July 2, 2025

332 - Spotify Lures YouTubers, Apple’s Top 20, & Are AI Subscriptions Worth it?

332 - Spotify Lures YouTubers, Apple’s Top 20, & Are AI Subscriptions Worth it?
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon

Spotify wants YouTubers. Apple’s celebrating 20 years of podcasting. And Gen Z? They're tuning in! It’s news day, and we’re breaking down Apple’s “20 Podcasts We Love” list, surprising Gen Z listening habits, and YouTube’s AI-powered upgrades that could shift how audiences search and watch. We also give you the scoop on a leaked Spotify strategy that includes $5K ad credits for video creators. Is this enough to tempt video creators to make the move? We also talk about Jeremy Enns’ 2025 Podcast Marketing Trends Report: who's growing, what’s working, and why personal connection might be your secret weapon. Bonus: our show is nominated for a People’s Choice Podcast Award (go vote under “T” for The Podcasting Morning Chat!).

Episode Highlights:

[02:24] Podcast Data and Trends

[03:35] Random Charts

[05:40] People's Choice Award Nomination

[08:51] Upcoming Events and Conferences

[11:01] Job Opportunities

[23:21] AI News and Developments

[28:21] The Signing Bonus Situation

[29:58] Apple's AI Ambitions

[31:05] Gemini's Educational Tools

[32:12] Are AI Subscriptions Worth It?

[34:51] AI in Daily Life

[41:35] Spotify's Big Push into Video

Links & Resources:

The Podcasting Morning Chat:

www.podpage.com/pmc

Join The Empowered Podcasting Facebook Group:

www.facebook.com/groups/empoweredpodcasting⁠

Empowered Podcasting Conference:

https://www.empoweredpodcasting.com

Podnews:

www.Podnews.net

Meta’s AI Talent War:

https://apple.news/AjhkHQqo0SsOpELJev4AKGg

Are AI Subscriptions Worth It?

https://bit.ly/44JPYKX

New YouTube AI Features:

https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/new-youtube-ai-tools-summer-2025/

Leaked Spotify Deck Reveals Big Video Push:

https://theankler.com/p/scoop-leaked-spotify-deck-reveals

Careers in Podcasting:

https://bit.ly/3I2MmLo

Jeremy Enns Marketing Trend Report:

https://podcastmarketingacademy.com/author/jeremypodcastmarketingacademy-com

Remember to rate, follow, share, and review our podcast. Your support helps us grow and bring valuable content to our community.

Join us LIVE every weekday morning at 7 am ET (US) on ⁠Clubhouse⁠: ⁠⁠⁠ https://www.clubhouse.com/house/empowered-podcasting-e6nlrk0w⁠⁠

Live on YouTube: ⁠https://youtube.com/@marcronick⁠”

Brought to you by⁠ ⁠iRonickMedia.com⁠

Please note that some links may be affiliate links, which support the hosts of the PMC. Thank you!

--- Send in your mailbag question at:⁠ https://www.podpage.com/pmc/contact/⁠ or ⁠marc@ironickmedia.com⁠

Want to be a guest on The Podcasting Morning Chat? Send me a message on PodMatch, here:

⁠https://www.podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/1729879899384520035bad21b⁠


1
00:00:05,040 --> 00:00:07,000
Good morning podcasting Morning
Chat.

2
00:00:07,320 --> 00:00:14,640
Today is Wednesday, July 2nd,
2025, and today we're we've got

3
00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:17,960
a fresh batch of podcast news
and commentary from Gen.

4
00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:21,080
ZS listening habits to
surprising trends, new tools,

5
00:00:21,080 --> 00:00:24,400
bold moves from Spotify and
YouTube, and more.

6
00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:28,280
So if you're listening live on
Clubhouse, hit the share button,

7
00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:30,360
bottom left hand side of the
screen and share it.

8
00:00:30,360 --> 00:00:34,040
However, Clubhouse lets you.
And if you're listening via

9
00:00:34,040 --> 00:00:37,200
podcast, please share this
episode with a fellow podcaster.

10
00:00:38,840 --> 00:00:43,080
And now give us about 30 seconds
and we'll get things rolling.

11
00:00:43,440 --> 00:01:22,300
Thanks for being here.
Good morning again podcasting

12
00:01:22,300 --> 00:01:24,540
Morning Chat.
Thank you for being here.

13
00:01:24,540 --> 00:01:28,300
I am your host, Mark Ronick, and
currently on stage with me we

14
00:01:28,300 --> 00:01:34,460
have my producer Ashley Feller,
Dr. Faye, Nick Naulback and Sid

15
00:01:34,660 --> 00:01:37,480
Meadows.
And as I said, we're going to be

16
00:01:37,480 --> 00:01:41,400
covering all the news around the
world of podcasting, content

17
00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:46,440
creation and things that are
probably going to be important

18
00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:49,440
to you.
Staying up to date as a content

19
00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:53,440
creator, I think gives you an
advantage because there's so

20
00:01:53,440 --> 00:01:57,680
much going on in this world.
And I do currently speaking

21
00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:01,000
about podcasting and content
creation and yes, so much going

22
00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:04,360
on in this whole world as well,
but so much going on in the

23
00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:07,120
world of podcasting that
sometimes it can feel a little

24
00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:09,759
hard to keep up.
So we that's one of the main

25
00:02:09,759 --> 00:02:13,080
goals of this episode is to get
you up to date.

26
00:02:14,120 --> 00:02:21,800
So with that, I think I might as
well just dive right in.

27
00:02:24,040 --> 00:02:28,720
So let's go with as I like to
start with a little podcast data

28
00:02:28,800 --> 00:02:32,960
for you this morning.
This is as of yesterday, July

29
00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:39,320
1st, the number one podcast on
Apple, Devil in the Desert and

30
00:02:39,320 --> 00:02:44,120
ABC News production.
A true Crime Story, I believe,

31
00:02:44,680 --> 00:02:49,400
and yes #1 on Spotify.
We'll hear it a little more from

32
00:02:49,840 --> 00:02:53,520
Dr. in a moment, but number one
on Spotify, The Joe Rogan

33
00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:56,440
Experience.
And by the way, over the last

34
00:02:56,440 --> 00:03:04,600
week, 195,669 podcasts produced,
published at least one new

35
00:03:04,640 --> 00:03:06,680
episode, which is up a half a
percent.

36
00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:08,760
Good to hear.
I feel like the last couple

37
00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:12,080
weeks I've said it was down, so
that's good to hear.

38
00:03:12,080 --> 00:03:15,240
And by the way, Alex Baelish has
joined us as well.

39
00:03:15,240 --> 00:03:17,720
And thank you to those of you
who are already here this

40
00:03:17,720 --> 00:03:21,760
morning, live bright and early
7:00 AM Eastern.

41
00:03:21,760 --> 00:03:24,680
Appreciate you being here with
us on Clubhouse.

42
00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:28,360
And a reminder, we are live on
YouTube as well.

43
00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:30,720
We're sharing the link here on
Clubhouse.

44
00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:34,680
I need to go share the link to
Clubhouse over on YouTube.

45
00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:39,440
All right, so with that, Dr.
let's hear your two top five

46
00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:41,480
lists for today.
Good morning.

47
00:03:41,880 --> 00:03:46,760
So Spotify #5 an oldie but
goodie, you know, And you'll

48
00:03:46,760 --> 00:03:53,080
love them.
Crime Junkie #4 is the daily #3

49
00:03:53,960 --> 00:03:58,680
Timpani is usually happy OK the
the past weekend with Theo Von.

50
00:03:58,880 --> 00:04:03,680
Number 2 is Tucker Carlson and
the number one is Joe Rogan.

51
00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:05,160
Experience.
Shocker.

52
00:04:05,920 --> 00:04:07,840
Yeah.
All right, so what's the random

53
00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:10,960
chart of the week?
OK, random chart of the week is

54
00:04:10,960 --> 00:04:12,600
education.
You know, I look for these

55
00:04:12,600 --> 00:04:15,800
random charts.
I look for something that

56
00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:18,480
usually doesn't have Joe Rogan's
name on it.

57
00:04:18,800 --> 00:04:22,600
I usually look for something
that is not something that I've

58
00:04:22,600 --> 00:04:26,960
said before in the prior chart
and stuff like that.

59
00:04:26,960 --> 00:04:31,600
So today I think I have it.
Education #5 is the Jordan P

60
00:04:32,600 --> 00:04:38,120
Jordan, sorry, Jordan B Peterson
podcast #4 is tiny technical

61
00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:40,920
tutorials.
OK, that's hard.

62
00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:44,520
Tiny technical tutorial.
That is a hard name to say.

63
00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:50,080
OK #3 is anything goes with Emma
Chamberlain.

64
00:04:50,840 --> 00:04:58,240
Number 2 is let's find out and
#1 you know where you love her,

65
00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:01,040
Sid, It's the Mel Robbins
podcast.

66
00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:02,960
Of course it is.
Yes.

67
00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:06,080
She's another one that is
commonly on the top of the

68
00:05:06,080 --> 00:05:08,160
charts.
And by the way, the pod,

69
00:05:08,160 --> 00:05:12,000
Speaking of the charts, Dr. we
are still the podcasting morning

70
00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:16,560
chat, still in the top 40s in
the how to category.

71
00:05:16,560 --> 00:05:20,280
I think I last checked we are at
4344.

72
00:05:20,280 --> 00:05:23,840
Something like that.
So awesome, really cool

73
00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:25,920
something.
Isn't there something that you

74
00:05:25,920 --> 00:05:29,200
would like to ask our listeners
to do?

75
00:05:29,600 --> 00:05:35,000
Oh, like why yes, why yes, there
is Dr. That wasn't planned, by

76
00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:37,680
the way.
I know it feels like it was, but

77
00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:43,480
thank you for the reminder.
Yes, we are also nominated for

78
00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:48,320
the People's Choice Award award
over at the podcast awards

79
00:05:48,320 --> 00:05:51,480
podcast awards.com there used.
To be a fanfare kind of music

80
00:05:51,480 --> 00:05:54,400
when you say that.
Though all I got really for

81
00:05:54,400 --> 00:05:57,440
fanfare.
Let me see what I got where

82
00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:00,560
where did it go?
I had it the other day for our

83
00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:02,080
game show.
I was going to you want.

84
00:06:02,280 --> 00:06:04,880
Me to hum something, give us,
give it to us again.

85
00:06:05,720 --> 00:06:10,880
We have been nominated for the
Podcast awards.com People's

86
00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:20,760
Choice Award.
Thank you, Dr. So yes, all you

87
00:06:20,760 --> 00:06:25,240
have to do, we need your help.
We need you to vote for us so we

88
00:06:25,240 --> 00:06:28,480
can move on to the next round.
The way you do that is you go to

89
00:06:28,760 --> 00:06:34,000
podcastawards.com and you have
to register, which I know some

90
00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:38,080
people may find annoying, but it
is free so and it only takes a

91
00:06:38,080 --> 00:06:40,440
second.
So you have to 1st register or

92
00:06:40,440 --> 00:06:43,360
sign up to vote is really the
correct terminology.

93
00:06:43,800 --> 00:06:48,200
Do that and then you'll get your
whole list of shows and

94
00:06:48,200 --> 00:06:51,960
categories to vote on.
You'll see, I think toward the

95
00:06:51,960 --> 00:06:54,240
top, the Adam Curry People's
Choice award.

96
00:06:54,240 --> 00:06:57,040
That's the one that we are
eligible for.

97
00:06:57,400 --> 00:07:00,320
The weird thing is, is they
decided to put us under.

98
00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:03,880
So it's all listed
alphabetically and they have us

99
00:07:04,040 --> 00:07:08,200
under the TS for the podcasting
morning chat.

100
00:07:09,040 --> 00:07:12,560
And there's a lot of them.
Don't let that, don't let that

101
00:07:13,080 --> 00:07:15,520
dissuade you.
There's a lot of them that you

102
00:07:15,520 --> 00:07:19,280
have to go through.
So knowing that we are under T

103
00:07:19,320 --> 00:07:22,040
for the is very important.
Yes.

