Aug. 12, 2025

354 - How To Get More From Spotify for Creators With Chris Stone

354 - How To Get More From Spotify for Creators With Chris Stone
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon

Are you using Spotify for Creators to its full potential? If not, you’re in for a treat. While Marc is away at camp, podcast producer Chris Stone of The New Statesman joins us to share powerful, lesser-known tools hidden inside the Spotify for Creators platform. Spoiler: you don’t need to host with Spotify to unlock them. Chris reveals his favorite features for boosting engagement, including interactive polls and customizable episode previews, as well as the SEO tactics that can help your show get discovered. We also explore which tools still need improvement, why he’s cautious about Spotify video, and how these insights can apply no matter where you host your podcast. Chris even gives us a peek into his Podcast Strategy newsletter on Substack and his upcoming venture, Podcast Crew, a service that connects busy podcasters with an ideal producer.

Episode Highlights:

[01:42] Meet the Guest: Chris Stone

[06:14] Spotify's Rise in Podcasting

[10:23] Engagement Tools on Spotify

[12:40] Challenges and Opportunities with Spotify Video

[15:33] Customizing Your Podcast on Spotify

[18:28] Analyzing Spotify's Analytics

[25:16] Areas for Improvement on Spotify

[26:13] Guest Tagging and Recommendations on Spotify

[28:51] Optimizing Podcast Titles and Descriptions

[35:52] Using Substack for Newsletters

[45:13] Introducing Podcast Crew

Links & Resources:

Join The Empowered Podcasting Facebook Group:

www.facebook.com/groups/empoweredpodcasting⁠

Get Your Tickets for The Empowered Podcasting Conference:

www.empoweredpodcasting.com

Podcast Strategy Weekly:

https://podcaststrategy.substack.com

The Daily Statesman:

www.newstatesman.com/author/chris-stone

Podcast Crew:

https://www.podcastcrew.co.uk

Every Way To Market Your Podcast On Spotify:

https://podcaststrategy.substack.com/p/how-to-grow-a-podcast-on-spotify-get-more-listeners

Remember to rate, follow, share, and review our podcast. Your support helps us grow and bring valuable content to our community.

Join us LIVE every weekday morning at 7 am ET (US) on ⁠Clubhouse⁠: ⁠⁠⁠ https://www.clubhouse.com/house/empowered-podcasting-e6nlrk0w⁠⁠

Or Join us on Chatter: https://preview.chattersocial.io/group/98a69881-f328-4eae-bf3c-9b0bb741481d

Live on YouTube: ⁠https://youtube.com/@marcronick⁠

Brought to you by⁠ ⁠iRonickMedia.com⁠

Please note that some links may be affiliate links, which support the hosts of the PMC. Thank you!

--- Send in your mailbag question at:⁠ https://www.podpage.com/pmc/contact/⁠ or ⁠marc@ironickmedia.com⁠

Want to be a guest on The Podcasting Morning Chat? Send me a message on PodMatch, here:

⁠https://www.podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/1729879899384520035bad21b⁠

1
00:00:03,720 --> 00:00:06,200
Good morning podcasting, morning
chat.

2
00:00:06,600 --> 00:00:12,000
It's Tuesday, August 12th, 2025,
and today we're talking to Chris

3
00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:16,400
Stone about Spotify.
I never thought I'd say this,

4
00:00:16,440 --> 00:00:20,560
but prepare to be amazed at some
of the little known features

5
00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:22,720
that'll help you market your
podcast.

6
00:00:23,120 --> 00:00:25,880
This is going to be one of those
get out your notebook kind of

7
00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:27,680
shows.
So if you're listening on

8
00:00:27,680 --> 00:00:31,200
Clubhouse, hit the share button
on the left hand side of the

9
00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:34,320
screen and share it.
However, Clubhouse lets you.

10
00:00:34,880 --> 00:00:37,480
And if you're listening via
podcast, please share this

11
00:00:37,480 --> 00:00:41,160
episode with a fellow podcaster.
And now give us about 30 seconds

12
00:00:41,560 --> 00:00:44,680
and we'll get things rolling.
Thanks for being here.

13
00:01:20,080 --> 00:01:22,000
All right, Good morning,
everybody.

14
00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:26,520
So, no, Mark has not had a sex
change.

15
00:01:26,920 --> 00:01:29,440
This is Dr. Fey.
It's not Mark Ronick.

16
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:33,440
Mark is off doing his yearly
thing that he does every year

17
00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:37,320
for his friend.
It's a camp for kids.

18
00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:40,360
And he is.
I think I can't counselor.

19
00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:43,000
I think that's what's going on
anyway.

20
00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:46,560
So he has left kind of the keys
to the joint to the inmates.

21
00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:52,000
And I thought this was a great
opportunity to interview someone

22
00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:54,520
who I've been reading his
newsletter for a long time.

23
00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:59,160
My guest today knows podcasting
inside and out and not just the

24
00:01:59,640 --> 00:02:03,640
shiny launch your show kind of
stuff, but the real behind the

25
00:02:03,640 --> 00:02:07,280
scenes kind of strategy that
gets people to actually listen.

26
00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:11,080
Chris Stone is also the founder
of the Podcast Crew.

27
00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:15,360
It's a new platform connecting
top tier podcast professionals

28
00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:19,840
with clients making stand out
audio and video content.

29
00:02:20,080 --> 00:02:23,840
He's executive producer of the
top podcast, I'm sorry, a top

30
00:02:23,840 --> 00:02:26,280
political show.
It's called the New Statesman.

31
00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:30,120
It's auk political show.
And he's also the brains behind

32
00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:35,120
my very favorite Substack
newsletter, podcast Strategy,

33
00:02:35,120 --> 00:02:38,600
where he dishes out highly
practical tips every single

34
00:02:38,600 --> 00:02:41,160
week.
He's been at it for a long

35
00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:45,640
enough, you know, to remember
when podcast, when Apple podcast

36
00:02:45,640 --> 00:02:49,680
was the only game in town.
And he's been helping creators

37
00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:53,760
adapt to and win on every
platform shift since.

38
00:02:53,760 --> 00:02:57,720
Chris, welcome to the show.
I really appreciate you doing

39
00:02:57,720 --> 00:02:59,800
this.
Hello, thank you so much for

40
00:02:59,800 --> 00:03:01,640
having me.
What a lovely introduction.

41
00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:07,360
It's true, but you know, I
subscribe to an enormous amount

42
00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:12,360
of news letters, as most of the
people on Clubhouse know, and

43
00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:14,520
there are very few.
I can count on one hand the

44
00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:17,520
amount that I actually pay for.
And you are at the top of the

45
00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:22,080
list, my friend, because your
podcast is titled with MY2

46
00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:24,920
Trigger Words podcast and the
strategy.

47
00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:28,840
So just some little background.
You have to realize something

48
00:03:28,840 --> 00:03:31,520
about Dr. You're one of her
boyfriends.

49
00:03:32,520 --> 00:03:36,200
OK, let's just know what it is
and your fawns.

50
00:03:36,200 --> 00:03:41,400
Over you like it's.
Going to have to make in about 5

51
00:03:41,400 --> 00:03:45,640
to 6 minutes from now.
It's sort of a healthy slash

52
00:03:45,840 --> 00:03:48,720
unhealthy relationship with
newsletters.

53
00:03:49,200 --> 00:03:52,200
So the fact that.
We really, Chris, this really

54
00:03:52,200 --> 00:03:54,760
isn't about you.
This is an intervention.

55
00:03:55,800 --> 00:03:59,720
We are OK.
So if she has to step out, it's

56
00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:02,680
not because that she has to make
eggs.

57
00:04:02,840 --> 00:04:07,160
She has to put herself together
because she in her eyes might be

58
00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:08,560
true.
Answer the door.

59
00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:10,320
There's chocolates and flowers
coming.

60
00:04:10,920 --> 00:04:12,920
I appreciate that.
So.

61
00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:16,079
You're very, you're very kind.
Well, absolutely.

62
00:04:16,079 --> 00:04:20,640
I just love, love, love your
podcast strategy and it kind of

63
00:04:20,959 --> 00:04:24,240
gives me St. cred.
And I think in one of your

64
00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:27,560
issues you quoted me and so I'm
very happy about that.

65
00:04:27,560 --> 00:04:32,320
So that is cool.
Added to my obsession with you.

66
00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:36,480
That's fine.
So you've been podcasting long

67
00:04:36,480 --> 00:04:38,320
enough to see platforms coming
go.

68
00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:43,040
What's the one change that still
makes you shake your head and

69
00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:45,920
think, I can't believe we're
doing this now?

70
00:04:48,160 --> 00:04:51,320
Well, I've actually been doing
it long enough that when I

71
00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:53,280
started, podcasting wasn't a
thing.

72
00:04:53,280 --> 00:04:58,800
And I studied TV production of
all things at university about

73
00:04:58,840 --> 00:05:01,880
20 something years ago.
And I can remember having

74
00:05:01,880 --> 00:05:05,520
conversations in my course at
the time, you know, about like

75
00:05:05,680 --> 00:05:11,040
the Internet and broadcasting
coming together and gosh, and

76
00:05:11,040 --> 00:05:14,760
you imagine, you know, And the
fact is that the thing that I've

77
00:05:14,760 --> 00:05:19,800
spent the last 10 or 15 years
doing just did not exist when I

78
00:05:19,800 --> 00:05:23,080
was studying.
So the big macro thing that

79
00:05:23,080 --> 00:05:26,080
always surprises me and I have
to pinch myself is that I

80
00:05:26,080 --> 00:05:28,280
actually get to make a living
out of this.

81
00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:32,080
And it's something that
genuinely was not a thing, did

82
00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:34,000
not exist.
The technology did not exist.

83
00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:37,120
And it does make me wonder, you
know, my kids, what, what are

84
00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:39,800
they going to be doing in 20
years time?

85
00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:42,880
What, That doesn't exist now?
You know, that's the sort of

86
00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:44,440
space that I'm in.
Right.

