May 6, 2026

511. The Video Race Reshaping Podcast Hosting | Podcast News

511. The Video Race Reshaping Podcast Hosting | Podcast News

Video podcasting keeps creeping into every corner of the industry, and the PMS cast and crew get into why reshaping podcast hosting may have less to do with audience demand and more to do with platforms racing to keep up with each other. We talk through the growing push from hosting companies adding video support for Apple, Spotify, and YouTube, what that means for indie creators already stretched thin, and whether all this added complexity actually improves the listener experience. You know the one, that feeling when every platform suddenly acts like you’re behind if you are not doing the latest thing. That tension sits underneath this whole conversation as reshaping podcast hosting starts changing how creators publish, distribute, and think about their shows moving forward.

Episode Highlights:

[01:48] Show Updates and Evaluations

[03:31] Active Podcast Stats

[06:15] DR Top Five Lists

[08:52] Grants and Conference

[11:47] Creator Business Bite

[16:44] Video Hosting News

[25:24] Video Listening Habits

[30:06] Will It Take Off?

[30:39] Podcast Spotlight Pitch

[31:46] Upload Once, Distribute Everywhere

[34:05] Rob Greenlee Friday Tease

[37:01] Podigee Adds Video Support

[38:25] Patreon Quips Discovery

[40:01] Amazon AI Review Audio

[46:21] What Counts as a Podcast?

[49:39] Gen Z Buys Old iPods

[53:28] Walkman Nostalgia Rabbit Hole

[56:52] Wrap-Up and Tomorrow’s Show

Links & Resources:

Content Creators Accountant:

https://www.contentcreatorsaccountant.com/blog/creators-build-the-business/

Apply for your potential $500 grant. Applications opened May 4 and will remain open until May 15:

https://podground.io/grant

Feature Your Podcast on the Podcasting Morning Show:

https://PodcastingMorningShow.com/spotlight

The Podcasting Morning Show:

⁠⁠www.podcastingmorningshow.com⁠⁠

Ways to Watch or Listen:⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.podcastingmorningshow.com/joinus/

Meet the PMS Cast and Crew:

⁠⁠https://podcastingmorningshow.com/people⁠⁠

Join The Empowered Podcasting Facebook Group:

⁠⁠www.facebook.com/groups/empoweredpodcasting⁠⁠⁠

Book A Free Call With Marc:

https://calendly.com/ironickmedia/freestrategycall

Application To Submit Your Show For Evaluation:

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcastingmorningshow.com/eval⁠⁠

Join us every other Monday at 8 AM ET for the Obsession Worthy Podcasts:⁠⁠⁠

http://podcastingmorningshow.com/owp/⁠⁠

Join us LIVE every weekday morning at 8 am ET (US) on ⁠Clubhouse⁠: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcastingmorningshow.com/clubhouse⁠⁠

EPC3 Speaker Application:⁠⁠ ⁠https://empoweredpodcasting.com/speakers

Powered by⁠⁠⁠ ⁠iRonickMedia.com⁠⁠⁠⁠ and⁠ ⁠ContentCreatorsAccountant.com⁠⁠

Send in your mailbag questions:⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://www.podcastingmorningshow.com/contact/⁠⁠⁠⁠ or ⁠marc@ironickmedia.com⁠

Want to be a guest on The Podcasting Morning Show? Send me a message on PodMatch, here:

https://podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/1729879899384520035bad21b


1
00:00:05,580 --> 00:00:07,944
Marc Ronick: Good morning

podcasters.

2
00:00:07,944 --> 00:00:12,939
Today is Wednesday, May the
sixth, 2026 and today
it's our

3
00:00:12,939 --> 00:00:17,366
news and comment episode, diving
into hosting
platforms, making

4
00:00:17,366 --> 00:00:20,505
video podcasting unavoidable.
Amazon
strange audio

5
00:00:20,505 --> 00:00:24,629
experiment and the growing
demands of full blown
creator

6
00:00:24,629 --> 00:00:27,144
businesses.
So if you're listening live on

7
00:00:27,144 --> 00:00:29,855
clubhouse, hit
the share
button, top right hand side of

8
00:00:29,855 --> 00:00:32,240
the screen and share it

however clubhouse lets you.

9
00:00:32,240 --> 00:00:35,625
And if you're catching us via

podcast, YouTube, etc, please

10
00:00:35,625 --> 00:00:38,565
share this episode with a fellow

podcaster.

11
00:00:38,565 --> 00:00:42,695
And now give us about 30
seconds, and we'll get things


12
00:00:42,703 --> 00:00:44,385
rolling.
Thanks for being here.

13
00:00:52,005 --> 00:00:55,950
The podcasting morning chat is

powered by ironic media helping

14
00:00:55,950 --> 00:01:00,810
podcasters launch polish and

grow great shows, and by content

15
00:01:00,810 --> 00:01:03,690
creator's accountant helping

creators build real Business

16
00:01:03,690 --> 00:01:22,347
behind their content.
Good morning again, podcasting


17
00:01:22,355 --> 00:01:25,205
morning show.
I said it right this time.

18
00:01:25,205 --> 00:01:28,845
Thank you for being
here.
I am your host, Mark ronick, and

19
00:01:28,845 --> 00:01:33,105
currently on stage
with me.
We have DR Fay, Ralph Estep, Sid

20
00:01:33,105 --> 00:01:36,936
meadows and Alex
Ballish.
We'll see who else we hear from

21
00:01:36,936 --> 00:01:38,525
as far as the casting
crew
goes.

22
00:01:38,525 --> 00:01:41,808
And if you want to learn more
about them, just go
to

23
00:01:41,808 --> 00:01:44,820
podcasting, morning
show.com/people and yes, today


24
00:01:44,828 --> 00:01:50,586
we are digging into the news.
First, I want to share with you

25
00:01:50,586 --> 00:01:54,861
a couple of little things going
on here with the show.

26
00:01:54,861 --> 00:01:57,765
Thursday.

This Thursday, that is the

27
00:01:57,765 --> 00:02:01,301
seventh we're going to be doing
our evaluation series.

28
00:02:01,301 --> 00:02:04,917
So how does that work?
If you want
honest, helpful

29
00:02:04,917 --> 00:02:08,226
feedback for your podcast, we do
this
roughly.

30
00:02:08,226 --> 00:02:11,665
Every other Thursday, we review
a real show from our
community

31
00:02:11,665 --> 00:02:15,807
with the goal of helping the
podcasters grow and
helping

32
00:02:15,807 --> 00:02:18,235
everyone listening learn from
that.

33
00:02:18,235 --> 00:02:22,410
This week, we're
evaluating
the loud, quiet, a podcast about

34
00:02:22,410 --> 00:02:26,130
empty nest living,
hosted by
Rick and Clancy Denton.

35
00:02:26,130 --> 00:02:30,600
They are empowered
podcasting
community members, and I know

36
00:02:30,600 --> 00:02:35,090
Rick listens
regularly here,
on or at or with or to, I don't

37
00:02:35,090 --> 00:02:37,356
know what the
right word is,
the podcasting morning show.

38
00:02:37,356 --> 00:02:39,686
Thank you for
listening so
much, Rick.

39
00:02:39,686 --> 00:02:42,879
And if you want your podcast
evaluated,
all you got to do

40
00:02:42,879 --> 00:02:48,855
is go to podcasting, morning

show.com/eval e, v, a, l, and if

41
00:02:48,855 --> 00:02:52,815
you want to listen to the full

30 minute episode of the loud

42
00:02:52,815 --> 00:02:55,635
quiet, just go to podcasting.

Morning show.com/loudquiet.

43
00:02:58,635 --> 00:03:03,675
Again, podcasting, morning

show.com/loudquiet and don't

44
00:03:03,675 --> 00:03:06,164
worry if you don't have time to
catch that episode.

45
00:03:06,164 --> 00:03:09,489
We play clips from the show, and
we talk
about those clips and

46
00:03:09,489 --> 00:03:13,010
put it all into context for you,
so you'll
be able to follow

47
00:03:13,010 --> 00:03:15,377
along along either way.
But we encourage you
to

48
00:03:15,377 --> 00:03:17,850
listen, just because, you know,
it's a community member
show,

49
00:03:17,850 --> 00:03:22,395
and I think it'll give you even
more to chew on when we do
our

50
00:03:22,395 --> 00:03:26,574
evaluation this Thursday.
Okay, let's dive in to today's


51
00:03:26,582 --> 00:03:29,205
news.
I think we got to all the

52
00:03:29,205 --> 00:03:33,705
housekeeping.
So the way I like
to do it, if

53
00:03:33,705 --> 00:03:36,765
you've been listening for any
period of
time, you know, we

54
00:03:36,765 --> 00:03:38,845
start this with some podcast
data.

55
00:03:38,845 --> 00:03:44,265
This is
as of yesterday, may
the fifth, and it comes from the

56
00:03:44,265 --> 00:03:47,415
podcasting
Business Journal.
And what they say about these

57
00:03:47,415 --> 00:03:51,072
particular
numbers, this is
about act the current number of

58
00:03:51,072 --> 00:03:54,822
active
podcasts.
And what they say here on their

59
00:03:54,822 --> 00:03:58,043
website is it's a
helpful
number to understand the amount

60
00:03:58,043 --> 00:04:01,986
of podcasts being
created.
And while they're actually what

61
00:04:01,986 --> 00:04:05,144
they're saying is
that a
helpful number to understand the

62
00:04:05,144 --> 00:04:08,412
amount of
podcasts being
created is the total number of

63
00:04:08,412 --> 00:04:11,931
quote unquote
active podcasts.
These are podcasts that still

64
00:04:11,931 --> 00:04:14,984
are being
updated and
therefore actively marketing

65
00:04:14,984 --> 00:04:17,942
themselves.
If you're
making podcasts, you

66
00:04:17,942 --> 00:04:21,512
probably want to consider this
to be your
quote, unquote

67
00:04:21,512 --> 00:04:23,995
competition number, rather than
the big
number above.

68
00:04:23,995 --> 00:04:27,645
By the way, I'm going to bring
in BC babbles on
the video

69
00:04:27,645 --> 00:04:29,280
here.
Oh, he's also on clubhouse,

70
00:04:29,280 --> 00:04:30,705
cool.
So welcome to
BC.

71
00:04:30,705 --> 00:04:34,895
So let me give you the numbers.
The total podcasts that
were

72
00:04:34,895 --> 00:04:40,530
updated over the past week were
203,900 nice even or round


73
00:04:40,538 --> 00:04:45,885
number, I should say that's up
4.4% from the previous week.

74
00:04:45,885 --> 00:04:52,568
And
also, as far as over the
past 30 days, the total podcasts

75
00:04:52,568 --> 00:04:58,930
that
actually updated is
372,081 which is also up almost

76
00:04:58,930 --> 00:05:01,892
3% 2.9%
from the previous
month.

77
00:05:01,892 --> 00:05:03,621
So again, this is a good thing
to
know.

78
00:05:03,621 --> 00:05:07,029
You know, I was just on threads
the other day, and I saw


79
00:05:07,037 --> 00:05:10,191
somebody post something about
how they really want to start a

80
00:05:10,191 --> 00:05:13,573
podcast, but they just feel
like it's oversaturated and they

81
00:05:13,573 --> 00:05:17,670

can't do it.
But the truth is, it is not

82
00:05:17,670 --> 00:05:19,595
oversaturated.
I just
gave you that number

83
00:05:19,595 --> 00:05:24,910
this past week, only 203 204,000
podcasts actually updated with a

84
00:05:24,910 --> 00:05:27,752

new episode.
When we think about there, when

85
00:05:27,752 --> 00:05:31,492
we think about a lot
of people
will start a band in music, or

86
00:05:31,492 --> 00:05:34,222
they'll start a
YouTube
channel and not think anything

87
00:05:34,222 --> 00:05:39,177
of the millions and
probably
billions of others that are

88
00:05:39,177 --> 00:05:41,484
doing the same thing.
But
for some reason, with

89
00:05:41,484 --> 00:05:44,272
podcasts, they feel like, oh,
there's it's
just another

90
00:05:44,272 --> 00:05:45,459
podcast.
I can't do.

91
00:05:45,459 --> 00:05:47,132
I can't be another one of

those.

92
00:05:47,132 --> 00:05:50,020
It's just not true.
There's not nearly as many as we

93
00:05:50,020 --> 00:05:51,440

think.
Ralph Estep Jr: And Mark, just


94
00:05:51,448 --> 00:05:54,260
think about all the AI podcasts
that probably make up a good


95
00:05:54,268 --> 00:05:57,092
portion of that number.
So Authenticity will win the

96
00:05:57,092 --> 00:05:59,075
day.
Marc Ronick: That is true.

97
00:05:59,075 --> 00:06:02,180
That
is true, yes.
And even still, those numbers,

98
00:06:02,180 --> 00:06:05,852
even before AI
started
infiltrating things, they were

99
00:06:05,852 --> 00:06:08,414
pretty lopsided.
In
that regard, lots of

100
00:06:08,414 --> 00:06:12,690
numbered, lots of podcasts out
there, but
not nearly as many

101
00:06:12,690 --> 00:06:17,306
are actually actively updating.
All right,
let's go to you DR

102
00:06:17,306 --> 00:06:20,344
with your two top five lists.
D.R.

103
00:06:20,344 --> 00:06:24,725
Fay: Okay, so these two
lists
are both of both kind of random.

104
00:06:24,725 --> 00:06:31,636
The first one is good
pods,
best podcast for ADHD and a u,

105
00:06:31,636 --> 00:06:37,480
d, H D, Marc Ronick: odd h d for

autistic and ADHD.