104
00:07:22,040 --> 00:07:25,760
So please Scroll down to.
When you start seeing the word

105
00:07:25,760 --> 00:07:28,240
the on the list, you know you're
close.

106
00:07:28,600 --> 00:07:31,000
And then look for the podcasting
morning chat.

107
00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:33,560
Give us your vote and then go
vote for some of these other

108
00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:38,000
great shows that are nominated.
I know that we have several

109
00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:43,480
people in our community here
that are eligible.

110
00:07:43,640 --> 00:07:46,880
Maybe I'm gonna maybe before I
start announcing some and not

111
00:07:47,120 --> 00:07:50,280
all, I'll collect a little list
and I'll I'll bring it up

112
00:07:50,280 --> 00:07:53,040
tomorrow so that we can all
support one another.

113
00:07:53,040 --> 00:07:55,880
For now, please, if you don't
mind, vote for the podcasting

114
00:07:55,880 --> 00:07:58,720
Morning Chat podcast awards dot
com.

115
00:07:58,720 --> 00:08:01,760
We'll link to it with
instructions in the show notes

116
00:08:01,760 --> 00:08:03,600
as well.
Sid, did you have a question?

117
00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:06,720
Yes, good morning, everybody.
Actually, Mark, it's in two

118
00:08:06,720 --> 00:08:09,240
categories.
Oh, you found this in the second

119
00:08:09,240 --> 00:08:10,320
one.
Yes.

120
00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:13,040
So it's on the right hand side
about the third one or fourth

121
00:08:13,040 --> 00:08:14,680
one down.
There's another because I went

122
00:08:14,680 --> 00:08:17,240
through every category and
voted.

123
00:08:17,240 --> 00:08:19,560
If I knew this show, I voted.
If not, I left it blank.

124
00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:22,080
And I happen to notice like on
the right hand side, like the

125
00:08:22,080 --> 00:08:25,720
third one down maybe that that
that it showed up there again.

126
00:08:25,760 --> 00:08:28,440
What category?
I don't remember, sorry.

127
00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:30,200
OK.
I don't remember.

128
00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:32,400
I just was like, oh, there it is
again.

129
00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:35,919
So, but it's on the right hand
side of the page.

130
00:08:35,919 --> 00:08:38,520
Excuse me, the left hand side of
the page, like the third or

131
00:08:38,520 --> 00:08:40,400
fourth one down?
All right.

132
00:08:40,799 --> 00:08:43,760
Well, we're going to have to
look that up and figure that

133
00:08:43,760 --> 00:08:45,400
out.
I was going to just try to do it

134
00:08:45,400 --> 00:08:47,640
here on the fly.
I have to go back and do it

135
00:08:47,640 --> 00:08:49,360
again.
All right, well, let's keep

136
00:08:49,360 --> 00:08:52,760
things moving.
We also have some events to

137
00:08:52,760 --> 00:08:55,640
share with you.
Not a ton, but we do have a few.

138
00:08:55,960 --> 00:09:00,560
A little reminder, Podcast
movement 2025 starts August 18th

139
00:09:00,960 --> 00:09:06,200
in hot Dallas, TX, August in
Texas.

140
00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:09,480
Not the best time of year, but a
great event.

141
00:09:09,480 --> 00:09:13,720
I've been to many podcast
movements now at this point and

142
00:09:13,720 --> 00:09:15,960
not sure if I'm going yet this
year.

143
00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:18,440
I think it's going to be a last
minute call for me, even though

144
00:09:19,120 --> 00:09:22,440
I get mad at people because so
many of you are last minute

145
00:09:22,440 --> 00:09:25,200
tickets, ticket purchasers for
Empowered Podcasting.

146
00:09:25,200 --> 00:09:28,320
Maybe that's karma.
So maybe I need to just make my

147
00:09:28,320 --> 00:09:31,640
decision and buy my ticket now
to help with the Empowered

148
00:09:31,640 --> 00:09:34,480
Podcasting ticket sales.
We'll get to that in a second.

149
00:09:34,680 --> 00:09:40,080
Radio Days Asia is coming
September 1st to Indonesia,

150
00:09:40,680 --> 00:09:44,920
pretty crazy.
And Pod Summit YYC 2025 that

151
00:09:44,920 --> 00:09:48,640
starts September 19th and that's
in Calgary, Canada.

152
00:09:49,320 --> 00:09:52,760
And yes the Empowered Podcasting
conference come in September

153
00:09:52,760 --> 00:09:55,760
26th through the 28th in
Charlotte, NC.

154
00:09:56,120 --> 00:10:00,680
Just like last year, ticket
sales don't seem to, well I'll

155
00:10:00,680 --> 00:10:05,520
just say last year they didn't
happen until way close to the

156
00:10:05,520 --> 00:10:09,440
event, nearly gave me a heart
attack and then we had a very

157
00:10:09,440 --> 00:10:12,600
successful event of over 100
people attending.

158
00:10:12,760 --> 00:10:16,200
This year it seems we are
trending in that same direction

159
00:10:16,200 --> 00:10:18,760
and I think I will have heart
attack.

160
00:10:18,760 --> 00:10:22,120
No, I'm knocking on wood here,
but seriously, I could really

161
00:10:22,120 --> 00:10:24,680
use your help.
If you are planning on coming,

162
00:10:24,680 --> 00:10:28,280
please consider going to
empoweredpodcasting.com and

163
00:10:28,280 --> 00:10:31,000
purchasing a ticket.
And if you are somebody who

164
00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:35,320
applied to speak at Empowered
Podcasting, we are looking to

165
00:10:35,320 --> 00:10:39,080
make the announcement, the
speaker announcements this very

166
00:10:39,120 --> 00:10:42,480
week.
So be on the lookout for your

167
00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:44,920
emails.
We will have that announcement

168
00:10:44,920 --> 00:10:49,760
in there shortly.
OK, and that is let me see so

169
00:10:49,760 --> 00:10:54,160
that in again September 28th,
I'm sorry, 26th through the 28th

170
00:10:54,440 --> 00:10:57,600
Dr. do you want to give us do
you have time before you go cook

171
00:10:57,600 --> 00:10:59,600
some breakfast?
I do all right, so job

172
00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:02,080
opportunities.
Yeah, so these job OPS, you

173
00:11:02,640 --> 00:11:06,240
know, normally we read them off
from Pod News, but these came

174
00:11:06,240 --> 00:11:11,720
from the newsletter Pod Fest
Messenger, and they're quite a

175
00:11:11,720 --> 00:11:13,240
few of them.
I'm not going to read them all

176
00:11:13,240 --> 00:11:15,040
off.
There's some in there that are

177
00:11:15,120 --> 00:11:18,480
remote.
NPR is hiring a podcast

178
00:11:18,480 --> 00:11:22,440
engagement and curation, but
that's an internship, but it is

179
00:11:22,480 --> 00:11:26,560
remote.
Red Balloon hiring podcast

180
00:11:26,560 --> 00:11:29,640
producer and content editor.
Hold on, that's also.

181
00:11:29,800 --> 00:11:31,280
Oh, Red Balloon.
OK, you did skip.

182
00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:33,400
I thought you.
I thought you were reading Robin

183
00:11:33,400 --> 00:11:35,360
Hood.
I'm looking at your list here.

184
00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:36,520
I thought you were reading it
wrong.

185
00:11:36,680 --> 00:11:39,120
OK, I'm just gonna there's a lot
of them here so I'm just gonna

186
00:11:39,200 --> 00:11:41,880
pick and choose some.
But I will read Robin Hood

187
00:11:41,880 --> 00:11:45,760
hiring podcast producer in
Clearwater, FL that is not

188
00:11:45,760 --> 00:11:51,920
designated as a remote and then
also Dallas Bulls hiring a

189
00:11:51,920 --> 00:11:55,360
podcast host and producer in
Dallas.

190
00:11:55,720 --> 00:11:57,360
So I thought that was kind of
interesting.

191
00:11:58,120 --> 00:12:00,800
Very cool.
Yeah, Thank you, Dr. Appreciate

192
00:12:00,800 --> 00:12:03,960
that.
And let's go.

193
00:12:04,120 --> 00:12:06,840
I'm trying to think here.
All right, let's just do a a few

194
00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:11,760
news bites for you and we're
going to get into some AI news

195
00:12:11,760 --> 00:12:15,480
while we're at it.
But first, important to note, I

196
00:12:15,480 --> 00:12:20,960
think that this past Saturday,
June 28th, marked 20 years since

197
00:12:20,960 --> 00:12:27,160
Podcasts first landed in iTunes.
Yes, I said iTunes.

198
00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:32,600
That was a name thrown around a
lot several years ago, and since

199
00:12:33,040 --> 00:12:36,040
Apple decided to get rid of it
and created Apple Music, Apple

200
00:12:36,040 --> 00:12:38,560
Podcasts kind of separated
everything out.

201
00:12:38,560 --> 00:12:41,720
We used to share iTunes with
musicians.

202
00:12:42,120 --> 00:12:45,520
Now we have our own app.
To celebrate this milestone,

203
00:12:45,520 --> 00:12:50,640
Apple Podcasts put out a list
called 20 Years, 20 Podcasts We

204
00:12:50,640 --> 00:12:54,480
Love and shared a thank you to
everyone who creates podcasts.

205
00:12:54,760 --> 00:12:58,960
In their words, podcasting has
become a global force thanks to

206
00:12:58,960 --> 00:13:02,120
the creativity and commitment of
creators and the deep

207
00:13:02,240 --> 00:13:05,440
connections they have with their
audiences.

208
00:13:05,680 --> 00:13:08,400
They go on to say the 20
podcasts that we select,

209
00:13:08,800 --> 00:13:13,520
selected for the 20 years, 20
podcasts we love, list our

210
00:13:13,520 --> 00:13:17,680
representation of this same
creativity and connection found

211
00:13:17,680 --> 00:13:22,680
across the millions of podcasts
and app on Apple Podcasts.

212
00:13:23,200 --> 00:13:26,640
Dr. If you don't mind, can you
see or Ashley, can you see if

213
00:13:26,640 --> 00:13:29,360
you can pull up that list 'cause
I don't have it in front of me

214
00:13:29,360 --> 00:13:32,440
and I thought it would be cool
to mention a couple of those do.

215
00:13:32,440 --> 00:13:35,080
What I can do?
And by the way, that quote came

216
00:13:35,080 --> 00:13:40,040
from Ben Cave, the global head
of podcasts at Apple, speaking

217
00:13:40,040 --> 00:13:44,040
to Pod News, where we get a lot
of our information.

218
00:13:44,040 --> 00:13:50,000
Not all, but a lot.
And by the way, Apple also said

219
00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:53,800
that these shows have made a
lasting impact on listeners and

220
00:13:53,800 --> 00:13:57,040
the podcast industry.
There's also an essential

221
00:13:57,040 --> 00:13:59,280
listening poll going on right
now.

222
00:13:59,280 --> 00:14:02,000
I think that's still happening.
Gathering pics from audio

223
00:14:02,000 --> 00:14:05,680
creators, writers and scholars.
A list they'll reveal this

224
00:14:05,680 --> 00:14:11,400
August at Podcast Movement.
And fun fact, June 26th.

225
00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:15,360
I know I said the 28th was 20
years of podcasting on Apple.

226
00:14:15,360 --> 00:14:20,200
The 26th marks the 13th
anniversary of the launch of the

227
00:14:20,200 --> 00:14:25,160
Apple Podcasts iOS app that came
out in 2012.

228
00:14:25,160 --> 00:14:30,280
The one I mentioned a moment ago
going on a new study just came

229
00:14:30,280 --> 00:14:37,480
out showing that 86% of Gen.
Z listens to music or tunes into

230
00:14:37,480 --> 00:14:40,240
podcasts when they want to boost
their mood.