87
00:05:44,440 --> 00:05:47,840
So you know this piece that you
did on Spotify, it just kind of

88
00:05:47,840 --> 00:05:50,760
blew my socks off.
There was so many, so many

89
00:05:50,760 --> 00:05:53,600
Nuggets, so many great things to
take away.

90
00:05:54,080 --> 00:05:58,000
And admittedly, I am the one
when I get clients, I'm

91
00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:02,600
admittedly the one to steer them
away from Spotify because, you

92
00:06:02,600 --> 00:06:04,120
know, they kind of have a
reputation.

93
00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:07,080
Can you speak about that
reputation they have and maybe

94
00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:09,960
how they've come full circle?
At least that's what I got from

95
00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:12,280
your article.
Yes, that's so that's

96
00:06:12,280 --> 00:06:14,280
interesting.
So Spotify have had like an

97
00:06:14,280 --> 00:06:17,080
interesting kind of journey with
podcasting, haven't they?

98
00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:18,840
They were sort of late to the
game really.

99
00:06:18,840 --> 00:06:22,120
They were primarily a music
listening platform and

100
00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:26,280
definitely in the UK at least
the music listening platform of

101
00:06:26,280 --> 00:06:28,560
choice.
And then in the US you, you had

102
00:06:28,560 --> 00:06:31,280
others as well, Pandora and such
that did very well.

103
00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:35,320
But when I started making
podcasts, it was Apple podcasts

104
00:06:35,320 --> 00:06:37,280
all the way.
And in fact, you know, the

105
00:06:37,280 --> 00:06:41,200
podcast that I work on now
predates me significantly, at

106
00:06:41,200 --> 00:06:43,880
least in, in the, in the job
that I'm doing now.

107
00:06:44,320 --> 00:06:50,680
They started in 2013.
And if I look at the data from

108
00:06:51,040 --> 00:06:57,480
2013 to now, you know, for the
first like 7 years, maybe

109
00:06:57,560 --> 00:07:03,160
longer, maybe even up to, you
know, 2021, it's Apple Podcasts

110
00:07:03,160 --> 00:07:06,080
all the way and everything else
trailing behind.

111
00:07:06,560 --> 00:07:10,840
You know, significantly, like
for a long time, it was like 90%

112
00:07:10,840 --> 00:07:13,080
of the audience was on Apple
Podcasts.

113
00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:15,320
But increasingly that's
changing.

114
00:07:15,400 --> 00:07:19,400
And if I look at the data on the
podcasts that I manage now,

115
00:07:19,680 --> 00:07:22,040
we're behind the curve, right?
Because we were so heavy on

116
00:07:22,040 --> 00:07:25,320
Apple Podcasts.
But actually our listenership

117
00:07:25,320 --> 00:07:31,040
on, on Spotify has increased by
400% over the last, you know,

118
00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:36,080
what, five years or so to the
point now where it makes up a

119
00:07:36,160 --> 00:07:38,200
significant proportion of our
audience.

120
00:07:38,280 --> 00:07:42,000
Our The New Statesman podcast
audience is still predominantly

121
00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:47,120
on Apple Podcasts, but it won't
be long until Spotify overtakes

122
00:07:47,120 --> 00:07:49,880
it.
And if you look at the data that

123
00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:53,960
Edison have been pulling out in
their brilliant Infinite Dial

124
00:07:54,280 --> 00:07:59,880
reports, they have Spotify
actually as if I pull up the

125
00:08:00,120 --> 00:08:03,920
where's the US one.
They reckon the servers most

126
00:08:03,960 --> 00:08:06,480
often used to listen to
podcasts.

127
00:08:06,480 --> 00:08:14,880
In the US, 33% on YouTube, 26%
on Spotify and 14% on Apple

128
00:08:14,880 --> 00:08:21,320
Podcasts, 14%.
But in the UK that's 33% on

129
00:08:21,320 --> 00:08:26,680
Spotify, 20% on YouTube.
We have ABBC service called BBC

130
00:08:26,680 --> 00:08:30,600
Sounds that's on 16%.
And Apple Podcast is languishing

131
00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:34,799
way back on 10%.
So actually in the UK, Spotify,

132
00:08:35,039 --> 00:08:39,120
according to Edison, is the
preeminent podcast listening

133
00:08:39,120 --> 00:08:43,120
platform right now.
Well, so in the issue you

134
00:08:43,120 --> 00:08:46,440
mentioned that Gen.
Z is already in the listening

135
00:08:46,440 --> 00:08:50,000
mode on Spotify.
If you were to if you were

136
00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:53,280
starting a a like a brand new
show today, would you only

137
00:08:53,280 --> 00:08:57,160
design it for where your
audience hangs out or would you

138
00:08:57,200 --> 00:09:01,720
try to pull them somewhere new?
I think the brilliant thing

139
00:09:01,720 --> 00:09:05,720
about Open RSS is obviously that
you can distribute it everywhere

140
00:09:06,240 --> 00:09:09,840
and you can make it very easy
for people to access it wherever

141
00:09:09,840 --> 00:09:12,920
they prefer.
But you, you want to be looking

142
00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:16,640
at investing your time.
You've got limited time to be

143
00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:19,400
working on the kind of the
promotion for the show.

144
00:09:19,400 --> 00:09:23,240
So you want to be strategic
about where you deploy that time

145
00:09:23,320 --> 00:09:26,880
resource, right?
So previously, I would have

146
00:09:26,880 --> 00:09:31,800
spent most of my time focusing
on how do we make this perform

147
00:09:31,800 --> 00:09:34,840
really well on Apple Podcasts.
Now, if I was launching

148
00:09:34,840 --> 00:09:40,360
something new, I would be
thinking, how do I spend most of

149
00:09:40,360 --> 00:09:43,600
my time making sure that this
maximum, this, the reach on

150
00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:48,000
Spotify is maximized.
And then if I've got spare time

151
00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:50,000
around the edge, I might look at
Apple Podcasts.

152
00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:53,080
I wouldn't eliminate Apple
Podcasts altogether, you know,

153
00:09:53,080 --> 00:09:55,920
but in terms of where I would
spend most of my marketing

154
00:09:55,920 --> 00:09:59,040
energy, it would be on Spotify
now, I think.

155
00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:02,720
Great.
I want to also mention to

156
00:10:02,840 --> 00:10:06,560
everyone up on stage, if you
have a question, please go ahead

157
00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:10,000
and raise your hand or in this
case, it's raise your chili

158
00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:12,000
pepper.
They took their hands away from

159
00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:16,120
Clubhouse and now we have to do
a chili pepper instead.

160
00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:20,600
So raise your chili pepper.
Yes, exactly.

161
00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:24,920
There's a lot of new fancy tools
on Spotify.

162
00:10:25,400 --> 00:10:27,320
Which one is on the the hidden
gems?

163
00:10:27,400 --> 00:10:29,360
The one that's the one that
you're talking about.

164
00:10:29,560 --> 00:10:34,000
So one of the reasons that I
wrote the article that you were

165
00:10:34,000 --> 00:10:36,520
talking about was that, you
know, Spotify have released a

166
00:10:36,520 --> 00:10:40,960
lot of different options for
users to control how they

167
00:10:40,960 --> 00:10:45,360
promote their podcasts on the
platform, Much more so actually

168
00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:48,160
than Apple Podcasts, like Apple
Podcasts now, sorry to keep

169
00:10:48,160 --> 00:10:50,280
getting back to Apple Podcasts,
but that's kind of my reference.

170
00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:54,320
That's where I came from.
But Apple Podcasts like really

171
00:10:54,320 --> 00:10:56,960
is kind of curated by the Apple
team.

172
00:10:57,280 --> 00:11:01,920
And like, you have quite limited
options in terms of what you can

173
00:11:01,920 --> 00:11:04,640
actually control in terms of
your presence on the platform.

174
00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:07,560
Whereas with Spotify, they give
you a lot more options.

175
00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:10,880
I think you asked for like the
hidden gem now.

176
00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:13,760
I mean, I think there's I think
all the tools are useful.

177
00:11:14,480 --> 00:11:18,560
That's the ones that I like the
most and that I think probably

178
00:11:18,680 --> 00:11:23,640
lean into what podcasting is
best at are those that

179
00:11:23,920 --> 00:11:29,200
facilitate a sense of community.
So for me, my favorites are the

180
00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:33,440
fact that users can comment on
episodes on Spotify and that you

181
00:11:33,440 --> 00:11:36,840
can ask for direct feedback in
polls.

182
00:11:36,880 --> 00:11:40,920
And Spotify allows you to set a
poll under a bespoke poll, a

183
00:11:40,920 --> 00:11:43,520
specific poll under each
episode.

184
00:11:43,520 --> 00:11:47,040
So you're immediately giving
somebody something to do and to

185
00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:50,240
contribute as they listen or off
or after they listen.

186
00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:52,240
Right.
So let's break that down just a

187
00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:56,440
little bit because that has been
a bone of contention with me for

188
00:11:56,440 --> 00:12:00,400
a long time.
I do not understand why all

189
00:12:00,440 --> 00:12:05,840
hosting platforms do not have do
not give the ability for

190
00:12:05,840 --> 00:12:11,160
listeners to comment.
I could very well put a link in

191
00:12:11,160 --> 00:12:16,200
the show notes that leads to
some place on, you know,

192
00:12:16,200 --> 00:12:17,880
Captivate.
And in my case, it would be

193
00:12:17,880 --> 00:12:21,120
Captivate and there would be
something there for, you know,

194
00:12:21,120 --> 00:12:24,240
for people to chat.
That way they could have a

195
00:12:24,240 --> 00:12:27,880
really accurate count of
engagement, you know, at least a

196
00:12:27,880 --> 00:12:29,400
more accurate count of
engagement.

197
00:12:29,400 --> 00:12:31,120
So this has been a bone of
contention with me.

198
00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:35,400
And it kind of rubs me the one
way that Spotify by Nemesis is

199
00:12:35,400 --> 00:12:38,120
the one that has it.
But I'm going to deal with it.