106
00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:39,228
D.R.
Fay: That's right.

107
00:06:39,228 --> 00:06:41,850
So
number five is embracing
intensity.

108
00:06:41,850 --> 00:06:49,846
Number four is a, U
D, H, D,
flourishing, odd, odd, D, H, D,

109
00:06:49,846 --> 00:06:52,858
flourishing, okay.

Number three is unashaming.

110
00:06:52,858 --> 00:06:57,990
A, U D, H D, number two is, I
have
ADHD.

111
00:06:57,990 --> 00:07:02,638
And number one is, I'm busy
being awesome, sustainable


112
00:07:02,646 --> 00:07:07,030
productivity for ADHD.
Marc Ronick: The only one that I

113
00:07:07,030 --> 00:07:11,105

actually am familiar with of
this list is number two.

114
00:07:11,105 --> 00:07:15,195
I have
ADHD podcast, and yeah,
the others, I don't know, and

115
00:07:15,195 --> 00:07:17,390
I'm
sad.
I want to get a couple of my

116
00:07:17,390 --> 00:07:21,240
clients in this top five
here.
I have a client.

117
00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:26,228
Brooke schnittman, successful
with two
L's, successful with

118
00:07:26,228 --> 00:07:29,945
ADHD.
And then a new client, Patrick


119
00:07:29,953 --> 00:07:35,356
casal, who he actually has, or
was diagnosed with odd HD a


120
00:07:35,364 --> 00:07:38,902
while back.
And he is he's doing super well

121
00:07:38,902 --> 00:07:42,164
in all different
areas of his
business, including his podcast,

122
00:07:42,164 --> 00:07:45,642
but we're doing a
rebrand.
He hired me to help him rebrand

123
00:07:45,642 --> 00:07:48,617
his podcast, which
originally
was called all things private

124
00:07:48,617 --> 00:07:51,835
practice, which really
does
has nothing to do with his

125
00:07:51,835 --> 00:07:54,420
podcast.
So we are doing a full
rebrand

126
00:07:54,420 --> 00:07:57,938
so that the title, the show,
etc, speaks to his target


127
00:07:57,946 --> 00:07:58,430
audience.
D.R.

128
00:07:58,430 --> 00:08:00,355
Fay: So anyway, that's the

target trying to get on that

129
00:08:00,355 --> 00:08:01,315
list.
Marc Ronick: That's right.

130
00:08:01,315 --> 00:08:03,345
D.R.
Fay: So let's see a random


131
00:08:03,353 --> 00:08:05,245
chart.
Number two the top YouTube

132
00:08:05,245 --> 00:08:08,395
podcasts.
Now, when it
comes to YouTube,

133
00:08:08,395 --> 00:08:10,611
they're always like two weeks
behind.

134
00:08:10,611 --> 00:08:15,424
So this
is like April 20
through April 26 Okay, so number

135
00:08:15,424 --> 00:08:18,695
five is Smosh
reads, Reddit
stories.

136
00:08:18,695 --> 00:08:23,452
Number four is good, mythical
morning
with Rhett and Link

137
00:08:23,452 --> 00:08:27,739
number three, haven't read this
name on
number three, the Joe

138
00:08:27,739 --> 00:08:30,334
Rogan experience.
Number two, Doctor
intensity

139
00:08:30,334 --> 00:08:35,059
podcast, and the number one
podcast is the Midas
touch

140
00:08:35,059 --> 00:08:37,831
podcast.
Marc Ronick: Very nice, okay,


141
00:08:37,839 --> 00:08:40,275
and that is what you said.
Specifically.

142
00:08:40,275 --> 00:08:43,671
What kind of list
is that?
Just the top YouTube podcasts.

143
00:08:43,671 --> 00:08:47,425
YouTube podcasts,
interesting.
Okay, cool, that's a new one.

144
00:08:47,425 --> 00:08:48,865
We haven't done that
one
before.

145
00:08:48,865 --> 00:08:50,665
Thank you.
Dr, appreciate you.

146
00:08:51,980 --> 00:08:56,660
Let's get into a couple, just a
couple of events or things of

147
00:08:56,660 --> 00:09:00,500
interest to you, the podcaster,
the content creator.

148
00:09:00,500 --> 00:09:05,213
First pod ground is back with
its second
creator micro

149
00:09:05,213 --> 00:09:07,695
grant.
I don't know if we talked about

150
00:09:07,695 --> 00:09:10,298
their
first one, so if we
didn't, please forgive us.

151
00:09:10,298 --> 00:09:14,022
And this one
is aimed directly
at independent podcasters who

152
00:09:14,022 --> 00:09:16,825
need a little
support to keep
building.

153
00:09:16,825 --> 00:09:20,945
Two creators will receive $500
each
to help with creative

154
00:09:20,945 --> 00:09:25,325
development, production or

promotion applications opened

155
00:09:25,325 --> 00:09:30,545
May the fourth and close may 15,

with judges including Greg

156
00:09:30,545 --> 00:09:33,611
Wasserman from rss.com I know

Greg also.

157
00:09:33,611 --> 00:09:37,730
I know Arielle nessenblatt from
earbuds podcast
collective,

158
00:09:37,730 --> 00:09:42,620
Claire wait Brown from
podcasting 2.0 in practice.


159
00:09:42,628 --> 00:09:47,150
And Gabe Burke from the
Australian Broadcasting


160
00:09:47,158 --> 00:09:52,055
Corporation, and look, $500
isn't quit your job and build a

161
00:09:52,055 --> 00:09:55,820
podcast Empire kind of money,
but for an indie podcaster, it


162
00:09:55,828 --> 00:10:01,202
can pay for lots of things.
Maybe better cover art a short


163
00:10:01,210 --> 00:10:04,085
promotional campaign, equipment
upgrades, or just a little


164
00:10:04,093 --> 00:10:05,945
breathing room to keep the show
alive.

165
00:10:05,945 --> 00:10:10,235
That matters, because pod
fade
is still one of the biggest

166
00:10:10,235 --> 00:10:14,285
problems in podcasting.
Pod
ground says more than half

167
00:10:14,285 --> 00:10:18,221
of new podcasts don't make it
past
their third episode.

168
00:10:18,221 --> 00:10:21,544
I usually hear it's around
eight, but
that's okay.

169
00:10:21,544 --> 00:10:26,060
I think the point here is that
single digits is
usually all a

170
00:10:26,060 --> 00:10:30,295
podcaster can get to a newer
podcaster can get to
until

171
00:10:30,295 --> 00:10:33,917
they end up quitting.
And this grant is a part of a

172
00:10:33,917 --> 00:10:35,645
bigger
mission to help
creators stay connected,

173
00:10:35,645 --> 00:10:39,320
supported and
consistent.
So if that's of interest to you,

174
00:10:39,320 --> 00:10:44,411
go to
podground.io/grant dot
io slash grant, and you can

175
00:10:44,411 --> 00:10:47,903
apply for
your potential $500
grant.

176
00:10:47,903 --> 00:10:51,015
Also, if you're new to this show
or
living under a rock

177
00:10:51,015 --> 00:10:54,559
empowered podcasting conference
three is
happening August, 21

178
00:10:54,559 --> 00:10:57,305
through the 23rd in Charlotte,
North
Carolina.

179
00:10:57,305 --> 00:11:01,589
And if you're an indie or DIY
podcaster who wants to


180
00:11:01,597 --> 00:11:04,645
connect, create and grow
alongside people who truly get


181
00:11:04,653 --> 00:11:06,953
it.
This is where you want to be.

182
00:11:06,953 --> 00:11:10,430
Come for the education, stay

for the community, and leave

183
00:11:10,430 --> 00:11:13,610
with new ideas, new

relationships and real momentum

184
00:11:13,670 --> 00:11:16,232
for your podcast.
So visit
empowered

185
00:11:16,232 --> 00:11:20,606
podcasting.com to grab your
tickets before May 15,
because

186
00:11:20,606 --> 00:11:23,762
that's when tickets go up in
price.

187
00:11:23,762 --> 00:11:26,858
So now's the time
to do it all
right?

188
00:11:26,858 --> 00:11:30,499
So yeah, so I'm trying to keep
those events
down a little

189
00:11:30,499 --> 00:11:32,570
bit.
I just feel like sometimes we

190
00:11:32,570 --> 00:11:35,007
spend a little
too much time
on those.

191
00:11:35,007 --> 00:11:38,915
So I just felt like that would
be a
better way to go.

192
00:11:38,915 --> 00:11:42,010
So with that, I'm stalling
again, because when
I am

193
00:11:42,010 --> 00:11:45,335
trying, whenever I want to find
Ralph's business bite, I
never

194
00:11:45,335 --> 00:11:49,755
can find it.
So Ralph, you want to hit it for

195
00:11:49,755 --> 00:11:52,372
me.
Quick
tip, smart move.

196
00:11:52,372 --> 00:11:59,200
Content creators business bite.
And today's business bite is


197
00:11:59,208 --> 00:12:03,287
brought to you by Ralph Estep Jr
of content creators


198
00:12:03,295 --> 00:12:06,768
accountant.com Ralph is a
licensed accountant with over 30

199
00:12:06,768 --> 00:12:09,530

years of experience helping
creators navigate taxes,


200
00:12:09,538 --> 00:12:13,200
bookkeeping and the money side
of their business with more


201
00:12:13,208 --> 00:12:15,243
clarity and a whole lot less
stress.

202
00:12:15,243 --> 00:12:19,055
He's also my accountant,
and
I'm happy to recommend him to

203
00:12:19,055 --> 00:12:21,785
you.
You can learn more again
at

204
00:12:21,785 --> 00:12:23,846
content creators.
Accountant.com, all right,


205
00:12:23,854 --> 00:12:27,584
Ralph, what are we diving into
Ralph Estep Jr: Well, thank you,

206
00:12:27,584 --> 00:12:26,585

and good morning.
Today's today?

207
00:12:28,640 --> 00:12:32,120
business bite is all about

creators, and I want to dive

208
00:12:32,120 --> 00:12:35,000
into a little bit of why making
content is not the same as

209
00:12:35,000 --> 00:12:37,226
building a business.
Now, I
actually decided to

210
00:12:37,226 --> 00:12:40,165
write a blog post about this
after the money
Monday show,

211
00:12:40,165 --> 00:12:43,010
we'll put a link to that out in
the show notes.

212
00:12:43,010 --> 00:12:45,915
We
were talking about creators
and how so many people are

213
00:12:45,915 --> 00:12:48,392
making
content right now.
But after the show, I kept

214
00:12:48,392 --> 00:12:50,482
thinking about it,
and I said,
There's got to be more.

215
00:12:50,482 --> 00:12:53,045
I got to offer more.
I
felt like the conversation

216
00:12:53,045 --> 00:12:56,147
needed to go a little deeper, so

I wrote a blog article.

217
00:12:56,147 --> 00:12:59,650
Blog article, let me say that
three
times to expand on it,

218
00:12:59,650 --> 00:13:02,870
because here's the thing, the
creator
economy is growing

219
00:13:02,870 --> 00:13:05,101
fast.
We read about this almost every

220
00:13:05,101 --> 00:13:07,085
day.

There's a ton of money moving

221
00:13:07,085 --> 00:13:09,629
through this space.
But just
because the industry

222
00:13:09,629 --> 00:13:13,253
is growing doesn't mean every
creator is
actually making

223
00:13:13,253 --> 00:13:15,656
money or building something that
can
last.

224
00:13:15,656 --> 00:13:19,070
A lot of creators like we
mentioned on Monday are focused

225
00:13:19,070 --> 00:13:22,190
on posting, focused on getting
views, gaining followers, and


226
00:13:22,198 --> 00:13:25,328
staying active online, and
listen, all those things matter,

227
00:13:25,328 --> 00:13:27,390

but that alone is not a
business.

228
00:13:27,390 --> 00:13:31,600
Your content gets
people's
attention, but what we need to

229
00:13:31,600 --> 00:13:33,455
step to is what happens
after
that.

230
00:13:33,455 --> 00:13:36,851
Do you have something to sell?
Do you know
who you're trying

231
00:13:36,851 --> 00:13:39,455
to help?
Do you know how much money

232
00:13:39,455 --> 00:13:42,347
you're
actually keeping after
expenses from a real practical


233
00:13:42,355 --> 00:13:45,245
standpoint, do you know how much
you're setting aside for taxes?

234
00:13:45,245 --> 00:13:47,075

And here's the problem, do you

235
00:13:47,075 --> 00:13:48,853
have a plan for those slower

months?

236
00:13:48,853 --> 00:13:52,067
This is the part a lot of people
and especially content


237
00:13:52,075 --> 00:13:55,067
creators, miss.
You can be busy every single day

238
00:13:55,067 --> 00:13:58,771
creating
content and still not
have a real business behind it.

239
00:13:58,771 --> 00:14:02,648
You can
have tons of followers
and still not have steady

240
00:14:02,648 --> 00:14:04,664
income.
And
here's another thing, you

241
00:14:04,664 --> 00:14:08,000
can make money one month and
still
not know if you're

242
00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:10,652
actually profitable.
So when I say
creators need to

243
00:14:10,652 --> 00:14:14,426
build a business, I mean they
need to
structure behind what

244
00:14:14,426 --> 00:14:17,261
they're already doing.
Have that clear
offer.

245
00:14:17,261 --> 00:14:20,268
Know your numbers.
Separate your business money


246
00:14:20,276 --> 00:14:23,177
from personal money.
Hey, Dr, pay yourself.