231
00:14:40,640 --> 00:14:45,520
And this is in some ways a small
follow up to the Blue's Clues

232
00:14:45,600 --> 00:14:49,800
Steve Burns story we did on
Thursday that absolutely helped

233
00:14:49,800 --> 00:14:55,200
catapult us up the charts on
Apple 'cause that thing is still

234
00:14:56,200 --> 00:14:58,400
being downloaded like crazy
right now.

235
00:14:58,400 --> 00:15:01,160
And again, as a result of all
those people finding us, they're

236
00:15:01,160 --> 00:15:04,320
downloading other episodes too.
But this is kind of a follow up

237
00:15:04,320 --> 00:15:08,560
'cause we talked about that,
that audience, and I forget what

238
00:15:08,560 --> 00:15:13,200
other generation we identified,
but that's part of his audience

239
00:15:13,520 --> 00:15:16,600
from back in the day.
And we talked about how now he's

240
00:15:16,600 --> 00:15:20,440
appealing to them in a whole new
way as adults, as I'll call them

241
00:15:20,440 --> 00:15:25,280
newer adults and, and figuring
out this adulting thing.

242
00:15:25,280 --> 00:15:30,320
So anyway, this is from the Gen.
Z report put together by Edison

243
00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:34,560
Research and SiriusXM Media.
The report also found that

244
00:15:34,560 --> 00:15:39,720
people ages 13 to 24 are most
concerned with the economy,

245
00:15:40,000 --> 00:15:43,240
social justice and political
division.

246
00:15:43,400 --> 00:15:47,960
Also, I think that's kind of
common things that younger

247
00:15:47,960 --> 00:15:51,960
people are into, right?
So that doesn't surprise me, I

248
00:15:51,960 --> 00:15:54,600
guess is all I'm saying.
And also another little note,

249
00:15:54,600 --> 00:15:56,960
when Gen.
Z is looking for something new,

250
00:15:56,960 --> 00:16:00,280
most of them start by searching
on YouTube.

251
00:16:00,680 --> 00:16:03,040
Also not terribly surprising
these days.

252
00:16:03,280 --> 00:16:06,080
OK, I want to go back to that
top 20 list.

253
00:16:06,080 --> 00:16:10,800
Dr. or Ashley, did you, did you
guys look at Apple's 20 years 20

254
00:16:10,800 --> 00:16:12,320
podcasts?
We love list.

255
00:16:12,960 --> 00:16:18,120
They have Serial on here,
Obviously Serial the show that

256
00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:21,320
they say the show that changed
everything for podcasting.

257
00:16:21,320 --> 00:16:25,720
And I would, I would agree with
that. 2014, I was working for

258
00:16:25,720 --> 00:16:28,200
that pretty large podcast at the
time.

259
00:16:28,200 --> 00:16:31,440
I've mentioned before the Mike
O'Mara show and we were

260
00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:35,320
certainly doing really well.
And then when Serial came out, I

261
00:16:35,320 --> 00:16:38,680
remember that being a thing for
us and us talking about that

262
00:16:38,680 --> 00:16:41,560
because it really catapulted
everything.

263
00:16:41,560 --> 00:16:45,520
It really did change the game,
including Listenership where

264
00:16:45,520 --> 00:16:48,480
that show as well, more people
were discovering podcasts and

265
00:16:48,480 --> 00:16:52,360
then as a result discovering our
show as well.

266
00:16:52,840 --> 00:16:56,400
Acquired is on there.
I'm trying to see The Daily is

267
00:16:56,400 --> 00:17:00,240
on there and of course, Call Her
Daddy is on there as well.

268
00:17:00,240 --> 00:17:03,720
And that's, you know, that's
just coming on the scene after a

269
00:17:03,960 --> 00:17:08,520
few recent years, but they've
made that 20 years list.

270
00:17:08,720 --> 00:17:13,160
I'm curious, has anybody seen or
finished watching the Call Her

271
00:17:13,160 --> 00:17:16,640
Alex documentary?
We talked about that last week.

272
00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:19,920
I'm just curious if anybody has
started it or finished it.

273
00:17:20,599 --> 00:17:24,160
But I don't see anybody raising
their hands, so I guess not.

274
00:17:24,599 --> 00:17:26,440
Ashley did.
Did you?

275
00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:29,760
I started it.
And I don't want to sound too

276
00:17:29,760 --> 00:17:32,480
critical, but I don't know if I
can watch Part 2 y'all.

277
00:17:32,720 --> 00:17:33,920
Really.
You didn't like it?

278
00:17:34,400 --> 00:17:36,520
How come?
It felt kind of like, you know

279
00:17:36,520 --> 00:17:40,600
how when you watch reality TV
and sometimes there's that force

280
00:17:40,600 --> 00:17:43,200
narrative that just seems like
they pushed it too much.

281
00:17:43,520 --> 00:17:45,960
I just think they tried a little
too hard.

282
00:17:46,200 --> 00:17:48,080
I don't know.
I'm probably not the target

283
00:17:48,080 --> 00:17:50,520
audience for that show though.
Yeah.

284
00:17:50,640 --> 00:17:55,360
And I think though, as a content
creator, a music creator,

285
00:17:55,840 --> 00:17:59,680
etcetera, I think that there you
could find something interesting

286
00:17:59,680 --> 00:18:00,880
about that.
And I respect that.

287
00:18:00,880 --> 00:18:04,040
I've, I've read some reviews
about that, the people saying

288
00:18:04,440 --> 00:18:07,760
similar things.
And I do admit there's a moment

289
00:18:07,760 --> 00:18:12,640
in Part 1 where I guess one of
their very important crew

290
00:18:12,640 --> 00:18:17,840
members was unhappy.
And I am just trying to be

291
00:18:17,840 --> 00:18:20,040
careful about spoilers for those
who may want to watch it.

292
00:18:20,040 --> 00:18:24,680
And I do remember thinking it
felt a little, I just was

293
00:18:24,680 --> 00:18:27,840
questioning, is this true or is
this a plant?

294
00:18:28,680 --> 00:18:32,120
So, Marcy, Yeah.
That was exactly the.

295
00:18:32,120 --> 00:18:34,880
Part that caused that thought in
my mind.

296
00:18:34,880 --> 00:18:38,760
I thought they tried too hard to
being careful what I'm saying.

297
00:18:39,320 --> 00:18:41,440
Cast a shadow on that guy, so to
speak.

298
00:18:41,440 --> 00:18:44,440
Yeah, yeah, I did think that
too.

299
00:18:44,440 --> 00:18:46,560
So that's interesting.
If anybody ends up watching,

300
00:18:46,560 --> 00:18:49,680
we'll bring it up, I'm sure.
Again, I'm curious what others

301
00:18:49,680 --> 00:18:52,240
think about that.
But when I got past that part,

302
00:18:52,240 --> 00:18:55,160
it yeah, at least, you know,
questioning that part.

303
00:18:55,160 --> 00:18:58,360
Overall, I was still really
fascinated with her story.

304
00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:01,960
Admittedly haven't seen Part 2
yet and I plan to, but I was

305
00:19:01,960 --> 00:19:04,920
kind of hoping I would get my
wife to watch it with me.

306
00:19:05,520 --> 00:19:07,840
I see here.
And also they have Apple has

307
00:19:07,840 --> 00:19:12,400
this list categorized from 2005
to 2010.

308
00:19:12,400 --> 00:19:16,440
Then they have their next list
from two 2011 to 2015.

309
00:19:16,680 --> 00:19:18,560
So that's interesting to see
him.

310
00:19:18,600 --> 00:19:21,000
Let's see it.
Song Exploder was another one.

311
00:19:21,320 --> 00:19:23,680
I remember that one being really
popular.

312
00:19:23,680 --> 00:19:24,880
I don't.
Are they still around?

313
00:19:24,880 --> 00:19:27,200
I don't know if Song Exploder is
still around.

314
00:19:27,200 --> 00:19:29,680
I haven't seen any or heard
anything about it.

315
00:19:29,840 --> 00:19:33,360
Also acquired is another one.
And then when we look at

316
00:19:33,960 --> 00:19:37,840
anything from recent history,
the past say four years,

317
00:19:38,160 --> 00:19:41,960
Huberman Lab, that's definitely
one I hear a lot about and have

318
00:19:41,960 --> 00:19:45,520
listened to regularly or at
somewhat regular, somewhat

319
00:19:45,520 --> 00:19:48,920
regularly.
They've got here Sweet Bobby.

320
00:19:49,560 --> 00:19:53,360
They have baby.
This is Keke Palmer and

321
00:19:54,080 --> 00:19:58,200
therapist with Jake Shane.
I don't know, therapist with

322
00:19:58,360 --> 00:20:00,720
Jake Shane.
So there you go.

323
00:20:00,720 --> 00:20:04,320
There's Apple's top 20 list.
Also, by the way, shout out to

324
00:20:04,320 --> 00:20:07,360
Dominic Lawson, who has just
joined us on stage.

325
00:20:07,360 --> 00:20:09,160
Dominic, where in the world are
you?

326
00:20:09,160 --> 00:20:12,360
I feel like I've seen some
status updates from you on

327
00:20:12,360 --> 00:20:15,360
social media and it feels like
you're bouncing all over the

328
00:20:15,360 --> 00:20:17,040
place.
Where are you And good morning.

329
00:20:17,400 --> 00:20:19,640
Good morning, hope all is well.
I'm at home.

330
00:20:20,120 --> 00:20:22,080
Oh, OK.
I just got back from New Orleans

331
00:20:22,080 --> 00:20:26,480
but I am on my way to Atlanta
later this week so.

332
00:20:26,480 --> 00:20:28,440
But I'm home right now.
Glad to be home.

333
00:20:28,440 --> 00:20:32,480
Nice and can I ask it I saw your
your status said you had

334
00:20:33,040 --> 00:20:36,560
recorded a late night recording
and then had an early recording

335
00:20:36,560 --> 00:20:38,240
the next day.
What are you working on if you

336
00:20:38,240 --> 00:20:40,960
don't mind sharing?
Oh, that was me working on a new

337
00:20:40,960 --> 00:20:44,480
episode of Rewritten.
I had to get that out, so it

338
00:20:44,480 --> 00:20:45,880
actually just came out this
morning.

339
00:20:45,880 --> 00:20:49,000
So there you go.
Nice, so you're able to record

340
00:20:49,000 --> 00:20:52,160
those on the go?
You don't have any problem doing

341
00:20:52,160 --> 00:20:54,600
it remotely from from your usual
setup.

342
00:20:55,080 --> 00:20:57,480
Yes and no.
I prefer to do it from home, but

343
00:20:57,480 --> 00:21:01,320
if I have to do it on the road,
then you know the show must go

344
00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:03,680
on as they may, as they say in
entertainment, I guess.

345
00:21:03,680 --> 00:21:06,120
So it just has to be done.
All right, So what?

346
00:21:06,120 --> 00:21:10,400
Sorry to put you on the spot.
What does an award-winning Apple

347
00:21:10,400 --> 00:21:15,320
podcast featured podcaster carry
with them remotely when they

348
00:21:15,320 --> 00:21:18,240
have to record episodes away
from home?

349
00:21:18,480 --> 00:21:22,840
What do you got on you?
So I have a Zoom F4 that I use

350
00:21:22,840 --> 00:21:26,400
that I was able to kind of
acquire recently actually.

351
00:21:26,400 --> 00:21:29,320
And so it gets the job done.
I'm not well versed in it

352
00:21:29,680 --> 00:21:33,120
because I was, it was given to
me as a gift, but it definitely

353
00:21:33,120 --> 00:21:34,920
gets the job done.
It's one of those field

354
00:21:34,920 --> 00:21:37,400
recorders.
And so I just kind of hook up

355
00:21:37,400 --> 00:21:42,240
everything, bring the EVR E20
mic with me and just make it

356
00:21:42,240 --> 00:21:43,640
happen, man.
That's about it.

357
00:21:43,640 --> 00:21:46,120
I love it, I love it.
Awesome.

358
00:21:46,120 --> 00:21:47,840
Thank you Dominic.
There you go.