200
00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:41,520
Have you tried a feature that
you thought, well, you know,

201
00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:44,040
this is this is useless, but
then later on it kind of

202
00:12:44,040 --> 00:12:46,000
surprised you a little bit?
I don't know about the

203
00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:50,240
second-half to that question,
but the one that I tried once

204
00:12:50,240 --> 00:12:53,640
and was like, I'm not doing that
again was video.

205
00:12:53,760 --> 00:12:58,240
This is where Spotify gets
interesting, and by interesting,

206
00:12:58,240 --> 00:13:01,880
I mean not very good.
We've been talking about video,

207
00:13:01,880 --> 00:13:04,760
haven't we, in the podcasting
community for the last couple of

208
00:13:04,760 --> 00:13:06,440
years.
It's the next big thing.

209
00:13:06,760 --> 00:13:10,120
Everybody's got to do video.
Some people don't like it, some

210
00:13:10,120 --> 00:13:14,280
people do like it.
Spotify have waded in and added

211
00:13:14,280 --> 00:13:19,120
video to that platform and have
worked quite hard to try and get

212
00:13:19,120 --> 00:13:24,280
people to upload video so that
their users can either listen or

213
00:13:24,280 --> 00:13:30,080
watch.
But there is massive red flag on

214
00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:35,400
Spotify video, which is that if
you upload a video version of

215
00:13:35,400 --> 00:13:40,440
your episode, so you distribute
via RSS, your audio version gets

216
00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:44,440
picked up by Spotify via RSS
with all of your dynamically

217
00:13:44,440 --> 00:13:47,080
inserted ads and you know
everything else.

218
00:13:47,280 --> 00:13:51,120
And then they say, oh, and you
can upload a video version of

219
00:13:51,120 --> 00:13:53,920
this and then your listeners can
choose to watch or listen.

220
00:13:54,280 --> 00:13:58,520
But if you upload the video,
then it overwrites the RSS.

221
00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:03,520
So when you upload a video, you
no longer serve your dynamically

222
00:14:03,520 --> 00:14:07,440
inserted ads and the audio
version gets completely

223
00:14:07,440 --> 00:14:11,680
forgotten.
If then a user toggles to listen

224
00:14:11,680 --> 00:14:14,920
instead of to watch, then what
they're listening to is the

225
00:14:14,960 --> 00:14:20,520
audio from that video.
So right now I do not upload

226
00:14:20,520 --> 00:14:25,640
video and I don't advise other
people to until or unless

227
00:14:25,960 --> 00:14:30,760
Spotify make moves to somehow
keep the RSS incorporated.

228
00:14:31,080 --> 00:14:32,720
I saw Nick's hand up.
Go ahead, Nick.

229
00:14:32,720 --> 00:14:34,360
Hey.
Chris, good morning, welcome.

230
00:14:34,680 --> 00:14:38,640
To our to our chaos.
So you mentioning that if you

231
00:14:38,640 --> 00:14:42,320
upload the audio and then you go
Spotify and upload the video,

232
00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:44,040
it's.
Yeah, you're overriding it.

233
00:14:44,040 --> 00:14:48,040
What if someone is hosted on
Spotify specifically?

234
00:14:48,520 --> 00:14:51,040
Does that process actually
change?

235
00:14:51,040 --> 00:14:55,200
Because now I would imagine
Spotify still has to distribute

236
00:14:55,280 --> 00:15:00,000
the RSS to the different hosting
platforms and the reason people

237
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:03,320
are hosting through Spotify.
Yeah, that is a brilliant

238
00:15:03,320 --> 00:15:05,760
question.
And actually I don't know the

239
00:15:05,760 --> 00:15:08,640
answer to that because we, I
don't host with Spotify.

240
00:15:08,640 --> 00:15:11,920
The podcasts I managed don't
host with Spotify, and therefore

241
00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:16,680
the only surface that I see is,
you know, the one that you're

242
00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:18,720
presented with as somebody who
hosts elsewhere.

243
00:15:18,880 --> 00:15:21,000
So yeah, I don't know, but
that's a great question and I'd

244
00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:22,800
love to know the answer if
anybody else does.

245
00:15:23,200 --> 00:15:26,280
I'm in the kitchen now making
eggs for my husband.

246
00:15:26,400 --> 00:15:29,600
I'm going to turn the rest some
of the interview over to Ashley.

247
00:15:29,600 --> 00:15:33,680
Ashley, go ahead and pick it up.
So what would you say is?

248
00:15:33,800 --> 00:15:36,200
One of the features I was
reading the newsletter.

249
00:15:36,920 --> 00:15:41,560
Is that you can actually change
the clips if you don't like the

250
00:15:41,560 --> 00:15:43,600
clip on Spotify.
Because we were just talking

251
00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:44,320
about.
Video.

252
00:15:44,320 --> 00:15:46,000
I was wondering if you could
walk us through that a little

253
00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:47,200
bit.
Yes.

254
00:15:47,200 --> 00:15:50,880
So this is great.
So when I say I don't upload

255
00:15:50,880 --> 00:15:54,000
video and I tell other people
not to, there is an exception to

256
00:15:54,000 --> 00:15:58,840
that, which is that video clips
actually I think are quite

257
00:15:58,840 --> 00:16:02,040
useful.
So if you do upload a full video

258
00:16:02,040 --> 00:16:07,520
version of your episode, then
overrides the RSS, if you are

259
00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:12,640
already publishing vertical
social clips from your podcast

260
00:16:12,640 --> 00:16:17,760
recording, you can upload a
video clip to Spotify as a

261
00:16:17,760 --> 00:16:21,960
vertical video and that will sit
in various kind of discovery

262
00:16:21,960 --> 00:16:26,160
surfaces within the platform.
So that I think is quite helpful

263
00:16:26,680 --> 00:16:28,320
in terms of the stuff that you
were talking about, about

264
00:16:28,320 --> 00:16:30,200
selecting like different
previews and things.

265
00:16:30,200 --> 00:16:31,360
So they're two separate things,
right?

266
00:16:31,360 --> 00:16:36,360
So you can upload a video clip
to an episode separately.

267
00:16:36,840 --> 00:16:41,440
But then the other cool thing
that I am quite a fan of is that

268
00:16:41,640 --> 00:16:45,280
if you go into your feed
settings and you turn all the

269
00:16:45,320 --> 00:16:50,160
automations on, then Spotify
will automatically transcribe

270
00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:52,440
your episode.
And from that transcript, it

271
00:16:52,440 --> 00:16:57,280
will choose, it will choose an
episode preview, which is an

272
00:16:57,280 --> 00:17:01,320
audio preview that it'll use
when you know on sort of various

273
00:17:01,320 --> 00:17:03,920
kind of discovery surfaces
around the platform.

274
00:17:04,079 --> 00:17:08,960
It'll choose some topics that it
thinks your episode is about and

275
00:17:08,960 --> 00:17:13,599
it'll choose some guests that it
thinks feature on your episode.

276
00:17:13,599 --> 00:17:15,920
And that takes all that from the
transcript.

277
00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:20,440
And although it does that
automatically, it then provides

278
00:17:20,440 --> 00:17:25,680
you an element of customization.
So per episode, if you go into

279
00:17:25,680 --> 00:17:29,240
your episode settings, you can
then you can then go and

280
00:17:29,240 --> 00:17:32,360
customize those automated
choices.

281
00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:37,640
So the episode previews you can
go into and you can actually, if

282
00:17:37,640 --> 00:17:39,440
you don't like, you can just
choose a completely different

283
00:17:39,440 --> 00:17:43,000
preview, set your own in and out
points and tell it what you want

284
00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:47,480
to select as the episode preview
with the topics and the guests.

285
00:17:47,480 --> 00:17:51,200
You actually can't add any more,
but you can reorder them so they

286
00:17:51,200 --> 00:17:53,920
show up in a different order.
And if there are ones that are

287
00:17:53,920 --> 00:17:55,680
incorrect, then you can delete
them.

288
00:17:55,960 --> 00:17:59,440
So it just it gives you that
little bit of control, which I

289
00:17:59,440 --> 00:18:02,080
think is quite helpful.
I don't actually know.

290
00:18:02,080 --> 00:18:05,200
I don't have any data on like
how.

291
00:18:05,440 --> 00:18:08,400
And something I would love to do
actually is to do like a deeper

292
00:18:08,400 --> 00:18:11,560
dive into kind of getting some
of the data on my how effective

293
00:18:11,560 --> 00:18:15,080
some of these things are.
But like, the options are there

294
00:18:15,080 --> 00:18:18,920
to play with and since they are
there, I think it's worth

295
00:18:18,920 --> 00:18:23,040
exploring them to kind of see
which levers you can pull to

296
00:18:23,040 --> 00:18:27,320
make the most difference to your
listenership to Spotify.

297
00:18:27,360 --> 00:18:30,480
Because I haven't played with
the clips too much in Spotify.

298
00:18:30,480 --> 00:18:36,120
Do they give you any kind of
analytics or engagement metrics

299
00:18:36,120 --> 00:18:38,960
to go by to see how many people
are actually watching those

300
00:18:39,400 --> 00:18:41,680
short clips?
Or I'm thinking kind of like, I

301
00:18:41,680 --> 00:18:43,800
took that and see if people
watch it all the way through or

302
00:18:43,800 --> 00:18:46,600
how many people watched it.
Do you get any of that with

303
00:18:46,600 --> 00:18:50,240
Spotify?
Yeah, annoyingly not actually.

304
00:18:50,480 --> 00:18:55,000
It's one of those things where
if it wasn't so easy because

305
00:18:55,000 --> 00:18:56,720
there isn't the data, I wouldn't
bother with it.

306
00:18:57,160 --> 00:18:59,800
But because it's just so
unbelievably easy.

307
00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:02,880
Like if I'm already uploading a
vertical clip to TikTok and

308
00:19:02,880 --> 00:19:07,360
Facebook and Instagram and
YouTube Shorts, then it's like

309
00:19:07,640 --> 00:19:11,440
the matter of like 3 clicks to
also add it to Spotify.

310
00:19:11,960 --> 00:19:14,280
And I sort of think it can't
hurt.