247
00:14:23,177 --> 00:14:26,999
Save for taxes and
build
something that doesn't depend

248
00:14:26,999 --> 00:14:30,305
only on the algorithm.

Because friends, views are

249
00:14:30,305 --> 00:14:33,285
great, but views don't pay your
bills.

250
00:14:33,285 --> 00:14:36,983
Followers are great, but
followers are not the same as


251
00:14:36,991 --> 00:14:39,191
customers.
So the real business news is

252
00:14:39,191 --> 00:14:42,185
this, the creators who
last
will be the ones who stop

253
00:14:42,185 --> 00:14:45,305
thinking only like creators and
start thinking like business

254
00:14:45,350 --> 00:14:47,345
owners.
And here's the question
I want

255
00:14:47,345 --> 00:14:50,138
to leave you with, if your
content stopped performing


256
00:14:50,146 --> 00:14:53,960
tomorrow, would you still have a
business, or would you just have

257
00:14:53,960 --> 00:14:55,730

an audience with nowhere to
go?

258
00:14:56,030 --> 00:14:57,470
And that's today's business

bite.

259
00:14:57,470 --> 00:15:00,308
Marc Ronick: Thank you, Ralph

and I know.

260
00:15:00,308 --> 00:15:04,076
Ralph, you called out, dr,
because we had a behind
the

261
00:15:04,076 --> 00:15:05,575
scenes conversation this
morning.

262
00:15:05,575 --> 00:15:10,124
Dr, you had suggested
maybe an
upcoming Money Monday topic.

263
00:15:10,124 --> 00:15:11,879
Did you want to share
that?
D.R.

264
00:15:11,879 --> 00:15:16,008
Fay: Yeah, I am always well
to
begin with.

265
00:15:16,008 --> 00:15:21,240
In 2025 I was commingling my
stuff, and after
listening to

266
00:15:21,240 --> 00:15:25,368
Ralph, I decided in 2026 I was
going to stop.

267
00:15:25,368 --> 00:15:29,276
But
now I'm faced with, what
do I pay myself?

268
00:15:29,276 --> 00:15:33,252
Is there?
How do I
figure out the

269
00:15:33,252 --> 00:15:38,725
formula on how to pay myself?
Right now I'm doing
like 25%

270
00:15:38,725 --> 00:15:42,709
of whatever comes in, but I
don't even, I just grabbed


271
00:15:42,717 --> 00:15:46,165
that out of thin air.
I have no idea if that's right,

272
00:15:46,165 --> 00:15:48,989
and I
thought that I would
adjust from there.

273
00:15:48,989 --> 00:15:51,515
So I don't know.
Ralph Estep Jr: Great question,

274
00:15:51,515 --> 00:15:54,983
Dr and we are going to cover
that on the very next Money


275
00:15:54,991 --> 00:15:56,905
Monday.
I'll talk about, what I'm going

276
00:15:56,905 --> 00:15:58,295
to talk about,
actually, is
how to pay yourself first.

277
00:15:58,295 --> 00:16:00,095
That's what we're really
going
to talk about.

278
00:16:00,095 --> 00:16:02,801
And want to give you a whole
model of how to
make sure

279
00:16:02,801 --> 00:16:04,458
you're paying yourself first,
because you matter.

280
00:16:04,458 --> 00:16:06,946
And
that's what we'll talk
about on the next Monday,

281
00:16:06,946 --> 00:16:08,990
Monday, which
will be Monday a
week from Monday.

282
00:16:08,990 --> 00:16:10,215
Marc Ronick: That's right, yes.


283
00:16:10,223 --> 00:16:14,000
And I would love to also know
during that episode how we


284
00:16:14,008 --> 00:16:17,348
determine how much right, like,
okay, pay ourselves first, but


285
00:16:17,356 --> 00:16:20,819
also trying to figure out to
what Dr was talking to me about

286
00:16:20,819 --> 00:16:23,027
this morning.
Yeah, how much is an appropriate

287
00:16:23,027 --> 00:16:23,639
amount?
Amount?


288
00:16:23,647 --> 00:16:26,696
How do we figure that out?
So, yeah, I'd love to do that

289
00:16:26,696 --> 00:16:28,205
too.

So yeah, Ralph Estep Jr: when we

290
00:16:28,205 --> 00:16:30,035
give you
the podcasting
answer, Marc Ronick: awesome

291
00:16:30,635 --> 00:16:32,395
Ralph Estep Jr: depends.
Marc Ronick: It depends.

292
00:16:32,395 --> 00:16:34,460
Yes,
yes, Ralph Estep Jr: just
kidding,
I'll give you, I'll

293
00:16:34,460 --> 00:16:36,035
give you a more clear answer on
that.

294
00:16:36,035 --> 00:16:37,295
Marc Ronick: Awesome.
All right,
cool.

295
00:16:37,295 --> 00:16:39,860
So that's coming up a week from
this Monday.

296
00:16:39,860 --> 00:16:43,744
Thank you,
Ralph, thank you.
Dr, for for that.

297
00:16:43,744 --> 00:16:48,292
I appreciate it.
We're
gonna keep things moving

298
00:16:48,292 --> 00:16:51,058
here.
So let's get into a couple of


299
00:16:51,066 --> 00:16:55,520
news bytes you're gonna see a
very common theme today in our


300
00:16:55,528 --> 00:16:59,035
news bytes section.
Dr, tell us a little bit about

301
00:16:59,035 --> 00:17:00,200
what's going
on with
Buzzsprout.

302
00:17:00,480 --> 00:17:02,580
D.R.
Fay: Okay, so buzz sprout
has

303
00:17:02,580 --> 00:17:06,023
officially joined the podcast
video train.

304
00:17:06,023 --> 00:17:10,260
Okay?

They're now officially rolling

305
00:17:10,260 --> 00:17:13,020
out video distribution to Apple
podcasts.

306
00:17:13,020 --> 00:17:17,392
Their new video friendly plans
start at $30 a
month, or if

307
00:17:17,392 --> 00:17:21,020
you want to break you can pay it
all at once
annually, which is

308
00:17:21,020 --> 00:17:25,194
would even out to about $25 a
month, and it
includes up to

309
00:17:25,194 --> 00:17:29,871
six hours of uploads each month.
They've also
added a multi

310
00:17:29,871 --> 00:17:34,545
podcast plan for people like
Ralph and transcript


311
00:17:34,553 --> 00:17:38,145
generation is included across
all plans.

312
00:17:38,145 --> 00:17:41,985
However, Spotify
video support
is not there yet.

313
00:17:41,985 --> 00:17:45,450
Marc Ronick: Yep, thank you.
Dr
and I got some interesting

314
00:17:45,450 --> 00:17:49,297
stuff coming up here in a moment
about
Spotify video support.

315
00:17:49,297 --> 00:17:52,957
Stay tuned for that.
But first,
Libsyn also has

316
00:17:52,957 --> 00:17:57,592
officially joined the video
train as of
May. 1, all

317
00:17:57,592 --> 00:18:01,950
creators using Libsyn can
publish and
distribute video

318
00:18:01,950 --> 00:18:05,754
across Spotify.
There you go, and YouTube with


319
00:18:05,762 --> 00:18:09,294
Apple podcasts rolling out,
video publishing is now


320
00:18:09,302 --> 00:18:13,387
available across all Libsyn
hosting plans and Spotify


321
00:18:13,395 --> 00:18:17,481
distribution functionality is
available on plans starting at


322
00:18:17,489 --> 00:18:21,771
$25 per month.
There's no wait list, no tier

323
00:18:21,771 --> 00:18:26,355
restrictions, no
hand picking
with which creators get access.

324
00:18:26,355 --> 00:18:30,915
All existing Libsyn
customers
have access to video

325
00:18:30,915 --> 00:18:33,036
functionality with their current

plans.

326
00:18:33,036 --> 00:18:37,490
So if you are a Lipson user,
there's nothing additional
you

327
00:18:37,490 --> 00:18:43,356
have to pay for in order to take
advantage of adding video
to

328
00:18:43,356 --> 00:18:47,670
your podcast distribution and
the pricing models all start at

329
00:18:47,670 --> 00:18:51,000
$8 per month, and they have
different tiers from there.

330
00:18:51,000 --> 00:18:54,645
But
again, you're paying that
$8 a month or more, depending on

331
00:18:54,645 --> 00:18:57,063
that
plan.
Anyway, the video is just coming

332
00:18:57,063 --> 00:19:00,405
with it, and I think this
is a
major shift from how other

333
00:19:00,405 --> 00:19:03,567
platforms have been so far

anyway.

334
00:19:03,567 --> 00:19:07,169
Gatekeeping The video features.
And I know gatekeeping
kind of

335
00:19:07,169 --> 00:19:10,290
makes it sound negative, but I
do understand why they're


336
00:19:10,298 --> 00:19:13,241
doing it that way.
They're rolling it out for one,

337
00:19:13,241 --> 00:19:16,092
they
want to kind of do it
slowly, right?

338
00:19:16,092 --> 00:19:20,010
And also, there's a lot
to
this whole video thing, so I

339
00:19:20,010 --> 00:19:24,630
think that they're just taking

the safe route, but I trust

340
00:19:24,630 --> 00:19:27,990
Lipson.
Lipson was able to do
video

341
00:19:27,990 --> 00:19:31,306
distribution before this new way
of doing it on Apple.


342
00:19:31,314 --> 00:19:34,158
Because, yes, we know there are
lots of experts out there that


343
00:19:34,166 --> 00:19:37,675
like to tell us that video was
always a thing on Apple, but it

344
00:19:37,675 --> 00:19:39,590
wasn't right.
It was something available, but

345
00:19:39,590 --> 00:19:42,486
no one knew how
to do it.
It was very complicated for

346
00:19:42,486 --> 00:19:44,921
those that did.

It just wasn't working.

347
00:19:44,921 --> 00:19:47,595
So this is the new answer from
Apple.

348
00:19:47,595 --> 00:19:48,945
D.R.
Fay: Didn't tell anyone.

349
00:19:48,945 --> 00:19:51,165
I
mean, they didn't market it
to anyone.

350
00:19:51,165 --> 00:19:54,135
Yeah, I want you to know

exactly, yeah, Ralph, you had

351
00:19:54,135 --> 00:19:55,296
something.
Ralph Estep Jr: Yeah.

352
00:19:55,296 --> 00:19:57,522
I just
want to give a shout
out to in and around podcasting,

353
00:19:57,522 --> 00:20:00,504
the
episode that was live this
morning talks all about


354
00:20:00,512 --> 00:20:02,890
Captivate.
And they get a real deep dive

355
00:20:02,890 --> 00:20:05,810
into Apple HLS.
It's a
great episode with

356
00:20:05,810 --> 00:20:09,144
Elsie, Mark Danny and Rob Walsh.
So great
episode.

357
00:20:09,144 --> 00:20:12,720
They really dove deep into all
of those dive deep
sound like

358
00:20:12,720 --> 00:20:15,095
an AI guy.
They really got into but they

359
00:20:15,095 --> 00:20:18,009
really
got into it, and they
said some really valuable things

360
00:20:18,009 --> 00:20:19,701
about the
reality on the
ground.

361
00:20:19,701 --> 00:20:22,305
So I would encourage everybody
go
check that out, because it

362
00:20:22,425 --> 00:20:24,825
really was, because I'm one

that's going to jump into video

363
00:20:24,825 --> 00:20:27,525
this week, probably on

Captivate, because all my shows

364
00:20:27,525 --> 00:20:29,541
are video.
So for me, it's kind
of a no

365
00:20:29,541 --> 00:20:31,785
brainer, but they really talked
about the nuances of
that.

366
00:20:31,785 --> 00:20:34,257
So I just wanted to interject
that, Marc Ronick: yeah.

367
00:20:34,257 --> 00:20:36,609
And I you
know, I appreciate
what you're saying, Ralph.

368
00:20:36,609 --> 00:20:41,142
And I think yeah,
for show or
shows like yours, I think it is

369
00:20:41,142 --> 00:20:45,474
important or
advantageous, I
should say to Yeah, go ahead and

370
00:20:45,474 --> 00:20:47,868
take
advantage and put those
videos that you're already

371
00:20:47,868 --> 00:20:50,704
making on
all the platforms
that accept the video.

372
00:20:50,704 --> 00:20:55,539
That makes a lot of
sense.
And I also don't think any of us

373
00:20:55,539 --> 00:20:59,408
have to do this if you
are not
a video first person.

374
00:20:59,408 --> 00:21:02,458
It doesn't mean now you've got
to
quickly rush to start

375
00:21:02,458 --> 00:21:06,475
becoming video it just doesn't.
And I
would argue that not a

376
00:21:06,475 --> 00:21:10,142
lot of people are even really
people,
meaning audiences are

377
00:21:10,142 --> 00:21:13,734
even really taking advantage of
it on
platforms like Apple and

378
00:21:13,734 --> 00:21:15,855
Spotify YouTube.
Yes, go ahead.

379
00:21:15,855 --> 00:21:18,618
Dr, D.R.
Fay: I got a question, so


380
00:21:18,626 --> 00:21:23,835
let's say you're on Lipson, and
let's say you do have a video


381
00:21:23,843 --> 00:21:28,930
plus audio, and let's say you
are manually putting in the


382
00:21:28,938 --> 00:21:33,968
video on YouTube.
Do I need to also, well, not

383
00:21:33,968 --> 00:21:37,251
need.
But since
Libsyn also has this

384
00:21:37,251 --> 00:21:41,161
video thing, where does, where
does
that video go to I mean,

385
00:21:41,161 --> 00:21:45,811
if I was to submit it through
Lipson,
where are people

386
00:21:45,811 --> 00:21:48,325
seeing that video that I'm
submitting to
Libsyn?