359
00:21:47,840 --> 00:21:50,400
So if Dominic can do it, we can
all do it.

360
00:21:50,680 --> 00:21:54,600
It's not it's, it's really just
takes a matter of getting used

361
00:21:54,600 --> 00:21:56,480
to being in a different place,
right.

362
00:21:56,480 --> 00:22:00,280
If you all you need is a mic,
those those little mixers are

363
00:22:00,280 --> 00:22:03,600
also really handy 'cause it just
gives you a lot more flexibility

364
00:22:03,840 --> 00:22:07,760
and preferably you have a set of
headphones as well or earbuds

365
00:22:07,760 --> 00:22:10,760
and you're good to go.
So we can learn a thing or two

366
00:22:10,760 --> 00:22:14,040
about how Dominic's doing it.
And yeah, that's mental health

367
00:22:14,160 --> 00:22:16,240
rewritten.
In case you're curious what

368
00:22:16,720 --> 00:22:18,800
which show or what show
Dominic's talking about.

369
00:22:18,800 --> 00:22:21,760
So go check out that show as
well.

370
00:22:21,760 --> 00:22:25,320
And Dominic, you weren't here
this at the start this morning.

371
00:22:25,840 --> 00:22:28,280
The podcasting morning chat I
share with you because you've

372
00:22:28,280 --> 00:22:32,360
been an inspiration to so many
of us to apply for awards.

373
00:22:32,680 --> 00:22:36,280
We are nominated over at
podcastawards.com and

374
00:22:36,280 --> 00:22:39,120
encouraging everyone to go over
there and vote for us for the

375
00:22:39,440 --> 00:22:41,880
Adam Curry People's Choice
Award.

376
00:22:42,320 --> 00:22:46,040
And we're under the TS.
It's alphabetically listed and

377
00:22:46,040 --> 00:22:49,320
they list us under T for the
podcasting morning chat.

378
00:22:49,320 --> 00:22:51,720
So everyone, please give us a
vote.

379
00:22:52,480 --> 00:22:56,720
And we know for sure we're under
the Adam Curry category, but

380
00:22:56,720 --> 00:23:00,800
there's also one other category
that we're under that is I found

381
00:23:01,000 --> 00:23:03,360
it OK.
So it's under the People's

382
00:23:03,360 --> 00:23:06,600
Choice and then then education
and I put it in the chat.

383
00:23:06,600 --> 00:23:08,280
Those are the 2 categories.
Awesome.

384
00:23:08,760 --> 00:23:10,360
Thank you, Sid.
Appreciate that.

385
00:23:11,240 --> 00:23:13,880
And Nick, did you want to, did
you find it too?

386
00:23:13,880 --> 00:23:15,360
Is that why you had your hand
up?

387
00:23:16,080 --> 00:23:18,800
I just saw it since comments in
the chat so I was just going to

388
00:23:18,800 --> 00:23:20,880
mention it.
OK, cool, cool.

389
00:23:21,240 --> 00:23:25,120
Alright, I'm gonna jump into
some AI news and then we'll get

390
00:23:25,240 --> 00:23:29,000
to other news stories as well.
I'll start and then I'm gonna

391
00:23:29,000 --> 00:23:32,400
hand it off to Nick.
First, YouTube is rolling out

392
00:23:32,800 --> 00:23:36,920
two new AI features to help
people discover content more

393
00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:39,440
easily.
First, they're adding an AI

394
00:23:39,440 --> 00:23:44,200
powered search results carousel
that can suggest videos and give

395
00:23:44,200 --> 00:23:48,920
you topic descriptions straight
from the creators across the

396
00:23:48,920 --> 00:23:51,200
platform.
And if you're a premium member

397
00:23:51,200 --> 00:23:55,560
in the US, you can try it now
for searches about shopping,

398
00:23:55,760 --> 00:23:59,800
travel or things to do in a
certain location.

399
00:23:59,960 --> 00:24:03,080
In the next few days, YouTube
says they'll also start testing

400
00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:08,280
their conversational AI tool
with some non premium users in

401
00:24:08,280 --> 00:24:10,800
the US.
This feature, which first

402
00:24:10,800 --> 00:24:14,440
launched last year for paid
members, can answer your

403
00:24:14,440 --> 00:24:18,840
questions, suggest related
content, and more, all while you

404
00:24:18,840 --> 00:24:22,920
keep watching your video.
So be on the lookout for some of

405
00:24:22,920 --> 00:24:27,320
those new features.
And Nick, you got other AI news

406
00:24:27,320 --> 00:24:30,240
for us that that matters to
content creators.

407
00:24:30,560 --> 00:24:34,120
Hey, good morning everybody.
So here's what I'm going to do.

408
00:24:34,120 --> 00:24:38,000
I have a couple different
headlines that I want to touch

409
00:24:38,000 --> 00:24:43,160
on, so I'll briefly just hit
some of these quick bits and you

410
00:24:43,160 --> 00:24:46,200
guys can stop me if you want to
discuss any of those.

411
00:24:46,200 --> 00:24:50,840
But then what I really want to
talk about is this article that

412
00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:55,440
I had found about people paying
for AI tools.

413
00:24:55,600 --> 00:25:01,160
It's kind of really fascinating.
The first article that I wanted

414
00:25:01,160 --> 00:25:04,960
to mention, Dr. actually tipped
me off to this and I started

415
00:25:04,960 --> 00:25:07,520
seeing more and more articles
about this.

416
00:25:08,000 --> 00:25:12,720
But Meta is currently in the
process of trying to coach open

417
00:25:12,720 --> 00:25:14,800
AI employees to come work for
them.

418
00:25:15,720 --> 00:25:20,320
And what is absolutely nuts is
they are offering these

419
00:25:20,320 --> 00:25:24,120
employees there's, there'll be
some of them $100 million

420
00:25:24,120 --> 00:25:29,960
signing bonuses to come work for
them. $100 million signing

421
00:25:29,960 --> 00:25:33,160
bonuses just to.
Just to switch teams coffee out

422
00:25:33,160 --> 00:25:34,800
of my nose you.
Said that.

423
00:25:34,800 --> 00:25:35,920
Oh.
My God.

424
00:25:38,160 --> 00:25:41,200
So yeah, that's a lot of money.
And the Winless article was

425
00:25:41,200 --> 00:25:42,520
written.
I kind of feel like it was a

426
00:25:42,520 --> 00:25:46,440
little click baity.
Open AI said that they're

427
00:25:46,440 --> 00:25:50,040
shutting down for a week.
Wait, before actually before you

428
00:25:50,040 --> 00:25:54,960
go to that one, I just wanted to
say I also heard that even with

429
00:25:54,960 --> 00:25:58,920
that offer of $100 million
signing bonus, I had heard that

430
00:25:59,200 --> 00:26:02,400
so far, at least the last I
heard, which may have been a few

431
00:26:02,400 --> 00:26:07,640
days ago, so far they say that
Open AI, none of those employees

432
00:26:07,640 --> 00:26:11,520
have accepted the offer.
They actually turned it down to

433
00:26:11,520 --> 00:26:15,800
stay at Open AI.
And Nick was saying to me early

434
00:26:15,800 --> 00:26:20,080
this morning how shocked he is
that nobody would have bitten on

435
00:26:20,080 --> 00:26:22,560
that.
And I, although I won't name the

436
00:26:22,560 --> 00:26:26,720
person, I do know there's a
person in this space in the

437
00:26:26,720 --> 00:26:30,640
creator world that rubbed Nick
and I the wrong way.

438
00:26:31,480 --> 00:26:37,160
And I asked Nick, so if that
person came to him and offered a

439
00:26:37,160 --> 00:26:39,840
similar type of offer, would he
take it?

440
00:26:40,200 --> 00:26:42,720
And I think Nick kind of
answered touché.

441
00:26:44,080 --> 00:26:48,480
So I guess I guess there is a,
there is a what?

442
00:26:48,480 --> 00:26:50,000
What's the word I'm looking for
there?

443
00:26:50,480 --> 00:26:54,600
There is a time where Nick will
say no to a certain amount of

444
00:26:54,600 --> 00:26:58,960
money, I suppose.
Yeah, yeah.

445
00:26:59,000 --> 00:27:00,760
Well, that was that was fair.
That was well played.

446
00:27:02,760 --> 00:27:06,000
So yeah, in a way to kind of
counter this is kind of how the

447
00:27:06,000 --> 00:27:08,480
whole open AI being shut down
for a week thing kind of

448
00:27:08,480 --> 00:27:10,000
happened.
If they worded it like that, but

449
00:27:10,000 --> 00:27:13,360
it made it sound like they're
giving the employees time off,

450
00:27:13,840 --> 00:27:16,560
they're kind of including that
in their package.

451
00:27:17,120 --> 00:27:20,040
So I think from the article I
was reading, I said these guys

452
00:27:20,040 --> 00:27:24,840
are working 80 plus hours a
week, so they're non-stop.

453
00:27:25,440 --> 00:27:27,280
That makes sense.
And if they're, I mean, if

454
00:27:27,280 --> 00:27:29,760
they're a lot of them are
choosing to stay despite the

455
00:27:29,800 --> 00:27:34,480
$100 million banking bonus
offers, I mean a week, is he

456
00:27:34,480 --> 00:27:36,600
just going to sweeten the pot?
Yeah.

457
00:27:37,000 --> 00:27:41,640
I'm really wondering about all
those people that are supposedly

458
00:27:41,640 --> 00:27:45,320
staying that sounds, that sounds
hard to believe to me that

459
00:27:45,320 --> 00:27:49,600
everyone would say no, I don't
need a, what was it, 100,000?

460
00:27:49,600 --> 00:27:51,880
I don't need 100,000.
I'm I'm good.

461
00:27:52,280 --> 00:27:54,000
It just seems really hard to
believe.

462
00:27:54,000 --> 00:27:59,360
So now now we know that Dr. does
have a price and she she can be

463
00:27:59,360 --> 00:28:04,720
bought off so be careful.
Was it 100,000 or 100 million?

464
00:28:04,720 --> 00:28:08,040
100 million.
Give me a party to go.

465
00:28:08,080 --> 00:28:13,280
I'm I'm I'm out of here.
Wow, yeah.

466
00:28:14,440 --> 00:28:17,280
Have some really good coffee at
that open AI.

467
00:28:17,400 --> 00:28:20,800
Yeah, Yeah.
Go ahead, Sid.

468
00:28:21,160 --> 00:28:25,440
It's a very interesting thing to
offer a signing bonus to your

469
00:28:25,440 --> 00:28:29,440
competitor, perceived competitor
to get them to switch teams,

470
00:28:29,440 --> 00:28:32,840
right?
That much money, if it's real,

471
00:28:33,280 --> 00:28:36,320
if it's a true, I mean, it's a
story is true, right?

472
00:28:37,120 --> 00:28:40,720
That much money, it must have a
ton of strings attached to it.

473
00:28:41,320 --> 00:28:43,560
You're not going to give
somebody that much money and

474
00:28:43,560 --> 00:28:45,680
then come for 30 days and then
leave, right?

475
00:28:45,800 --> 00:28:47,080
So.
There.

476
00:28:47,080 --> 00:28:51,960
Has to be not just that, but
there has to be I mean that's

477
00:28:51,960 --> 00:28:53,880
that's more money than most
people will ever make in a

478
00:28:53,880 --> 00:28:58,000
lifetime, right, right.
So you have to be really, really

479
00:28:58,000 --> 00:29:01,400
good at what you do.
Except for Bill yeah.

480
00:29:01,400 --> 00:29:06,480
Or have some area of expertise,
right, that they don't have it

481
00:29:06,480 --> 00:29:08,880
Meta.
And then I would imagine the

482
00:29:08,880 --> 00:29:12,600
document that you have to sign,
you'll spend $10,000 having an

483
00:29:12,600 --> 00:29:14,320
attorney review all the language
with it.