311
00:19:14,280 --> 00:19:17,360
When I browse podcasts, I see
those video clips sometimes and

312
00:19:17,360 --> 00:19:20,960
that helps me make a decision.
So that's probably a good thing

313
00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:22,600
to do.
But if it was like, oh, it's

314
00:19:22,600 --> 00:19:25,000
going to take me another 15
minutes to do this, I wouldn't,

315
00:19:25,040 --> 00:19:29,560
I would have to, it would give
me pause if I'm not getting any

316
00:19:29,560 --> 00:19:31,600
data.
And I think one of the things it

317
00:19:31,600 --> 00:19:36,840
feels to me like Spotify is kind
of product team of like created

318
00:19:36,840 --> 00:19:42,240
a bunch of features, but they're
still quite early and maybe the

319
00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:44,600
analytics haven't caught up with
it yet.

320
00:19:44,600 --> 00:19:46,640
I do quite like in Spotify's
analytics.

321
00:19:46,640 --> 00:19:49,080
I don't know whether you've
played with this at all, but it

322
00:19:49,080 --> 00:19:52,960
gives you like this nice little
funnel that shows you how many

323
00:19:52,960 --> 00:19:55,840
impressions you're getting, how
many of those impressions are

324
00:19:55,840 --> 00:20:00,160
converting to interest, and then
how many of those kind of views

325
00:20:00,160 --> 00:20:04,520
of your podcast are converting
into listens, which is sort of a

326
00:20:04,520 --> 00:20:06,320
nice.
It's a nice way of seeing it,

327
00:20:06,320 --> 00:20:09,880
but I do think the data could be
more granular and would be more

328
00:20:09,880 --> 00:20:12,520
useful if it was, I think.
Have you, have you played with

329
00:20:12,520 --> 00:20:15,880
that at all?
I've looked into and I got like

330
00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:18,200
taking a look at the impressions
and plays and listens, kind of

331
00:20:18,200 --> 00:20:20,000
like what you were talking
about, but I hadn't gotten too

332
00:20:20,000 --> 00:20:23,360
deep into it.
I think it was because of the

333
00:20:23,360 --> 00:20:27,880
confusion of I understand
impressions and I know we've

334
00:20:27,880 --> 00:20:31,280
covered it in this podcast, the
difference between plays and

335
00:20:31,280 --> 00:20:33,560
listens on Spotify and that,
that.

336
00:20:33,560 --> 00:20:36,760
Whole deal still excuses me for
this day.

337
00:20:36,800 --> 00:20:38,560
Absolutely, but there is a
difference.

338
00:20:39,560 --> 00:20:44,160
Oh yeah, so that is confusing.
So a listen, as far as I

339
00:20:44,160 --> 00:20:50,760
understand it is an individual,
whereas a play is when the play

340
00:20:50,760 --> 00:20:52,800
button is clicked on your
episode.

341
00:20:53,080 --> 00:20:57,720
So an individual might listen to
1 episode all the way through,

342
00:20:57,720 --> 00:21:01,840
but they might do it in five
sittings and every time they hit

343
00:21:01,840 --> 00:21:04,920
play and pause and play and
pause and whatever, skip and

344
00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:08,280
things, then I think it counts.
I'm not sure about skip, but

345
00:21:08,280 --> 00:21:11,360
like every time they hit play,
it counts as a play.

346
00:21:11,360 --> 00:21:13,600
So that's why the play number is
so much larger.

347
00:21:13,800 --> 00:21:18,360
I do like that Spotify gives you
unique listeners and in fact,

348
00:21:18,360 --> 00:21:23,080
one of the metrics that I use,
so I aggregate, I take the data

349
00:21:23,080 --> 00:21:26,400
from Apple Podcasts and from
Spotify and I put it all

350
00:21:26,400 --> 00:21:31,400
together and get a sort of a
total uniques her episode, which

351
00:21:31,400 --> 00:21:34,640
is quite a useful metric to
track because that shows actual

352
00:21:34,640 --> 00:21:38,880
people listening to your show.
Yeah, some of these analytics

353
00:21:39,240 --> 00:21:42,400
feel just redundant, you know
what I mean?

354
00:21:42,600 --> 00:21:46,720
There are some that are needed
that I don't see that are that

355
00:21:46,720 --> 00:21:48,920
they're touching on yet.
And then there are others that

356
00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:52,920
feel kind of redundant.
So now, Chris, you had already

357
00:21:52,920 --> 00:21:57,400
said that you are not on Spotify
and your clients are not on

358
00:21:57,400 --> 00:21:59,760
Spotify.
And that is the same with me.

359
00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:06,200
So for all of those people who
are not share, do not have the

360
00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:12,360
platform of Spotify, are any of
these gems and marketing things,

361
00:22:12,560 --> 00:22:16,760
how many of them are for us that
are maybe being hosted on other

362
00:22:16,760 --> 00:22:18,960
platforms?
All of the things that I've

363
00:22:18,960 --> 00:22:22,360
mentioned so far are things that
you can access even if your

364
00:22:22,360 --> 00:22:24,240
podcast is hosted on other
platforms.

365
00:22:24,680 --> 00:22:29,440
So you can you need to claim
your podcast in, you need to log

366
00:22:29,440 --> 00:22:32,840
into Spotify for Creators.
It used to be Spotify for

367
00:22:32,840 --> 00:22:35,880
Podcasters, but now they call it
Spotify for Creators.

368
00:22:36,120 --> 00:22:40,280
And I think it's creators dot,
Spotify dot from or something.

369
00:22:40,560 --> 00:22:44,200
And yeah, you log into that, you
claim your podcast by putting in

370
00:22:44,200 --> 00:22:49,040
the RSS feed, and then you have
access to all of these tools.

371
00:22:49,240 --> 00:22:52,520
So Spotify for Creators is the
platform, the back end platform

372
00:22:52,800 --> 00:22:54,600
that you're using to manage all
of this stuff.

373
00:22:55,040 --> 00:22:58,080
And yeah, anybody can access it.
Any any podcast can access it

374
00:22:58,080 --> 00:23:00,200
wherever they're hosted.
That's great.

375
00:23:00,440 --> 00:23:04,640
And just a reminder to our
listeners, this interview is

376
00:23:04,640 --> 00:23:09,880
based on his issue.
He has a podcasting newsletter

377
00:23:09,880 --> 00:23:12,800
on Sub Stack called Podcast
Strategy.

378
00:23:13,080 --> 00:23:18,800
And there was an enormous amount
of research that went into this

379
00:23:18,800 --> 00:23:22,160
issue all about Spotify.
How long did it take you to

380
00:23:22,160 --> 00:23:28,040
research all of this?
Well, the actual issue like is

381
00:23:28,040 --> 00:23:31,880
like a day's worth of work, but
all of the like, but most of it

382
00:23:31,880 --> 00:23:34,720
comes from like actively
managing a podcast every day.

383
00:23:34,720 --> 00:23:37,440
So I don't know.
I mean, I've been doing it for

384
00:23:37,440 --> 00:23:38,920
13 or so years.
Does that count?

385
00:23:38,920 --> 00:23:41,440
I.
Guess so.

386
00:23:41,840 --> 00:23:44,760
I guess so.
The one that I'm really like

387
00:23:44,920 --> 00:23:47,840
gravitating towards is the
comment section that people can

388
00:23:47,840 --> 00:23:53,440
actually do comments, do polls.
That is just a piece of gold.

389
00:23:53,800 --> 00:23:57,320
So what's the wildest, most
unexpected poll or comment that

390
00:23:57,320 --> 00:24:01,760
you have seen on the show?
Can you pick one?

391
00:24:02,640 --> 00:24:05,800
I mean, the thing that has
amazed me actually about the

392
00:24:05,800 --> 00:24:09,320
comments that we get on our
podcast on Spotify and also on

393
00:24:09,320 --> 00:24:12,800
YouTube as well is how good
faith they generally are.

394
00:24:13,120 --> 00:24:18,120
I'm sort of used to seeing a lot
of quite negative comments.

395
00:24:18,280 --> 00:24:21,760
If you spend any time on the
Internet, then you are going to

396
00:24:22,280 --> 00:24:24,720
you put anything out in the in
on the Internet, you're going to

397
00:24:24,720 --> 00:24:27,680
get some negative comments.
And you know, I've had some

398
00:24:27,680 --> 00:24:32,680
doozies in my time, but like
most of the comments that we get

399
00:24:32,680 --> 00:24:34,400
are actually in really good
faith.

400
00:24:34,800 --> 00:24:38,440
We have had some we've had some
spam, you know, we've had people

401
00:24:38,440 --> 00:24:41,560
kind of leaving the same comment
over and over because they're

402
00:24:41,560 --> 00:24:44,240
we're a political podcast.
So you know, they want to make

403
00:24:44,240 --> 00:24:46,280
that political point or
something and you just have to

404
00:24:46,280 --> 00:24:47,760
moderate for those sorts of
things.

405
00:24:48,160 --> 00:24:51,480
Most of the comments are
actually like responding to what

406
00:24:51,480 --> 00:24:54,520
people have heard in the
episode, contributing their

407
00:24:54,520 --> 00:24:57,960
thoughts, starting a
conversation or, you know,

408
00:24:57,960 --> 00:25:01,520
asking us a question for our
listeners questions episode.

409
00:25:01,600 --> 00:25:04,120
And I can't think of one that
kind of stands out.

410
00:25:04,120 --> 00:25:08,200
But like, the overriding feeling
that I get from the comments is

411
00:25:08,200 --> 00:25:11,280
that people, they're, they're
genuine listeners who are

412
00:25:11,280 --> 00:25:14,200
actively engaged and interested
in what we're talking about.

413
00:25:14,440 --> 00:25:19,200
So of all the gems that Spotify
has for us to use them for

414
00:25:19,200 --> 00:25:23,120
marketing, where's the one that
you think that maybe they

415
00:25:23,320 --> 00:25:26,400
they're not meeting the bar they
need a little bit of help on, or

416
00:25:26,400 --> 00:25:28,240
maybe something's missing
entirely?

417
00:25:28,600 --> 00:25:32,120
I've talked about video.
I think that's that's a really

418
00:25:32,120 --> 00:25:35,520
hot topic and really don't like
how they do it right now.