387
00:21:48,805 --> 00:21:52,285
Marc Ronick: Libsyn is saying

that you would get that well

388
00:21:52,285 --> 00:21:56,305
from here you could get that

actually to Spotify YouTube and

389
00:21:56,305 --> 00:21:58,365
Apple all in one shot.
D.R.

390
00:21:58,365 --> 00:22:01,885
Fay: So I wouldn't have to

manually submit it to YouTube

391
00:22:01,885 --> 00:22:03,455
any longer.
Marc Ronick: That's the claim


392
00:22:03,463 --> 00:22:05,236
here.
I have not tried it to see, but

393
00:22:05,236 --> 00:22:07,622
that is what they're
saying
here, that you can distribute

394
00:22:07,622 --> 00:22:10,450
video to YouTube
directly
using lit.

395
00:22:10,450 --> 00:22:12,130
Ralph Estep Jr: And I think

that's where all the hosts are

396
00:22:12,130 --> 00:22:13,966
going Captivate.
Keeps alluding
to that.

397
00:22:13,966 --> 00:22:16,936
They keep saying, well, we can't
do it at this time.


398
00:22:16,944 --> 00:22:20,020
They're very clear about that.
I think you're going to see an


399
00:22:20,028 --> 00:22:23,110
aggregation of a single point of
entry that fans out everywhere,

400
00:22:23,110 --> 00:22:26,704
which is going to be great for
creators, because I have a team

401
00:22:26,704 --> 00:22:29,671
now that somebody has to do
this, and somebody has to do


402
00:22:29,679 --> 00:22:31,187
this, this should really
streamline it.

403
00:22:31,187 --> 00:22:34,833
But just the only
caveat to
that is, if you have a separate

404
00:22:34,833 --> 00:22:38,839
audio and video
version,
understand how that's going to

405
00:22:38,839 --> 00:22:43,551
play out, because just
if they
go, HLS, you're going to hear

406
00:22:43,551 --> 00:22:46,505
the audio of the video.
I
know it's confusing, but

407
00:22:46,505 --> 00:22:49,134
just be aware of that, because
that is
going to be impactful

408
00:22:49,134 --> 00:22:50,145
to some people.
D.R.

409
00:22:50,145 --> 00:22:54,230
Fay: I wonder if you can
pick
and choose, because we do have

410
00:22:54,230 --> 00:22:59,400
for like my client, there
is a
separate I edit separately the

411
00:22:59,400 --> 00:23:02,920
audio and my video person

edits the video.

412
00:23:02,920 --> 00:23:07,372
So if I'm presented with all of
these
choices through Lipson,

413
00:23:07,372 --> 00:23:12,839
can I uncheck the YouTube box?
Do you
know what I'm saying?

414
00:23:12,839 --> 00:23:16,365
And also, what about show notes?
Is show
notes also going over

415
00:23:16,365 --> 00:23:18,915
there too?
Marc Ronick: Yeah, I think that

416
00:23:18,915 --> 00:23:21,705
would all transfer over, which
does make it a little


417
00:23:21,713 --> 00:23:24,685
challenging, because, I mean,
some people might argue that


418
00:23:24,693 --> 00:23:29,485
show notes or episodes or video
descriptions should be formatted

419
00:23:29,485 --> 00:23:32,629

approached a little
differently than, say, podcast

420
00:23:32,629 --> 00:23:33,685
show notes, D.R.
Fay: right?

421
00:23:33,685 --> 00:23:35,180
Marc Ronick: I've been

experimenting.

422
00:23:35,180 --> 00:23:39,670
I want to try at some point, I
should say, to
just go all in

423
00:23:39,670 --> 00:23:43,321
on the same descriptions, the
same titles,
and just try to

424
00:23:43,321 --> 00:23:46,750
optimize it for every platform.
I think at some
point that's

425
00:23:46,750 --> 00:23:49,946
got to be that's got to happen.
At some point, I
don't know

426
00:23:49,946 --> 00:23:52,750
it's just maybe it's more of a
wishful thinking kind
of thing

427
00:23:52,750 --> 00:23:55,330
than anything.
But yeah, BC you had something

428
00:23:55,720 --> 00:23:57,700
BC Babbles: Yeah, to answer dr's

question, I think you should

429
00:23:57,700 --> 00:23:59,680
be able to uncheck the YouTube

option.

430
00:23:59,680 --> 00:24:02,932
It's been a few years since I
was on Lipson, but I do
recall

431
00:24:02,932 --> 00:24:07,016
back in the day when I was using
that as a host that
when I

432
00:24:07,016 --> 00:24:10,584
didn't for a little while, I was
seeing a double up
on my

433
00:24:10,584 --> 00:24:13,295
YouTube channel because I would
do a separate YouTube
manual

434
00:24:13,295 --> 00:24:15,580
upload.
But then I had YouTube checked

435
00:24:15,580 --> 00:24:20,314
on Libsyn, so it
sent the
audio, a video version of the

436
00:24:20,314 --> 00:24:23,245
audio version up to the

YouTube channel as well, so I

437
00:24:23,245 --> 00:24:25,705
had to make sure that wasn't

clicked anymore, so that should

438
00:24:25,705 --> 00:24:26,835
still be an option.
D.R.

439
00:24:26,835 --> 00:24:28,585
Fay: Okay, great.
Thank
you.

440
00:24:28,585 --> 00:24:32,325
Marc Ronick: Thank you.
BC,
thank you to all of you

441
00:24:32,325 --> 00:24:35,725
for chiming in there.
By the way,
shout out to

442
00:24:35,725 --> 00:24:38,725
Ashley feller in the audience.
Great to see you,
Ashley.

443
00:24:38,725 --> 00:24:41,786
It's been a minute.
We do miss you a lot, and like

444
00:24:41,786 --> 00:24:45,038
nice
to see a lot of familiar
faces here in the clubhouse

445
00:24:45,038 --> 00:24:46,138
audience.

Welcome everyone.

446
00:24:46,138 --> 00:24:49,315
And John, actually in the
audience, said
in the chat,

447
00:24:49,315 --> 00:24:53,635
I'm making a prediction Apple
podcast video
will be a huge

448
00:24:53,635 --> 00:24:55,774
dud.
I'm already tired of hearing

449
00:24:55,774 --> 00:24:57,235
about it.
D.R.

450
00:24:57,235 --> 00:25:00,700
Fay: John, I love you.
Mary
me Marc Ronick: See,

451
00:25:00,700 --> 00:25:02,800
we'll see if
it's going to be
a huge dud.

452
00:25:02,800 --> 00:25:06,175
I mean, the big things is we got

to make sure that consumers

453
00:25:06,355 --> 00:25:09,175
understand that it's available

and that they're actually

454
00:25:09,175 --> 00:25:13,025
interested in using it.
I feel
like we've, we saying

455
00:25:13,025 --> 00:25:16,414
that we've rushed on video.
It feels a
little weird to

456
00:25:16,414 --> 00:25:20,674
say, but I think that the video
stuff is really
being made

457
00:25:20,674 --> 00:25:23,665
more for creators than it is for
audiences, right?


458
00:25:23,673 --> 00:25:26,805
I just feel like it's being
pushed on us a lot.

459
00:25:26,805 --> 00:25:28,639
And yeah.

Sid, you want to comment?

460
00:25:28,639 --> 00:25:31,105
Go ahead.
Sid Meadows: Actually, I have a

461
00:25:31,105 --> 00:25:34,048
question, okay?
Because I'm not, I don't listen

462
00:25:34,048 --> 00:25:37,660
to podcasts on
Spotify,
because I'm Apple, right?

463
00:25:37,660 --> 00:25:43,006
But I'm curious is like,
how
many of you here watch a podcast

464
00:25:43,006 --> 00:25:45,760
on Spotify, or would
watch a
podcast on Apple?

465
00:25:46,300 --> 00:25:47,965
D.R.
Fay: Neither one Marc Ronick: I

466
00:25:47,965 --> 00:25:52,189
would say, Dr,
saying nope,
and I, I would say, No, I don't

467
00:25:52,189 --> 00:25:53,785
really.
I mean, I've
done it maybe

468
00:25:53,785 --> 00:25:57,975
just to see how it works, but I
tend to just listen
to the

469
00:25:57,975 --> 00:26:00,893
audio, and I see Meredith in the
chat.

470
00:26:00,893 --> 00:26:03,756
Says she does.
She
watches video podcasting

471
00:26:03,756 --> 00:26:05,950
on Spotify.
Sid Meadows: I'm just really


472
00:26:05,958 --> 00:26:08,560
curious what the experience is
like and watching it.

473
00:26:08,560 --> 00:26:12,340
Because, I
mean, when you have
a device, right, and lot of us

474
00:26:12,340 --> 00:26:15,308
are doing
things while we're
listening to podcasts, which is

475
00:26:15,308 --> 00:26:18,475
also why I
don't watch on
YouTube, because that means I

476
00:26:18,475 --> 00:26:21,285
have to hold my
phone best in
the horizontal position.

477
00:26:21,285 --> 00:26:24,475
I can't be I can't be
on my
morning walk and, you know,

478
00:26:24,475 --> 00:26:27,025
listen or watch a podcast.

I'm just really curious about

479
00:26:27,025 --> 00:26:30,710
the experience here, because, as

I see, this is a big

480
00:26:30,710 --> 00:26:32,485
additional expense into your
business.


481
00:26:32,493 --> 00:26:36,877
Yeah, because it's not just what
the hosting cost is going to be,

482
00:26:36,877 --> 00:26:39,960

it's the editing cost.
And I need to understand from my

483
00:26:39,960 --> 00:26:42,709

editor, what does this mean
for what I pay on a monthly

484
00:26:42,709 --> 00:26:45,355
basis
for her, if we were
going to go do this?

485
00:26:45,355 --> 00:26:47,551
Because obviously
Apple's
platform is completely different

486
00:26:47,551 --> 00:26:50,848
than what Spotify is,
you
know, video platform is, so it

487
00:26:50,848 --> 00:26:54,006
means extra work for us if we

want to do it on Apple.

488
00:26:54,006 --> 00:26:57,486
And so I'm in my mind, trying to
think
about, what is the cost

489
00:26:57,486 --> 00:27:00,277
benefit here to doing it?
Is it going to
get me more

490
00:27:00,277 --> 00:27:02,410
listeners that so there's, I
don't think there's
enough

491
00:27:02,410 --> 00:27:04,750
data, at least that I haven't
done a lot of research.


492
00:27:04,758 --> 00:27:07,990
I don't know that there's enough
data to prove to me that I


493
00:27:07,998 --> 00:27:11,681
absolutely need to upload a
video on Apple or Spotify when I

494
00:27:11,681 --> 00:27:13,975

already have that same video
on YouTube.

495
00:27:13,975 --> 00:27:16,459
Marc Ronick: Yeah, I think

that's an excellent point.

496
00:27:16,459 --> 00:27:18,685
Sid, yeah, if we're going to
jump
into something like that,

497
00:27:18,685 --> 00:27:21,441
we got to make sure it's going
to be
worth the time and money

498
00:27:21,441 --> 00:27:25,435
that it takes to make a video
podcast,
I'm with you, and

499
00:27:25,435 --> 00:27:29,151
Meredith says in the chat, it's
great on
Spotify, because you

500
00:27:29,151 --> 00:27:33,088
can more easily Rewind and Fast
Forward
with more accuracy.

501
00:27:33,088 --> 00:27:35,964
So that's an interesting take.
D.R.

502
00:27:35,964 --> 00:27:38,923
Fay: So I've got a question
to
piggyback on to Sid.

503
00:27:38,923 --> 00:27:42,340
So he asked, Who watches video
on
YouTube?

504
00:27:42,340 --> 00:27:47,124
Who watches video on Spotify?
Now I'm going to ask,
who

505
00:27:47,124 --> 00:27:50,980
watches video, who watches
podcasts on Netflix?

506
00:27:52,060 --> 00:27:55,462
Marc Ronick: I do not.
I've seen
the section, but I

507
00:27:55,462 --> 00:27:57,040
don't really engage with it
much.

508
00:27:57,040 --> 00:27:59,467
D.R.
Fay: BC, does, Marc Ronick: oh,

509
00:27:59,467 --> 00:28:01,825
BC, you want to
chime in.
How is that experience?

510
00:28:01,825 --> 00:28:04,045
BC Babbles: So far, I've just

been watching the bridgerton

511
00:28:04,105 --> 00:28:06,205
podcast, and I've enjoyed it a

lot.

512
00:28:06,205 --> 00:28:08,687
You know?
I'm a complete sucker for

513
00:28:08,687 --> 00:28:10,864
bridgerton, so it's
been great
for that.

514
00:28:10,864 --> 00:28:12,610
I haven't explored the other
ones, though.


515
00:28:12,618 --> 00:28:15,949
I haven't explored the how do we
want to call them the Netflix


516
00:28:15,957 --> 00:28:19,680
exclusive podcasts that are
like, not based off of a show,


517
00:28:19,688 --> 00:28:21,869
they are right, contracted to
Netflix.

518
00:28:21,869 --> 00:28:24,958
I've not checked those
out
yet, so maybe that's a bit of a

519
00:28:24,958 --> 00:28:26,672
copy out there.
Marc Ronick: Okay, D.R.

520
00:28:26,672 --> 00:28:29,290
Fay: now, I answered SIDS

question by saying neither one,

521
00:28:29,290 --> 00:28:31,630
but as he was speaking, I

thought about it, and you know

522
00:28:31,630 --> 00:28:35,065
what?
I actually do watch one or
two

523
00:28:35,065 --> 00:28:39,622
on YouTube, but they don't seem
like a podcast to me.