484
00:29:14,320 --> 00:29:16,240
So.
And I do think though, it is a

485
00:29:16,240 --> 00:29:21,120
legit story because I saw Sam
Altman being interviewed about

486
00:29:21,120 --> 00:29:22,440
it and that's actually the
source.

487
00:29:22,440 --> 00:29:26,320
That's where I heard that.
According to him, none of his

488
00:29:26,320 --> 00:29:30,920
employees have taken the offer.
So it is a story, It is real.

489
00:29:30,920 --> 00:29:34,200
It's just a matter of maybe some
of the details could be false.

490
00:29:34,200 --> 00:29:37,640
But it sounds like they Facebook
is making a big play for their

491
00:29:37,640 --> 00:29:41,400
competition next.
So keep it, keep it going.

492
00:29:41,400 --> 00:29:43,360
You were just sharing something
else about open AI.

493
00:29:43,840 --> 00:29:45,760
Just that they were shutting
down for a week.

494
00:29:45,800 --> 00:29:48,640
Which to me made it sound the
article more sounded like

495
00:29:48,640 --> 00:29:50,840
they're giving time off then
they're actually shutting down

496
00:29:50,840 --> 00:29:52,320
because I have a hard time
believing with how many

497
00:29:52,320 --> 00:29:56,200
customers they have.
That kind of rounded out that

498
00:29:56,560 --> 00:30:01,600
quick little AI bit.
The next one is for all you

499
00:30:01,600 --> 00:30:05,840
Apple fans that have been
waiting for Apple's AI to

500
00:30:05,840 --> 00:30:12,560
finally become good or existent.
Apple was actually testing and

501
00:30:12,560 --> 00:30:16,920
looking around at other AI
models to potentially ditch

502
00:30:16,920 --> 00:30:20,800
their own AI model.
So they are actually testing

503
00:30:20,840 --> 00:30:27,000
with Open AI and Anthropic the
maker of Clod to basically have

504
00:30:27,000 --> 00:30:31,520
that model now run Siri instead
of their own AI.

505
00:30:33,040 --> 00:30:36,560
The other day, the other day you
told me that, yeah, it is funny.

506
00:30:36,600 --> 00:30:40,720
The other day you told me that
Perplexity was on their hit

507
00:30:40,720 --> 00:30:41,720
list.
Is that?

508
00:30:41,720 --> 00:30:44,200
Yeah, they.
So not in this article, they

509
00:30:44,200 --> 00:30:46,480
didn't talk about that, but just
the other day that was another

510
00:30:46,480 --> 00:30:49,440
name that popped up that they
were seriously talking about.

511
00:30:49,440 --> 00:30:52,160
I think they wanted to purchase
Perplexity is what I had seen.

512
00:30:52,880 --> 00:30:54,520
OK, gotcha.
Which would be a little bit of a

513
00:30:54,520 --> 00:30:57,920
different scenario, but still
interesting nonetheless.

514
00:30:57,960 --> 00:30:59,880
You know, if that happens, I'm
going to be really upset.

515
00:31:01,880 --> 00:31:05,080
All right, the next one, last
quick one, I'm can dive into the

516
00:31:05,080 --> 00:31:08,360
article.
So Gemini for education, I

517
00:31:08,360 --> 00:31:11,360
haven't seen a whole lot about
this until recently, but Gemini

518
00:31:11,360 --> 00:31:16,440
is releasing a suite of tools
for the education space.

519
00:31:16,840 --> 00:31:20,440
From what I could tell, a lot of
it is for helping teachers plan

520
00:31:20,440 --> 00:31:24,680
curriculum and lessons and also
helping students.

521
00:31:24,680 --> 00:31:27,040
I mean we've kind of seen it
with notebook LM, they have

522
00:31:27,040 --> 00:31:29,160
their study guide features and
things like that.

523
00:31:29,520 --> 00:31:34,600
But they are expanding on these
tools and making a more robust

524
00:31:34,600 --> 00:31:37,480
for the education space and for
students, which I think is

525
00:31:37,920 --> 00:31:40,840
awesome because we've talked
about how these tools can help

526
00:31:40,840 --> 00:31:43,600
for things like this.
And we haven't really seen

527
00:31:43,600 --> 00:31:46,560
anything hatered specifically to
that industry.

528
00:31:47,320 --> 00:31:50,560
And with how fast AI is growing
and a lot of people are starting

529
00:31:50,560 --> 00:31:55,120
to adopt it, I think this is
such a brilliant move to get

530
00:31:55,120 --> 00:31:58,120
people comfortable and help
educate and teach how to use

531
00:31:58,120 --> 00:32:00,640
these tools effectively.
I just thought that was an

532
00:32:00,640 --> 00:32:03,320
interesting one.
Yeah, very interesting.

533
00:32:03,800 --> 00:32:06,960
The next one, the big headline
that you shared with me this

534
00:32:06,960 --> 00:32:08,960
morning, I think that's even
more interesting.

535
00:32:08,960 --> 00:32:10,640
You want to share a little bit
about that?

536
00:32:11,040 --> 00:32:17,000
Yes, this article was called Are
AI Subscriptions Worth It?

537
00:32:17,120 --> 00:32:19,240
Most people don't seem to think
so.

538
00:32:19,280 --> 00:32:26,280
Despite nearly 2 billion global
AI users, only about $12 billion

539
00:32:26,600 --> 00:32:29,440
have been made annually, and
most of that numbers come from

540
00:32:29,440 --> 00:32:32,200
open AI.
I think it was about 10 billion

541
00:32:32,200 --> 00:32:34,480
of that was open AI
specifically.

542
00:32:34,800 --> 00:32:42,720
Now this is saying of those
users, only 3% of people are

543
00:32:42,720 --> 00:32:45,680
actually paying for the AI
tools.

544
00:32:46,240 --> 00:32:49,760
Most people just ride with the
free versions of it and are

545
00:32:49,760 --> 00:32:53,960
perfectly happy with that, which
completely blows my mind because

546
00:32:53,960 --> 00:32:55,280
I'm surrounded by a ton of
people.

547
00:32:55,480 --> 00:32:59,720
But I do want to pose the
question in this group of any AI

548
00:32:59,720 --> 00:33:02,680
tools that you use, give up like
a thumbs up or a thumbs down?

549
00:33:02,720 --> 00:33:05,400
Are you paying for any of those
AI tools?

550
00:33:05,640 --> 00:33:09,560
I don't have a thumbs up.
I do pay and probably too much

551
00:33:09,560 --> 00:33:14,000
for too many tools.
I agree, I'd probably make up

552
00:33:14,360 --> 00:33:16,480
1.5% of that paying customer
base.

553
00:33:16,760 --> 00:33:21,480
You can't make one of those
custom GPT's without paying for

554
00:33:21,480 --> 00:33:23,680
it, right?
I don't know anymore.

555
00:33:23,680 --> 00:33:27,440
I feel like now anyone can make
a custom GPT without having to

556
00:33:27,440 --> 00:33:30,960
pay for open AII think.
That's now a feature that

557
00:33:30,960 --> 00:33:33,560
everybody can access now, but
maybe to a limit.

558
00:33:33,680 --> 00:33:35,880
I'll find out.
You can keep going, Nick.

559
00:33:37,520 --> 00:33:40,000
Can I say something real quick?
Yeah, go for it, Dominic.

560
00:33:40,200 --> 00:33:42,840
Oh, no, I, I was just going to
say honestly, for some of the

561
00:33:42,840 --> 00:33:46,040
things that I use, me and
Kendall talk about this often,

562
00:33:46,560 --> 00:33:51,600
I, I would pay more if I'm being
honest, especially from Kendall,

563
00:33:51,600 --> 00:33:54,160
you was talking about the Gemini
Sweden education, stuff like

564
00:33:54,160 --> 00:33:55,800
that.
She definitely would pay more

565
00:33:55,800 --> 00:33:59,800
for what she does and I probably
would too because I think I just

566
00:33:59,800 --> 00:34:04,840
see, I think we both just see
the value in most of the tools

567
00:34:04,840 --> 00:34:08,360
that we use.
So not only do we pay for a lot

568
00:34:08,360 --> 00:34:10,719
of them, we would actually pay
more for some of them.

569
00:34:11,280 --> 00:34:13,960
I agree.
That's fascinating.

570
00:34:13,960 --> 00:34:15,600
Yeah.
I mean, look, I would too

571
00:34:15,600 --> 00:34:18,760
because I just, I see how much
value they bring me.

572
00:34:18,760 --> 00:34:22,960
But I just based on what I see
and what I have experienced

573
00:34:22,960 --> 00:34:25,199
other with other apps and things
like that.

574
00:34:25,199 --> 00:34:27,840
It seems like people, if they
can get any kind of free

575
00:34:27,840 --> 00:34:30,960
version, they will do whatever
they can to make that work so

576
00:34:30,960 --> 00:34:32,800
that they don't have to pay for
the upgrades.

577
00:34:33,360 --> 00:34:38,400
I'm wondering if that the
population that that study

578
00:34:38,800 --> 00:34:44,159
highlights, have they done like
you know, custom made GPT?

579
00:34:44,560 --> 00:34:49,840
How deep into AI are they?
That's the question.

580
00:34:50,080 --> 00:34:53,199
I have a question.
This doesn't surprise me at all

581
00:34:53,920 --> 00:34:58,960
because we're in a very unique
situation where we want to use

582
00:34:58,960 --> 00:35:01,800
these tools.
The average person doesn't even

583
00:35:01,800 --> 00:35:05,680
know AI is part of their life.
I pay for a lot of this stuff

584
00:35:05,920 --> 00:35:08,400
and I don't use it as much as I
should or I could.

585
00:35:09,040 --> 00:35:13,880
And I think the bottom line is
it's still too new.

586
00:35:13,880 --> 00:35:16,960
I mean, a year ago we were
talking about, I believe it was

587
00:35:16,960 --> 00:35:21,960
coming and we were having rooms
upon rooms about how AI is doing

588
00:35:21,960 --> 00:35:25,360
all these fancy things.
And then you did your custom GPT

589
00:35:25,360 --> 00:35:28,080
for podcasting, which by the
way, I still use.

590
00:35:29,000 --> 00:35:33,680
But I'm just saying I think it's
going to probably take not 5 or

591
00:35:33,680 --> 00:35:37,440
10 years, but the generation
that's I think it's going to

592
00:35:37,440 --> 00:35:41,440
invest our lives more on a
regular basis where people

593
00:35:41,440 --> 00:35:44,640
actually understand it in the
next couple of years.

594
00:35:44,640 --> 00:35:48,640
I know I'm probably wrong, but I
think it's here.

595
00:35:48,760 --> 00:35:51,640
People know about it, but
there's people like you, Nick,

596
00:35:51,800 --> 00:35:54,440
that are really pushing the
envelope.

597
00:35:54,720 --> 00:35:57,800
And then there's the rest of us
that are just like, OK, you

598
00:35:57,800 --> 00:35:59,240
know, when it gets here, it gets
here.

599
00:35:59,320 --> 00:36:02,560
It's kind of like, you know, and
I hate to use this analogy, but

600
00:36:02,560 --> 00:36:06,120
like Android versus Apple, like
the people that use Apple, they

601
00:36:06,120 --> 00:36:07,240
don't want to deal with any of
this crap.

602
00:36:07,240 --> 00:36:12,200
Just fix it, find it, have the
people in the depths of time fix

603
00:36:12,200 --> 00:36:14,240
it and then just put it on my
phone and I'll figure it out.

604
00:36:14,680 --> 00:36:16,760
That's what I think most people
are doing and they're just

605
00:36:16,760 --> 00:36:21,280
waiting for it to kind of invest
in their their lives on purpose,

606
00:36:21,280 --> 00:36:23,480
not by accident.
They're not going to go seek it.

607
00:36:23,960 --> 00:36:26,880
You're you're.
Touching on a lot of very

608
00:36:26,880 --> 00:36:30,680
specific points that are
actually and I've touched on in

609
00:36:30,680 --> 00:36:35,720
this article because right now
it says that the most AI is used

610
00:36:35,720 --> 00:36:41,360
most in five categories of daily
life, which 19% of people are

611
00:36:41,360 --> 00:36:44,520
using it to help read write
emails and 18% of people are

612
00:36:44,520 --> 00:36:48,600
using it to manage to do lists.
So those are a pretty.