419
00:25:36,000 --> 00:25:39,120
I'm sort of quite disappointed
that you can't customize the

420
00:25:39,400 --> 00:25:42,480
topics and the guests more.
I think it would be really

421
00:25:42,480 --> 00:25:46,560
helpful to be able to specify
because actually the guest

422
00:25:46,560 --> 00:25:51,200
selector is not brilliant.
I put in the newsletter actually

423
00:25:51,200 --> 00:25:56,560
that I found that episodes where
somebody said my guest today is

424
00:25:56,640 --> 00:26:01,480
so and so tended to pick up the
guest names better.

425
00:26:01,920 --> 00:26:06,880
But I, somebody from Spotify got
in touch after the after I

426
00:26:07,000 --> 00:26:10,080
published the e-mail and they
said actually that kind of

427
00:26:10,080 --> 00:26:12,440
shouldn't make a difference.
It should just pick it up from

428
00:26:12,440 --> 00:26:15,600
the transcript.
But to my mind, it would be, it

429
00:26:15,600 --> 00:26:22,440
would be quite helpful to be
able to tag a guest and for

430
00:26:22,440 --> 00:26:24,600
guests to have a page in
Spotify.

431
00:26:24,600 --> 00:26:27,960
So you could like go to a guest
page and see all the podcasts

432
00:26:27,960 --> 00:26:30,920
that they have appeared on.
There's like different ways that

433
00:26:30,920 --> 00:26:33,640
you can do the kind of
recommendations and things based

434
00:26:33,640 --> 00:26:36,800
on like if I like, there's a,
there's a business creator that

435
00:26:36,800 --> 00:26:39,200
I really like called Daniel
Priestley.

436
00:26:39,560 --> 00:26:43,160
And I listen to a lot of the
podcasts that he's on.

437
00:26:43,160 --> 00:26:45,720
Actually, I've listened to so
many that I've reached the point

438
00:26:45,720 --> 00:26:47,400
where he's just saying the same
thing over and over now.

439
00:26:47,400 --> 00:26:50,480
But getting into him and his
content, He doesn't have his own

440
00:26:50,480 --> 00:26:53,800
podcast, but he appears on a lot
of other podcasts.

441
00:26:54,000 --> 00:26:59,000
I would quite enjoy a guest feed
of all of his content on

442
00:26:59,000 --> 00:27:01,880
different people shows and then
I would discover lots of

443
00:27:01,880 --> 00:27:03,520
different people shows through
doing that.

444
00:27:03,520 --> 00:27:06,520
So I think that's something that
would be cool but doesn't exist

445
00:27:06,520 --> 00:27:08,440
at the moment.
What would your like wish list

446
00:27:08,440 --> 00:27:10,480
be?
If you could get Spotify on the

447
00:27:10,480 --> 00:27:13,440
phone and tell them a feature
request, what do you think it

448
00:27:13,440 --> 00:27:14,800
would be?
Well, you know what?

449
00:27:14,800 --> 00:27:17,800
That's the thing though, I try
and steer away from.

450
00:27:20,200 --> 00:27:22,120
Why is that?
It's just, it has this

451
00:27:22,120 --> 00:27:26,880
reputation of not being the best
when it comes to customer

452
00:27:26,880 --> 00:27:31,280
service.
And I, and again, I think that

453
00:27:31,280 --> 00:27:36,480
maybe I, maybe I'm going on
antiquated information.

454
00:27:36,560 --> 00:27:39,920
Maybe I need to update my, my
feelings on that.

455
00:27:40,160 --> 00:27:43,240
Have you had a chance to
experience their customer

456
00:27:43,240 --> 00:27:46,080
service and they're going
through such a metamorphic that

457
00:27:46,120 --> 00:27:48,960
it's you?
Know well, I suppose technically

458
00:27:48,960 --> 00:27:53,400
we're not a Spotify customer,
we're a Spotify user, right?

459
00:27:53,400 --> 00:27:59,000
So I have had relationships with
people who work at Spotify in

460
00:27:59,000 --> 00:28:01,880
the same way that I've had
relationships that work with

461
00:28:01,880 --> 00:28:06,360
people that work at Apple in the
sense of you might sometimes get

462
00:28:06,480 --> 00:28:09,960
on different shows, a, you know,
a partner success manager or

463
00:28:09,960 --> 00:28:12,040
something.
He can like give you tips on how

464
00:28:12,040 --> 00:28:13,520
to use the platform and that
sort of thing.

465
00:28:13,800 --> 00:28:16,880
But I haven't, as I said, we
don't host on Spotify, so we're

466
00:28:16,880 --> 00:28:19,040
not paying any money and they're
not paying us any money.

467
00:28:19,520 --> 00:28:21,800
So we're just, we're just a user
at the moment.

468
00:28:22,160 --> 00:28:24,440
But you know, these platforms
that like, there are people that

469
00:28:24,440 --> 00:28:28,280
run them and half the time it's
just like trying to figure out

470
00:28:28,280 --> 00:28:29,840
how to get in touch with the
right people.

471
00:28:30,560 --> 00:28:33,640
Yes, I understand.
It's it's who you know.

472
00:28:33,880 --> 00:28:35,720
Hey, Nick, you have a question?
Go ahead, Nick.

473
00:28:36,320 --> 00:28:40,440
Say you were going to be
starting a new podcast or

474
00:28:40,800 --> 00:28:44,560
someone wants to kind of start
putting more of their eggs in

475
00:28:44,560 --> 00:28:47,640
the Spotify basket and kind of
shift away from Apple or

476
00:28:47,640 --> 00:28:51,960
YouTube, wherever they're at.
What would be like the top three

477
00:28:51,960 --> 00:28:56,080
things that someone should focus
on to get the most out of the

478
00:28:56,080 --> 00:29:01,480
platform and really be able to
expand their reach on Spotify

479
00:29:01,480 --> 00:29:05,920
specifically?
So the first thing I think is

480
00:29:05,920 --> 00:29:10,200
getting your titles and
descriptions right, both on a

481
00:29:10,200 --> 00:29:13,560
show level and on a feed level.
And, and this of course has the

482
00:29:13,560 --> 00:29:16,400
benefit that if you get that
right, this isn't just about

483
00:29:16,400 --> 00:29:19,000
Spotify, This is about every
player that you appear on.

484
00:29:19,360 --> 00:29:23,440
But different players will have
different character limits for

485
00:29:23,440 --> 00:29:25,920
titles and, and for
descriptions.

486
00:29:25,920 --> 00:29:29,360
And I actually had another
newsletter issue where I went

487
00:29:29,360 --> 00:29:33,120
into a bit more detail about
this, but because they all have

488
00:29:33,120 --> 00:29:35,960
like different character limits
and stuff, if we're saying like

489
00:29:36,200 --> 00:29:40,000
I'm going to, Spotify is my
primary discovery platform, so

490
00:29:40,000 --> 00:29:43,360
I'm going to optimize all of my
content from that.

491
00:29:43,680 --> 00:29:45,840
And then everything else will
follow.

492
00:29:46,200 --> 00:29:52,280
Then Spotify's title gives you
maximum 2 lines, I think it's

493
00:29:52,280 --> 00:29:54,960
like 8 to 12 words depending on
how long the words are.

494
00:29:55,320 --> 00:29:58,920
And then the description gives
you a maximum of two lines as

495
00:29:58,920 --> 00:30:03,440
the preview.
For me, I would make sure that

496
00:30:03,440 --> 00:30:07,640
I'm optimizing my title and
description for that character

497
00:30:07,640 --> 00:30:11,480
count so that what really
important information surfaces

498
00:30:11,480 --> 00:30:16,040
first.
Then I would do the video clips

499
00:30:16,120 --> 00:30:18,480
because they're the easiest
lift, I think.

500
00:30:19,280 --> 00:30:21,560
And the other thing that I
should say about titles and

501
00:30:21,560 --> 00:30:28,920
descriptions in Spotify is that
it appears that Spotify uses

502
00:30:29,200 --> 00:30:34,160
show title, show description,
episode title, and episode

503
00:30:34,160 --> 00:30:38,360
description to inform search
results.

504
00:30:38,720 --> 00:30:44,080
It says that it doesn't just use
keywords, it uses natural

505
00:30:44,080 --> 00:30:47,280
language processing.
So you don't just have to like

506
00:30:47,280 --> 00:30:51,120
stuff all your primary keywords
in your titles and descriptions,

507
00:30:51,120 --> 00:30:55,400
but making sure that you are
referencing the topics that

508
00:30:55,400 --> 00:30:59,080
you're discussing using a good
kind of SEO and keyword

509
00:30:59,080 --> 00:31:02,440
strategy.
And you know, you can vary kind

510
00:31:02,440 --> 00:31:04,760
of how the keywords is
displayed, but making sure that

511
00:31:04,760 --> 00:31:09,200
the relevant topics are talked
about in your description will

512
00:31:09,360 --> 00:31:12,120
give you the best chance of kind
of surfacing on search.

513
00:31:12,120 --> 00:31:14,760
So I'd say like, that's the
that's the starting point.

514
00:31:15,280 --> 00:31:19,000
Then I would go to the video
clips because if you're doing

515
00:31:19,000 --> 00:31:22,240
video already, they're so easy.
If you're not doing video

516
00:31:22,240 --> 00:31:24,520
already and you just skip over
that bit.

517
00:31:24,920 --> 00:31:30,200
And then I would go to polls and
comments and do as much as I can

518
00:31:30,200 --> 00:31:34,040
to encourage those.
Because that, I think, is the

519
00:31:34,040 --> 00:31:38,560
feature that ties most neatly
into what podcasting is

520
00:31:38,560 --> 00:31:41,680
brilliant at, which is helping
people feel part of a gang.

521
00:31:41,960 --> 00:31:47,960
Yes, I really go back and unpack
the title description SEO thing.

522
00:31:48,320 --> 00:31:53,680
So for our listeners, can you
give us like a good example of a

523
00:31:53,720 --> 00:31:58,040
title versus an example that's
not so good?

524
00:31:59,440 --> 00:32:03,640
I can take one from the podcasts
that we've published recently.