524
00:28:39,622 --> 00:28:44,475
I
watch chewed up, which is
kind of a continuation of a

525
00:28:44,475 --> 00:28:48,915
cooking
show called chewed
which was on ABC for a long

526
00:28:48,915 --> 00:28:51,279
time.
Now, it's
chewed up on

527
00:28:51,279 --> 00:28:54,559
YouTube, and I love it.
They do it three days a
week,

528
00:28:54,559 --> 00:28:56,735
Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and
when I'm chopping my


529
00:28:56,743 --> 00:28:59,510
vegetables on Saturday for
Saturday night dinner, I'm


530
00:28:59,518 --> 00:29:02,295
seeing all three shows right
there.

531
00:29:02,295 --> 00:29:07,360
So I actually do watch Marc
Ronick: you do, but he was,


532
00:29:07,368 --> 00:29:10,930
but Sid was specific to Spotify
and Apple, okay, yeah, because I

533
00:29:10,930 --> 00:29:14,290

think I know I'm speaking for
you Sid, but I think, you know,

534
00:29:14,290 --> 00:29:16,600
YouTube, we assume that, we
assume that people are going to

535
00:29:16,600 --> 00:29:18,679
be watching, or at least
turning on the video.

536
00:29:18,679 --> 00:29:21,840
But yeah, he was
curious
about, you know, specific to

537
00:29:21,840 --> 00:29:24,088
Spotify and Apple.

Okay, Ralph Estep Jr: I actually

538
00:29:24,088 --> 00:29:26,622
think
this is going to take
off, because Apple is pushing

539
00:29:26,622 --> 00:29:29,479
this
really strongly.
On this morning, when I went to

540
00:29:29,479 --> 00:29:32,433
exercise, I looked at my
YouTube or my apple podcast, and

541
00:29:32,433 --> 00:29:34,059
right
center, watch this on
video.

542
00:29:34,110 --> 00:29:36,594
Watch this on video.
I mean,
they are promoting it

543
00:29:36,594 --> 00:29:39,129
and promoting it.
And I think for
me, it's like,

544
00:29:39,129 --> 00:29:41,151
yeah, I'm exercising.
I'm not watching it.


545
00:29:41,159 --> 00:29:44,297
But I clicked the video anyway,
because if I wanted to see


546
00:29:44,305 --> 00:29:46,836
something and I had a break, I
was like, why not?

547
00:29:46,836 --> 00:29:49,249
And like,
Dave Campbell put in
the in the chat.

548
00:29:49,249 --> 00:29:52,445
You know, the cool thing
about
this, and I disagree with John

549
00:29:52,445 --> 00:29:55,144
vehemently, I think this is

going to actually take off.

550
00:29:55,144 --> 00:29:58,267
The thing that I love about this
is
the is the ability to

551
00:29:58,267 --> 00:29:59,861
switch between audio and video.
I.

552
00:29:59,861 --> 00:30:02,943
I
think that's super cool.
So that if you're in a position

553
00:30:02,943 --> 00:30:05,902
where
you can't look at the
video right now, you click one

554
00:30:05,902 --> 00:30:08,718
button
and it changes.
I tested it out the other day.

555
00:30:08,718 --> 00:30:10,326
It works
seamlessly.
It works great.

556
00:30:10,326 --> 00:30:12,720
I actually think this is going
to
take off.

557
00:30:12,600 --> 00:30:14,056
Marc Ronick: Yeah, it's hard to
say.

558
00:30:14,056 --> 00:30:17,855
I mean, I think, I think, most,
more than likely, it will
take

559
00:30:17,855 --> 00:30:19,986
off.
But again, I think more

560
00:30:19,986 --> 00:30:21,820
consumers need to know
about
it.

561
00:30:21,820 --> 00:30:25,200
But like you said, Yeah, I mean,
if Apple's really
pushing it,

562
00:30:25,200 --> 00:30:27,280
that's a good thing.
And more to come.

563
00:30:27,280 --> 00:30:29,975
We'll see
where this goes from
here, for sure.

564
00:30:29,975 --> 00:30:34,320
Now, I don't have my oops.

I'll just do this for a little

565
00:30:34,320 --> 00:30:36,992
palette cleanser.
I don't have
my whoosh quick

566
00:30:36,992 --> 00:30:39,183
on the ready.
S I'll do that.

567
00:30:39,183 --> 00:30:42,089
But I do want to
remind you
that, if you'd like your podcast

568
00:30:42,089 --> 00:30:44,985
to be featured on
the
podcasting morning show for

569
00:30:44,985 --> 00:30:49,665
free, submit a 62nd clip about

your show, something that gives

570
00:30:49,665 --> 00:30:51,660
people a real feel for your

podcast.

571
00:30:51,660 --> 00:30:55,645
If we select it, we'll play your
clip on a future
episode.

572
00:30:55,645 --> 00:30:59,450
We'll share what stood out to us
and introduce your
show to our

573
00:30:59,450 --> 00:31:03,050
community of podcasters and
creators submit
your clip now

574
00:31:03,050 --> 00:31:06,625
at podcasting morning
show.com/spotlight and I


575
00:31:06,633 --> 00:31:11,598
encourage you to actually do
this more like a talking head


576
00:31:11,606 --> 00:31:15,245
type of video, or we'll say, or
audio for that matter, but more

577
00:31:15,245 --> 00:31:18,540
so than just a clip from your
show, because we want real


578
00:31:18,548 --> 00:31:20,087
context.
We want to really understand

579
00:31:20,087 --> 00:31:23,415
what your show is
about.
And sometimes I think clips will

580
00:31:23,415 --> 00:31:26,313
only give us a little
glimpse
of what your show is about.

581
00:31:26,313 --> 00:31:28,370
I want to get more of the

overview.

582
00:31:28,370 --> 00:31:32,231
So I think you the host, sharing
about the show,
telling us who

583
00:31:32,231 --> 00:31:34,379
it's for, what problems does it
solve?

584
00:31:34,379 --> 00:31:36,150
When can
we find it?
Etc.

585
00:31:36,150 --> 00:31:41,175
That's what we want to hear.
So podcasting,
morning

586
00:31:41,175 --> 00:31:44,415
show.com/spotlight, and BC, did
you have something?

587
00:31:45,555 --> 00:31:47,700
BC Babbles: Yeah, going back to
the earlier point about whether

588
00:31:47,700 --> 00:31:52,980
or not this would be just a

wasteful additional investment

589
00:31:52,980 --> 00:31:56,280
into the company for Apple, I'm
curious as to whether or not

590
00:31:56,280 --> 00:31:59,880
this is meant to be a purely an
additional element to the

591
00:31:59,880 --> 00:32:02,636
model, or is it meant to be a

replacement model?

592
00:32:02,636 --> 00:32:05,742
Because would not the smarter
approach be
swapping the

593
00:32:05,742 --> 00:32:10,408
earlier model out for one where
anyone can only
needs to

594
00:32:10,408 --> 00:32:13,485
concern themselves with
uploading a video version of the

595
00:32:13,485 --> 00:32:16,700

podcast, but those files can
be separated out by the system

596
00:32:16,700 --> 00:32:20,640
to
distribute out based on the
platform access, so that no


597
00:32:20,648 --> 00:32:25,355
team, per se, your team, or dr's
team, has to worry about doing


598
00:32:25,363 --> 00:32:28,195
audio and video version.
They just upload an audio or

599
00:32:28,195 --> 00:32:31,820
video
version, and the audio
can be separated out for audio

600
00:32:31,820 --> 00:32:34,785
only or
audio first platforms.
Marc Ronick: Yeah.

601
00:32:34,785 --> 00:32:38,772
What do you
do, though, if
you're not doing video like if

602
00:32:38,772 --> 00:32:41,958
you're a
podcaster?
So you just upload audio, that's

603
00:32:41,958 --> 00:32:43,374
okay.
That makes
sense.

604
00:32:43,374 --> 00:32:45,190
Yeah.
So you basically, you're saying

605
00:32:45,190 --> 00:32:47,470
it would be cool
that the
platform just gives you the

606
00:32:47,470 --> 00:32:50,550
option, you pick and choose
if
you upload video, then it

607
00:32:50,550 --> 00:32:54,690
distributes it either as either
or right, or if you just, if

608
00:32:54,690 --> 00:32:58,254
you just upload the audio file,
then
that speaks for itself,

609
00:32:58,254 --> 00:33:01,180
right?
BC Babbles: Even now, lets you


610
00:33:01,188 --> 00:33:04,582
choose between even on music, to
just listen to the song or pull

611
00:33:04,582 --> 00:33:07,690
up the music video, if there's
available for it.

612
00:33:07,690 --> 00:33:10,275
Yep,
absolutely, yeah.
Well, we'll see.

613
00:33:10,275 --> 00:33:14,620
I do think at some point we

will see some kind of universal

614
00:33:14,620 --> 00:33:20,260
change for for uploading,

distributing video and or audio

615
00:33:20,260 --> 00:33:22,452
podcast More to come on that for

sure.

616
00:33:22,452 --> 00:33:24,905
Let's see.
I'm just checking out the chat

617
00:33:24,905 --> 00:33:29,065
here I saw
earlier that rocky
asked a question that is one

618
00:33:29,065 --> 00:33:33,561
that I know
we've debated here
many times, and now I can't find

619
00:33:33,561 --> 00:33:35,822
where.
Oh,
I hate, okay, she she

620
00:33:35,822 --> 00:33:40,039
writes, what's the difference
between
podcast video and a

621
00:33:40,039 --> 00:33:45,234
YouTube talking head video, that
can be
a whole topic for sure.

622
00:33:45,234 --> 00:33:47,290
Some may say there is no
difference.


623
00:33:47,298 --> 00:33:49,618
Others will say there's a very
strong difference.

624
00:33:49,618 --> 00:33:53,596
Especially,
look, if it's a
podcast, it's an RSS feed.

625
00:33:53,596 --> 00:33:56,380
That's what a lot of
people
like to hang their hat on.

626
00:33:56,380 --> 00:34:00,880
So it's an in mostly RSS

feeds, it's just audio.

627
00:34:00,880 --> 00:34:03,425
But yeah, I can't go down that
route
right now, because we

628
00:34:03,425 --> 00:34:05,634
will derail the whole show.
Ralph Estep Jr: Mark.

629
00:34:05,634 --> 00:34:06,964
Let me
just interject
something.

630
00:34:06,964 --> 00:34:09,933
By the way, on Friday we are
going to
have a special guest

631
00:34:09,933 --> 00:34:12,411
on the show.
Rob Greenlee is going to
join

632
00:34:12,411 --> 00:34:13,284
us.
Oh, good.

633
00:34:13,284 --> 00:34:17,386
And Rob is going to get into
this whole
discussion of

634
00:34:17,386 --> 00:34:20,226
podcasting 2.0 HLS and all those
sort of things.

635
00:34:20,226 --> 00:34:23,375
So
make sure you join us on
Friday for Rob Greenlee joining

636
00:34:23,375 --> 00:34:25,554
the
show D.R.
Fay: that is awesome.

637
00:34:26,080 --> 00:34:28,780
Marc Ronick: Yeah, yeah.
And
Ralph, let's just real

638
00:34:28,780 --> 00:34:31,030
quick we can tease it a little
bit.

639
00:34:31,030 --> 00:34:33,856
There
was a little controversy
with Rob and Rob by the way,

640
00:34:33,856 --> 00:34:37,080
just for
those who may not
know who rob Greenlee is, he is

641
00:34:37,080 --> 00:34:41,500
a 20 plus
year podcaster.
He is a Hall of Fame podcaster.

642
00:34:41,500 --> 00:34:46,184
He has a lot of
influence in
the especially in the indie

643
00:34:46,184 --> 00:34:50,719
space, yeah, and he,
he caught
a little heat recently, Ralph

644
00:34:50,719 --> 00:34:52,159
Estep Jr: yeah, my man,
Rob
got attacked.

645
00:34:52,159 --> 00:34:54,632
I think that's the best way to
say it.

646
00:34:54,632 --> 00:34:58,244
Rob said
something on his
show, and, man, I reached out to

647
00:34:58,244 --> 00:34:59,960
mark, actually,
yesterday, and
said, you know.

648
00:34:59,960 --> 00:35:03,140
You should really talk to Rob,

because I think podcasting is a

649
00:35:03,140 --> 00:35:06,770
community, and Rob is one of the

old G's of this.

650
00:35:06,770 --> 00:35:11,108
And man, they took him to the
woodshed, and I
think not in a

651
00:35:11,108 --> 00:35:14,048
fair way, and that's one of the
reasons that I
really wanted

652
00:35:14,048 --> 00:35:16,765
to have him on the show, because
I want him to have
an

653
00:35:16,765 --> 00:35:19,205
opportunity to speak about it.
Because Rob is a very


654
00:35:19,213 --> 00:35:22,513
intelligent guy with a ton of
experience, and he understands


655
00:35:22,521 --> 00:35:26,885
all of this, and to throw him
out, like yesterday's garbage,


656
00:35:26,893 --> 00:35:29,285
in my opinion, was just not
cool.

657
00:35:29,765 --> 00:35:32,384
Marc Ronick: Do you have an idea

of what was said or, like,

658
00:35:32,384 --> 00:35:34,205
what did he say that got
everybody
crazy?

659
00:35:34,160 --> 00:35:36,888
Ralph Estep Jr: What he said was

he was specifically talking

660
00:35:36,950 --> 00:35:39,436
about podcasting 2.0 and called
it fringe.