613
00:36:48,600 --> 00:36:51,320
I mean when you're looking at it
in terms of do I need to pay for

614
00:36:51,360 --> 00:36:55,040
AI to help me do this?
Yeah, you there's not a lot that

615
00:36:55,040 --> 00:36:59,320
you need the AI to do for you in
order to perform those kinds of.

616
00:36:59,320 --> 00:37:01,160
Tasks.
But but Nick, I think it does

617
00:37:01,160 --> 00:37:05,520
make sense when kids come out of
college, I'm talking freshmen or

618
00:37:05,520 --> 00:37:08,600
even high schoolers, they're the
ones that are really going to

619
00:37:08,600 --> 00:37:10,600
push the envelope and we're
going to be forced to.

620
00:37:10,600 --> 00:37:14,680
You're going to get that kid
that's going to say, oh, well,

621
00:37:14,680 --> 00:37:18,160
you can do this, this and that.
We'll be like, oh, OK, I think

622
00:37:18,160 --> 00:37:20,080
that's the thing.
It's just not there yet.

623
00:37:20,280 --> 00:37:23,800
And we've been on such a
ludicrous speed with this stuff.

624
00:37:23,960 --> 00:37:26,280
We don't know.
We don't know, and I think it's

625
00:37:26,280 --> 00:37:27,880
just too fast.
And thank God there's people

626
00:37:27,880 --> 00:37:31,400
like you that want to know this,
because you're saving us from

627
00:37:31,400 --> 00:37:35,640
ourselves.
I'm curious how many people are

628
00:37:35,640 --> 00:37:39,520
using these tools indirectly and
don't even realize it.

629
00:37:39,840 --> 00:37:43,760
Because now and more and more is
being integrated into things we

630
00:37:43,760 --> 00:37:49,400
do on a normal basis, right from
the doctor's office to your car

631
00:37:49,400 --> 00:37:51,760
to everything.
So it's like, I understand

632
00:37:52,200 --> 00:37:56,480
they're not paying directly for
maybe an open AI, but what are

633
00:37:56,480 --> 00:38:00,760
they using where AI is being
slowly integrated into what

634
00:38:00,760 --> 00:38:03,760
they're already doing?
Like we have refrigerators now

635
00:38:03,760 --> 00:38:06,000
they use AI.
I'm curious about that part.

636
00:38:06,000 --> 00:38:08,600
Maybe the article addresses it,
maybe it doesn't, but I'll be

637
00:38:08,600 --> 00:38:10,280
interested in knowing what that
stat would be.

638
00:38:10,680 --> 00:38:13,960
Most people if they're Googling,
that's AI.

639
00:38:14,160 --> 00:38:16,240
They're.
Using AI about to say that

640
00:38:16,240 --> 00:38:19,440
predictive you just put in one
word and it starts.

641
00:38:19,840 --> 00:38:21,200
What did you mean this?
Did you mean that?

642
00:38:21,680 --> 00:38:25,400
Yep, exactly, exactly.
We're using it more than we

643
00:38:25,400 --> 00:38:27,280
think.
It's going to be interesting to

644
00:38:27,280 --> 00:38:31,880
see what we're because we feel,
I mean, I at least I feel, you

645
00:38:31,880 --> 00:38:34,000
know, we're at the best it could
be, right?

646
00:38:34,160 --> 00:38:38,080
AI is here and it's doing all
this stuff, but like, where is

647
00:38:38,080 --> 00:38:41,000
it going to go and how far is it
going to really go?

648
00:38:41,360 --> 00:38:43,520
I mean, again, that's not an
answer for right now.

649
00:38:43,720 --> 00:38:47,360
I, I keep going back to when you
first started, you and Nick and

650
00:38:47,360 --> 00:38:48,840
every day we would talk about
this.

651
00:38:49,040 --> 00:38:51,040
It's amazing.
The question is where is it

652
00:38:51,040 --> 00:38:54,080
going to go and how much is it
going to be invested in our

653
00:38:54,080 --> 00:38:57,080
lives, like Diamond said.
I'm not joking when I say this,

654
00:38:57,080 --> 00:39:00,920
but robots.
I believe that we will have AI

655
00:39:01,520 --> 00:39:07,160
operated robots in our lifetime.
I think every one of us here

656
00:39:07,400 --> 00:39:09,840
will see that.
We'll see it where it's a more

657
00:39:09,840 --> 00:39:14,560
commonly owned household
product, for lack of a better

658
00:39:14,560 --> 00:39:18,120
word, which I'm sure in the
future that will be considered,

659
00:39:18,400 --> 00:39:23,760
you know, insulting to the AI
race, right, to call them that.

660
00:39:23,760 --> 00:39:27,000
But the truth is, is, yes, I
think that we're going to see

661
00:39:27,000 --> 00:39:30,880
that more quickly than we
actually believe we will.

662
00:39:30,880 --> 00:39:33,640
I mean, I know we're seeing some
of it already, but I believe we

663
00:39:33,640 --> 00:39:37,160
will see it in more households
in the near future.

664
00:39:38,440 --> 00:39:40,280
Right.
So Will Smith will be right and

665
00:39:40,280 --> 00:39:43,680
they will go bad, and I'll be I.
I didn't say that just out of

666
00:39:43,680 --> 00:39:45,720
optimism.
I'm hoping that's not the case.

667
00:39:46,720 --> 00:39:49,840
For instance, I mean, there's a
lot of people that have the

668
00:39:49,840 --> 00:39:53,960
Roomba, the vacuum that knows
exactly where to go.

669
00:39:53,960 --> 00:39:57,560
There's even those I used to,
when I worked for Home Shopping

670
00:39:57,560 --> 00:39:59,240
Network, I used to sell them all
the time.

671
00:39:59,240 --> 00:40:03,280
So there's these virtual walls
that you can put up these little

672
00:40:03,480 --> 00:40:05,240
boundaries.
If you don't want it to go into

673
00:40:05,240 --> 00:40:07,000
the kitchen, you put up these
little boundaries.

674
00:40:07,240 --> 00:40:09,480
And it mines where you put these
boundaries.

675
00:40:09,840 --> 00:40:15,760
So it's just one little tiny
step for the AI to happen with

676
00:40:15,760 --> 00:40:18,440
that.
And I don't know, I'm trying to

677
00:40:18,440 --> 00:40:21,000
think where else it could go.
We're going to have assistance.

678
00:40:21,000 --> 00:40:25,240
We're going to have humanoid
looking robots that will be

679
00:40:25,240 --> 00:40:29,240
doing all of our chores for us,
running errands for us.

680
00:40:29,400 --> 00:40:32,200
It's driving the AI.
Sounds awesome to me.

681
00:40:32,280 --> 00:40:36,040
I'm sorry, it sounds great.
Taking you, taking the robot in

682
00:40:36,040 --> 00:40:39,720
the AI powered car.
I mean, yeah, I, I really think

683
00:40:39,720 --> 00:40:42,840
we're going to see a lot of this
as long as this, as long as this

684
00:40:42,840 --> 00:40:45,400
society and worlds hold holds
up.

685
00:40:45,840 --> 00:40:48,840
I think we will see that at some
point in the near future.

686
00:40:49,080 --> 00:40:51,520
And that also goes back to jobs
like, what are they going to be

687
00:40:51,520 --> 00:40:53,600
the new jobs that are going to
be lost?

688
00:40:53,640 --> 00:40:58,560
In exactly, yeah, what are what?
We'll have a lot of jobs lost, I

689
00:40:58,560 --> 00:41:01,920
think, and I think there are
going to be new types of jobs

690
00:41:01,920 --> 00:41:03,640
that we can't even fathom right
now.

691
00:41:03,920 --> 00:41:05,200
Pivot.
That's right.

692
00:41:05,240 --> 00:41:08,840
Yeah, OK, Listen, I want to keep
things moving and get back into

693
00:41:08,840 --> 00:41:11,360
some more podcasting content
creation stuff.

694
00:41:11,360 --> 00:41:14,760
Nick, do you feel like we've
covered this story and can we

695
00:41:14,760 --> 00:41:17,080
move on?
There's so much in that article

696
00:41:17,080 --> 00:41:19,200
I would recommend.
I think Mark put it in the chat

697
00:41:19,200 --> 00:41:21,720
or it'll be in the show notes,
but go check that out because

698
00:41:21,720 --> 00:41:25,120
there are a lot of interesting
tidbits inside that article.

699
00:41:25,360 --> 00:41:26,960
Yeah, we can move on.
OK, cool.

700
00:41:26,960 --> 00:41:28,480
Thank you, Nick.
Thanks for bringing that this

701
00:41:28,480 --> 00:41:32,720
morning.
Let's get to a few headlines.

702
00:41:32,960 --> 00:41:35,280
I mentioned this at the top of
the show.

703
00:41:35,560 --> 00:41:40,520
Spotify is in the news again.
They want Youtubers.

704
00:41:41,240 --> 00:41:46,680
They're offering big ad credits
and a new home for video.

705
00:41:47,160 --> 00:41:53,800
So their internal deck leaked to
the Angler and it reveals A

706
00:41:53,800 --> 00:41:58,640
strategic push into hosting
video content beyond video

707
00:41:58,640 --> 00:42:04,120
podcasts, signaling a full on
attempt to court top YouTube

708
00:42:04,120 --> 00:42:08,640
tubers and capture a bigger
share of the creator economy.

709
00:42:08,640 --> 00:42:11,240
This is pretty fascinating to
me.

710
00:42:11,720 --> 00:42:14,800
So first, some highlights from
the article.

711
00:42:15,080 --> 00:42:19,840
Aggressive shifts into video
that like I said, this leak, it

712
00:42:19,840 --> 00:42:23,280
urges creators to upload all
video content, not just

713
00:42:23,280 --> 00:42:27,080
podcasts, revealing its
intentions with monetization and

714
00:42:27,080 --> 00:42:29,520
incentive.
I should say with monetization

715
00:42:29,520 --> 00:42:34,320
incentives, Spotify is offering
money and marketing support,

716
00:42:34,760 --> 00:42:41,280
including up to $5000 in free ad
credit for new video creators.

717
00:42:41,280 --> 00:42:44,920
I don't I can't tell you where
to go yet cuz this is a leak.

718
00:42:45,400 --> 00:42:46,840
That's far less than 100
million.

719
00:42:46,880 --> 00:42:50,960
That is, and it's still a lot of
money for a lot of independent,

720
00:42:50,960 --> 00:42:53,840
especially new independent video
creators.

721
00:42:54,000 --> 00:42:58,080
These credits can be used in
Spotify Ads Manager to boost

722
00:42:58,080 --> 00:43:02,000
show visibility and engagement,
a major draw for creators

723
00:43:02,000 --> 00:43:05,960
looking to grow their audience.
And then they have creator

724
00:43:05,960 --> 00:43:11,360
migration in action.
So big name podcasters creators

725
00:43:11,360 --> 00:43:15,760
have already uploaded non
podcast video libraries landing

726
00:43:15,760 --> 00:43:21,960
in Spotify's podcast charts.
Spotify's disclosed a 44% year

727
00:43:21,960 --> 00:43:26,320
over year increase in video
watch time with over 70% of

728
00:43:26,320 --> 00:43:29,160
users consuming video in the
foreground.

729
00:43:29,600 --> 00:43:33,360
That statistic bothers me
because sure, there's going to

730
00:43:33,360 --> 00:43:38,120
be a big jump in the increase in
video watch time because adding

731
00:43:38,120 --> 00:43:38,880
video they're.
Going from.

732
00:43:39,000 --> 00:43:40,720
Nothing.
They're going from nothing that

733
00:43:40,720 --> 00:43:43,360
this is a a relatively new
feature, especially in the

734
00:43:43,360 --> 00:43:47,600
podcasting space of Spotify.
This is a newer feature.