525
00:32:03,720 --> 00:32:07,480
We've gone through various kind
of iterations with titles at the

526
00:32:07,480 --> 00:32:09,240
New Statesman where I currently
work.

527
00:32:09,320 --> 00:32:14,480
And when I started, they were
like super big on puns and they

528
00:32:14,480 --> 00:32:18,960
would use these puns to like
give a two or three word title

529
00:32:19,280 --> 00:32:23,800
that were very clever and very
witty, but absolutely useless

530
00:32:23,800 --> 00:32:28,200
for search, right?
Because like a pun is not an

531
00:32:28,200 --> 00:32:31,920
actual word of half the time or,
or it makes it makes the robot

532
00:32:31,920 --> 00:32:35,040
who's responsible for crawling
the thing think it's something

533
00:32:35,040 --> 00:32:38,520
it's not, you know.
So actually I think being quite

534
00:32:38,520 --> 00:32:43,080
sort of huge utilitarian with
titles can help to surface you

535
00:32:43,080 --> 00:32:45,480
in search.
We've got to balance that with

536
00:32:45,880 --> 00:32:51,160
clickability and presenting the
right information in the preview

537
00:32:51,400 --> 00:32:53,680
window so that when somebody
sees your episode, they know

538
00:32:54,080 --> 00:32:58,800
kind of what it is.
So the way that we have started

539
00:32:58,800 --> 00:33:08,960
doing it now is to do a title
that is maybe 4 to 6 words, but

540
00:33:08,960 --> 00:33:12,360
then we put a break in, you
know, a vertical line break.

541
00:33:12,880 --> 00:33:16,560
And then we do like a subtitle
that's like another few words.

542
00:33:16,760 --> 00:33:20,040
If I get cut off in the preview,
it doesn't matter so much.

543
00:33:20,360 --> 00:33:24,480
But like, for example, the
latest episode is labor students

544
00:33:24,480 --> 00:33:27,680
revolt over Gaza, right?
It's quite utilitarian.

545
00:33:28,000 --> 00:33:30,080
It's got some good keywords in
there.

546
00:33:30,320 --> 00:33:33,320
It's got a bit of conflict.
I feel like that's quite a

547
00:33:33,320 --> 00:33:35,120
strong title.
But then we have a break and

548
00:33:35,120 --> 00:33:39,200
then we say politics with a new
Shakelian who is our host.

549
00:33:39,560 --> 00:33:42,560
So then we're getting the
politics keyword in and we're

550
00:33:42,560 --> 00:33:47,600
getting the host name.
And then for the description,

551
00:33:48,000 --> 00:33:51,800
because you get like a two line
preview in the episode

552
00:33:51,800 --> 00:33:55,040
appearance on the feed that you
see in Spotify.

553
00:33:55,840 --> 00:34:00,720
I like to try and start the
description with a hook a bit

554
00:34:00,720 --> 00:34:05,720
like if you're writing a post on
LinkedIn or you know, whatever,

555
00:34:05,800 --> 00:34:12,360
like put your like 12 to 15 word
single sentence hook at the very

556
00:34:12,360 --> 00:34:16,480
top of your description and that
might have a few more kind of

557
00:34:16,960 --> 00:34:19,800
useful keywords.
Actually, I didn't do this one,

558
00:34:19,800 --> 00:34:22,080
so I don't know if the producer
did it on this one or not.

559
00:34:22,320 --> 00:34:23,679
And if not, he's going to tell
them off.

560
00:34:24,360 --> 00:34:25,840
So there we go.
That sort of hook.

561
00:34:25,840 --> 00:34:29,960
Here was youth membership for
the Labour Party has collapsed,

562
00:34:30,800 --> 00:34:31,960
right?
And then you can go into that

563
00:34:31,960 --> 00:34:33,960
more kind of detail.
So like if you've done

564
00:34:33,960 --> 00:34:37,040
journalism or if you're like
writing articles for the web and

565
00:34:37,040 --> 00:34:40,120
stuff, then you might think of
it as your like your headline

566
00:34:40,120 --> 00:34:42,199
and your stand first.
That's how I think of it.

567
00:34:42,199 --> 00:34:45,040
So like the title is the
headline and the hook is like

568
00:34:45,040 --> 00:34:47,719
the subhead or the stand first
web article.

569
00:34:48,040 --> 00:34:52,880
So do you change up titles after
so long to try and optimize for

570
00:34:53,199 --> 00:34:56,639
search engines, or do you just,
you know, decide to go on, just

571
00:34:56,639 --> 00:34:58,240
move on?
Well, it's funny, isn't it?

572
00:34:58,240 --> 00:35:00,560
Like I do this on YouTube
sometimes.

573
00:35:00,560 --> 00:35:03,680
On YouTube, we change the titles
from time to time to see if that

574
00:35:03,800 --> 00:35:07,440
helps the algorithm.
I change the titles.

575
00:35:07,440 --> 00:35:10,080
If one of my producers has
written a title I don't like,

576
00:35:11,760 --> 00:35:13,040
I'll go in.
There's one here.

577
00:35:13,040 --> 00:35:15,120
There's one here they published
while I was away.

578
00:35:15,440 --> 00:35:19,040
The title is Wasp Movie, so I'm
going to change that because

579
00:35:19,040 --> 00:35:22,720
that doesn't mean anything.
Yeah, but no, but they're very

580
00:35:22,720 --> 00:35:24,800
good.
The producers I work with are

581
00:35:24,800 --> 00:35:26,920
absolutely brilliant and I
really don't have to do that

582
00:35:26,920 --> 00:35:30,760
very much.
So like, yeah, I mean, we, we

583
00:35:30,760 --> 00:35:34,200
haven't done, but then we're
producing daily content.

584
00:35:34,760 --> 00:35:38,400
And honestly, we don't really
have the bandwidth to sort of go

585
00:35:38,400 --> 00:35:41,560
back and change stuff too much.
But if I was producing a weekly

586
00:35:41,560 --> 00:35:45,400
show, then I probably would pay
quite close attention to how The

587
00:35:45,400 --> 00:35:48,440
Reach is doing and then think
about maybe going back in and

588
00:35:48,440 --> 00:35:50,440
changing if it wasn't working.
Excellent.

589
00:35:50,560 --> 00:35:54,240
I know I originally brought you
on here to talk about Spotify,

590
00:35:54,920 --> 00:36:00,600
but I also want to talk about
having a newsletter on Substack.

591
00:36:01,040 --> 00:36:05,760
Can you talk about Substack as
opposed to any other of the

592
00:36:06,000 --> 00:36:09,400
millions of platforms that there
are for newsletters?

593
00:36:09,640 --> 00:36:13,720
Why did you decide on Spotify
and how has your growth been

594
00:36:13,920 --> 00:36:16,280
from the time that you started?
OK, cool.

595
00:36:16,280 --> 00:36:19,880
So this is like my other new
passions, like my hobby passion,

596
00:36:20,240 --> 00:36:24,520
which I'm very excited about.
I launched the newsletter

597
00:36:24,720 --> 00:36:29,360
because I'm in a day job and I
thought there might come a time

598
00:36:29,360 --> 00:36:30,960
when I want to launch a
business.

599
00:36:31,320 --> 00:36:35,080
Don't know what that's going to
be yet, but everybody says that

600
00:36:35,080 --> 00:36:37,840
having an e-mail list is a
really sensible thing to do.

601
00:36:37,840 --> 00:36:40,800
So I'm going to launch a
newsletter to Create an e-mail

602
00:36:40,800 --> 00:36:45,240
list so that I've got some owned
audience that I can go to if I

603
00:36:45,240 --> 00:36:47,080
launch a business.
And that's kind of what's

604
00:36:47,080 --> 00:36:49,160
happened, right?
So I'm doing podcast crew now,

605
00:36:49,160 --> 00:36:53,400
and the Sub Stack newsletter is
helping to kind of market that

606
00:36:53,400 --> 00:36:56,720
business.
But the reason I chose Sub Stack

607
00:36:57,120 --> 00:37:02,840
was primarily because it was
free and had a lot of kind of

608
00:37:02,840 --> 00:37:06,400
useful tools and it allows you
to monetize and that sort of

609
00:37:06,400 --> 00:37:10,920
thing.
I know that it's not perfect for

610
00:37:10,920 --> 00:37:12,800
things like audience
segmentation.

611
00:37:13,120 --> 00:37:17,160
It is not an e-mail marketing
platform, so it's not like

612
00:37:17,160 --> 00:37:21,520
Convertkit or MailChimp or any
of the others way you can do

613
00:37:21,520 --> 00:37:23,880
that.
Chris, this surprises me because

614
00:37:23,880 --> 00:37:27,200
I was under the impression and
by the way, I don't have a

615
00:37:27,200 --> 00:37:30,400
newsletter yet, but Substack is
one of them that I've been

616
00:37:30,400 --> 00:37:34,480
looking at.
So I was told that Substack is

617
00:37:34,520 --> 00:37:38,280
really primarily for
newsletters, primarily for

618
00:37:38,280 --> 00:37:41,240
newsletters.
Now over the years they have

619
00:37:41,440 --> 00:37:46,640
evolved into having videos kind
of TikTok kind of videos.

620
00:37:46,960 --> 00:37:48,520
Can you, can you talk about
that?

621
00:37:48,680 --> 00:37:50,960
So I went into Substat because I
wanted to launch an e-mail

622
00:37:50,960 --> 00:37:54,040
newsletter and that seemed to me
the most frictionless way of

623
00:37:54,040 --> 00:37:55,440
doing it.
And it has been very

624
00:37:55,440 --> 00:37:57,640
frictionless and I've really
enjoyed it.

625
00:37:58,000 --> 00:38:01,280
It does also have like a social
surface as well.

626
00:38:01,280 --> 00:38:06,880
So it's got notes, which is a
bit like Twitter, and it's sign

627
00:38:06,960 --> 00:38:10,280
it can be a good way of
attracting new subscribers.

628
00:38:10,800 --> 00:38:15,520
It also has a video vertical
video function and things.