661
00:35:39,436 --> 00:35:42,548
And that word fringe got
everybody all fired up.

662
00:35:42,548 --> 00:35:46,230
And
I understand that if I'm
bought into the podcasting 2.0

663
00:35:46,230 --> 00:35:49,678
thing, I
totally get it, but
Rob actually has posted

664
00:35:49,678 --> 00:35:52,822
something since then
to
explain what he was saying.

665
00:35:52,884 --> 00:35:56,728
But I just feel like, you know,
it's not fair to just take one

666
00:35:56,790 --> 00:36:00,573
word and just go after a guy,

because he used one word and he

667
00:36:00,635 --> 00:36:04,045
got attacked on several

different platforms, and I just

668
00:36:04,107 --> 00:36:07,951
felt like it was an opportunity
for us to have him on the show

669
00:36:08,013 --> 00:36:11,547
to really talk about what he

said, the context of what he

670
00:36:11,609 --> 00:36:15,453
said and how he really feels,

because Rob has a ton of passion

671
00:36:15,515 --> 00:36:18,399
for podcasting.
Oh yeah, this is
a guy that

672
00:36:18,399 --> 00:36:21,737
deeply cares about podcasting,
and we need to
listen to him.

673
00:36:21,737 --> 00:36:24,190
We just do.
We Marc Ronick: Yeah, and I

674
00:36:24,190 --> 00:36:24,320
don't
always agree with, at
least I need to listen to him.

675
00:36:26,710 --> 00:36:30,382
didn't used to always agree with

different perspectives of

676
00:36:30,382 --> 00:36:34,030
Rob's, but I do respect the heck
out of
Rob.

677
00:36:34,030 --> 00:36:37,240
And, yeah, like you said, he's
very passionate about this,


678
00:36:37,248 --> 00:36:39,442
and he's passionate about seeing
podcasters succeed.

679
00:36:39,442 --> 00:36:43,468
And yeah,
I'm very curious to
get his perspective on that

680
00:36:43,468 --> 00:36:46,015
little
controversy.
Maybe not so little, depending

681
00:36:46,015 --> 00:36:49,059
on your
perspective.
But yeah, feel bad for him.

682
00:36:49,059 --> 00:36:51,154
And great idea.
I'm
glad that you suggested

683
00:36:51,154 --> 00:36:54,706
it, Ralph, and I'm glad that
he'll
be here on Friday.

684
00:36:54,706 --> 00:36:57,988
So stay tuned Friday, 8am
Eastern, if you want
to join

685
00:36:57,988 --> 00:37:00,355
us, live podcasting, morning
show.com/join, us.

686
00:37:00,355 --> 00:37:05,563
Okay,
just keeping it moving
real quick, another player in

687
00:37:05,563 --> 00:37:08,320
this
video podcasting game
prodigee.

688
00:37:08,740 --> 00:37:12,100
They are also adding video

podcast support for Apple,

689
00:37:12,160 --> 00:37:16,000
YouTube and Spotify, and I think

that's worth paying attention

690
00:37:16,000 --> 00:37:20,140
to, because, you know, video is
now on with them anyway, is

691
00:37:20,140 --> 00:37:24,100
included across every podcast

plan, which means they're saying

692
00:37:24,160 --> 00:37:26,638
they're the first to support

video distribution.

693
00:37:26,638 --> 00:37:29,930
I think they beat Libsyn to
that, but now I
think they

694
00:37:29,930 --> 00:37:34,145
both do it, so they can't really
claim that anymore
to all

695
00:37:34,145 --> 00:37:37,069
three major platforms at every
pricing tier.

696
00:37:37,069 --> 00:37:41,769
So they also
told, by the way,
told pod news recently that

697
00:37:41,769 --> 00:37:44,965
they're still
looking into
alternate, alternate, alternate.

698
00:37:44,965 --> 00:37:49,270
Words are
hard in the morning.
Yeah, where's that one?

699
00:37:49,270 --> 00:37:52,816
Ralph,
coffee's hot.
Brain is not mouth says,

700
00:37:52,816 --> 00:37:55,375
morning.
Guess I forgot
words are hard

701
00:37:55,375 --> 00:37:58,949
in the morning.
Did I say that out loud?

702
00:37:58,949 --> 00:38:02,636
They
also told pod news
recently that they're still

703
00:38:02,636 --> 00:38:06,043
looking into
alternate
enclosure support long term.

704
00:38:06,043 --> 00:38:10,330
That could mean video
showing
up in other open podcast apps

705
00:38:10,330 --> 00:38:12,850
too.
Dr, we heard from a
listener

706
00:38:12,850 --> 00:38:15,721
that I thought this would be
worth a news bite.


707
00:38:15,729 --> 00:38:16,708
Share it, please.
D.R.

708
00:38:16,708 --> 00:38:18,891
Fay: Yeah.
So this was sent
in from

709
00:38:18,891 --> 00:38:20,785
regular listeners.
Steven Cofer, I believe that's


710
00:38:20,793 --> 00:38:23,475
how you pronounce his name.
Cofer, is that right?

711
00:38:23,475 --> 00:38:28,423
Yeah,
okay, okay, this was
sent in to mark, and it's about

712
00:38:28,423 --> 00:38:31,255
Patreon.

Patreon just launched quips.

713
00:38:31,495 --> 00:38:35,875
Quips is a short term, I'm

sorry, short form, pot, oh.

714
00:38:35,875 --> 00:38:37,735
Words are Oh, Marc Ronick: do we
have to do it
again?

715
00:38:38,695 --> 00:38:40,150
D.R.
Fay: Okay?Mouth

716
00:38:40,150 --> 00:38:42,572
says,
glory.
Guess I forgot.

717
00:38:42,572 --> 00:38:46,240
Words are hard in the morning.
Did I say
that?

718
00:38:48,160 --> 00:38:54,160
Okay, short form posts that let
creators preview paid content

719
00:38:54,160 --> 00:38:57,322
to people who don't yet support
them.

720
00:38:57,322 --> 00:39:00,132
It's essentially a
recommendation feed like tick


721
00:39:00,140 --> 00:39:04,160
tocks for you page, except it's
designed to send people


722
00:39:04,168 --> 00:39:06,895
elsewhere rather than keep them
scrolling.

723
00:39:06,895 --> 00:39:11,761
The platform is
rolling out
discovery features to 300,000

724
00:39:11,761 --> 00:39:17,287
creators and nearly
80 million
fans, finally giving Patreon

725
00:39:17,287 --> 00:39:20,365
users a way to find

communities they didn't know

726
00:39:20,365 --> 00:39:23,109
existed.
Unlike social media
platforms

727
00:39:23,109 --> 00:39:26,440
chasing engagement metrics,
Patreon is betting that


728
00:39:26,448 --> 00:39:31,398
helping people find the right
creators is better business than

729
00:39:31,398 --> 00:39:34,730

feeding them endless content.
All right?

730
00:39:34,730 --> 00:39:36,944
Patreon, Marc Ronick: yeah, I
think
that's a cool idea,

731
00:39:36,944 --> 00:39:38,657
right?
Because it's the type of content

732
00:39:38,657 --> 00:39:42,748

that we know a lot of people
consume that short form,


733
00:39:42,756 --> 00:39:47,510
horizontal video content like, I
think that's a great idea.

734
00:39:47,510 --> 00:39:50,546
And,
yeah, it's basically
keeping people within the

735
00:39:50,546 --> 00:39:54,296
platform and
introducing new,
well, new to you, communities on

736
00:39:54,296 --> 00:39:56,845
the
platform.
I think that's a very cool

737
00:39:56,845 --> 00:39:58,669
feature.
Looking forward to
seeing more

738
00:39:58,669 --> 00:39:59,581
of that.
I.

739
00:39:59,581 --> 00:40:05,433
Yeah, let's get into some
headlines in
the news.

740
00:40:05,433 --> 00:40:10,613
Amazon just turned product
reviews into mini AI
podcasts.

741
00:40:10,613 --> 00:40:15,165
Amazon's testing a new AI
powered feature that turns


742
00:40:15,173 --> 00:40:18,597
product pages into short
conversational audio segments,


743
00:40:18,605 --> 00:40:22,858
complete with two synthetic
hosts talking through product


744
00:40:22,866 --> 00:40:26,024
details, customer reviews and
shopper questions.

745
00:40:26,024 --> 00:40:31,082
I'm looking
at this similarly
to Google's notebook LM, right,

746
00:40:31,082 --> 00:40:35,210
where you
can feed it a lot of
information, and then you get


747
00:40:35,218 --> 00:40:38,330
the two AI hosts talking
conversationally about whatever

748
00:40:38,330 --> 00:40:41,939
that content is.
Well, this is specific to the

749
00:40:41,939 --> 00:40:46,235
product that
you're on Amazon.
It's weird, clever, and also a

750
00:40:46,235 --> 00:40:50,087
pretty big
clue about where
audio may be headed, next,

751
00:40:50,087 --> 00:40:55,169
everywhere, even
next to a
toilet brush.

752
00:40:55,169 --> 00:40:59,023
Amazon's new feature creates
short AI
generated audio

753
00:40:59,023 --> 00:41:02,841
podcasts for certain products
designed to
help shoppers

754
00:41:02,841 --> 00:41:06,744
understand items without reading
through long
descriptions and

755
00:41:06,744 --> 00:41:09,500
reviews.
The tool is powered by Amazon


756
00:41:09,508 --> 00:41:12,758
bedrock, which is Amazon's
platform for building and


757
00:41:12,766 --> 00:41:14,678
scaling generative AI
applications.

758
00:41:14,678 --> 00:41:19,442
Business Insider's
take is
pretty skeptical, calling it the

759
00:41:19,442 --> 00:41:22,280
world's least
necessary
product, while still

760
00:41:22,280 --> 00:41:25,480
acknowledging that audio could

be useful for shopper.

761
00:41:25,480 --> 00:41:29,421
Shoppers who'd rather listen
than read
the early version

762
00:41:29,421 --> 00:41:32,249
does have limits.
It doesn't work on every


763
00:41:32,257 --> 00:41:35,845
product, and some answers
reportedly lack real depth when

764
00:41:35,845 --> 00:41:41,040
shoppers ask more specific
comparison style questions D.R.

765
00:41:41,040 --> 00:41:43,105
Fay: like none.
Go ahead,
no products.

766
00:41:43,105 --> 00:41:47,525
When I first saw this story
yesterday, I'm on
Amazon

767
00:41:47,525 --> 00:41:51,513
probably every single day.
And I have not I know
Ralph.

768
00:41:51,513 --> 00:41:56,070
Look at Ralph's go, Oh my God,
that's where the money's


769
00:41:56,078 --> 00:41:59,948
going.
So and I looked specifically for

770
00:41:59,948 --> 00:42:05,238
this little
feature that they
have in a lot of different

771
00:42:05,238 --> 00:42:07,436
genres, and I could
not find
it.

772
00:42:07,436 --> 00:42:13,109
I even took the story, even had,
like an
example, and I took

773
00:42:13,109 --> 00:42:17,379
the product that they had in the
example,
and I put it into

774
00:42:17,379 --> 00:42:19,635
Amazon, and I still didn't find
it.

775
00:42:19,635 --> 00:42:23,170
So it's a
slow roll.
Marc Ronick: Yeah, it's a brand

776
00:42:23,170 --> 00:42:25,339
new feature.
And, yeah, they have admitted

777
00:42:25,339 --> 00:42:28,907
that it's still,
they're still
working on it, but interesting,

778
00:42:28,907 --> 00:42:32,363
right?
Like, is
this a smart use of

779
00:42:32,363 --> 00:42:34,715
AI podcasting?
You know, Ralph
brought this

780
00:42:34,715 --> 00:42:37,639
up earlier.
How much AI is infiltrating


781
00:42:37,647 --> 00:42:41,640
podcasting?
Is this a better use of AI

782
00:42:41,640 --> 00:42:45,075
because now they're
building
it into specifically their

783
00:42:45,075 --> 00:42:47,560
products.
And yeah, we can
listen to

784
00:42:47,560 --> 00:42:50,400
some couple of quote, unquote
people talking about a


785
00:42:50,408 --> 00:42:52,100
product.
So Ralph, what are your

786
00:42:52,100 --> 00:42:53,518
thoughts?
Ralph Estep Jr: Yeah, but here's

787
00:42:53,518 --> 00:42:55,712

the thing, Mark, are you going
to believe this?

788
00:42:55,712 --> 00:42:58,337
Like, oh,
Travis said you
should buy this product.

789
00:42:58,337 --> 00:43:01,959
But you know damn well,
Travis
is not a human being, that's my

790
00:43:01,959 --> 00:43:04,063
concern.
And so I
don't see Billy in

791
00:43:04,063 --> 00:43:07,437
here today, but like Billy does
a lot of
product videos, and I

792
00:43:07,437 --> 00:43:10,786
would think this is going to go
right
after him, and maybe

793
00:43:10,786 --> 00:43:13,742
Amazon's looking at it like,
well, we can
pay Billy, or we

794
00:43:13,742 --> 00:43:17,264
can pay nothing, and that may be

Amazon's end goal, because the

795
00:43:17,319 --> 00:43:19,991
technology is there.
I just
don't know if people

796
00:43:19,991 --> 00:43:22,669
are willing to embrace that.
Funny something
Dave Jackson

797
00:43:22,669 --> 00:43:26,389
said on his show a little while
ago, he was
listening to one

798
00:43:26,389 --> 00:43:29,729
of these llms, and the person
was talking about
losing their

799
00:43:29,729 --> 00:43:32,912
wallet, and Dave says, You
didn't lose your
wallet, you

800
00:43:32,912 --> 00:43:34,174
don't exist.
You're fake.