735
00:43:47,600 --> 00:43:51,160
And when I say newer, I know
it's been around for at least a

736
00:43:51,160 --> 00:43:54,720
year now, I believe, maybe
longer, but still, yeah.

737
00:43:54,720 --> 00:44:00,000
So we're comparing from very few
videos to lots more videos,

738
00:44:00,200 --> 00:44:03,280
especially since they've been
pushing it so much to and

739
00:44:03,280 --> 00:44:06,200
pushing how important they
believe it is to have video.

740
00:44:06,720 --> 00:44:09,640
So sure, there's going to be a
44% increase.

741
00:44:09,640 --> 00:44:13,680
Sure, 70% of users are going to
consume video in the foreground.

742
00:44:13,720 --> 00:44:17,240
Duh.
And also another key piece of

743
00:44:17,240 --> 00:44:21,400
the article I found was that
with over 300 million users

744
00:44:21,400 --> 00:44:25,040
watching video podcasts on
Spotify versus YouTube's

745
00:44:25,040 --> 00:44:30,320
billion, Spotify is certainly,
in my opinion, looking to grab

746
00:44:30,840 --> 00:44:33,640
the YouTube audience and
creators.

747
00:44:33,640 --> 00:44:37,960
So with that, how tempting is it
'cause I know there are some

748
00:44:37,960 --> 00:44:42,360
people on this stage, some
people listening that don't like

749
00:44:42,600 --> 00:44:46,320
using Spotify to distribute
their content.

750
00:44:46,600 --> 00:44:49,800
Back to the similar question I
asked earlier of Nick with the

751
00:44:49,800 --> 00:44:53,240
would you take $100 million deal
to go work for somebody you

752
00:44:53,400 --> 00:44:57,880
don't jive with?
How tempting does $5000 in free

753
00:44:57,880 --> 00:45:00,200
Spotify credit sound to you as a
creator?

754
00:45:00,200 --> 00:45:03,720
Would you, would you move to
that platform?

755
00:45:03,720 --> 00:45:05,240
Sid says no.
Why not Sid?

756
00:45:05,920 --> 00:45:09,840
Just not a Spotify person.
I don't listen on Spotify.

757
00:45:09,840 --> 00:45:13,640
I don't go to Spotify.
I don't even literally go even

758
00:45:13,640 --> 00:45:16,840
check out the stats of my show
on Spotify because my people

759
00:45:16,840 --> 00:45:18,560
that listed on Spotify is really
low.

760
00:45:18,560 --> 00:45:22,120
So I don't even go and stack up
the stats there.

761
00:45:22,160 --> 00:45:28,960
So $5000 is not going to get me
to start creating content

762
00:45:29,520 --> 00:45:33,880
specifically for Spotify when
it's a not an app that I use.

763
00:45:34,240 --> 00:45:37,000
OK.
And you currently to distribute

764
00:45:37,000 --> 00:45:39,640
your content, you're using Buzz
Sprout if I'm not mistaken,

765
00:45:39,640 --> 00:45:41,240
right?
Yes, correct.

766
00:45:41,240 --> 00:45:43,240
We just upload it to Buzz Sprout
and it sends it to all the

767
00:45:43,240 --> 00:45:44,000
places.
Yep.

768
00:45:44,480 --> 00:45:46,320
OK.
And to be clear, I mean, that is

769
00:45:46,320 --> 00:45:51,400
what one way, that's one way I
believe you could get this $5000

770
00:45:51,400 --> 00:45:53,360
credit if you were to switch
from Buzz Sprout.

771
00:45:53,360 --> 00:45:55,720
I just want to make it clear.
Doesn't mean you have to be a

772
00:45:55,720 --> 00:45:58,960
Spotify user.
It just means you'd have to use

773
00:45:59,120 --> 00:46:02,040
Spotify for creators to
distribute your content.

774
00:46:02,720 --> 00:46:05,040
That's how they're offering the
five grand.

775
00:46:05,040 --> 00:46:10,280
Although again, I don't see like
a, a special link to where to go

776
00:46:10,280 --> 00:46:13,080
to take advantage of that.
And I think that's just because

777
00:46:13,080 --> 00:46:15,560
this is currently still part of
a leak.

778
00:46:15,560 --> 00:46:18,560
I don't think it's something
that has at least publicly

779
00:46:18,560 --> 00:46:20,360
rolled out yet, as far as I
know.

780
00:46:20,760 --> 00:46:24,360
To begin with, this little
statement with over 300 million

781
00:46:24,360 --> 00:46:30,120
users watching video podcasts on
Spotify versus the YouTube's

782
00:46:30,120 --> 00:46:35,400
billion, Spotify looks to crack
loose attention from incoming.

783
00:46:35,400 --> 00:46:40,120
Now it feels weird to me that,
number one, I'm not part of a

784
00:46:40,120 --> 00:46:44,560
number of 300 million, and it
feels even more weird to me that

785
00:46:44,560 --> 00:46:49,680
I'm not part of a billion people
'cause I don't watch podcasts, I

786
00:46:49,680 --> 00:46:51,440
listen to them.
So.

787
00:46:51,440 --> 00:46:55,000
But you use YouTube for you
watch other things or?

788
00:46:55,000 --> 00:46:59,680
Oh, I do use YouTube, but this
says watching video podcasts.

789
00:47:00,040 --> 00:47:04,240
That's what it does that.
So it feels weird to say that

790
00:47:04,240 --> 00:47:07,600
I'm not part of 300 million or a
billion.

791
00:47:07,920 --> 00:47:11,560
That's the first thing.
My other thing is that obviously

792
00:47:11,920 --> 00:47:17,640
Spotify is making a play to be
YouTube's like #1 competitor.

793
00:47:18,080 --> 00:47:23,040
And I mean, they keep acquiring
all of these companies and

794
00:47:23,240 --> 00:47:28,240
gobbling them up.
My only hope is that when they

795
00:47:28,240 --> 00:47:33,200
do get to a point where they are
neck and neck with YouTube, that

796
00:47:33,200 --> 00:47:36,560
they don't call everything
Spotify.

797
00:47:37,120 --> 00:47:39,520
Like the one of the big problems
that I have with YouTube is

798
00:47:39,720 --> 00:47:43,200
YouTube Music, YouTube proper
YouTube standard YouTube this

799
00:47:43,360 --> 00:47:48,320
YouTube that they need a little
bit of some kind of difference

800
00:47:48,320 --> 00:47:52,080
in their names, like, you know,
something something different

801
00:47:52,400 --> 00:47:56,440
because it's very, very
confusing to old people to old

802
00:47:56,480 --> 00:48:00,920
people.
I don't think just old people.

803
00:48:00,920 --> 00:48:03,640
I'm sure that that can get
confusing.

804
00:48:04,080 --> 00:48:08,920
Yes, I'm very curious to see how
Spotify evolves, if this is the

805
00:48:08,920 --> 00:48:11,720
direction they're going in.
I always say there is a place

806
00:48:11,720 --> 00:48:14,840
for audio too, and I think that
that's not going anywhere.

807
00:48:14,840 --> 00:48:19,200
I think Spotify will continue to
offer audio content, but I'm

808
00:48:19,200 --> 00:48:21,840
just very curious to see where
it goes from here.

809
00:48:22,560 --> 00:48:28,560
So to be continued, and I want
to go DRT back to you and

810
00:48:28,560 --> 00:48:31,120
discuss a little bit with the
last several minutes.

811
00:48:31,120 --> 00:48:36,720
We've got here this new trend
report and some of the findings

812
00:48:36,880 --> 00:48:40,240
that are in there.
So some of you might know the

813
00:48:40,240 --> 00:48:44,320
name Jeremy Inns.
He is a one of the leading

814
00:48:44,400 --> 00:48:46,760
podcasting, what would you call
them?

815
00:48:46,760 --> 00:48:49,120
Leaders, gurus.
I'm not quite sure what the word

816
00:48:49,120 --> 00:48:50,040
is.
OK.

817
00:48:51,080 --> 00:48:55,280
And I've taken a couple of his
courses to be to be perfectly

818
00:48:55,280 --> 00:48:58,240
honest.
And so every year he comes out

819
00:48:58,240 --> 00:49:01,520
with the training.
Whose courses hasn't Dr. taken?

820
00:49:01,520 --> 00:49:04,760
That's what I want to know.
That's the that's the more

821
00:49:04,760 --> 00:49:06,800
interesting question.
I'm starting a course.

822
00:49:07,080 --> 00:49:09,760
I'm actually starting a course
so Dion can take it.

823
00:49:09,800 --> 00:49:11,880
Yeah, hey, sign me up.
Sign me up.

824
00:49:13,880 --> 00:49:17,560
Sorry, keep going.
The podcast Marketing Trends

825
00:49:17,560 --> 00:49:20,640
report is something that he
comes out with every single

826
00:49:20,640 --> 00:49:23,280
year.
And I'm telling you, I was

827
00:49:23,280 --> 00:49:25,560
thinking about it this morning
as we were gathering news.

828
00:49:25,960 --> 00:49:30,680
So the next time that he makes a
call for, you know, please,

829
00:49:30,880 --> 00:49:32,800
please fill out this
questionnaire.

830
00:49:33,080 --> 00:49:36,200
I think we need to make, you
know, do a drive for him to make

831
00:49:36,200 --> 00:49:40,120
sure that all our listeners do
because your voice is truly can

832
00:49:40,120 --> 00:49:43,360
be heard in these numbers that
he comes up with.

833
00:49:44,200 --> 00:49:47,920
So the podcasting Marketing
trend report 2025 is out and

834
00:49:47,920 --> 00:49:51,880
there are a lot there's a lot in
here for creators to pay

835
00:49:51,880 --> 00:49:55,320
attention to.
The report digs into podcasts

836
00:49:55,440 --> 00:49:59,840
that are growing, how people are
using video, and what's actually

837
00:49:59,840 --> 00:50:03,720
working for creators right now.
You'll find real data on

838
00:50:03,720 --> 00:50:08,680
downloads, details on budgets,
and solid ideas for connecting

839
00:50:08,680 --> 00:50:10,520
with your audience if you want
to.

840
00:50:10,960 --> 00:50:14,800
If you want a clear look at the
current podcasting landscape,

841
00:50:15,120 --> 00:50:19,240
this report delivers new
insights and practical takeaways

842
00:50:19,640 --> 00:50:23,520
for the year ahead.
So this is broken down.

843
00:50:23,680 --> 00:50:25,960
Mark broke this down for me.
And Mark, you and I are going to

844
00:50:25,960 --> 00:50:28,400
ping pong through this.
OK, no problem.

845
00:50:28,720 --> 00:50:31,920
OK, so the number one thing is
growth patterns.

846
00:50:32,120 --> 00:50:36,240
Who's winning and who isn't.
Now the key points of this one

847
00:50:36,240 --> 00:50:41,680
is over 1/2 of podcasts saw a
drop in downloads over a year.

848
00:50:42,040 --> 00:50:47,840
Smaller shows sometimes grew
while bigger ones struggle.

849
00:50:47,840 --> 00:50:51,080
And just to cut you off real
quick, that was over half of

850
00:50:51,080 --> 00:50:53,960
podcasts saw a drop in downloads
year over year.

851
00:50:54,600 --> 00:50:58,400
Right, year over year.
And the second highlight is

852
00:50:58,400 --> 00:51:03,120
median downloads increased
slightly, but this hides the

853
00:51:03,120 --> 00:51:06,360
most growth.
But this hides that most growth

854
00:51:06,360 --> 00:51:09,440
was among smaller shows, not the
big ones.

855
00:51:10,320 --> 00:51:12,800
Yeah.
So that's interesting that

856
00:51:13,440 --> 00:51:16,840
there's really, the smaller
shows grow, the bigger ones

857
00:51:16,840 --> 00:51:19,840
don't as much.
I guess that you could make the

858
00:51:19,840 --> 00:51:22,440
argument that it's just because
the IT is a new show.