629
00:38:15,520 --> 00:38:19,680
So there's like a social bit of
it, which frankly I use less

630
00:38:19,800 --> 00:38:24,200
than the newsletter function.
Most of the listenership, most

631
00:38:24,200 --> 00:38:28,400
of the readership for the
newsletter comes through e-mail.

632
00:38:28,400 --> 00:38:34,000
So people receiving it and then
opening the e-mail like 95% or

633
00:38:34,000 --> 00:38:38,840
more comes that way and then a
small amount reads it on the app

634
00:38:38,840 --> 00:38:41,480
or comes via search or comes via
notes or whatever.

635
00:38:41,720 --> 00:38:46,320
But notes have been quite useful
when I have tried them and

636
00:38:46,320 --> 00:38:49,880
occasionally had a had one
that's done reasonably well.

637
00:38:50,200 --> 00:38:53,320
They can be quite good at
attracting new subscribers.

638
00:38:53,600 --> 00:38:57,960
I do wonder how valuable those
subscribers are and how high

639
00:38:57,960 --> 00:39:00,560
quality those subscribers are
though, because they're sort of

640
00:39:01,080 --> 00:39:03,200
in browsing in the app and it's
very easy to subscribe.

641
00:39:03,200 --> 00:39:07,800
I feel like the two biggest
other routes to subscriber

642
00:39:07,800 --> 00:39:09,880
acquisition that I found have
been LinkedIn.

643
00:39:10,160 --> 00:39:14,200
So I'm very active on LinkedIn.
That's my main discovery surface

644
00:39:14,200 --> 00:39:18,160
and then I then ID platform
people to Sub Stack through

645
00:39:18,160 --> 00:39:21,720
various kind of calls to action.
And the other one is

646
00:39:21,720 --> 00:39:24,120
recommendations, which is
something else that Sub Stack is

647
00:39:24,120 --> 00:39:28,880
really good at is if you
recommend a newsletter, then

648
00:39:29,600 --> 00:39:32,680
people who subscribe to your
newsletter are more likely to

649
00:39:32,680 --> 00:39:35,760
then subscribe to the newsletter
that you've recommended.

650
00:39:35,760 --> 00:39:39,320
And actually Sub Stack has kind
of ways of making sure that

651
00:39:39,320 --> 00:39:41,520
happens.
And I've had perceived quite a

652
00:39:41,520 --> 00:39:45,000
lot of subscribers through other
newsletters who write on a

653
00:39:45,000 --> 00:39:47,240
similar topic.
Absolutely.

654
00:39:47,240 --> 00:39:49,720
Can you, before we go to Jeff,
because I know Jeff has a

655
00:39:49,720 --> 00:39:53,920
question, can you briefly talk
about your growth from where you

656
00:39:53,920 --> 00:39:59,080
started to where you are now?
Yeah, so I started with 0

657
00:39:59,080 --> 00:40:01,520
obviously, because I started
from nothing when I.

658
00:40:01,560 --> 00:40:04,400
So I had a little bit of a
following on LinkedIn, like a

659
00:40:04,400 --> 00:40:07,840
tiny bit like 1500 followers or
something.

660
00:40:08,200 --> 00:40:12,840
And I put a thing out and I said
I'm going to do a sub stack and

661
00:40:13,080 --> 00:40:16,840
50 people very kindly subscribed
on the off chance that it was

662
00:40:16,840 --> 00:40:24,760
going to be interesting.
And now I'm at 14150 after about

663
00:40:24,760 --> 00:40:28,920
a year.
And a large chunk of that,

664
00:40:28,960 --> 00:40:35,040
probably 30% came in one day
when I had a LinkedIn post that

665
00:40:35,040 --> 00:40:39,360
went absolutely gangbusters,
mega viral for me anyway.

666
00:40:39,440 --> 00:40:44,240
And I used like a sub stack post
as a, so I housed a lead magnet

667
00:40:44,240 --> 00:40:47,200
within a sub stack post.
But I promoted on LinkedIn, the

668
00:40:47,200 --> 00:40:50,560
LinkedIn thing went viral and
then it attracted a whole bunch

669
00:40:50,560 --> 00:40:52,960
of subscribers.
So that's something I want to

670
00:40:52,960 --> 00:40:55,080
try and do more of.
Awesome, awesome.

671
00:40:55,360 --> 00:40:58,920
Hey, Jeff, welcome to the stage.
I appreciate you.

672
00:40:58,920 --> 00:41:00,400
Coming up.
Do you have a question for

673
00:41:00,400 --> 00:41:03,920
Chris?
Yeah, I think I'm understanding

674
00:41:03,960 --> 00:41:07,080
part of what you're referencing,
Chris, but it there are pieces

675
00:41:07,080 --> 00:41:09,480
of it that feel a little
nuanced, so I just wanted to ask

676
00:41:09,480 --> 00:41:12,600
it explicitly.
I'm not familiar with Substack,

677
00:41:12,720 --> 00:41:15,200
so that may be my underlying
problem.

678
00:41:15,600 --> 00:41:18,440
But when you say you choose, you
choose to do your.

679
00:41:18,480 --> 00:41:22,640
Your newsletter on Substack.
Can your newsletter not be?

680
00:41:22,640 --> 00:41:27,200
And it it may be your newsletter
is, isn't it the same kind of

681
00:41:27,200 --> 00:41:31,080
thing like a podcast lock?
You can focus on Spotify or

682
00:41:31,080 --> 00:41:35,840
focus on Substack, but you can
still take that same newsletter

683
00:41:35,840 --> 00:41:40,120
and run it through Medium and
run it through other ways of

684
00:41:40,120 --> 00:41:43,160
circulating it.
Are you saying it's exclusively

685
00:41:43,160 --> 00:41:45,760
on sub stack?
Or that's just where you kind of

686
00:41:45,760 --> 00:41:47,440
focus.
Hello, Jeff.

687
00:41:47,440 --> 00:41:50,960
That's a really good question.
And you're right, there's some

688
00:41:50,960 --> 00:41:54,320
nuance there.
So one of the things that I like

689
00:41:54,320 --> 00:41:56,800
about Sub Stack is that it also
gives you a website.

690
00:41:56,920 --> 00:42:01,760
You publish your newsletter
through Sub Stack and it

691
00:42:01,760 --> 00:42:03,920
delivers it to people's e-mail
addresses.

692
00:42:04,440 --> 00:42:08,600
It also gives you your own URL.
So mine is podcast

693
00:42:08,600 --> 00:42:14,200
strategy.substack.com, although
you can also create a custom

694
00:42:14,200 --> 00:42:15,880
URL.
So I'm in the process of doing

695
00:42:15,880 --> 00:42:18,320
that as well.
And then all of your articles

696
00:42:18,320 --> 00:42:23,800
are housed on that URL and
within your profile on the Sub

697
00:42:23,800 --> 00:42:27,880
Stack app.
So like it becomes like from 1

698
00:42:27,880 --> 00:42:31,360
publish, you've got those three
like different platforms that it

699
00:42:31,360 --> 00:42:34,040
goes out to e-mail, website and
the app.

700
00:42:34,560 --> 00:42:39,280
I have experimented with
repurposing the stuff that I've

701
00:42:39,280 --> 00:42:46,640
written on sub Stack as LinkedIn
articles, which is good, I

702
00:42:46,640 --> 00:42:47,960
think.
I think that's fine.

703
00:42:48,280 --> 00:42:52,880
I haven't put it on like Medium
or on a personal blog or

704
00:42:52,880 --> 00:42:56,400
anything like that, partly
because I'm a bit nervous about

705
00:42:56,400 --> 00:42:58,440
duplicate content affecting the
SEO.

706
00:42:58,440 --> 00:43:01,240
So obviously SEO takes a long
time to build.

707
00:43:01,600 --> 00:43:07,440
I've only just started to see
traffic, small and really small

708
00:43:07,440 --> 00:43:14,080
amounts of traffic coming to the
Substack website via search.

709
00:43:14,800 --> 00:43:19,560
And I'm a bit nervous about kind
of whether SEO would get

710
00:43:19,560 --> 00:43:21,160
punished.
I mean, to be honest, it's

711
00:43:21,160 --> 00:43:23,160
probably academic because the
amount of traffic is so small

712
00:43:23,160 --> 00:43:25,880
right now, but that's why I
haven't published it elsewhere.

713
00:43:25,880 --> 00:43:28,960
But yeah, I mean like absolutely
you could like if you wanted to

714
00:43:28,960 --> 00:43:30,800
put it on different platforms,
there's nothing to stop you.

715
00:43:31,200 --> 00:43:34,760
So one more question just
because you just said it and it

716
00:43:34,840 --> 00:43:39,800
baffled me what you just said.
You said that you have

717
00:43:39,800 --> 00:43:45,240
experimented with posting some
of the articles on LinkedIn and

718
00:43:45,240 --> 00:43:50,880
you think it's good?
But you just told us a story

719
00:43:50,880 --> 00:43:55,880
about getting a 30% jump on your
subscriptions, which I thought

720
00:43:55,880 --> 00:43:58,080
was from an article on LinkedIn.
Is that not right?

721
00:43:58,520 --> 00:44:00,360
Ah, right, no.
So that was from a post.

722
00:44:00,600 --> 00:44:05,720
So LinkedIn allows you to
publish articles as a separate

723
00:44:06,000 --> 00:44:13,000
media type and then you can post
a link to that LinkedIn article.

724
00:44:13,920 --> 00:44:15,120
So it's just a different media
type.

725
00:44:15,120 --> 00:44:17,760
No.
So, So what I found very good

726
00:44:18,000 --> 00:44:28,040
has been posting on LinkedIn.
The LinkedIn articles I have had

727
00:44:28,040 --> 00:44:31,000
some traffic from.
I haven't experimented with them

728
00:44:31,000 --> 00:44:33,600
for a while simply because of
kind of bandwidth really.

729
00:44:33,920 --> 00:44:36,840
But yeah, I'm, I'm talking about
two different media types on

730
00:44:36,840 --> 00:44:38,080
LinkedIn.
Does that make sense?