801
00:43:34,174 --> 00:43:37,615
I just wonder, how many
people
are going to buy into that, or

802
00:43:37,615 --> 00:43:40,645
are we so naive that
we're
just going to listen to two

803
00:43:40,645 --> 00:43:43,758
people or one person talking

and go, Wow, I'm gonna do it.

804
00:43:43,812 --> 00:43:47,076
When I look at the proliferation

of AI slop out there, people

805
00:43:47,076 --> 00:43:50,230
are listening to this stuff, so
it
must be working, Marc

806
00:43:50,230 --> 00:43:53,230
Ronick: yeah.
And I, so I
the way that the

807
00:43:53,230 --> 00:43:56,572
article reads, This isn't about
replacing the
Amazon

808
00:43:56,572 --> 00:43:59,766
influencers.
This is about having a voice

809
00:43:59,766 --> 00:44:04,693
that you
can listen to and
interact with about the product

810
00:44:04,693 --> 00:44:07,135
itself, right?

And I think what people like

811
00:44:07,135 --> 00:44:11,635
Billy Thorpe does, Billy's

putting content out there to

812
00:44:11,635 --> 00:44:13,639
persuade you to buy the product,

right?

813
00:44:13,639 --> 00:44:18,163
I mean, that might not be the
best use or the best choice
of

814
00:44:18,163 --> 00:44:21,625
words, persuade, but you get the
idea influence people to buy


815
00:44:21,633 --> 00:44:23,678
the product.
And this is more informational,

816
00:44:23,678 --> 00:44:26,416
like I said, more
like a
Google notebook.

817
00:44:26,416 --> 00:44:28,086
Lm, Sid, you wanted to add
something?

818
00:44:28,086 --> 00:44:29,995
Go
ahead.
Sid Meadows: Yeah.

819
00:44:29,995 --> 00:44:34,090
So what I
heard you say is
they're taking the reviews that

820
00:44:34,090 --> 00:44:36,790
have been put
there by
someone.

821
00:44:36,790 --> 00:44:40,498
Now, I think it's very probable
that some of
the reviews are

822
00:44:40,498 --> 00:44:43,918
AI generated reviews, or, you
know, or owner
related

823
00:44:43,918 --> 00:44:45,946
reviews.
Maybe the business had five

824
00:44:45,946 --> 00:44:49,136
people go
review it.
But what I understand is they're

825
00:44:49,136 --> 00:44:51,802
going to take the
reviews and
they're going to put that in a

826
00:44:51,802 --> 00:44:55,235
audio format for you
to click
and listen to two AI voices to

827
00:44:55,235 --> 00:44:57,710
tell you about the
reviews
that have been left.

828
00:44:57,710 --> 00:44:59,991
And I assume that means it's
going
to be the good and the

829
00:44:59,991 --> 00:45:02,239
bad.
At as it relates to the reviews,

830
00:45:02,239 --> 00:45:04,725

right?
What I like about this is it's

831
00:45:04,725 --> 00:45:07,925
certainly easier to listen
to
it if you're a seller on Amazon,

832
00:45:07,925 --> 00:45:11,331
certainly easier for
people.
If you shopper on Amazon, it's

833
00:45:11,331 --> 00:45:14,770
easier for you to
listen to
someone tell you really quickly

834
00:45:14,770 --> 00:45:16,570
in two minutes
than it is for
you to read.

835
00:45:16,570 --> 00:45:19,280
And a lot of times those reviews
are
hidden further down the

836
00:45:19,280 --> 00:45:20,542
screen, and you got to scroll
down.

837
00:45:20,542 --> 00:45:22,690
And
I think you also have to
be very intentional about

838
00:45:22,690 --> 00:45:26,095
wanting to go
see the or read
the reviews, like you're really

839
00:45:26,095 --> 00:45:27,736
on the fence
about buying this
product.

840
00:45:27,736 --> 00:45:31,105
Let me go read the reviews.
So I
think this actually might

841
00:45:31,105 --> 00:45:34,810
help increase sales from the

perspective that it's going to

842
00:45:34,810 --> 00:45:37,176
make it more accessible for

people to actually hear the

843
00:45:37,176 --> 00:45:37,518
reviews.
So that's kind of what
I

844
00:45:37,518 --> 00:45:37,758
think.
But what I think.

845
00:45:37,758 --> 00:45:42,982
But what Billy does is, I
understand
it's completely

846
00:45:42,982 --> 00:45:46,795
different, yeah, because there's
like a video
carousel inside

847
00:45:46,795 --> 00:45:49,720
of a where you're looking at
something and
you can click on

848
00:45:49,720 --> 00:45:52,495
videos could be from him or five
other people,
where they're

849
00:45:52,495 --> 00:45:54,493
demoing the product.
They're not
recommending it,

850
00:45:54,493 --> 00:45:56,779
they're demoing it, and they're
telling you how
it works.

851
00:45:56,779 --> 00:45:58,615
That's what I've watched a few
of those.

852
00:45:58,615 --> 00:46:01,760
And then
Billy gets paid if
you click on his video and watch

853
00:46:01,760 --> 00:46:05,100
his video
and then you buy
that product, he gets paid a

854
00:46:05,100 --> 00:46:07,660
percentage of
that and
anything else from that time

855
00:46:07,660 --> 00:46:10,870
that you put in your cart.
Marc Ronick: Yeah, thank you.


856
00:46:10,878 --> 00:46:13,189
Sid, I think that's a great way
to put it.

857
00:46:13,189 --> 00:46:17,200
And yeah, I think it
is built
on, mostly on the reviews, but I

858
00:46:17,200 --> 00:46:20,584
think it also is
built on the
product information itself as

859
00:46:20,584 --> 00:46:22,294
well.
But yeah, great
points.

860
00:46:22,294 --> 00:46:25,327
And I want to go to BC, who has
something?

861
00:46:25,327 --> 00:46:28,525
And then, dr,
go ahead.
BC, BC Babbles: oh, I was just,

862
00:46:28,525 --> 00:46:31,230
well, I was gonna say earlier,
when you announced this new


863
00:46:31,238 --> 00:46:36,375
feature, I just kind of sat here
and thought to myself, What is a

864
00:46:36,375 --> 00:46:39,745

podcast at this point?
Yeah, what I mean, we talk a lot

865
00:46:39,745 --> 00:46:42,067
of
time on the show, you know,
with different features coming

866
00:46:42,067 --> 00:46:45,304
out,
it pushes the boundaries
of what is a definable podcast,

867
00:46:45,304 --> 00:46:47,950
or what,
how do you define
this or that?

868
00:46:48,550 --> 00:46:53,590
I feel so kind of like

disjointed with the idea that AI

869
00:46:53,590 --> 00:46:56,950
putting together reviews and

turning it into a little, tiny,

870
00:46:56,950 --> 00:47:00,055
little shebang is enough to call

it a podcast.

871
00:47:00,055 --> 00:47:03,456
And this partially coming from
my, you know,
broadcasting

872
00:47:03,456 --> 00:47:05,914
background, learning the whole
ship, and
look learning the

873
00:47:05,914 --> 00:47:08,979
whole thing, and all the
different skills and
whatnot

874
00:47:08,979 --> 00:47:13,315
I've accrued over the past 15
years to establish and
be a

875
00:47:13,315 --> 00:47:17,803
part of this world, and for that
to be so overtly simplified


876
00:47:17,811 --> 00:47:22,315
and call it the same thing.
It's like, what, what am I

877
00:47:22,315 --> 00:47:23,035
doing?

Agreed?

878
00:47:23,035 --> 00:47:26,015
Well, why am I here?
D.R.

879
00:47:26,015 --> 00:47:27,495
Fay: Agreed?
Marc Ronick: You literally


880
00:47:27,503 --> 00:47:29,631
answered the question before I
asked it.

881
00:47:29,631 --> 00:47:32,623
That was my next
question.
BC was, does calling this a

882
00:47:32,623 --> 00:47:35,900
podcast water down the
meaning
of podcasting, or is the format

883
00:47:35,900 --> 00:47:38,620
just evolving?
And it's
hard to say, really.

884
00:47:38,620 --> 00:47:42,232
And like I said, there are
people out there
that say if

885
00:47:42,232 --> 00:47:46,600
it is not on an RSS feed, it is
not a podcast, so
therefore

886
00:47:46,600 --> 00:47:50,126
calling in a podcast.
And to those people, it's just


887
00:47:50,134 --> 00:47:51,970
completely false.
BC Babbles: But also to Ralph's

888
00:47:51,970 --> 00:47:54,795
point, too, if they're if they
don't have the nuance of a human

889
00:47:54,795 --> 00:47:56,933

perspective, I also think
that's not a podcast.

890
00:47:56,933 --> 00:47:59,911
You know, it's to
his point
about mentioning losing a

891
00:47:59,911 --> 00:48:01,003
wallet.
You're not
real.

892
00:48:01,003 --> 00:48:03,952
You don't got no wallet, you
don't got no ID.

893
00:48:03,952 --> 00:48:07,918
Your ideas
is ones and zeros
beyond that, I don't know you.

894
00:48:07,918 --> 00:48:11,255
What experience
do you have?
Yeah, that's very true.

895
00:48:11,255 --> 00:48:14,215
You can claim it, but it
ain't
there.

896
00:48:14,215 --> 00:48:17,017
How about this?
That's my cat for the morning.


897
00:48:17,025 --> 00:48:18,955
You're welcome.
Free, premium content coming in

898
00:48:18,955 --> 00:48:21,577
hot.
Marc Ronick: Yes, he is and Gabe

899
00:48:21,577 --> 00:48:24,505

is both on YouTube watching
and on clubhouse listening.

900
00:48:24,505 --> 00:48:27,550
And Gabe
says that this is a
waste of AI.

901
00:48:27,550 --> 00:48:31,150
He goes on to say, I think many
people are so unsure about a

902
00:48:31,150 --> 00:48:35,470
product and will trust the AI

instead of doing the research.

903
00:48:35,470 --> 00:48:36,410
Yeah, that's certainly possible.



904
00:48:36,418 --> 00:48:39,490
Dr, what did you want to add as
the final word here?

905
00:48:39,490 --> 00:48:41,681
D.R.
Fay: Okay, so one of the


906
00:48:41,689 --> 00:48:45,325
things that I'm hoping that they
include in this thing, we're not

907
00:48:45,325 --> 00:48:48,895

going to call it a podcast.
We're going to, we'll figure out

908
00:48:48,895 --> 00:48:53,295

a name for it.
But you know, as a heavy user of

909
00:48:53,295 --> 00:48:58,459
Amazon, I have
been contacted
before about a product that I

910
00:48:58,459 --> 00:49:01,555
have purchased.

Someone out there in this great

911
00:49:01,555 --> 00:49:05,815
big world is asking a specific

question, and Amazon has

912
00:49:05,875 --> 00:49:09,400
contacted me to see if I know

the answer to it.

913
00:49:09,400 --> 00:49:13,801
So I'm hoping that Amazon will
include those
questions.

914
00:49:13,801 --> 00:49:18,308
It would sound something like,
Hey, John Smith
wants to know

915
00:49:18,308 --> 00:49:20,945
if this cat fountain, how
durable is it?

916
00:49:20,945 --> 00:49:23,380
You
know, how long have you
had it?

917
00:49:23,380 --> 00:49:25,480
Is it?
Has it broken at all?

918
00:49:25,480 --> 00:49:28,645
And
I think that would be
beneficial.

919
00:49:29,005 --> 00:49:31,705
Marc Ronick: Yeah, absolutely.

All right, well, more to come.

920
00:49:31,765 --> 00:49:33,895
Very interesting.
What Amazon's
doing.

921
00:49:33,895 --> 00:49:38,205
We'll see if that holds any
ground or not.

922
00:49:38,205 --> 00:49:43,735
Let's keep it
moving.
Dr with Gen Z doing something a

923
00:49:43,735 --> 00:49:45,173
little interesting.
D.R.

924
00:49:45,173 --> 00:49:50,037
Fay: Gen Z is buying old
iPods
because, well, they actually

925
00:49:50,037 --> 00:49:52,777
want to listen to
music.
Go figure.

926
00:49:52,777 --> 00:49:55,588
Okay.
So not too long ago, we covered

927
00:49:55,588 --> 00:49:59,596
a story
on younger generations
buying old flip phones to become

928
00:49:59,596 --> 00:50:02,050
less.

Less distracted by apps and

929
00:50:02,050 --> 00:50:05,356
media.
Now, a device nobody's
made

930
00:50:05,356 --> 00:50:10,025
since 19 Well, since 2022 Marc
Ronick: Say that again.


931
00:50:10,033 --> 00:50:11,269
Sorry, since when?
Okay.

932
00:50:11,269 --> 00:50:14,128
Why are you laughing?
D.R.

933
00:50:14,128 --> 00:50:19,200
Fay: Now, a device nobody's

made since 2022 is suddenly

934
00:50:19,200 --> 00:50:25,680
everywhere on eBay, Gen Z is

buying used iPods, and the

935
00:50:25,680 --> 00:50:29,974
reason is weirdly simple.
They
work offline.

936
00:50:29,974 --> 00:50:34,224
No notifications popping up on
mid song, no
algorithms

937
00:50:34,224 --> 00:50:37,038
deciding what plays next, no
ads.