859
00:51:22,440 --> 00:51:26,160
So if they're properly getting
the word out there, they'd

860
00:51:26,160 --> 00:51:29,920
probably have a big rush to that
new show.

861
00:51:30,320 --> 00:51:34,840
And yeah, as the shows go on and
on, then it starts to plateau at

862
00:51:34,840 --> 00:51:36,720
some point.
That seems to be the current

863
00:51:36,720 --> 00:51:38,120
trend, yeah.
Right.

864
00:51:38,120 --> 00:51:41,160
So Mark, you just mentioned at
the top of the show that we are

865
00:51:41,160 --> 00:51:42,760
now on the charts number.
What?

866
00:51:42,920 --> 00:51:45,240
What did you say?
I think it's around 4243.

867
00:51:45,800 --> 00:51:48,640
OK.
So how do you measure knowing

868
00:51:48,640 --> 00:51:51,760
that, how do you measure podcast
success for your own show?

869
00:51:52,400 --> 00:51:54,680
There's a lot of different
criteria that can kind of.

870
00:51:55,000 --> 00:51:57,320
Get.
I do think that looking at

871
00:51:57,320 --> 00:52:01,000
download numbers is part of it.
I just don't.

872
00:52:01,480 --> 00:52:04,040
And I want to make it clear, I
don't think that they are the

873
00:52:04,040 --> 00:52:06,960
only thing to.
Pay attention to yeah.

874
00:52:07,160 --> 00:52:10,200
Because I'll tell you, yes, I
get the dopamine hit, I get the

875
00:52:10,200 --> 00:52:15,080
rush, seeing the hundreds and
hundreds of downloads some of

876
00:52:15,080 --> 00:52:18,000
our recent episodes are getting
these days.

877
00:52:18,640 --> 00:52:22,720
And one of the next things I do
once I get that little dopamine

878
00:52:22,720 --> 00:52:26,600
hit is I go and I look at
retention and I look at these

879
00:52:26,600 --> 00:52:30,320
episodes that people are
downloading and seeing like, OK,

880
00:52:30,320 --> 00:52:32,080
so great that they're
downloading these.

881
00:52:32,080 --> 00:52:36,480
Are they actually listening?
And yes, it looks like those

882
00:52:36,480 --> 00:52:41,200
episodes, people are consuming
at least half or more of them.

883
00:52:41,600 --> 00:52:44,440
So that's great to hear.
And there is what, oh, and also

884
00:52:44,440 --> 00:52:47,720
what I'm noticing how I'm
measuring the success is that

885
00:52:48,040 --> 00:52:53,080
now on Spotify, people can leave
comments and the, these, you

886
00:52:53,080 --> 00:52:56,840
know, especially the Blues Clues
episode we did last week, more,

887
00:52:56,840 --> 00:53:00,160
I'm getting more and more
comments on those episodes.

888
00:53:00,160 --> 00:53:02,800
So that's a good sign that
people are listening, especially

889
00:53:02,800 --> 00:53:05,760
'cause I can tell from some of
the comments, like they're

890
00:53:05,760 --> 00:53:09,320
addressing specific things we
discussed throughout the

891
00:53:09,320 --> 00:53:12,160
episode.
So it's a, it's a good sign that

892
00:53:12,160 --> 00:53:15,960
yes, that people are actually
hitting play and then sticking

893
00:53:15,960 --> 00:53:17,400
around.
So those are just some of the

894
00:53:17,400 --> 00:53:19,480
ways I would measure it.
Right.

895
00:53:20,680 --> 00:53:23,280
I'll take the next one Dr.
because I want to try to get

896
00:53:23,280 --> 00:53:27,640
through most of these if we can.
Yeah, I know we only have a few

897
00:53:27,640 --> 00:53:32,800
minutes left, but then this is
on video and YouTube talking

898
00:53:32,800 --> 00:53:35,280
about it being an untapped
growth engine.

899
00:53:35,320 --> 00:53:39,200
Hard to believe it would be
untapped considering how popular

900
00:53:39,240 --> 00:53:44,680
it is, but nearly 50% of podcast
consumption now happens on video

901
00:53:44,680 --> 00:53:48,720
platforms according to Jeremy's
study, especially on YouTube.

902
00:53:49,000 --> 00:53:52,200
YouTube view time.
However, this is that retention

903
00:53:52,200 --> 00:53:54,920
I was just talking about.
This is something important to

904
00:53:54,920 --> 00:53:59,320
focus on.
YouTube view time averages 7 1/2

905
00:53:59,320 --> 00:54:05,960
minutes per session, compared to
24 minutes for audio.

906
00:54:06,320 --> 00:54:09,800
Yet many podcasters still don't
optimize for video, and maybe

907
00:54:09,800 --> 00:54:12,800
that's why, right?
Maybe that's a reason because

908
00:54:13,360 --> 00:54:17,440
I'm not going to rush to do
heavy editing, heavy post

909
00:54:17,440 --> 00:54:22,720
production on say, a 30 minute
video if on average people are

910
00:54:22,720 --> 00:54:25,800
only watching for 7 minutes or
so.

911
00:54:26,800 --> 00:54:31,160
That seems like a lot of work or
a lot of money if you're going

912
00:54:31,160 --> 00:54:35,080
to pay somebody to do it.
We're only 7 1/2 minutes of

913
00:54:35,080 --> 00:54:37,640
watch time.
Now, granted, this is an overall

914
00:54:37,640 --> 00:54:40,240
average, so that's going to vary
depending on your target

915
00:54:40,240 --> 00:54:46,440
audience for sure, but it is a
pretty common average across the

916
00:54:46,440 --> 00:54:48,280
board, so it's something to
think about.

917
00:54:48,840 --> 00:54:52,440
Most creators spend very little
time on things like YouTube

918
00:54:52,440 --> 00:54:55,680
thumbnails and video titles.
That was another key point.

919
00:54:56,760 --> 00:54:59,240
This is shocking to me.
Yeah, and those are probably,

920
00:54:59,240 --> 00:55:02,640
and I'm telling you if you
change those on the fly, if you

921
00:55:02,640 --> 00:55:06,240
have a video that you are just
certain or content that you are

922
00:55:06,240 --> 00:55:10,600
certain it is quality and your
target audience would eat that

923
00:55:10,600 --> 00:55:14,360
up, go play with the thumbnail,
change it, Go play with the

924
00:55:14,360 --> 00:55:17,160
title, change it and see if it
happens.

925
00:55:17,160 --> 00:55:22,280
I have done this countless times
and more times than not I see a

926
00:55:22,280 --> 00:55:26,480
spike after I make that change.
It does make a difference.

927
00:55:27,160 --> 00:55:30,600
It does make a difference.
I'm now outsourcing all of my

928
00:55:30,600 --> 00:55:34,400
YouTube stuff from my clients
and ever since we started with

929
00:55:34,400 --> 00:55:36,840
her the she's doing the
thumbnails, she's doing

930
00:55:36,840 --> 00:55:38,640
everything.
Yeah, and I'm going to keep it

931
00:55:38,640 --> 00:55:41,320
going.
This section here, Marketing

932
00:55:41,320 --> 00:55:45,360
muscle versus budget paradox.
Here's some of the key points in

933
00:55:45,360 --> 00:55:47,520
this area.
High Growth podcast reported the

934
00:55:47,520 --> 00:55:49,840
lowest monthly marketing
budgets.

935
00:55:50,000 --> 00:55:53,400
Big spenders didn't always see
bigger results.

936
00:55:54,000 --> 00:55:57,760
Also shows that spent more time
and money didn't necessarily

937
00:55:57,760 --> 00:56:01,240
grow faster.
Sometimes the opposite.

938
00:56:01,680 --> 00:56:05,840
And efficiency and strategic
focus matter more than simply

939
00:56:05,840 --> 00:56:09,240
throwing money at marketing.
Yeah, that's basically summing

940
00:56:09,240 --> 00:56:12,560
up what we're saying here.
Really fascinating to me that

941
00:56:12,720 --> 00:56:16,040
people are putting more money
into the shows, more time, but

942
00:56:16,040 --> 00:56:18,560
it doesn't necessarily equate to
more.

943
00:56:18,800 --> 00:56:21,520
More audience, more view time,
etcetera.

944
00:56:21,920 --> 00:56:24,520
I'll end it here with audience
research and strategy.

945
00:56:24,760 --> 00:56:28,920
The biggest shows have about
twice as many one-on-one

946
00:56:28,920 --> 00:56:32,160
conversations with listeners,
but it's still less than you'd

947
00:56:32,160 --> 00:56:34,960
expect.
And just to be clear, that is

948
00:56:34,960 --> 00:56:40,200
literally the host or the people
working on the shows actually

949
00:56:40,200 --> 00:56:44,640
reaching out and connecting with
speaking with their audience

950
00:56:44,640 --> 00:56:48,160
directly.
One one-on-one unique show

951
00:56:48,160 --> 00:56:52,080
concept in quotes was cited as
the most important factor for

952
00:56:52,080 --> 00:56:54,680
growth.
While show packaging, also in

953
00:56:54,680 --> 00:56:57,240
quotes, was often the weakest
part.

954
00:56:57,880 --> 00:57:01,120
Shows that regularly connect
with their audience seem to have

955
00:57:01,200 --> 00:57:04,560
an advantage.
Keep that in mind, please.

956
00:57:05,080 --> 00:57:08,080
So when you're thinking about Oh
yeah, Mark is because I know I

957
00:57:08,080 --> 00:57:11,080
talked about this, Mark.
Mark encourages that one,

958
00:57:11,080 --> 00:57:15,200
one-on-one connection.
Reach out to those listeners,

959
00:57:15,200 --> 00:57:19,120
those viewers that are
commenting on your content, send

960
00:57:19,120 --> 00:57:22,240
them Adm thank them for it.
It's such a waste of time.

961
00:57:22,240 --> 00:57:24,200
It's not.
It makes a difference.

962
00:57:24,200 --> 00:57:29,200
This study shows an overwhelming
response to the biggest shows

963
00:57:29,640 --> 00:57:32,840
having twice as many one-on-one
conversations with their

964
00:57:33,040 --> 00:57:35,800
audiences.
Consider doing that.

965
00:57:35,800 --> 00:57:38,560
It does make a difference.
It means a lot.

966
00:57:38,560 --> 00:57:44,200
Once you can convert a listener
into a raging fan, they're going

967
00:57:44,200 --> 00:57:47,200
to go and spread the word, share
it with more people.

968
00:57:47,200 --> 00:57:51,040
And part of that recipe is to
reach out to them individually.

969
00:57:51,800 --> 00:57:55,480
OK, so we're back tomorrow at
7:00 AM Eastern Time.

970
00:57:55,480 --> 00:57:58,520
We're going to be, if you
recall, I asked you yesterday.

971
00:57:58,520 --> 00:58:01,520
So keep thinking about this.
What are some of the things in

972
00:58:01,520 --> 00:58:07,560
your life over your time that
you've said yes to that's gotten

973
00:58:07,560 --> 00:58:10,640
you to where you are today?
Especially in your podcasting

974
00:58:10,640 --> 00:58:12,560
journey?
What are the things that

975
00:58:12,680 --> 00:58:18,560
happened on your timeline that
you said yes to or no to that

976
00:58:18,560 --> 00:58:22,960
brought you here today, that got
you put you in this room on this

977
00:58:22,960 --> 00:58:26,520
show, whatever it is, putting
out podcasts regularly.

978
00:58:27,160 --> 00:58:29,280
What did you say yes to?
What did you say no to?

979
00:58:29,280 --> 00:58:30,880
Bring it.
Tomorrow morning we're going to

980
00:58:30,880 --> 00:58:33,920
talk about it.
I think it will be a fascinating

981
00:58:33,960 --> 00:58:36,960
conversation and I'm looking
forward to hearing what you have

982
00:58:36,960 --> 00:58:40,400
to say.
So until tomorrow, make it a

983
00:58:40,400 --> 00:58:42,600
great day.
Everybody take care.