731
00:44:38,240 --> 00:44:40,480
It does now.
I was, I was like you just said

732
00:44:40,480 --> 00:44:42,760
LinkedIn was a huge win.
Well, the other thing is that

733
00:44:42,760 --> 00:44:46,240
LinkedIn also has newsletters,
what they call newsletters.

734
00:44:46,640 --> 00:44:49,480
And so there's this live sort of
conversation in my head going,

735
00:44:49,800 --> 00:44:52,600
hey, just also put it on
LinkedIn as a newsletter.

736
00:44:52,800 --> 00:44:55,640
And then no, don't do that
because what you want to do is

737
00:44:55,640 --> 00:44:57,560
de platform people to get them
onto the sub stack.

738
00:44:57,560 --> 00:45:00,320
So you get their e-mail address.
But then if you just put it on

739
00:45:00,320 --> 00:45:01,800
LinkedIn, then more people will
see it.

740
00:45:02,560 --> 00:45:03,640
But no, I want the e-mail
address.

741
00:45:03,640 --> 00:45:05,800
So I'm constantly debating that
in my head.

742
00:45:06,280 --> 00:45:10,320
Right, exactly, very good.
So we only have a couple minutes

743
00:45:10,320 --> 00:45:13,360
left, Chris.
I wanted to touch a little bit

744
00:45:13,360 --> 00:45:20,000
on the podcast crew, explain it
and and you know that I am at I,

745
00:45:20,120 --> 00:45:25,200
I should be at the top of your
list, Chris, because as soon as

746
00:45:25,200 --> 00:45:27,480
I saw it, I went, yes, I'm
signing up for this.

747
00:45:27,840 --> 00:45:31,280
So it's something that has not
happened yet, but it's on the

748
00:45:31,280 --> 00:45:33,640
verge.
And so give us some inside

749
00:45:33,640 --> 00:45:35,320
scoop.
What is it and when is it

750
00:45:35,320 --> 00:45:39,120
happening?
Podcast Crew is a recruitment

751
00:45:39,120 --> 00:45:42,520
platform for the podcast
industry, connecting top tier

752
00:45:42,520 --> 00:45:47,000
podcast professionals with the
clients who need their services.

753
00:45:47,000 --> 00:45:50,240
So the target client is really
kind of, you know, production

754
00:45:50,240 --> 00:45:52,680
companies and businesses that
want podcasts.

755
00:45:53,040 --> 00:45:58,600
The reason I'm doing it is
because I have hired a lot of

756
00:45:59,080 --> 00:46:02,640
podcast producers over the
course of my career and I've

757
00:46:02,720 --> 00:46:08,120
always been amazed at how analog
and fragmented the processes,

758
00:46:08,120 --> 00:46:12,160
right?
So LinkedIn and Indeed or any of

759
00:46:12,160 --> 00:46:17,080
the other like general job sites
are super broad and nonspecific.

760
00:46:17,440 --> 00:46:19,640
I don't know what it's like in
the US, but at least here in the

761
00:46:19,640 --> 00:46:24,880
UK, there are a couple of kind
of podcast specific networks

762
00:46:24,880 --> 00:46:29,600
that people post jobs on, but
they tend to get flooded with

763
00:46:30,000 --> 00:46:32,880
inappropriate candidate.
So people that don't have the

764
00:46:32,880 --> 00:46:34,720
relevant experience or, you
know, whatever.

765
00:46:35,200 --> 00:46:38,440
And at the same time, I got to a
point where a lot of people were

766
00:46:38,440 --> 00:46:41,160
asking me, do you know a good
podcast producer?

767
00:46:41,280 --> 00:46:44,360
And that's the main way that
people find people to make their

768
00:46:44,360 --> 00:46:45,480
podcast, right?
It's word of mouth.

769
00:46:45,880 --> 00:46:50,160
And So what I want to do is try
and systematize that and provide

770
00:46:50,160 --> 00:46:54,360
a service that makes that whole
process a lot easier for people.

771
00:46:54,440 --> 00:46:58,720
So Podcast crew is going to be a
web platform.

772
00:46:59,080 --> 00:47:00,920
It's it's a sort of a
marketplace business.

773
00:47:00,920 --> 00:47:05,000
So it's a web platform where
podcast professionals can build

774
00:47:05,000 --> 00:47:08,520
their profile, apply for jobs
and connect with clients and

775
00:47:08,560 --> 00:47:14,800
clients can find an easy way to
get good podcast people.

776
00:47:15,640 --> 00:47:19,440
And the important kind of layer
of that is a level of sort of

777
00:47:19,440 --> 00:47:24,320
minimum barrier to entry.
So we only want kind of actual

778
00:47:24,320 --> 00:47:27,000
trusted, proven professionals
who've got like professional

779
00:47:27,000 --> 00:47:29,720
podcast experience.
And then there's a sort of a

780
00:47:29,720 --> 00:47:32,320
level of kind of vetting and
verification that goes on as

781
00:47:32,320 --> 00:47:35,680
well to make sure that clients
are getting access to the best

782
00:47:35,680 --> 00:47:37,760
talent.
And then it will come also with

783
00:47:37,960 --> 00:47:41,840
a bespoke matching service.
So clients can either go on the

784
00:47:41,840 --> 00:47:44,920
platform and self-serve and
contact podcast professionals

785
00:47:44,920 --> 00:47:49,200
directly or to the clients that
we that we are already working

786
00:47:49,200 --> 00:47:51,840
with.
Often they're time pressed,

787
00:47:52,240 --> 00:47:54,480
they've got a Commission that's
come through and they need a

788
00:47:54,480 --> 00:47:56,880
producer right now.
They don't really have time to

789
00:47:56,880 --> 00:47:59,760
go in self-serve, so we'll do a
white glove experience for them

790
00:47:59,760 --> 00:48:03,480
so that so we can do a bespoke
matching process where we find

791
00:48:03,840 --> 00:48:06,200
basically a head hunting process
using the database on the

792
00:48:06,200 --> 00:48:09,720
platform to service them with
the podcast producers that they

793
00:48:09,720 --> 00:48:11,960
need.
That is awesome.

794
00:48:12,240 --> 00:48:16,240
Now, Chris, I'm going to ask you
to provide us with a link that

795
00:48:16,240 --> 00:48:21,160
we can put on for the replays
and so everyone can get access

796
00:48:21,160 --> 00:48:23,000
to maybe signing up for this,
OK?

797
00:48:23,640 --> 00:48:25,920
Yeah, that'd be great.
So I should say we're going to.

798
00:48:25,920 --> 00:48:27,160
So I'm building the platform
now.

799
00:48:27,160 --> 00:48:31,080
It's nearly done.
I keep saying that and then I

800
00:48:31,080 --> 00:48:34,280
find another bug that need to
iron out and it's going to

801
00:48:34,280 --> 00:48:38,960
launch first in the UK because
that's where I am and I need to

802
00:48:39,400 --> 00:48:41,720
make sure that I'm getting.
So I'm going to launch it first

803
00:48:41,720 --> 00:48:45,960
with like a very private beta
with maybe just 20 people that

804
00:48:45,960 --> 00:48:48,480
I've already vetted who I know
are good and they're in the UK

805
00:48:48,480 --> 00:48:51,880
and that's going to work.
So then I'm going to yet make

806
00:48:51,920 --> 00:48:54,400
make sure that I'm servicing
them with the right support that

807
00:48:54,400 --> 00:48:55,960
they need.
Then I'm going to open it out

808
00:48:55,960 --> 00:48:59,480
within the UK.
But I've also got somebody in

809
00:48:59,720 --> 00:49:02,840
Sweden who wants to help me
launch it over there because the

810
00:49:02,840 --> 00:49:05,520
Nordics have a good kind of
podcasting community as well.

811
00:49:05,800 --> 00:49:09,000
And I would love to bring it
into the US because obviously

812
00:49:09,000 --> 00:49:12,720
the podcast industry in the US
is is much larger.

813
00:49:13,040 --> 00:49:16,760
And I think, I mean you tell me
if I'm wrong, but I don't think

814
00:49:16,760 --> 00:49:19,720
there is anything like this for
the podcast industry in the US

815
00:49:20,240 --> 00:49:22,200
at the moment either.
Is that right?

816
00:49:22,560 --> 00:49:26,320
I can't think of of any Ashley,
Jonathan, Jeff, can you think of

817
00:49:26,320 --> 00:49:28,520
anything like that off the top
of your head?

818
00:49:28,720 --> 00:49:30,480
No.
So I think that would be a

819
00:49:30,480 --> 00:49:33,200
really.
Welcome thing to have over here.

820
00:49:33,480 --> 00:49:35,600
I'll try and try and do that
quickly then before anyone else

821
00:49:35,600 --> 00:49:39,920
does, please do.
Well, Chris, thank you so much

822
00:49:39,920 --> 00:49:42,360
for taking out the time to talk
with us today.

823
00:49:42,680 --> 00:49:46,760
I will tell you that I you may
have changed my mind completely

824
00:49:46,760 --> 00:49:49,360
on Spotify.
It might be something that I

825
00:49:49,360 --> 00:49:52,840
have to take a closer look at.
So I appreciate that.

826
00:49:52,840 --> 00:49:55,840
And I know you didn't have to
wake up early for this, right?

827
00:49:55,840 --> 00:49:57,120
This is midday for.
You.

828
00:49:57,120 --> 00:49:58,600
No, I mean, this is my
lunchtime.

829
00:49:58,720 --> 00:50:01,280
I'm honored to be with you while
you're making eggs.

830
00:50:01,280 --> 00:50:04,320
Thank.
You that's that happens every

831
00:50:04,320 --> 00:50:07,720
morning, by the way, so join us
anytime you want to.

832
00:50:08,480 --> 00:50:11,120
So everyone, thank you so much
for joining us.

833
00:50:11,120 --> 00:50:14,840
I appreciate it and be with us
tomorrow for Newsday.

834
00:50:14,840 --> 00:50:20,520
Tomorrow is all full of news and
until next time, thank you so

835
00:50:20,520 --> 00:50:23,080
much.
Have a great day.

836
00:50:23,520 --> 00:50:24,800
Thanks, Chris.
Thank you.