54:07,920
But I'm doing it personally, I'm
I'm not pushed it a lot yet.

946
00:54:07,920 --> 00:54:10,800
That's one of the things on my
after tax season radar.

947
00:54:11,120 --> 00:54:12,760
But no, I think it's a great
product.

948
00:54:13,000 --> 00:54:15,440
The only thing I don't like
about Patreon is they take a lot

949
00:54:15,440 --> 00:54:17,920
of the percentage of the money
from you.

950
00:54:18,200 --> 00:54:19,720
So you just have to be aware of
that.

951
00:54:19,720 --> 00:54:22,720
You're not going to get 100% of
the dollars that you're getting.

952
00:54:23,040 --> 00:54:26,160
But they make it super simple.
There's a little bit of friction

953
00:54:26,160 --> 00:54:28,920
getting involved with it, but
it's easy to put content up

954
00:54:28,920 --> 00:54:30,400
there.
My team puts content up there on

955
00:54:30,400 --> 00:54:32,120
each of our channels every
single day.

956
00:54:32,120 --> 00:54:33,920
So it's it's really a great
thing.

957
00:54:34,560 --> 00:54:36,440
Thank you Ralph BC did you want
to add something?

958
00:54:36,960 --> 00:54:39,000
I was going to stay real quick.
I'm not on video today, so I

959
00:54:39,000 --> 00:54:41,720
just wanted to make sure, Dr.
Are you holding your pinky to

960
00:54:41,720 --> 00:54:44,200
your mouth every single time you
say millions?

961
00:54:45,720 --> 00:54:47,120
Got to make sure you do it the
right way it.

962
00:54:47,760 --> 00:54:53,440
Kind of feels like it.
Thank you BC thank you, Ralph

963
00:54:53,440 --> 00:54:56,400
and Dr. Thank you for wrapping
up today's news.

964
00:54:56,520 --> 00:54:59,760
We are back tomorrow with our
evaluation series.

965
00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:02,480
So we are evaluating the podcast
Salvage.

966
00:55:02,480 --> 00:55:05,200
We will put a link to the
episode we're breaking down

967
00:55:05,440 --> 00:55:08,560
tomorrow.
This is a listener's podcast and

968
00:55:08,560 --> 00:55:12,760
that's what we do every so often
on Thursdays is they submit

969
00:55:12,760 --> 00:55:16,640
their podcast for feedback and
we'll provide it tomorrow for

970
00:55:16,640 --> 00:55:19,880
the podcast Salvage.
And that's your reminder team

971
00:55:20,160 --> 00:55:24,960
to, if you haven't listened yet,
go listen and be ready to share

972
00:55:24,960 --> 00:55:28,520
your feedback tomorrow on the
podcasting morning chat.

973
00:55:28,520 --> 00:55:32,240
So until then, make it a great
day everybody, take care.