938
00:50:37,038 --> 00:50:42,201
Some schools ban
iPhones, but
let students bring in iPods,

939
00:50:42,201 --> 00:50:47,735
since they're just
music
players used iPod prices are up

940
00:50:47,735 --> 00:50:53,584
60% since 2023 and people
are
genuinely choosing a device that

941
00:50:53,584 --> 00:50:58,074
does one thing over a phone

that does everything.

942
00:50:58,074 --> 00:51:03,525
So Mark, would you actually use
an old
iPod, or would it feel

943
00:51:03,525 --> 00:51:05,946
too limiting?
Right now, Marc Ronick: I think

944
00:51:05,946 --> 00:51:08,832
I would
consider using it,
especially for, like, road

945
00:51:08,832 --> 00:51:11,824
trips.
I could
see using it to listen

946
00:51:11,824 --> 00:51:15,810
to a podcast, listen to music,

because then it's not, I'm not

947
00:51:15,810 --> 00:51:17,035
going to get those distractions.



948
00:51:17,043 --> 00:51:20,616
You know, I don't know if some
of you may have, like, Apple


949
00:51:20,624 --> 00:51:23,582
CarPlay, for example, I wouldn't
have those notifications popping

950
00:51:23,582 --> 00:51:27,900

up all the time distracting me
like I think I could see myself

951
00:51:27,900 --> 00:51:30,054
using it for certain instances.
Yeah, yeah.

952
00:51:30,054 --> 00:51:32,895
But hey, BC you
wanted to say
something, go ahead.

953
00:51:32,895 --> 00:51:34,233
BC Babbles: I absolutely would.


954
00:51:34,241 --> 00:51:38,427
And this comes from the fact
that I came up in from 22,007 to

955
00:51:38,427 --> 00:51:43,215

2011 was my were my high
school years, and so that was

956
00:51:43,215 --> 00:51:47,040
before
music capability was
fully integrated into the phone.

957
00:51:47,040 --> 00:51:50,559
So I
still had to balance
having a cell phone, a flip

958
00:51:50,559 --> 00:51:53,025
phone at the
time, and a
little mp three player.

959
00:51:53,025 --> 00:51:54,600
I never got the brand
and
stuff.

960
00:51:54,600 --> 00:51:57,332
Didn't have an iPod.
I got the off brand, mp three


961
00:51:57,340 --> 00:52:01,435
players, and back in the day of
iTunes, where every single song

962
00:52:01,435 --> 00:52:04,740
you had, you specifically
purchased that song to put it


963
00:52:04,748 --> 00:52:06,949
onto your device.
So I would actually happily go

964
00:52:06,949 --> 00:52:11,385
back to that
to just get a
little bit of a break from the

965
00:52:11,385 --> 00:52:15,591
constant, even
more hyper
velocity stream of information

966
00:52:15,591 --> 00:52:20,505
we have today
compared to pre
2011 I kind of miss those days

967
00:52:20,505 --> 00:52:23,210
to be honest.
Marc Ronick: Okay, that's fair.

968
00:52:23,210 --> 00:52:24,645

Sid, you wanted to chime in Go

969
00:52:24,645 --> 00:52:26,745
for it.
Sid Meadows: So there's one


970
00:52:26,753 --> 00:52:30,218
thing that I really dislike,
which is when I'm walking or


971
00:52:30,226 --> 00:52:34,260
whatever I'm doing, I'm
listening to a podcast, and my


972
00:52:34,268 --> 00:52:38,934
Australian voice on my phone, my
wife calls him Jeeves.

973
00:52:38,934 --> 00:52:43,185
When
Jeeves says, Mark ronnick
sends you a text message and

974
00:52:43,185 --> 00:52:45,930
then he
starts reading it, or
there's a calendar notice that

975
00:52:45,930 --> 00:52:49,494
pops up and
he starts reading.
And I'm yelling through my

976
00:52:49,494 --> 00:52:53,166
microphone,
stop, stop.
And when I get to the third

977
00:52:53,166 --> 00:52:57,011
stop, it not only
stops the
podcast, it stops giving me the

978
00:52:57,011 --> 00:52:59,715
notification.
So
all that to say that really

979
00:52:59,715 --> 00:53:01,977
irritates me.
It's like a pain,
and I know I

980
00:53:01,977 --> 00:53:04,635
can probably turn it off.
I don't know that I
want, I

981
00:53:04,635 --> 00:53:06,900
want to, but so I'm just dealing
with it.

982
00:53:06,900 --> 00:53:10,455
All that to say
is absolutely
would use the device that would

983
00:53:10,455 --> 00:53:12,419
not interrupt
you.
Well, I'm either listening to

984
00:53:12,419 --> 00:53:15,255
music or listening to a

podcast, 100% I'd use it.

985
00:53:15,255 --> 00:53:16,799
D.R.
Fay: I was about to say,
don't

986
00:53:16,799 --> 00:53:18,564
you have a feature that turns
off?

987
00:53:18,564 --> 00:53:22,195
You know, the
notifications
when you listen to podcasts?

988
00:53:22,195 --> 00:53:26,760
Because I use that
feature all
the time on my droid.

989
00:53:27,740 --> 00:53:30,080
Ralph Estep Jr: I want to go

back to my Sony Walkman, like, I

990
00:53:30,080 --> 00:53:33,256
want to go back to my tapes.
You
know what I'm saying, my

991
00:53:33,256 --> 00:53:36,580
Sony Walkman, pop that single
tape in
there and I'll rock it

992
00:53:36,580 --> 00:53:39,446
because, like, I'm a little
older than bc
I graduated from

993
00:53:39,446 --> 00:53:42,785
high school in 1990 so, you
know, we had the
Sony disc.

994
00:53:42,785 --> 00:53:44,546
Man, somebody put that in the
chat.

995
00:53:44,546 --> 00:53:46,128
Man, I think
that's an awesome
idea.

996
00:53:46,128 --> 00:53:49,068
What I was going to say is, I
think
this is the definition

997
00:53:49,068 --> 00:53:52,367
of this generation wanting to
disconnect
from so many

998
00:53:52,367 --> 00:53:54,515
distractions.
And I think there's a real place

999
00:53:54,515 --> 00:53:56,027
for
that at this point.
Marc Ronick: Yeah, D.R.

1000
00:53:56,027 --> 00:53:59,405
Fay: and we go back to

cassette tapes, then I have to

1001
00:53:59,405 --> 00:54:02,525
invest in all those pencils,

remember, you put the pencil, oh

1002
00:54:02,525 --> 00:54:05,501
yeah, and then you try and

rewind it, Marc Ronick: oh yeah.

1003
00:54:05,501 --> 00:54:07,805
We are
completely dating
ourselves, and I'm gonna really

1004
00:54:07,805 --> 00:54:08,485
date ourselves.
D.R.

1005
00:54:08,485 --> 00:54:11,135
Fay: Somebody's gotta date
me.
Marc Ronick: Here you go, Ralph,

1006
00:54:11,135 --> 00:54:14,699

this is, although I don't
think it's a Sony, no, it's not

1007
00:54:14,699 --> 00:54:16,613
a
Sony.
But here you go.

1008
00:54:16,613 --> 00:54:20,774
This is a Walkman, right.
Here it is the
Walkman I used

1009
00:54:20,774 --> 00:54:24,940
to use when I was younger, and
it still actually
works.

1010
00:54:24,940 --> 00:54:27,785
I've tested it before and it
still works.

1011
00:54:27,785 --> 00:54:30,935
And look, here
you go.
Dr, here's an actual cassette

1012
00:54:30,935 --> 00:54:34,978
tape as well.
Ralph Estep Jr: Tape is that a


1013
00:54:34,986 --> 00:54:37,170
mixed tape mark?
Y Marc Ronick: ou know what?

1014
00:54:37,170 --> 00:54:40,275
This
is, Ralph.
This is of me and my friend

1015
00:54:40,275 --> 00:54:44,267
Lowell, who was also my
co
host on my original, well, not

1016
00:54:44,267 --> 00:54:46,835
original one, my last
podcast,
the mark and Lowell show.

1017
00:54:46,835 --> 00:54:50,791
This was when he and I
used to
call the local radio station

1018
00:54:50,791 --> 00:54:53,990
every morning and try to
make
the DJs laugh.

1019
00:54:53,990 --> 00:54:58,025
So it's a compilation of that,
and it's
also, I think, the

1020
00:54:58,025 --> 00:55:00,422
appearance when they when we
find.

1021
00:55:00,422 --> 00:55:04,400
Finally
really won them over.
They invited us to the radio

1022
00:55:04,400 --> 00:55:08,033
station
and let us take over
for an hour of their show

1023
00:55:08,033 --> 00:55:10,210
completely.
They
walked out of the station

1024
00:55:10,210 --> 00:55:12,740
and let us do it.
And Ralph Estep Jr: we got to

1025
00:55:12,740 --> 00:55:14,540
hear
that mark.
You got to drop that onto like

1026
00:55:14,540 --> 00:55:15,740
the Facebook group or

something.

1027
00:55:15,740 --> 00:55:17,486
I will hear.
Marc Ronick: I will maybe I'll


1028
00:55:17,494 --> 00:55:19,740
play that for you guys, maybe on
a Friday or something.

1029
00:55:19,740 --> 00:55:23,396
I'll play
that for you guys.
So we you can hear young, 16

1030
00:55:23,396 --> 00:55:27,845
year old Mark do
not knowing
what the heck he's doing on the

1031
00:55:27,845 --> 00:55:30,389
radio.
BC Babbles: And see, I'm a 93


1032
00:55:30,397 --> 00:55:31,767
baby.
I think I missed the Walkman.

1033
00:55:31,767 --> 00:55:35,830
We had those little,
like
square single hit ones you put

1034
00:55:35,830 --> 00:55:38,765
into like a little capsule.

And then we had, like, the round

1035
00:55:38,765 --> 00:55:41,295
CD players, which you can't move

it all with those, because

1036
00:55:41,295 --> 00:55:45,365
it'll throw the entire CD off.
And,
yeah, ruins the whole

1037
00:55:45,365 --> 00:55:46,997
experience.
But yeah, I didn't
get the I

1038
00:55:46,997 --> 00:55:48,830
did not get the Walkman
experience.

1039
00:55:49,070 --> 00:55:53,195
Marc Ronick: Yeah, and I, if you

saw my stories yesterday,

1040
00:55:53,195 --> 00:55:56,370
you'll probably miss it when
you're
hearing this now.

1041
00:55:56,370 --> 00:56:01,095
But I posted a laser disc now
that is really
old school,

1042
00:56:01,095 --> 00:56:05,060
that is like a giant CD.
That's the best way to
explain

1043
00:56:05,060 --> 00:56:08,125
it.
It's like the size of a LP, of a

1044
00:56:08,125 --> 00:56:11,555
record, and it is
of the
original Star Wars movie,

1045
00:56:11,555 --> 00:56:14,831
unchanged, unedited.
This is the
original screening

1046
00:56:14,831 --> 00:56:17,755
of Star Wars D.R.
Fay: on that.

1047
00:56:17,755 --> 00:56:19,675
Is there any
like backstage
stuff?

1048
00:56:19,675 --> 00:56:22,532
Do they talk about the script?
Do they
talk to the actors?

1049
00:56:22,532 --> 00:56:25,279
Do they talk to Marc Ronick: I
don't even I
think there are

1050
00:56:25,279 --> 00:56:28,170
some extra features on it, but I
don't
know, because I haven't

1051
00:56:28,170 --> 00:56:31,418
watched it since I had, my dad
had a
laser disc player when I

1052
00:56:31,418 --> 00:56:34,435
was a kid.
So Ralph Estep Jr: Mark, I just

1053
00:56:34,435 --> 00:56:37,194
want to shout out something.
Mark, one of our friends in the

1054
00:56:37,194 --> 00:56:39,290
Philippines just put something
in a private chat to me.

1055
00:56:39,290 --> 00:56:40,940
Love
the discussion on the
show today.

1056
00:56:40,940 --> 00:56:46,040
I miss my iPod, even
across
Philippines, absolutely right.

1057
00:56:46,040 --> 00:56:49,040
Thank you for listening.

So Abby, thanks for joining us

1058
00:56:49,040 --> 00:56:51,068
today.
Marc Ronick: That's hilarious.


1059
00:56:51,076 --> 00:56:52,955
Yeah, all right.
Well, listen gang.

1060
00:56:52,955 --> 00:56:55,440
I think we had some more

stories.

1061
00:56:55,440 --> 00:56:59,268
Maybe we'll hold them over for
next week, because
these are

1062
00:56:59,268 --> 00:57:02,824
pretty ever green, so we will
share those next
Wednesday and

1063
00:57:02,824 --> 00:57:05,560
a reminder that we're back
tomorrow evaluating
the

1064
00:57:05,560 --> 00:57:09,264
podcast the loud quiet.
Go to podcasting morning


1065
00:57:09,272 --> 00:57:12,965
show.com/loud, quiet, and you
can hear that episode we're


1066
00:57:12,973 --> 00:57:15,325
going to be breaking down
tomorrow morning and again,


1067
00:57:15,333 --> 00:57:19,309
don't worry if you don't hear
it, you can still join us and


1068
00:57:19,317 --> 00:57:21,715
follow along beautifully,
because we will play you lots of

1069
00:57:21,715 --> 00:57:24,417

clips and really break those
down for you so that you can


1070
00:57:24,425 --> 00:57:28,195
learn a thing or two while we're
giving some feedback to the


1071
00:57:28,203 --> 00:57:32,017
podcasters Rick and Clancy.
So join us tomorrow, and until


1072
00:57:32,025 --> 00:57:34,465
then, make it a great day.
Everybody.

1073
00:57:34,465 --> 00:57:35,305
Take care.